Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: 地獄の季節パノプティコン丸山サウンド#DontPerformBOSSInTheUKDGKO DamlaGüven#TTGooglePlay#EdSheeranNoBrasil#SaitÇamlıcaSancaktepeAnadoluLisesinde#ProtesisatSuKaçağıBulmaYoutube Berkay Kırmızıkan ElvedaAğaçiçinBağıranCHP AğaçlarıKatlediyor#Violetta3AñosDeAmorヌマクロー28KasimCumaGünüMeybarTrabzon DjBernaOzturkよくモテ普通にしたらBizTürkiyeyiz CumaDersimdeyiz#MentionPeopleYouAreThankfulFor#stoptheparade#BizeLazımOlanTekŞey#MilliLiderErdoğan#身長たす22をすると抱きつきやすいSean Abbott#CameronMustGo#AtrêFlyers#MariaEuSeiQueVoceTreme#sametecem#TheGirlsLive#6abcTDPHarlem Globetrotters#MTVStarsニーハイの日#plebgate#世界征服ラヂヲKardecZacariasAndrew MitchellNeedtobreatheBlack FridayPhil HughesRockette#blackfridayGobble GobbleLollaHappy ThanksgivingChristmasワンシャンロンピン教育実習生HayatınPatronuKadınlar PatronicemCOM#NoSpacesBetweenLarryAbigail BreslinCraig WhyteNick Jonaskenちゃん柳沢慎吾#TDayCBS丸山隆Daft Punk Medley#堀政行生誕祭2014RockettesPenguins of Madagascarcranberry sauceDarren Wilson interviewTurkey Brine RecipeScott StappLymphomaMeghan TrainorJanel ParrishJurassic WorldChuck HagelTurkey BrineFox NewsRichard Shermanhow to cook a turkeyDallas CowboysCNNFergusonAl Sharptonnew orleans saintsDancing With the StarsMore

Most recent 20 results returned for keyword: osama bin laden death (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/104294310327571723353 Alex Louis : John Cena Announces Osama Bin Laden's Death at WW…: http://youtu.be/Kw7_Rip9z20
John Cena Announces Osama Bin Laden's Death at WW…: http://youtu.be/Kw7_Rip9z20
Watch the video: John Cena Announces Osama Bin Laden's Death at WWE Extreme Rules 2011
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/QlJdy4-twUAvYmjMaUNPaVS6sTMmAH39bs-wP6VwmsLoL_41zHSRVIjTo4GdLVxl6BrYMh-sAK4AQkCllZrP=w506-h379
John Cena Announces Osama Bin Laden's Death at WWE Extreme Rules 2011
7 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/111114800070943635370 Renna Mccalister : A Hardcore Proof that Osama Bin Laden's Death was…: http://youtu.be/GcstJBy9Ut8
A Hardcore Proof that Osama Bin Laden's Death was…: http://youtu.be/GcstJBy9Ut8
Watch the video: A Hardcore Proof that Osama Bin Laden's Death was a FRAUD
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/g1e6QjvFyQeUJ_LT12VJPT9zta5Tu1XMAtyjsZUPflJRxA5_eHrGAHsMpIqVH9MJ4PptPMkMy5vgLni6YyWu=w506-h379
Please, spread this. Thanks.
7 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/117743451741134292569 skripsi un : English Literature:Implicature Used in Barack Obama’s Speech on Osama Bin Laden's Death CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION...
English Literature:Implicature Used in Barack Obama’s Speech on Osama Bin Laden's Death
 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This  chapter 
elaborates  the  research 
context,  background  of 
the  study,  problems of the study, objectives of the
study, significance of the study, scope and  limitation, and definition of the key terms. 1.1  Background of th...
English Literature:Implicature Used in Barack Obama’s Speech on Osama Bin Laden's Death | Contoh Skripsi
English Literature:
10 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114687333126489318856 Dominic Shonk : When i heard about that seal team 6 member taking credit for osama bin laden's death, I was pissed. ...
When i heard about that seal team 6 member taking credit for osama bin laden's death, I was pissed. I have a question i'd like to ask him too... What is the keyword in Seal Team 6? the answer is TEAM people, you don't act like you single handedly took him down when it was a TEAM operation... Anyone agree?
13 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114819043452938297152 ABC FOX MONTANA : The Significance of Osama bin Laden's Death - The killing of Osama bin Laden eliminated one of the greatest...
The Significance of Osama bin Laden's Death - The killing of Osama bin Laden eliminated one of the greatest terrorist threats known to America. It took ten years to locate and kill the founder and former leader of the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda. http://ow.ly/2QysbG
The Significance of Osama bin Laden's Death
The killing of Osama bin Laden eliminated one of the greatest terrorist threats known to America. It took ten years to locate and kill the founder and former leader of the Islamist militant group al-Qaeda.
15 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/113144752909151438492 Noah Carrell : Osama Bin Laden's Death Osama Bin Laden's historic death on the day of May 2, 2011 became world wide...
Osama Bin Laden's Death
    Osama Bin Laden's historic death on the day of May 2, 2011 became world wide news very quickly. The most wanted man on the face of the planet was killed by our very own U.S military. Osama's death was announced by U.S President Obama at the White House ...
Osama Bin Laden's Death
    Osama Bin Laden's historic death on the day of May 2, 2011 became world wide news very quickly. The most wanted man on the face of the planet was killed by our very own U.S military. Osama's death was announced by U.S ...
20 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/106933744358890353858 gurpreet singh : Who Shot and Killed Osama Bin Laden Recently after a long time of Osama bin Laden’s death a person come...
Who Shot and Killed Osama Bin Laden
Recently after a long time of Osama bin Laden’s death a
person come infront and self claimed that he shot Osama Bin Laden. After this
status Laden again become a flash story of new channels. It was told by the American
agencies that Osama Bin Laden has been...
Who Shot and Killed Osama Bin Laden
Recently after a long time of Osama bin Laden’s death a person come infront and self claimed that he shot Osama Bin Laden. After this status Laden again become a flash story of new channels. It was told by the American agenci...
20 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114773035627897181833 lassb : Photo: Meet Navy Seal who is behind Osama Bin Laden's death UK Daily Mail has revealed the identity ...
Photo: Meet Navy Seal who is behind Osama Bin Laden's death
UK Daily Mail has revealed the identity of the Navy Seal who shot terror chief Osama bin Laden dead in the special force's most famous operation at Abbottobad, in Pakistan, on 2 May 2011. His name is Rob O'Neill, 38, (pictured above), a highly-decorated ...
Photo: Meet Navy Seal who is behind Osama Bin Laden's death

21 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/109322724032513309945 David Crenshaw : Dedicated to the US diplomatic mission lost in Libya The US citizens should be as thoroughly choosing...
Dedicated to the US diplomatic mission lost in Libya

The US citizens should be as thoroughly choosing the person they are going to follow as they are when they choose the house they are going to live in.

Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?
Isn’t in enough to be mistaken in the same man?
I just don’t understand why the US citizens need the President that who has no real capabilities to change their life for the better. Or may be the people living in the US made a society which has no negative moments in its memory?
Just try to analyze the pseudo-activity of Barak Obama during his first presidential term from the point of view of the economic appropriateness for the USA and taking into consideration Barak Obama's special feature of making his best to take out more than he has brought. Isn't everything becomes clear? How B. Obama was introduced to the US people during his first presidential election campaign. New messiah, wasn’t he? And what marvels did he promise? He promised to withdraw forces from Iraq, kill the No 1 terrorist Osama bin Laden, change the US economic situation for the better and life of the US citizens correspondingly.
From the economic point of view the USA budged gained nothing from Barak Obama’s withdrawal of forces from Iraq and introduction thereof to Afghanistan. Military expenditures didn’t wasn’t reduced. The US soldiers that were earlier killed in Iraq are being killed in Afghanistan now. For what sake? Barak Obama considers the intelligence services’ operation of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden liquidation as his great public service. But think what if the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden was caught alive and brought into jail by the US intelligence services. He belonged to a wealthy Arabian family and he would pay the indemnity for moral and material losses of the USA. That would be a positive step of Barak Obama done for the US economy. And in fact the operation of the forces relocation from one geographical point of the world to another planned long before the election of Barak Obama and performed by the US generals, liquidation of the No 1 Osama bin Laden who was brought out of law by the USA justice long ago, performed by the US intelligence services are the things that professionals do at their jobs and get their wages for. What does B. Obama has to do with the above services? Did he personally elaborate the liquidation or may be he personally took part in the operation? Why doesn’t Barak Obama think then that the carpenter's work to repair the broken door lock in the White house is the service he rendered to the country? It is as if as a fly sat onto a loaded cart says that it’s carry load as well. Therefore the above activities of relocation of the forces from Iraq to Afghanistan and liquidation of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden both planned long before the Obama’s first election campaign brought no economic benefits to the USA. Even on the contrary the wrong task the intelligence services didn't imply catching and bringing the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden to the justice but it urged for his liquidation thus giving no chances to the USA to get indemnification for the moral and material loss Ben Laden brought to the country. Or may be I am mistaken in my reasoning and Barak Obama didn’t need the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden brought to the US justice alive? And weather that very Osama Ben Laden was liquidated by the US intelligence services? May be the intelligent services liquidated the Ben Laden’s carpenter who was the namesake of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden which by the way was also a wholesale supplier of drugs to the US territory? At all the times the person who asked for killing of a man requested the material evidence of a strict execution of the contract work from the executors. Now consider the particular case of an elusive terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden. Pictures of an unrecognizable disfigured dead body submitted by the US intelligence services to Barak Obama obviously weren't sufficient to affirm the death of Osama Ben Laden. The US intelligence services’ agents took part in the liquidation of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden and transportation of his body (in a uniform covered with his blood) to the American warship. Why didn’t they try to take blood samples (or even a head as it used to be at old good times) to provide the international medical expertise and identify the Ben Laden’s personality.
And the most interesting thing is the reason of Barak Obama to consider the pictures of an unrecognizable disfigured dead body submitted by the US intelligence services satisfactory evidence of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden who was also the one of a group of wholesale suppliers of drugs to the US territory which receives profits of billions of US dollars for this trade? (It is interesting who controls the retail drug trade in the USA?) Probably Barak Obama knew the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden personally if it was enough for him to see the pictures of an unrecognizable disfigured dead body to identify the personality of Osama Ben Laden by the signs he personally knew.
Or may be on the contrary Barak Obama was satisfied that the pictures submitted by the US intelligence services show a dead man who looks very much alike the terrorist no1 Osama Ben Laden but not Ben Laden himself. The US citizens may also create pictures of the dead terrorist No 1 bin Laden using PhotoShop of the quality not worse then those submitted to Barak Obama by the US intelligence services' agents.
The terrorist No 1 liquidation operation looked to me as a fixed match of football teams between two unscrupulous teams one of which needed winning points to remain in the premier league. Could B. Obama’s team make a deal with the team of the elusive for the intelligence agents terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden to fake Osama Ben Laden’s death at the hands of the US intelligence services. In case if Osama Ben Laden agrees to fake the death at the hands of the US intelligence services Barak Obama gets positive political stir around his name and gets back the popularity in the USA that he was loosing as the man who gave promises to improve life of the USA citizens but didn't have real capabilities to fulfill them. The terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden does not remain looser in this case as well since he gets opportunity to change appearance a bit (shaving off his beard) and can travel all around the world with forged documents and no fear of the US intelligence chasing and still can make business of the drug delivery to the USA territory. Won’t the US citizens have questions to Barak Obama concerning the official legend of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden death fabricated by the White House?(Didn’t the USA had everything it needs for its wellbeing?)
And now let's speak about the marvels promoting the USA economic growth and the citizens’ life improvement were made by Barak Obama being the Messiah on the Earth during his first Presidential term.
How did the presidential contender Barak Obama attract the attention of the US citizens during his first presidential election campaign? It is not enough to be Afro-American to get the votes of mass media, professional liars with big names bought by Barak Obama and to appear as a messiah who shall save the US citizens from the troubles of the world crisis and dramatically change their life for the better. That was the bluff the USA population believed to. Barak Obama estimated the sum of factors which can have impact on the voters well beginning with the complicated situation of the USA and to the human foibles. The world economic crisis uncertainty-wearied US citizens lived expecting the financial troubles leading to break of the established order of things. Then who was the one they would prefer to give they votes to? Aged but experienced John. McKenzie who told them real things about the complicated economic situation of the USA and calling to be careful with your finances since there have never been quick and simple solutions for world economic troubles Obama promised or may be young-looking Afro-American Barak Obama who’s proved his capability to implement the things the US citizens wanted to believe in? Promises of a better life times coming soon and free of any troubles were that very thing that the US citizens wanted to hear from Barak Obama. Didn’t Barak Obama deceive those US citizens who couldn't sort out the complicated economic situation of the USA resulting from the world crisis?
And for sure B. Obama took into consideration such a physiological factor inherent to the USA population mentality and capable to influence the decision-making as an ambitious will to be the first (no mater in economy or in politics but worldwide) citizens electing someone of African origin for the presidential post. It was that very escapade Barak Obama expected the US citizens to choose rather then reasonable decision. Deceitful promises of Barak Obama given to the US population in the guise of truth were the means of manipulation with the consciousness of the US citizens, that very drug that made them leave the real world and immerse into illusions of trouble-free future and provoked will to take financial decisions contradicting the economic suitability i.e. making confuse the meaning of words “need” and "require”. Do the US citizens need new houses and new cars? Most of you would say "Yes”. But are these things really required? Who inspired you with confidence that in the times of the world financial crisis and deep economic stagnation of the US economy you will always have real capability to pay off all the credits? If you lose you financial capabilities to pay for the credits you will lose your house and the car and for sure no one would return you that first contribution for the credit you spent almost all of your savings. Did Barak Obama tell you something like that about this possible situation? Or may be you thought that Barak Obama takes the full responsibility for the financial steps you take as most of you take them relying exclusively on the deceptive promises he made? I don't think Barak Obama agrees with you. However the promises of the President Obama were the best guarantee for the law-abiding US citizens who took mortgage credits that time. G. Soros gives interesting comments on the thoughtlessness of Barak Obama missing the word "faithfully” in the presidential oath taken during inauguration. Well, G Soros perfectly aware in the sky-signs that the God sends now knows everything about Barak Obama. Or may be he knew it before this sign the God sent to the people as a warning of the things that are not inherent to Barak Obama. May be Soros knew much more of the USA President that the rest US citizens?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
All this fake show called the first Afro-American President election resembles fiddles at the horse races to the rest of the world. It is when the US citizens not able to sort out themselves listen to dirty-handed bookie considered to be horse experts who advise to bet on a dubious dark horse having as they say good documents proving its high capabilities and that as they say let snatch a large sum. Now as the country is submersing into a financial quagmire deeper and deeper, I believe, the US citizens become aware of the subsequences of dubious dark horse bets which documents on the high capabilities turned out to be a fake. Or may be the US citizens now some special capabilities of Barak Obama that make him exceptional compared to the rest of the US citizens?
Free your consciousness and stop thinking of Barak Obama as of a person that get’s the grace of God through some metaphysical divinity and becomes smart, educated and technically qualified. Stop thinking of him as of Lord in highness that would foresee and care of everything. The above thoughts of Barak Obama personality being just a little man managed to get a big post through manipulations on the US citizens’ consciousness creates conditions which do not imply real democracy, real collective will of the nation and provoke the US citizens to be passive individuals and controlled people, to be honestly, to be a dumb flock.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Barak Obama has the only one special feature. He is the one of those called ethnic minority in the USA. And I think Barak Obama’s mother told him when he was a little boy that there was times when there were such signs as "For white only”, and his father giving him business advices mentioned that the most of the power and money in the USA belong to white ones. And therefore the only way to try to obtain something in his life, i.e. big money, is to threaten those whites with power and big money to remain useful for them. (Isn’t it true that even now the most of power and money belong to white ones? Right?) When Barak Obama was young an artificial and thoroughly controlled Wave of pseudo democracy rose in the USA on the background of the changes happening in the geopolitical situation of the world. People of power in the USA took into consideration the effect that the revolutionary changes at Cuba had on the US citizens’ consciousness, the effect that freedom of former colonies had on Great Britain and France. And for sure those people of power took some particular steps to so-called democratic society. Those steps were done to maintain the illusions in the consciousness of the ethnic minorities of the USA. Barak Obama was let (as a democracy ad board) to study in a prestigious college, university, he was allowed into the USA political elite and finally politically outdated Democratic Party of the USA having no possibility to suggest implementable political and economical promises at the US Presidential elections found non-standard solution and suggested the Afro-American to become the US President.
Barak Obama is a selfish vain player climbed to the power summit from the social bottom. And this upward progress from emigrant's son to the national leader do left traces on the Barak Obama's self-esteem. Moving up the career ladder (as a democracy ad board intended for the US Afro-Americans) without possibilities that had those with wealthy families Barak Obama had to go through humiliations trying to satisfy all and often vile suggestions of his sponsors so he has injured his self-esteem so much that it turned a running sore. This injured self-esteem is the basic mover of Barak Obama ideas. The resulting height he reaches is the most important then the price he paid, actually, the price the US citizens pay. Barak Obama is devoted to himself, he is his career fanatic. The injured self-esteem is the weakest point of Barak Obama he brought from his past and those who know about them can manipulate him little by little. The US citizens may protest against so many blackening words with no particular facts. The facts lie on the surface.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
I give you an example providing my version of the reasons why Chris Stevens didn’t headed the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi, Libya get help from Barak Obama. Chris Stevens appealed directly to Barak Obama (there are documents proving this fact) and asked for a military protection to him and officers the US mission he headed against the armed Libyan bandits threatening them to kill. The reason why Barak Obama didn’t provide protection of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi, Libya is not his thoughtlessness but the Presidential election campaign in the full play. During this campaign Barak Obama was the Democratic candidate running for the second Presidential term and Chris Stevens as everybody knows was homosexual and his direct appeal to Barak Obama may be considered by the Obama’s ill-wishers as a non-official asking for a favor of one homosexual partner to another by phone. And Barak Obama couldn’t allow such a risk for his career despite Chris Stevens explained that he had to appealing by phone since he had no time to follow the chain of command having to submit the statement first to the State Department which shall spend plenty of his literally valuable time when the armed Libyan bandits have already encircled the building of the US diplomatic mission and got ready to take it by storm. He also added that he appeals to Barak Obama as to the US President which in the cases of emergencies has the right to make operative decisions solely and as to the US President which is the Protector of the Constitution of the USA which provides that a law-abiding US citizen wherever he is has the right to be protected by the country forces in case if his life is in danger. Nevertheless Barak Obama regarded his career more important that some lives of some Americans dying at Libyan bandits' hands. Barak Obama couldn’t allow the idea of his secret hidden from the public sexual orientation to creep the mind of the US citizens. Most of the US citizens sincerely believe in God and still adhere to traditional orientation and the church still denounces homosexual relationships. How do you think how much votes would Obama lose if the US citizens had such a suspicion? I’d like to believe that Obama’s playing in the gallery of the sexual minorities and appointment of representatives thereof to high state positions are just nothing but effort to follow principles of democracy and liberalization in the USA which also helps him to attract additional voters. Well, if the US citizens wouldn’t like to agree with such a version then, probably they have another version of events’ course leaded to slaughtering of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi? May be this version provides that Chris Stevens, diplomat, assessed the situation around the USA diplomatic version in Bengasi threatening lives of the mission personnel in the face Libyan bandits and made call as he used to do to his secret sexual partner Barak Obama which has always patronized him and asked for a trivial favor to send a platoon of marines to defend the US diplomatic mission building in Bengasi where the population and the bandits as well got lots of fire arms after the latest military activities. And the security of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi was provided by several poorly armed people. It is likely that during the phone conversation of Obama with Chris Stevens Obama promised to provide him such a help. Then when the conversation was over Obama thought for a while and found that he would expose himself to the Republicans at the period of the election campaign if he made decision on assistance to Chris Stevens without approval of the State Department Chris Stevens directly subordinated to. He though that it’s not good to send a platoon of marines just because a gay at the post of the Bengasi US diplomatic mission head made a phone call to ask for security. And what if the Republicans start searching and disclose the information proving his secret homosexual passion? Then it is not hard to imagine the question of the Republican candidate opposing him at the TV debates coming. Therefore Barak Obama preferred to provide no assistance. When his sexual partner Chris Stevens called again to find out when he should expect the marines to defend the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi Barak Obama said that the situation in under his control and the assistance soon to be provided. Why did Obama lie to Stevens? Probably Barak Obama felt uncomfortable to reveal his fears to Chris Stevens (probably the homosexual relations imply some ethics or some kind of code of honor as secret societies do which implies assistance to each other in case of troubles.) So he couldn’t tell Chris Stevens to appeal to the State Department since the direct appeal to Obama may compromise him in the eyes of the voters. If he did so Chris Stevens would doubt weather Obama follows the code of honor and weather Obama has real power and shared his doubts with other homosexuals of their social contacts. Barak Obama hoped that the Bengasi situation will be resolved well by natural course of things since he thought of Chris Stevens as of a sluggish, weak-willed person, effeminate inclined to excessive emotions and dramatization of events. However the Libyan citizens as opposed to Obama hearty dislike to the homosexuals. Therefore they considered the Washington appointment of a homosexual to a post of the US diplomatic mission head in Bengasi as outrage to their Motherland. That was the reason why the indignant citizens of Bengasi attacked the US diplomatic mission building and Chris Stevens and four of his colleagues lost their lives. For sure they would be alive if Barak Obama bogged down in dubious situations would provide military assistance. When Chris Stevens realized that no Obama’s help to be expected it was too late. And what would you do if you were (Heaven save you from it) Barak Obama? Would you risk your political career to save lives of five US citizens? However I believe that Obama is still a human as all the US citizens saw him depressed and confused at the first TV debates. He didn’t give any reply to the question of his opponent, the Republicans candidate, related to the tragedy of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi, but told not to politicize this issue too much since that tragedy was also his own personal drama as he lost the closest in every respect partner. May be there is a mistake in these reasoning? May be Barak Obama decided to struggle with the homosexuals of the USA by such a radical method sending them to Muslim countries where they to be just killed? I’ve got no other versions to explain why didn’t’ the USA President help the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi at the brink of death. Why didn’t he didn’t he commit that patriotic act that no one in the world would condemn? The only one finding of all the reasoning says that Barak Obama didn’t commit the patriotic act and didn’t save the US diplomatic mission because he decided that it would have negative impact on his career. Don’t the US citizens feel that Barak Obama moving up the career ladder studied meanness perfectly and now makes his best to teach his nation to be mean? Isn’t it a mean act to shift full responsibility for the tragedy of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi on two in no way guilty women of the USA State Department stuff, blaming them for official crime, firing them thus destroying their career and lives too? May be the US citizens still have doubts that a homosexual can have an ordinary problem-free family? Barak Obama let slaughtering of five US citizens to protect his career, and I believe the US citizens know how to fake glossy picture of family idyll.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Entering the US elite didn’t provide Barak Obama with wealth automatically. (I don’t think Obama may call wealth those percents he had for dubious deals he covered.) It’s nothing comparing to those successors of fortune he met at the university being the US elite by birth. What could ruin Obama’s mood when he woke up a newly elected President of the USA? It was awareness that people who have got money, big money will still direct him as it was when he was moving up the career ladder to this highest country position. It was the big money Barak Obama longed for but didn’t get yet. What chances does Obama have to earn that big money to rank with those whose pictures are printed in the Forbes if all the world sources of wealth (and in the USA particularly) have already been divided and aliens are not allowed go get closer? Well, Obama may be allowed to get closer but with the number 10 and this would not imply the conditions to become very rich. The most reliable and promising Obama’s way to big money is the world rearrangement since he’ll get chance to catch all the fish when the waters are muddled. This process of the world rearrangement, Muslim world of Libya, Egypt, and Syria for now, we see these days. Innocent children of these countries die for Barak Obama to become rich.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
But the process of the Muslim world destruction and upcoming partitioning of its territory with the wealth sources (oil, gas, mineral resources) between Barak Obama and his allies is not as fast as Obama would like to be. Anyway it is required to show the face of democracy to the rest of the world before its time hasn’t come. They have to give time for arrangement of separatist movement formation (in 1936 in Spain those were called the 5th column) at the territory of Libya, Egypt, Syria and assist them in different ways in order to discredit the existing political regimes in the eyes of the world community and to exert political and military pressure on the Muslim community. That means the Obama’s precious time of the Presidential term is waste for such trifles as preparation grounds for the world community opinion by the times when Libya, Egypt and Syria nations on supposedly voluntary basis but not under the separatists pressure choose new democratically tuned political regimes. And naturally the new Barak Obama controlled leaders of these countries will turn to Obama for assistance in rehabilitation the county’s economy ruined during the military activities. What things will Obama ask for his assistance in this case? How do you think? What sector of these countries economies did Obama choose for himself? But the time of this joyful occasion hasn’t come yet and the power of Barak Obama ends with the second Presidential term. What will Barak Obama do in this case?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
However the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits for the US population has brought Barak Obama money faster (however not as much as he would have of oil and gas fields), moreover the citizens themselves got into bondage of debts. Or may be it’s not just debt bondage? Think over yourself. Your creditors demanding payment of interests can give you or refuse to give you new credits to pay off the current hot credits or they can give you or refuse to give you moratorium on interests. Anyway the new credits shall have new higher interest rates. This growing snowball of debt progression shall never let you pay off the debts. This is the real possibility to influence your political decisions demanding the payment or giving moratorium on interests. Why don’t Barak Obama try to use this situation and to make his best to railroad and amendment of the law through the national referendum that would let him run for the third Presidential term under the pretext that he is that very person who can recover the US economy from the crisis and provide the US citizens wellbeing. And the US citizens need no arguments since they once believed to the Obama’s promises and now are caught into the lifelong debt bondage through the wheeler-dealer finance he organized around the mortgage credits. They know well that in case if the vote against the political initiative of Barak Obama they immediately receive notifications from the financial institutions saying of the moratorium or new credit denial thus reminding of the need to pay off the current debts. Do you have any doubts about that? Isn’t it the time for the US citizens caught into the lifelong debt bondage to realize that Obama’s promises of the better life is just willful deceit? (Any signs of the US economy revival? New jobs created? Increase of wage level? More medical services available for all? Any financial possibilities seen to pay off the debts finally?) And is it now the time to actually implement the principles of the democratic society such as liberty of speech and criticize the economic policy Barak Obama adopted in the USA. Those who really try to do that will be immediately noted by the police and then following the chain the request will be sent to the financial institutions to find out your financial situation and debts to be paid for the credits. At the next step you receive the notification of the financial institution credited you demanding the payment of interests or informing on the moratorium denial. Are there any bold spirits to check it out and find out the truth? I’m wondering of the financial genius that suggested Barak Obama such a clever trick made millions of the US citizens get into the lifelong debt bondage without no real chance to pay off the credits they took, made them shake in their boots and looking up at Barak Obama suppliantly and waiting at least for the words that would rise hope their desperate situation will change for the better. These citizens probably should give Barak Obama political support when he’ll try to use the trick suggested by some financial genius again leading to increase the tax rate for the USA wealthy people up to 75% in order make the US economy fold at all.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Who helped Barak Obama to implement the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits for the US citizens during his first Presidential term? It would be foolish for such an enterprising person as Barak Obama miss a suitable political moment suitable as the US citizens still believed his campaign promises of positive changes marvel for the US economy despite the world financial crisis. Why wouldn’t Obama come to an arrangement with the crediting financial institutions heads and with their help wouldn’t draw the US citizens into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits? I hope you don’t think that the heads of the financial institution Obama turned with his offer were such fools to swallow his gibberish. They are experts of economy and finance and perfectly understood that the Barak Obama’s offer of bulk mortgage crediting of the US citizens implies reviewing of the person’s financial competence just to comply with formalities to give credit. They understood that at the times of the world crisis and the USA economic frailty this swindle will lead to a disastrous effect in the US financial system. Therefore they requested guarantee of repayment of their funds to be spent for this swindle with interests. Did Obama give the above guarantee of repayment with interests to the financial institutions? How do you think? The US President Barak Obama is that very person who takes decisions on the Government financial measures to relief the financial system situation in case if the financial system of the USA turns to be on the brink of crush resulted from the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits. Therefore Barak Obama is that very person who can use his official position, his connections with the Senate and Congress corrupt politicians to influence the final decision on the financial aid assigned out of the USA federal budget to the financial institution on the brink of bankruptcy. Naturally the financial aid was provided to those financial institutions which heads made deal with Barak Obama. That swindle related to wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits shows style of G. Soros. Probably Barak Obama turned to him for advice on the issue of artificial provoke of crisis in the USA in order to make money. Everyone knows that G. Soros is an expert on provoking crises and everyone is well aware of the strong financial given to the first Presidential election campaign of Barak Obama. G. Soros manipulated Barak Obama as a puppet to arrange the swindle related to wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits that leaded the USA financial system to the crisis. G. Soros was to get back the funds he spent for the election campaign of the first African-American President of the USA and, for sure, make money on the financial crisis he created using President Obama as Soros used to. May be the President Obama is just a tool to make money that is passed from hand to hand of the people like Soros?
The US citizens, an outstanding mortgage credit for the house in one of the main reasons of your anxiety.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
I suppose now the US citizens start realizing a difference between the Lord in the Highs and Barak Obama. Have you any questions about any of Ten Commandments left unbroken? Believe me, none is left. Even “Thou shalt not kill” was broken; just remember his deliberate omission in the situation of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi. Barak Obama will sooner reform the Bible than reform himself. Do the US citizens drawn into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits have chances to pull through this situation without financial losses, i.e. to do something to pay off the mortgage credit and therefore dispel the fear of giving away the house for unplayable debts? I think you still have quite good chances. You live in the USA, in the country where people of different nationalities united and the USA elite, Senate, Congress and Barak Obama do not want to be a part this union. What ties the US nation and Senate, Congress, Barak Obama together? It’s just legal rights and duties that tie uncoupling parts. What is the USA main document regulating the relations between the US citizens and authorities? Right, it is the Constitution of the USA which Protector is Barak Obama and which clearly specifies that the equality of the US citizens rights doesn’t mean that everybody shall use them, but it means that those rights are provided to everyone. If the Senate, Congress and Barak Obama have officially admitted that the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits is a crime against the USA nation which requires criminal punishment, then where are notorious lawsuits with the suspected ones? Do the US citizens know the names of those who underwent the punishment for the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits? No. Well. It is because neither FBI nor the Senate commission launched thorough investigation to determine the masterminds of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits. There is only one simple reason. The investigators would find Barak Obama to be the mastermind. Therefore they are carried out disinterested investigation of the crime related to the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits in order to relief the public tension which resulted in possible criminal punishment of some small fries shifting the full responsibility for the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits. (Remember who bore the full responsibility for the US diplomatic mission lost in Bengasi? Those were two women fired and that’s all!) Do you want to know why such things happen? Because Barak Obama still has the real capability to have influence on the decisions of the Senate commission carrying out the investigation using his connections gained in the US Senate and Congress as well as using his official position. How much did it cost to save the USA financial system? And in fact? I mean including the reimbursement paid out by Barak Obama from the US federal budget to the heads of the financial institutions took part in the arrangement of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits, their financial expenditures including the interests yielded. It’s for sure that Barak Obama has received the funds due and naturally the silence guarantee of the heads of the financial institutions took part in the swindle. And the USA and the nation have got credits of dubious benefit.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
If Barak Obama assigned the reimbursement to the masterminds of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits from the US federal budget to cover their financial expenditures then it would be fair to pay the same reimbursement to the deceived US citizens. It doesn’t take much. It requires Barak Obama to turn to Mr. Bernanke, the FRS head with a small request to print dollars just enough to pay off the mortgage credits of the deceived US citizens thus withdrawing the question of his involvement in the arrangement of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits and of injustice to the deceived US citizens. Barak Obama may have some objections that acting justly for the benefit of the US citizens this way he will create another financial crisis in the USA. This way makes Obama break prerogative of G. Soros and puts him in the awkward situation in the eyes of Soros. Then remind Barak Obama about the sold mass-media independent of the common citizens, about quite dependent rating agencies, about bought and sold opinions of public figures, political and economic observers who can show the political and economic situation in the USA to the whole world not as it is, but as it is required to Barak Obama.
Cost of one 100$ note is just 14 cents and it may be sold to the Chinese National Bank for the nominal of 100$. This token year for Mr. Bernanke (the FRS head) it would be unreasonable to deny the Obama’s request. And why doesn’t Obama take this just solution with regard to the US citizens deceptively drawn in the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits? It is because Barak Obama does not collect any brickbats expressing displease and criticism addressed to him as the result of the economic policy adopted in the USA. It is because he doesn’t see organized protest actions of the US citizens deceived by the masterminds of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits; he doesn’t hear urgent requests to find and punish the masterminds of the swindle brought the USA to the brink of the financial crisis. It is because he doesn’t get petitions from the deceived US citizens claiming for the amendment of the law providing more strict punishment for such crimes against the US citizens. It means that the deceived by Barak Obama people shall made the real reasons or intensify the possible reasons to make Barak Obama take the just decision about the mortgage credit redemption by the money taken from the US budget.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Since the US citizens keep silence Barak Obama has the reasons to believe that they are a dumb flock, that the people he deceived are satisfied with the situation of the lifelong debt bondage with no real prospects to change it. May be the silence the deceived US citizens keep and their nonparticipation in the second for Barak Obama US Presidential elections were some kind of their tacit protest against the existing political and economic situation of the USA? This kind of protest played right into Barak Obama's hands and now he has grounds to believe that the deceived US citizens are good for nothing dumb flock that shall keep surrendering. Those US citizens who were not deceived by Barak Obama came to the polling station to choose on of the two candidates for the US Presidential post, Barak Obama and Mitt Romney. And the most of those who came were the youth and the female representatives of the US population. (Of course I do not exclude the possibility of the falsification of vote counting during the Presidential elections as well as did those people of 33 states expressed their distrust to Barak Obama, however the sold rating agencies said otherwise. You choose those one to believe to.) Those who came voted not for Barak Obama but for those who helped him to arrange well financed election campaign of his second election to the post of the USA President. The youth voted for the pop-culture representatives, for amenities of Obama’s accredited representative Madonna. The US women voted for the well-played idyll of the Obamas which is something most of them do not have themselves and for superficial charm. And you should not forget that Barak Obama has arsenal to create favorable public opinion (How do you judge a person? You take into consideration references of others) comprising of well-prepaid public figures with world reputation, professional liars such as rating agencies and etc. Despite the USA is not to be called the society 2/3 any more as less than a half of the population with the voting right came the poll stations it is not important when the matter is the career of the US President. Isn’t it the ineligibility of the US Presidential election that could be used by the deceived US citizens for the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits?
If the US citizens thoroughly choose the house they are going to live in then they should be thorough when they choose the person they are going to obey. And passiveness of the individuals will play a malicious trick on you considering yourself apolitical people whose opinion nothing can change, considering yourself just a law-abiding citizen making a timorous so-called majority. For sure you’re brave enough to get the credits thoughtlessly, but not enough to think over the real capabilities of the person promising you the better life and speak openly your doubts to everybody.
Then should the deceived US citizens hope for a marvel, for a just solution of their problems by Barak Obama the messiah on the Earth? Should the Constitution of the USA be somehow observed? Otherwise it appears that the money form the USA budget may be given to cover losses of some citizens included in the US elite and directing the financial institutions arranged the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits leaded to the USA financial system to the crisis and not to be given to common US citizens suffered from this swindle and caught into the lifelong debt bondage. Then the common US citizens deceptively drawn into this swindle to get their own financial crisis are not taken into the economical account of the US elite, Senate, Congress and Barak Obama? Then the other laws of the USA subordinated to the same power i.e. the US elite where the common US citizens are not allowed.
What does Obama prepare to the deceived US citizens for the future? It is heart-debilitating fear, anxieties, illnesses, doleful senility, isn’t it? Barak Obama promised you secure trouble-free life and now he is going to teach you living in poverty, he is going to bring your existence to the edge when anything you get is seen as the highest good. And such a state is ambiguous since it can provoke people deceived by Barak Obama to acts of despair and cruelty motivated with a desire to get even with the person who brought them to this state. Therefore I advise Barak Obama to make just decision with regards to the deceived US citizens deceptively drawn into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits and settle accounts with them before beginning a new similar swindle with the mortgage credits.

(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
And what opinion do the wealthy US citizens have of Obama with his initiative to railroad the so-called tax from the rich which provides 75% increase of the profit tax rate? May be Barak Obama is trying to rise in the standard of poor people living to the standard of rich at the expense of the last ones; or on the contrary he is trying to reduce the standard of the rich people to the level of poor for social justice? It turns that Barak Obama changes for the worse just anything even the things with prospective for the better. Dostoevsky said that money you receive is materialized freedom. I.e. money is your freedom to choose goals and objectives and Barak Obama is intended to limit your freedoms. Do you want your freedom to be dependent on someone else? If the Obama’s initiative related to the tax from the rich bill failed in the full claimed amount of 75% for this moment it doesn’t mean he wouldn’t try it again. In what way? Barak Obama will do it in the new person of social justice fighter supported by the timorous majority called the common US citizens divided into those dreaming of their own house and a new car and those already drawn by Barak Obama and his deceitful promises of the better life into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits and now trembling with fear due to lack of capabilities to pay off for the house and for sure those of the US Afro-Americans considering Barak Obama as their man in Washington. I think it won’t be difficult to Barak Obama one more time give promises to the common citizens of the USA to change their life for the better. He will claim it’s not his fault that the changes for the better failed during his first Presidential term since there were some circumstances as counteractions of the rich opposed to his sound initiatives and this brought the USA to economy to the submarginal economic condition. And now it is time of Barak Obama second Presidential term when he acts in the name of democracy and to eliminate the social tension, to prevent revolutionary actions of the citizens wondering why the rich people become even richer at the times of the financial perturbation in the USA. And so Barak Obama will submit the bill of the 75% rich profit tax to the national referendum. What results of this referendum can the rich US citizens expect? Do you think there are no grounds to care about this way of the events’ development? Are the rich US citizens ready to give away their money they made for the financial swindles of Barak Obama? If the rich tax bill comes into effect he’ll have no need to ask you and just will take what he needs. I’d advise the rich US citizens to turn their head to each noise Obama makes. Are you wondering why Obama has changed his political line so abruptly? May be he’s got newly elaborated plan of the US society rearrangement in order to reallocate the country’s wealth sources? Barak Obama is going to raise the standard of poor people living through the increase of tax revenues but not through the USA economic growth, isn’t he? I hope the common US citizens understand that if Obama creates unfavorable conditions for making money then the rich will leave the USA to such countries as Russia where sound tax policy is adopted thanks to the President. The rich people leaving the USA will take away the things their own, i.e. factories, plants, banks etc. Then what effect shall these situation provoked by the Obama’s rich tax bill will have regarding the economy of the USA?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Taking into consideration a nominal contribution of G. Soros to the second presidential election of Barak Obama comparing to the amounts he provided for the first one and taking in to consideration the sorting out relations between the Republicans and Barak Obama pushing his rich tax bill I believe that Barak Obama made decision stop squandering his gifts on trifles i.e. render services for the people with big money and power that brought him to the Presidential post. He doesn’t want to be just a tool for money making getting shares he consider ridiculous.
Follow the law of analogy. The things happening to Barak Obama now are similar to the things happened to an African-American boxer who betrayed his masters for opportunistic reasons when he mistakenly decided that everything he became is just his own merits and embraced Islam taking name of Mohammed Ali. To avoid the punishment from the betrayed masters Ali turned for protection to the organization named Muslim Brotherhood and managed to bargain more favorable conditions of the box profit sharing then he had before. Why wouldn’t Muslim Brotherhood use such a promoted brand as Mohammed Ali to popularize themselves among the USA population and so become the symbol of the social justice fighter? May be for the past years the Muslim Brotherhood has become such a powerful organization that it can easily provide protection not just to boxers escaped from the masters but to the President of the USA as well? And alliance of such powers as the US President with the legal right to print dollars and the Muslim Brotherhood make the last one all-powerful in the way FBI and CIA all together not to be compared with. Yes, that’s what I mean. Barak Obama got the legal base to print dollars beginning in this year of 2013, but it happens only if he doesn’t break his own rules and make another one official position foolish thing and renew the contract of Mr. Bernanke representing the FRS interests. It is one percent of one hundred likely that Barak Obama renews the contract with the FRS which expires in 2013. If it happens and Barak Obama renews contract with Mr. Bernanke i.e. with FRS then it means that Barak Obama became very rich person getting kickback from Mr. Bernanke for the possibility of the contract renewal. But it also means that Barak Obama didn’t become the real Lord of the World, real Lord in the Highs in the eyes of average people (instead of the impostor he is) and lost possibility on the legal basis to print the amounts he requires in dollars of 14 cents cost and then sell them globally for nominal price. My opponents may object it arguing that neither the Senate nor Congress will allow Barak Obama to print dollars out of control. Then I reply to my naïve opponents that in the Senate as well as in the Congress there are people like Obama who wouldn’t deny the fellowship offered by the person with the legal possibility to print US dollars giving the real freedom to choose goals and objectives to anyone who has them.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
What steps can Mr. Bernanke take in case of such a hard-to-manage person as Barak Obama to get the positive result in terms of the renewed contract between the USA Government and the Federal Reserve System? Should he talk to the people supporting Barak Obama giving sound arguments and explain them that they are likely to lose their continuously developing business and thus the lose the funs flowing to them? And heeded the arguments of B. Bernanke they would prefer to choose more thoughtful decision and have fixed incomes rather then plunge into adventures with Barak Obama which may result (as it happened to those US citizens deceived by Barak Obama with the promises of better life and drawn into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits) in bread and butter lost completely. Probably they think over choosing the right variant in “fellowship with Barak Obama needed/required” and their finding would be favorable for B. Bernanke? Or may be B. Bernanke acquaint them some documented facts from Barak Obama’s biography which could bring the last one to impeachment? It would be ideally of people of the USA, especially their Afro-American part charge Barak Obama for high treason. I think chances to obtain additional interesting information about Barak Obama shouldn’t be denied just because this information has an unusual to everyone form.
Who can define the conditions explaining existence of such organization as the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA everyday life?
What is the main source of incomes of the people belonging to this organization?
Why is the entire Muslim world so alert about the Muslim Brotherhood?
What if the Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood have the same leaders?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
After all I would like to appeal to the US citizens of all the nationalities of different confessions and sincerely believing in their Lords.
Now I would like to talk to you about something serious and more important than the things said above. Let’s apply to logic and try to determine the real reasons of your existing life troubles. Everyday you sincerely pray to your Lords appealing for mercy and wait for it. And how can they help you if you yourself broke the spiritual liaison with them? How can they help you if now you believe in Barak Obama forgetting about the true spiritual values? Did you protest when Barak Obama used the God’s symbols and named himself the messiah during his first Presidential election campaign? No, no one expressed indignation with the sacrilegious actions of Barak Obama insulted your Lords. May be you thought that the God thought of it as of a joke when Barak Obama used symbols of divinity for the first Presidential election PR? Do you think it looks like a joke when the Lords watching from their highs see millions of the citizens of this country unconstraint and voluntary choose Barak Obama who is just a small figure comparing to them but has already break the Commandment not to take the name of the Lord in vain, outraging the Lords comparing himself with them. If Barak Obama thinks it’s a joke to use the symbols of divinity for PR, then he should know that the Lords see it otherwise. (No one living in the USA, who sincerely believes in and reveres his Lord, except Barak Obama of course, would afford such an outraging act with respect to the Lord.) Are the Lords wrong if they decide that the US citizens betrayed them turning to another Lord under the name Barak Obama when they saw the things happening during the first Presidential election campaign of Barak Obama? Then what mercy do the US citizens expect from the Lords if the Lords now know that their souls are given away to Barak Obama? Why should they help you? Lords left the USA alone. And every year, every day, every hour they are moving farther and farther from it. May be it’s not too late and the US citizens can turn back to their Lords with a penitential prayer and say it in public, not whispering but aloud to let the others hear and in a single spiritual impulse of people repented of their deeds as the US people betrayed the Lords in public and so the repentance should be in public as well. Moreover a sincere repentance is the repentance done openly. The believers know the Lord’s mercy. If there are any doubts let the believers turn for explanations to their spiritual advisers but not to those who allows insulting of the other confessions, but to those who openly condemned Barak Obama outraging your Lords when identified himself with them during his first Presidential election campaign. Do you know such spiritual advisers? Lords are merciful; didn’t they try to bring the betraying US citizens to reason? Didn’t they send you their signs clarifying the personality of the man you believed to? Isn’t the word “faithfully” missed by Barak Obama in the oath of the President of the USA that very sky-signs sent to warn the US citizens about the thing out of Obama’s nature? Of course atheists say that its trifle, contingency or coincidence. Then why didn’t Barak Obama miss some other word less important to everybody? Contingency is the reverse side of regularity. The US citizens should better think of it themselves. I do not call you for rebellion against Barak Obama moreover he is the legally elected President of the USA according to secular laws. I just ask you to comprehend all the things happened objectively. And if in the result you come to the finding that your betrayal to your Lords took place then there was the reason made you did so, there was a deception on Barak Obama’s part made you through the manipulations with the name of the Lord to believe that he’s the Lord-messiah on the Earth and thus deprived you and you children of the real Lord’s mercy. And when you realize the Obama’s lie you may say openly: “We know of the deception took place. And now you know that we know that. Sure you are capable to bring us troubles but you can not deceive us. Look someone else for deception.” Your Lords will judge who is guiltier in this offence on their own since all are equal to them no matter if it is a common US citizen or a President of the USA. The most important thing is to prevent the ambitions of such a small comparing to them figure as Barak Obama didn’t turn the reason for the Lords and tragedy for the entire nation,
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Probably in this complex case the US citizens should help their Lords to give judgment?
Determine on your own what does the word “betrayal” means for you in your secular level. Then decide weather the actions of Barak Obama with regards of the US citizens correspond the meaning of this word. Can’t you believe that the betrayal is possible on such a high level of authorities? However the history teaches us that there were some regrettable examples.
I will tell you about my suppositions about Barak Obama’s betrayal with regards to the US citizens in my next message. The US citizens should think over themselves on the things I mentioned about the Barak Obama’s deeds and bringing up questions weather these deeds turn into a huge minus sign striking through his career of the President of the USA. In fact people should think over weather the cure invented by Barak Obama for the negative consequences of the world crisis can turn out to be more harmful then the illness it to cure.
P.S.
The US citizens may use this message as an instruction on immunization from the manipulations over their consciousness on Barak Obama’s part.

World ecology outsourcing
zeropro16@rambler.ru 
Isupov Eduard
Tel  +79149032122
Caught in the System, Ex-Hacker Is Stalked by His Past | Threat Level | Wired.com
Before the suspects were identified in the Boston Marathon bombings, a U.S. probation officer and his supervisor visited the Manhattan apartment of programmer Stephen Watt with a question: Did Watt ha...
27 days ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/109322724032513309945 David Crenshaw : Dedicated to the US diplomatic mission lost in Libya The US citizens should be as thoroughly choosing...

Dedicated to the US diplomatic mission lost in Libya

The US citizens should be as thoroughly choosing the person they are going to follow as they are when they choose the house they are going to live in.

Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?
Isn’t in enough to be mistaken in the same man?
I just don’t understand why the US citizens need the President that who has no real capabilities to change their life for the better. Or may be the people living in the US made a society which has no negative moments in its memory?
Just try to analyze the pseudo-activity of Barak Obama during his first presidential term from the point of view of the economic appropriateness for the USA and taking into consideration Barak Obama's special feature of making his best to take out more than he has brought. Isn't everything becomes clear? How B. Obama was introduced to the US people during his first presidential election campaign. New messiah, wasn’t he? And what marvels did he promise? He promised to withdraw forces from Iraq, kill the No 1 terrorist Osama bin Laden, change the US economic situation for the better and life of the US citizens correspondingly.
From the economic point of view the USA budged gained nothing from Barak Obama’s withdrawal of forces from Iraq and introduction thereof to Afghanistan. Military expenditures didn’t wasn’t reduced. The US soldiers that were earlier killed in Iraq are being killed in Afghanistan now. For what sake? Barak Obama considers the intelligence services’ operation of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden liquidation as his great public service. But think what if the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden was caught alive and brought into jail by the US intelligence services. He belonged to a wealthy Arabian family and he would pay the indemnity for moral and material losses of the USA. That would be a positive step of Barak Obama done for the US economy. And in fact the operation of the forces relocation from one geographical point of the world to another planned long before the election of Barak Obama and performed by the US generals, liquidation of the No 1 Osama bin Laden who was brought out of law by the USA justice long ago, performed by the US intelligence services are the things that professionals do at their jobs and get their wages for. What does B. Obama has to do with the above services? Did he personally elaborate the liquidation or may be he personally took part in the operation? Why doesn’t Barak Obama think then that the carpenter's work to repair the broken door lock in the White house is the service he rendered to the country? It is as if as a fly sat onto a loaded cart says that it’s carry load as well. Therefore the above activities of relocation of the forces from Iraq to Afghanistan and liquidation of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden both planned long before the Obama’s first election campaign brought no economic benefits to the USA. Even on the contrary the wrong task the intelligence services didn't imply catching and bringing the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden to the justice but it urged for his liquidation thus giving no chances to the USA to get indemnification for the moral and material loss Ben Laden brought to the country. Or may be I am mistaken in my reasoning and Barak Obama didn’t need the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden brought to the US justice alive? And weather that very Osama Ben Laden was liquidated by the US intelligence services? May be the intelligent services liquidated the Ben Laden’s carpenter who was the namesake of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden which by the way was also a wholesale supplier of drugs to the US territory? At all the times the person who asked for killing of a man requested the material evidence of a strict execution of the contract work from the executors. Now consider the particular case of an elusive terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden. Pictures of an unrecognizable disfigured dead body submitted by the US intelligence services to Barak Obama obviously weren't sufficient to affirm the death of Osama Ben Laden. The US intelligence services’ agents took part in the liquidation of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden and transportation of his body (in a uniform covered with his blood) to the American warship. Why didn’t they try to take blood samples (or even a head as it used to be at old good times) to provide the international medical expertise and identify the Ben Laden’s personality.
And the most interesting thing is the reason of Barak Obama to consider the pictures of an unrecognizable disfigured dead body submitted by the US intelligence services satisfactory evidence of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden who was also the one of a group of wholesale suppliers of drugs to the US territory which receives profits of billions of US dollars for this trade? (It is interesting who controls the retail drug trade in the USA?) Probably Barak Obama knew the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden personally if it was enough for him to see the pictures of an unrecognizable disfigured dead body to identify the personality of Osama Ben Laden by the signs he personally knew.
Or may be on the contrary Barak Obama was satisfied that the pictures submitted by the US intelligence services show a dead man who looks very much alike the terrorist no1 Osama Ben Laden but not Ben Laden himself. The US citizens may also create pictures of the dead terrorist No 1 bin Laden using PhotoShop of the quality not worse then those submitted to Barak Obama by the US intelligence services' agents.
The terrorist No 1 liquidation operation looked to me as a fixed match of football teams between two unscrupulous teams one of which needed winning points to remain in the premier league. Could B. Obama’s team make a deal with the team of the elusive for the intelligence agents terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden to fake Osama Ben Laden’s death at the hands of the US intelligence services. In case if Osama Ben Laden agrees to fake the death at the hands of the US intelligence services Barak Obama gets positive political stir around his name and gets back the popularity in the USA that he was loosing as the man who gave promises to improve life of the USA citizens but didn't have real capabilities to fulfill them. The terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden does not remain looser in this case as well since he gets opportunity to change appearance a bit (shaving off his beard) and can travel all around the world with forged documents and no fear of the US intelligence chasing and still can make business of the drug delivery to the USA territory. Won’t the US citizens have questions to Barak Obama concerning the official legend of the terrorist No 1 Osama bin Laden death fabricated by the White House?(Didn’t the USA had everything it needs for its wellbeing?)
And now let's speak about the marvels promoting the USA economic growth and the citizens’ life improvement were made by Barak Obama being the Messiah on the Earth during his first Presidential term.
How did the presidential contender Barak Obama attract the attention of the US citizens during his first presidential election campaign? It is not enough to be Afro-American to get the votes of mass media, professional liars with big names bought by Barak Obama and to appear as a messiah who shall save the US citizens from the troubles of the world crisis and dramatically change their life for the better. That was the bluff the USA population believed to. Barak Obama estimated the sum of factors which can have impact on the voters well beginning with the complicated situation of the USA and to the human foibles. The world economic crisis uncertainty-wearied US citizens lived expecting the financial troubles leading to break of the established order of things. Then who was the one they would prefer to give they votes to? Aged but experienced John. McKenzie who told them real things about the complicated economic situation of the USA and calling to be careful with your finances since there have never been quick and simple solutions for world economic troubles Obama promised or may be young-looking Afro-American Barak Obama who’s proved his capability to implement the things the US citizens wanted to believe in? Promises of a better life times coming soon and free of any troubles were that very thing that the US citizens wanted to hear from Barak Obama. Didn’t Barak Obama deceive those US citizens who couldn't sort out the complicated economic situation of the USA resulting from the world crisis?
And for sure B. Obama took into consideration such a physiological factor inherent to the USA population mentality and capable to influence the decision-making as an ambitious will to be the first (no mater in economy or in politics but worldwide) citizens electing someone of African origin for the presidential post. It was that very escapade Barak Obama expected the US citizens to choose rather then reasonable decision. Deceitful promises of Barak Obama given to the US population in the guise of truth were the means of manipulation with the consciousness of the US citizens, that very drug that made them leave the real world and immerse into illusions of trouble-free future and provoked will to take financial decisions contradicting the economic suitability i.e. making confuse the meaning of words “need” and "require”. Do the US citizens need new houses and new cars? Most of you would say "Yes”. But are these things really required? Who inspired you with confidence that in the times of the world financial crisis and deep economic stagnation of the US economy you will always have real capability to pay off all the credits? If you lose you financial capabilities to pay for the credits you will lose your house and the car and for sure no one would return you that first contribution for the credit you spent almost all of your savings. Did Barak Obama tell you something like that about this possible situation? Or may be you thought that Barak Obama takes the full responsibility for the financial steps you take as most of you take them relying exclusively on the deceptive promises he made? I don't think Barak Obama agrees with you. However the promises of the President Obama were the best guarantee for the law-abiding US citizens who took mortgage credits that time. G. Soros gives interesting comments on the thoughtlessness of Barak Obama missing the word "faithfully” in the presidential oath taken during inauguration. Well, G Soros perfectly aware in the sky-signs that the God sends now knows everything about Barak Obama. Or may be he knew it before this sign the God sent to the people as a warning of the things that are not inherent to Barak Obama. May be Soros knew much more of the USA President that the rest US citizens?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
All this fake show called the first Afro-American President election resembles fiddles at the horse races to the rest of the world. It is when the US citizens not able to sort out themselves listen to dirty-handed bookie considered to be horse experts who advise to bet on a dubious dark horse having as they say good documents proving its high capabilities and that as they say let snatch a large sum. Now as the country is submersing into a financial quagmire deeper and deeper, I believe, the US citizens become aware of the subsequences of dubious dark horse bets which documents on the high capabilities turned out to be a fake. Or may be the US citizens now some special capabilities of Barak Obama that make him exceptional compared to the rest of the US citizens?
Free your consciousness and stop thinking of Barak Obama as of a person that get’s the grace of God through some metaphysical divinity and becomes smart, educated and technically qualified. Stop thinking of him as of Lord in highness that would foresee and care of everything. The above thoughts of Barak Obama personality being just a little man managed to get a big post through manipulations on the US citizens’ consciousness creates conditions which do not imply real democracy, real collective will of the nation and provoke the US citizens to be passive individuals and controlled people, to be honestly, to be a dumb flock.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Barak Obama has the only one special feature. He is the one of those called ethnic minority in the USA. And I think Barak Obama’s mother told him when he was a little boy that there was times when there were such signs as "For white only”, and his father giving him business advices mentioned that the most of the power and money in the USA belong to white ones. And therefore the only way to try to obtain something in his life, i.e. big money, is to threaten those whites with power and big money to remain useful for them. (Isn’t it true that even now the most of power and money belong to white ones? Right?) When Barak Obama was young an artificial and thoroughly controlled Wave of pseudo democracy rose in the USA on the background of the changes happening in the geopolitical situation of the world. People of power in the USA took into consideration the effect that the revolutionary changes at Cuba had on the US citizens’ consciousness, the effect that freedom of former colonies had on Great Britain and France. And for sure those people of power took some particular steps to so-called democratic society. Those steps were done to maintain the illusions in the consciousness of the ethnic minorities of the USA. Barak Obama was let (as a democracy ad board) to study in a prestigious college, university, he was allowed into the USA political elite and finally politically outdated Democratic Party of the USA having no possibility to suggest implementable political and economical promises at the US Presidential elections found non-standard solution and suggested the Afro-American to become the US President.
Barak Obama is a selfish vain player climbed to the power summit from the social bottom. And this upward progress from emigrant's son to the national leader do left traces on the Barak Obama's self-esteem. Moving up the career ladder (as a democracy ad board intended for the US Afro-Americans) without possibilities that had those with wealthy families Barak Obama had to go through humiliations trying to satisfy all and often vile suggestions of his sponsors so he has injured his self-esteem so much that it turned a running sore. This injured self-esteem is the basic mover of Barak Obama ideas. The resulting height he reaches is the most important then the price he paid, actually, the price the US citizens pay. Barak Obama is devoted to himself, he is his career fanatic. The injured self-esteem is the weakest point of Barak Obama he brought from his past and those who know about them can manipulate him little by little. The US citizens may protest against so many blackening words with no particular facts. The facts lie on the surface.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
I give you an example providing my version of the reasons why Chris Stevens didn’t headed the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi, Libya get help from Barak Obama. Chris Stevens appealed directly to Barak Obama (there are documents proving this fact) and asked for a military protection to him and officers the US mission he headed against the armed Libyan bandits threatening them to kill. The reason why Barak Obama didn’t provide protection of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi, Libya is not his thoughtlessness but the Presidential election campaign in the full play. During this campaign Barak Obama was the Democratic candidate running for the second Presidential term and Chris Stevens as everybody knows was homosexual and his direct appeal to Barak Obama may be considered by the Obama’s ill-wishers as a non-official asking for a favor of one homosexual partner to another by phone. And Barak Obama couldn’t allow such a risk for his career despite Chris Stevens explained that he had to appealing by phone since he had no time to follow the chain of command having to submit the statement first to the State Department which shall spend plenty of his literally valuable time when the armed Libyan bandits have already encircled the building of the US diplomatic mission and got ready to take it by storm. He also added that he appeals to Barak Obama as to the US President which in the cases of emergencies has the right to make operative decisions solely and as to the US President which is the Protector of the Constitution of the USA which provides that a law-abiding US citizen wherever he is has the right to be protected by the country forces in case if his life is in danger. Nevertheless Barak Obama regarded his career more important that some lives of some Americans dying at Libyan bandits' hands. Barak Obama couldn’t allow the idea of his secret hidden from the public sexual orientation to creep the mind of the US citizens. Most of the US citizens sincerely believe in God and still adhere to traditional orientation and the church still denounces homosexual relationships. How do you think how much votes would Obama lose if the US citizens had such a suspicion? I’d like to believe that Obama’s playing in the gallery of the sexual minorities and appointment of representatives thereof to high state positions are just nothing but effort to follow principles of democracy and liberalization in the USA which also helps him to attract additional voters. Well, if the US citizens wouldn’t like to agree with such a version then, probably they have another version of events’ course leaded to slaughtering of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi? May be this version provides that Chris Stevens, diplomat, assessed the situation around the USA diplomatic version in Bengasi threatening lives of the mission personnel in the face Libyan bandits and made call as he used to do to his secret sexual partner Barak Obama which has always patronized him and asked for a trivial favor to send a platoon of marines to defend the US diplomatic mission building in Bengasi where the population and the bandits as well got lots of fire arms after the latest military activities. And the security of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi was provided by several poorly armed people. It is likely that during the phone conversation of Obama with Chris Stevens Obama promised to provide him such a help. Then when the conversation was over Obama thought for a while and found that he would expose himself to the Republicans at the period of the election campaign if he made decision on assistance to Chris Stevens without approval of the State Department Chris Stevens directly subordinated to. He though that it’s not good to send a platoon of marines just because a gay at the post of the Bengasi US diplomatic mission head made a phone call to ask for security. And what if the Republicans start searching and disclose the information proving his secret homosexual passion? Then it is not hard to imagine the question of the Republican candidate opposing him at the TV debates coming. Therefore Barak Obama preferred to provide no assistance. When his sexual partner Chris Stevens called again to find out when he should expect the marines to defend the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi Barak Obama said that the situation in under his control and the assistance soon to be provided. Why did Obama lie to Stevens? Probably Barak Obama felt uncomfortable to reveal his fears to Chris Stevens (probably the homosexual relations imply some ethics or some kind of code of honor as secret societies do which implies assistance to each other in case of troubles.) So he couldn’t tell Chris Stevens to appeal to the State Department since the direct appeal to Obama may compromise him in the eyes of the voters. If he did so Chris Stevens would doubt weather Obama follows the code of honor and weather Obama has real power and shared his doubts with other homosexuals of their social contacts. Barak Obama hoped that the Bengasi situation will be resolved well by natural course of things since he thought of Chris Stevens as of a sluggish, weak-willed person, effeminate inclined to excessive emotions and dramatization of events. However the Libyan citizens as opposed to Obama hearty dislike to the homosexuals. Therefore they considered the Washington appointment of a homosexual to a post of the US diplomatic mission head in Bengasi as outrage to their Motherland. That was the reason why the indignant citizens of Bengasi attacked the US diplomatic mission building and Chris Stevens and four of his colleagues lost their lives. For sure they would be alive if Barak Obama bogged down in dubious situations would provide military assistance. When Chris Stevens realized that no Obama’s help to be expected it was too late. And what would you do if you were (Heaven save you from it) Barak Obama? Would you risk your political career to save lives of five US citizens? However I believe that Obama is still a human as all the US citizens saw him depressed and confused at the first TV debates. He didn’t give any reply to the question of his opponent, the Republicans candidate, related to the tragedy of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi, but told not to politicize this issue too much since that tragedy was also his own personal drama as he lost the closest in every respect partner. May be there is a mistake in these reasoning? May be Barak Obama decided to struggle with the homosexuals of the USA by such a radical method sending them to Muslim countries where they to be just killed? I’ve got no other versions to explain why didn’t’ the USA President help the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi at the brink of death. Why didn’t he didn’t he commit that patriotic act that no one in the world would condemn? The only one finding of all the reasoning says that Barak Obama didn’t commit the patriotic act and didn’t save the US diplomatic mission because he decided that it would have negative impact on his career. Don’t the US citizens feel that Barak Obama moving up the career ladder studied meanness perfectly and now makes his best to teach his nation to be mean? Isn’t it a mean act to shift full responsibility for the tragedy of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi on two in no way guilty women of the USA State Department stuff, blaming them for official crime, firing them thus destroying their career and lives too? May be the US citizens still have doubts that a homosexual can have an ordinary problem-free family? Barak Obama let slaughtering of five US citizens to protect his career, and I believe the US citizens know how to fake glossy picture of family idyll.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Entering the US elite didn’t provide Barak Obama with wealth automatically. (I don’t think Obama may call wealth those percents he had for dubious deals he covered.) It’s nothing comparing to those successors of fortune he met at the university being the US elite by birth. What could ruin Obama’s mood when he woke up a newly elected President of the USA? It was awareness that people who have got money, big money will still direct him as it was when he was moving up the career ladder to this highest country position. It was the big money Barak Obama longed for but didn’t get yet. What chances does Obama have to earn that big money to rank with those whose pictures are printed in the Forbes if all the world sources of wealth (and in the USA particularly) have already been divided and aliens are not allowed go get closer? Well, Obama may be allowed to get closer but with the number 10 and this would not imply the conditions to become very rich. The most reliable and promising Obama’s way to big money is the world rearrangement since he’ll get chance to catch all the fish when the waters are muddled. This process of the world rearrangement, Muslim world of Libya, Egypt, and Syria for now, we see these days. Innocent children of these countries die for Barak Obama to become rich.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
But the process of the Muslim world destruction and upcoming partitioning of its territory with the wealth sources (oil, gas, mineral resources) between Barak Obama and his allies is not as fast as Obama would like to be. Anyway it is required to show the face of democracy to the rest of the world before its time hasn’t come. They have to give time for arrangement of separatist movement formation (in 1936 in Spain those were called the 5th column) at the territory of Libya, Egypt, Syria and assist them in different ways in order to discredit the existing political regimes in the eyes of the world community and to exert political and military pressure on the Muslim community. That means the Obama’s precious time of the Presidential term is waste for such trifles as preparation grounds for the world community opinion by the times when Libya, Egypt and Syria nations on supposedly voluntary basis but not under the separatists pressure choose new democratically tuned political regimes. And naturally the new Barak Obama controlled leaders of these countries will turn to Obama for assistance in rehabilitation the county’s economy ruined during the military activities. What things will Obama ask for his assistance in this case? How do you think? What sector of these countries economies did Obama choose for himself? But the time of this joyful occasion hasn’t come yet and the power of Barak Obama ends with the second Presidential term. What will Barak Obama do in this case?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
However the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits for the US population has brought Barak Obama money faster (however not as much as he would have of oil and gas fields), moreover the citizens themselves got into bondage of debts. Or may be it’s not just debt bondage? Think over yourself. Your creditors demanding payment of interests can give you or refuse to give you new credits to pay off the current hot credits or they can give you or refuse to give you moratorium on interests. Anyway the new credits shall have new higher interest rates. This growing snowball of debt progression shall never let you pay off the debts. This is the real possibility to influence your political decisions demanding the payment or giving moratorium on interests. Why don’t Barak Obama try to use this situation and to make his best to railroad and amendment of the law through the national referendum that would let him run for the third Presidential term under the pretext that he is that very person who can recover the US economy from the crisis and provide the US citizens wellbeing. And the US citizens need no arguments since they once believed to the Obama’s promises and now are caught into the lifelong debt bondage through the wheeler-dealer finance he organized around the mortgage credits. They know well that in case if the vote against the political initiative of Barak Obama they immediately receive notifications from the financial institutions saying of the moratorium or new credit denial thus reminding of the need to pay off the current debts. Do you have any doubts about that? Isn’t it the time for the US citizens caught into the lifelong debt bondage to realize that Obama’s promises of the better life is just willful deceit? (Any signs of the US economy revival? New jobs created? Increase of wage level? More medical services available for all? Any financial possibilities seen to pay off the debts finally?) And is it now the time to actually implement the principles of the democratic society such as liberty of speech and criticize the economic policy Barak Obama adopted in the USA. Those who really try to do that will be immediately noted by the police and then following the chain the request will be sent to the financial institutions to find out your financial situation and debts to be paid for the credits. At the next step you receive the notification of the financial institution credited you demanding the payment of interests or informing on the moratorium denial. Are there any bold spirits to check it out and find out the truth? I’m wondering of the financial genius that suggested Barak Obama such a clever trick made millions of the US citizens get into the lifelong debt bondage without no real chance to pay off the credits they took, made them shake in their boots and looking up at Barak Obama suppliantly and waiting at least for the words that would rise hope their desperate situation will change for the better. These citizens probably should give Barak Obama political support when he’ll try to use the trick suggested by some financial genius again leading to increase the tax rate for the USA wealthy people up to 75% in order make the US economy fold at all.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Who helped Barak Obama to implement the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits for the US citizens during his first Presidential term? It would be foolish for such an enterprising person as Barak Obama miss a suitable political moment suitable as the US citizens still believed his campaign promises of positive changes marvel for the US economy despite the world financial crisis. Why wouldn’t Obama come to an arrangement with the crediting financial institutions heads and with their help wouldn’t draw the US citizens into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits? I hope you don’t think that the heads of the financial institution Obama turned with his offer were such fools to swallow his gibberish. They are experts of economy and finance and perfectly understood that the Barak Obama’s offer of bulk mortgage crediting of the US citizens implies reviewing of the person’s financial competence just to comply with formalities to give credit. They understood that at the times of the world crisis and the USA economic frailty this swindle will lead to a disastrous effect in the US financial system. Therefore they requested guarantee of repayment of their funds to be spent for this swindle with interests. Did Obama give the above guarantee of repayment with interests to the financial institutions? How do you think? The US President Barak Obama is that very person who takes decisions on the Government financial measures to relief the financial system situation in case if the financial system of the USA turns to be on the brink of crush resulted from the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits. Therefore Barak Obama is that very person who can use his official position, his connections with the Senate and Congress corrupt politicians to influence the final decision on the financial aid assigned out of the USA federal budget to the financial institution on the brink of bankruptcy. Naturally the financial aid was provided to those financial institutions which heads made deal with Barak Obama. That swindle related to wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits shows style of G. Soros. Probably Barak Obama turned to him for advice on the issue of artificial provoke of crisis in the USA in order to make money. Everyone knows that G. Soros is an expert on provoking crises and everyone is well aware of the strong financial given to the first Presidential election campaign of Barak Obama. G. Soros manipulated Barak Obama as a puppet to arrange the swindle related to wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits that leaded the USA financial system to the crisis. G. Soros was to get back the funds he spent for the election campaign of the first African-American President of the USA and, for sure, make money on the financial crisis he created using President Obama as Soros used to. May be the President Obama is just a tool to make money that is passed from hand to hand of the people like Soros?
The US citizens, an outstanding mortgage credit for the house in one of the main reasons of your anxiety.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
I suppose now the US citizens start realizing a difference between the Lord in the Highs and Barak Obama. Have you any questions about any of Ten Commandments left unbroken? Believe me, none is left. Even “Thou shalt not kill” was broken; just remember his deliberate omission in the situation of the US diplomatic mission in Bengasi. Barak Obama will sooner reform the Bible than reform himself. Do the US citizens drawn into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits have chances to pull through this situation without financial losses, i.e. to do something to pay off the mortgage credit and therefore dispel the fear of giving away the house for unplayable debts? I think you still have quite good chances. You live in the USA, in the country where people of different nationalities united and the USA elite, Senate, Congress and Barak Obama do not want to be a part this union. What ties the US nation and Senate, Congress, Barak Obama together? It’s just legal rights and duties that tie uncoupling parts. What is the USA main document regulating the relations between the US citizens and authorities? Right, it is the Constitution of the USA which Protector is Barak Obama and which clearly specifies that the equality of the US citizens rights doesn’t mean that everybody shall use them, but it means that those rights are provided to everyone. If the Senate, Congress and Barak Obama have officially admitted that the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits is a crime against the USA nation which requires criminal punishment, then where are notorious lawsuits with the suspected ones? Do the US citizens know the names of those who underwent the punishment for the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits? No. Well. It is because neither FBI nor the Senate commission launched thorough investigation to determine the masterminds of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits. There is only one simple reason. The investigators would find Barak Obama to be the mastermind. Therefore they are carried out disinterested investigation of the crime related to the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits in order to relief the public tension which resulted in possible criminal punishment of some small fries shifting the full responsibility for the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits. (Remember who bore the full responsibility for the US diplomatic mission lost in Bengasi? Those were two women fired and that’s all!) Do you want to know why such things happen? Because Barak Obama still has the real capability to have influence on the decisions of the Senate commission carrying out the investigation using his connections gained in the US Senate and Congress as well as using his official position. How much did it cost to save the USA financial system? And in fact? I mean including the reimbursement paid out by Barak Obama from the US federal budget to the heads of the financial institutions took part in the arrangement of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits, their financial expenditures including the interests yielded. It’s for sure that Barak Obama has received the funds due and naturally the silence guarantee of the heads of the financial institutions took part in the swindle. And the USA and the nation have got credits of dubious benefit.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
If Barak Obama assigned the reimbursement to the masterminds of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits from the US federal budget to cover their financial expenditures then it would be fair to pay the same reimbursement to the deceived US citizens. It doesn’t take much. It requires Barak Obama to turn to Mr. Bernanke, the FRS head with a small request to print dollars just enough to pay off the mortgage credits of the deceived US citizens thus withdrawing the question of his involvement in the arrangement of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits and of injustice to the deceived US citizens. Barak Obama may have some objections that acting justly for the benefit of the US citizens this way he will create another financial crisis in the USA. This way makes Obama break prerogative of G. Soros and puts him in the awkward situation in the eyes of Soros. Then remind Barak Obama about the sold mass-media independent of the common citizens, about quite dependent rating agencies, about bought and sold opinions of public figures, political and economic observers who can show the political and economic situation in the USA to the whole world not as it is, but as it is required to Barak Obama.
Cost of one 100$ note is just 14 cents and it may be sold to the Chinese National Bank for the nominal of 100$. This token year for Mr. Bernanke (the FRS head) it would be unreasonable to deny the Obama’s request. And why doesn’t Obama take this just solution with regard to the US citizens deceptively drawn in the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits? It is because Barak Obama does not collect any brickbats expressing displease and criticism addressed to him as the result of the economic policy adopted in the USA. It is because he doesn’t see organized protest actions of the US citizens deceived by the masterminds of the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits; he doesn’t hear urgent requests to find and punish the masterminds of the swindle brought the USA to the brink of the financial crisis. It is because he doesn’t get petitions from the deceived US citizens claiming for the amendment of the law providing more strict punishment for such crimes against the US citizens. It means that the deceived by Barak Obama people shall made the real reasons or intensify the possible reasons to make Barak Obama take the just decision about the mortgage credit redemption by the money taken from the US budget.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Since the US citizens keep silence Barak Obama has the reasons to believe that they are a dumb flock, that the people he deceived are satisfied with the situation of the lifelong debt bondage with no real prospects to change it. May be the silence the deceived US citizens keep and their nonparticipation in the second for Barak Obama US Presidential elections were some kind of their tacit protest against the existing political and economic situation of the USA? This kind of protest played right into Barak Obama's hands and now he has grounds to believe that the deceived US citizens are good for nothing dumb flock that shall keep surrendering. Those US citizens who were not deceived by Barak Obama came to the polling station to choose on of the two candidates for the US Presidential post, Barak Obama and Mitt Romney. And the most of those who came were the youth and the female representatives of the US population. (Of course I do not exclude the possibility of the falsification of vote counting during the Presidential elections as well as did those people of 33 states expressed their distrust to Barak Obama, however the sold rating agencies said otherwise. You choose those one to believe to.) Those who came voted not for Barak Obama but for those who helped him to arrange well financed election campaign of his second election to the post of the USA President. The youth voted for the pop-culture representatives, for amenities of Obama’s accredited representative Madonna. The US women voted for the well-played idyll of the Obamas which is something most of them do not have themselves and for superficial charm. And you should not forget that Barak Obama has arsenal to create favorable public opinion (How do you judge a person? You take into consideration references of others) comprising of well-prepaid public figures with world reputation, professional liars such as rating agencies and etc. Despite the USA is not to be called the society 2/3 any more as less than a half of the population with the voting right came the poll stations it is not important when the matter is the career of the US President. Isn’t it the ineligibility of the US Presidential election that could be used by the deceived US citizens for the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits?
If the US citizens thoroughly choose the house they are going to live in then they should be thorough when they choose the person they are going to obey. And passiveness of the individuals will play a malicious trick on you considering yourself apolitical people whose opinion nothing can change, considering yourself just a law-abiding citizen making a timorous so-called majority. For sure you’re brave enough to get the credits thoughtlessly, but not enough to think over the real capabilities of the person promising you the better life and speak openly your doubts to everybody.
Then should the deceived US citizens hope for a marvel, for a just solution of their problems by Barak Obama the messiah on the Earth? Should the Constitution of the USA be somehow observed? Otherwise it appears that the money form the USA budget may be given to cover losses of some citizens included in the US elite and directing the financial institutions arranged the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits leaded to the USA financial system to the crisis and not to be given to common US citizens suffered from this swindle and caught into the lifelong debt bondage. Then the common US citizens deceptively drawn into this swindle to get their own financial crisis are not taken into the economical account of the US elite, Senate, Congress and Barak Obama? Then the other laws of the USA subordinated to the same power i.e. the US elite where the common US citizens are not allowed.
What does Obama prepare to the deceived US citizens for the future? It is heart-debilitating fear, anxieties, illnesses, doleful senility, isn’t it? Barak Obama promised you secure trouble-free life and now he is going to teach you living in poverty, he is going to bring your existence to the edge when anything you get is seen as the highest good. And such a state is ambiguous since it can provoke people deceived by Barak Obama to acts of despair and cruelty motivated with a desire to get even with the person who brought them to this state. Therefore I advise Barak Obama to make just decision with regards to the deceived US citizens deceptively drawn into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits and settle accounts with them before beginning a new similar swindle with the mortgage credits.

(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
And what opinion do the wealthy US citizens have of Obama with his initiative to railroad the so-called tax from the rich which provides 75% increase of the profit tax rate? May be Barak Obama is trying to rise in the standard of poor people living to the standard of rich at the expense of the last ones; or on the contrary he is trying to reduce the standard of the rich people to the level of poor for social justice? It turns that Barak Obama changes for the worse just anything even the things with prospective for the better. Dostoevsky said that money you receive is materialized freedom. I.e. money is your freedom to choose goals and objectives and Barak Obama is intended to limit your freedoms. Do you want your freedom to be dependent on someone else? If the Obama’s initiative related to the tax from the rich bill failed in the full claimed amount of 75% for this moment it doesn’t mean he wouldn’t try it again. In what way? Barak Obama will do it in the new person of social justice fighter supported by the timorous majority called the common US citizens divided into those dreaming of their own house and a new car and those already drawn by Barak Obama and his deceitful promises of the better life into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits and now trembling with fear due to lack of capabilities to pay off for the house and for sure those of the US Afro-Americans considering Barak Obama as their man in Washington. I think it won’t be difficult to Barak Obama one more time give promises to the common citizens of the USA to change their life for the better. He will claim it’s not his fault that the changes for the better failed during his first Presidential term since there were some circumstances as counteractions of the rich opposed to his sound initiatives and this brought the USA to economy to the submarginal economic condition. And now it is time of Barak Obama second Presidential term when he acts in the name of democracy and to eliminate the social tension, to prevent revolutionary actions of the citizens wondering why the rich people become even richer at the times of the financial perturbation in the USA. And so Barak Obama will submit the bill of the 75% rich profit tax to the national referendum. What results of this referendum can the rich US citizens expect? Do you think there are no grounds to care about this way of the events’ development? Are the rich US citizens ready to give away their money they made for the financial swindles of Barak Obama? If the rich tax bill comes into effect he’ll have no need to ask you and just will take what he needs. I’d advise the rich US citizens to turn their head to each noise Obama makes. Are you wondering why Obama has changed his political line so abruptly? May be he’s got newly elaborated plan of the US society rearrangement in order to reallocate the country’s wealth sources? Barak Obama is going to raise the standard of poor people living through the increase of tax revenues but not through the USA economic growth, isn’t he? I hope the common US citizens understand that if Obama creates unfavorable conditions for making money then the rich will leave the USA to such countries as Russia where sound tax policy is adopted thanks to the President. The rich people leaving the USA will take away the things their own, i.e. factories, plants, banks etc. Then what effect shall these situation provoked by the Obama’s rich tax bill will have regarding the economy of the USA?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Taking into consideration a nominal contribution of G. Soros to the second presidential election of Barak Obama comparing to the amounts he provided for the first one and taking in to consideration the sorting out relations between the Republicans and Barak Obama pushing his rich tax bill I believe that Barak Obama made decision stop squandering his gifts on trifles i.e. render services for the people with big money and power that brought him to the Presidential post. He doesn’t want to be just a tool for money making getting shares he consider ridiculous.
Follow the law of analogy. The things happening to Barak Obama now are similar to the things happened to an African-American boxer who betrayed his masters for opportunistic reasons when he mistakenly decided that everything he became is just his own merits and embraced Islam taking name of Mohammed Ali. To avoid the punishment from the betrayed masters Ali turned for protection to the organization named Muslim Brotherhood and managed to bargain more favorable conditions of the box profit sharing then he had before. Why wouldn’t Muslim Brotherhood use such a promoted brand as Mohammed Ali to popularize themselves among the USA population and so become the symbol of the social justice fighter? May be for the past years the Muslim Brotherhood has become such a powerful organization that it can easily provide protection not just to boxers escaped from the masters but to the President of the USA as well? And alliance of such powers as the US President with the legal right to print dollars and the Muslim Brotherhood make the last one all-powerful in the way FBI and CIA all together not to be compared with. Yes, that’s what I mean. Barak Obama got the legal base to print dollars beginning in this year of 2013, but it happens only if he doesn’t break his own rules and make another one official position foolish thing and renew the contract of Mr. Bernanke representing the FRS interests. It is one percent of one hundred likely that Barak Obama renews the contract with the FRS which expires in 2013. If it happens and Barak Obama renews contract with Mr. Bernanke i.e. with FRS then it means that Barak Obama became very rich person getting kickback from Mr. Bernanke for the possibility of the contract renewal. But it also means that Barak Obama didn’t become the real Lord of the World, real Lord in the Highs in the eyes of average people (instead of the impostor he is) and lost possibility on the legal basis to print the amounts he requires in dollars of 14 cents cost and then sell them globally for nominal price. My opponents may object it arguing that neither the Senate nor Congress will allow Barak Obama to print dollars out of control. Then I reply to my naïve opponents that in the Senate as well as in the Congress there are people like Obama who wouldn’t deny the fellowship offered by the person with the legal possibility to print US dollars giving the real freedom to choose goals and objectives to anyone who has them.
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
What steps can Mr. Bernanke take in case of such a hard-to-manage person as Barak Obama to get the positive result in terms of the renewed contract between the USA Government and the Federal Reserve System? Should he talk to the people supporting Barak Obama giving sound arguments and explain them that they are likely to lose their continuously developing business and thus the lose the funs flowing to them? And heeded the arguments of B. Bernanke they would prefer to choose more thoughtful decision and have fixed incomes rather then plunge into adventures with Barak Obama which may result (as it happened to those US citizens deceived by Barak Obama with the promises of better life and drawn into the wheeler-dealer finance with the mortgage credits) in bread and butter lost completely. Probably they think over choosing the right variant in “fellowship with Barak Obama needed/required” and their finding would be favorable for B. Bernanke? Or may be B. Bernanke acquaint them some documented facts from Barak Obama’s biography which could bring the last one to impeachment? It would be ideally of people of the USA, especially their Afro-American part charge Barak Obama for high treason. I think chances to obtain additional interesting information about Barak Obama shouldn’t be denied just because this information has an unusual to everyone form.
Who can define the conditions explaining existence of such organization as the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA everyday life?
What is the main source of incomes of the people belonging to this organization?
Why is the entire Muslim world so alert about the Muslim Brotherhood?
What if the Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood have the same leaders?
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
After all I would like to appeal to the US citizens of all the nationalities of different confessions and sincerely believing in their Lords.
Now I would like to talk to you about something serious and more important than the things said above. Let’s apply to logic and try to determine the real reasons of your existing life troubles. Everyday you sincerely pray to your Lords appealing for mercy and wait for it. And how can they help you if you yourself broke the spiritual liaison with them? How can they help you if now you believe in Barak Obama forgetting about the true spiritual values? Did you protest when Barak Obama used the God’s symbols and named himself the messiah during his first Presidential election campaign? No, no one expressed indignation with the sacrilegious actions of Barak Obama insulted your Lords. May be you thought that the God thought of it as of a joke when Barak Obama used symbols of divinity for the first Presidential election PR? Do you think it looks like a joke when the Lords watching from their highs see millions of the citizens of this country unconstraint and voluntary choose Barak Obama who is just a small figure comparing to them but has already break the Commandment not to take the name of the Lord in vain, outraging the Lords comparing himself with them. If Barak Obama thinks it’s a joke to use the symbols of divinity for PR, then he should know that the Lords see it otherwise. (No one living in the USA, who sincerely believes in and reveres his Lord, except Barak Obama of course, would afford such an outraging act with respect to the Lord.) Are the Lords wrong if they decide that the US citizens betrayed them turning to another Lord under the name Barak Obama when they saw the things happening during the first Presidential election campaign of Barak Obama? Then what mercy do the US citizens expect from the Lords if the Lords now know that their souls are given away to Barak Obama? Why should they help you? Lords left the USA alone. And every year, every day, every hour they are moving farther and farther from it. May be it’s not too late and the US citizens can turn back to their Lords with a penitential prayer and say it in public, not whispering but aloud to let the others hear and in a single spiritual impulse of people repented of their deeds as the US people betrayed the Lords in public and so the repentance should be in public as well. Moreover a sincere repentance is the repentance done openly. The believers know the Lord’s mercy. If there are any doubts let the believers turn for explanations to their spiritual advisers but not to those who allows insulting of the other confessions, but to those who openly condemned Barak Obama outraging your Lords when identified himself with them during his first Presidential election campaign. Do you know such spiritual advisers? Lords are merciful; didn’t they try to bring the betraying US citizens to reason? Didn’t they send you their signs clarifying the personality of the man you believed to? Isn’t the word “faithfully” missed by Barak Obama in the oath of the President of the USA that very sky-signs sent to warn the US citizens about the thing out of Obama’s nature? Of course atheists say that its trifle, contingency or coincidence. Then why didn’t Barak Obama miss some other word less important to everybody? Contingency is the reverse side of regularity. The US citizens should better think of it themselves. I do not call you for rebellion against Barak Obama moreover he is the legally elected President of the USA according to secular laws. I just ask you to comprehend all the things happened objectively. And if in the result you come to the finding that your betrayal to your Lords took place then there was the reason made you did so, there was a deception on Barak Obama’s part made you through the manipulations with the name of the Lord to believe that he’s the Lord-messiah on the Earth and thus deprived you and you children of the real Lord’s mercy. And when you realize the Obama’s lie you may say openly: “We know of the deception took place. And now you know that we know that. Sure you are capable to bring us troubles but you can not deceive us. Look someone else for deception.” Your Lords will judge who is guiltier in this offence on their own since all are equal to them no matter if it is a common US citizen or a President of the USA. The most important thing is to prevent the ambitions of such a small comparing to them figure as Barak Obama didn’t turn the reason for the Lords and tragedy for the entire nation,
(Don’t you think that the USA had all the things it needs for its wellbeing?)
Probably in this complex case the US citizens should help their Lords to give judgment?
Determine on your own what does the word “betrayal” means for you in your secular level. Then decide weather the actions of Barak Obama with regards of the US citizens correspond the meaning of this word. Can’t you believe that the betrayal is possible on such a high level of authorities? However the history teaches us that there were some regrettable examples.
I will tell you about my suppositions about Barak Obama’s betrayal with regards to the US citizens in my next message. The US citizens should think over themselves on the things I mentioned about the Barak Obama’s deeds and bringing up questions weather these deeds turn into a huge minus sign striking through his career of the President of the USA. In fact people should think over weather the cure invented by Barak Obama for the negative consequences of the world crisis can turn out to be more harmful then the illness it to cure.
P.S.
The US citizens may use this message as an instruction on immunization from the manipulations over their consciousness on Barak Obama’s part.

World ecology outsourcing
zeropro16@rambler.ru 
Isupov Eduard
Tel  +79149032122
Радио Свобода, 19.01.2012, Борис Акунин: "Время Путина заканчивается" - ГК "КФК"
Премьер-министр Владимир Путин на встрече с руководителями СМИ заявил, что готов к контактам с представителями оппозиции
27 days ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/108311633737424473642 Imre Demech : Arab States want the US to do the dirty work so their leadership stays on it's throne, like the Saudi's...
Arab States want the US to do the dirty work so their leadership stays on it's throne, like the Saudi's, Turks etc. They want the war out of their countries at the expense of US ground troops spilling blood in Syria & Iraq. They don't want to dirty their hands against Extremist Forces & get overthrown just as Libya &  Egypt did during the Spring uprisings. Assad of Syria is  the equal to Saddam Hussein in keeping other factions out.  They ruled with brutal force within their boundaries. The Turks can't buy US weapons, because we already have them there in US hands such as our Air Forces. ISIS has US weapons from Iraq & they are ground force weapons. It would take US boots on the ground to go up against them.  We are going to be dragged into another ground war over there  which never stopped inclusive of Afghanistan. Since 1990 we have been at war in the Middle East like it or not. If it's not over oil then it's a terrorist state in the making which ISIS is trying to do. Carve out a new State out of Iraq & Syria, maybe Turkey also. This is why the Turks want US ground forces.  The US has become a pawn for our so called Arab Ally  States. All them countries are ruled by dictators. The US pays money for it's influence  up until 1990. We now pay in blood also. War makes battles, & more battles make for a bigger war which these  whole turn of events since 1990  has turning into. Obama can't escape the US being dragged into a spreading battles. We can't do a George Bush Iraq war by conquering for 10 years then leaving everything behind with another bad leader of an Arab country. Terrorism will always be there & the USA is still learning how to deal with it. It doesn't end with Osama Bin Laden's death, nor the over throw of Saddam Hussein. The USA needs to close it's borders,& have our own energy resources. Shield this country & not of all the dictators running theirs.
Turkey’s President Calls for Ground Troops to Fight Islamic State
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan says the fall of Syrian border city of Kobani to the extremist group is imminent and ground forces are needed to fight it.
1 month ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/104257951888121810147 Day in Tech History : October 5, 2011: Steve Jobs Passes Away - 2011- Steve Jobs passes away in his home at 3 pm Pacific. ...
October 5, 2011: Steve Jobs Passes Away - 2011- Steve Jobs passes away in his home at 3 pm Pacific. He went into respritory failure due to the pancreatic cancer he was fighting for over 10 years. Twitter exploded with over 10,000 tweets per second on this event (Osama Bin Laden death was 5,000). Vigils were held in his memory and Cupertino office was plastered with flowers and memories on post-it notes. 1999- The Microprocessor Forum is held in San Jose, California. Dur... http://ow.ly/2OCtwq
October 5, 2011: Steve Jobs Passes Away

1 month ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/113514748427912245895 OSINT : #OSINFO: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GLOBAL TERRORIST THREAT; From 9/11 to Osama Bin Laden's Death http://buff.ly...
#OSINFO: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GLOBAL TERRORIST THREAT; From 9/11 to Osama Bin Laden's Death http://buff.ly/1nLZXqU
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-ybudf-tFHCM/VCxDA9x0pNI/AAAAAAAABvU/UcnE2QflEh8/w506-h750/0fed755f-ec7c-48e1-ad44-6f9dba672f36
1 month ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/109370892157685877275 Jenn Goodall : September 11, 2001 will always be remembered by Americans as “911”.  Americans take solace that the ...
September 11, 2001 will always be remembered by Americans as “911”.  Americans take solace that the author of those terrorist acts died on May 2, 2011, and each year on that date, we remember all those who perished.
On the morning of September 11, 2001, Americans were horrified as they witnessed Airplanes crashing into the two World Trade Center buildings in New York City, New York.   Those in the World Trade Center buildings heard and felt an explosion but did not know that an airplane had crashed into their building.  A third airplane crashed into the Pentagon.  A fourth airplane crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.  In total approximately 3,000 Americans died and every American wanted justice.
On 911, many died and are remember each year.  Horrific acts of terrorism occurred and many died.  Americans and other around the world mourn those lost on that day.   Flags are flown at half mast, special assemblies are held in schools and many parks and fields are covered in flags.   The  most awe inspiring tribute are the lights that beam into the Manhattan sky from where the World Trade Center Building previously stood.
The 911 attacks were on American soil.  This created a new war with an enemy who is not a country but a group, Al-Queda. The United States and British forces objective was to exterminate all terrorist tied to 911.  To further this objective, October 7, 2001 the war in Afghanistan started with US and British forces bombing the terrorist groups in the country.  These bombings ended one month later.  Over the course of ten years covert operations and military intelligence was used to hunt down and destroy all known Al-Queda participants. On May 2, 2011 in Abbottabad, Pakistan Navy Seals performed a covert operation.  This operation concluded with the death of Osama Bin Laden.  America and the rest of the world continues to mourn the loss of 911;  but we have a small sense of peace since Osama bin Laden’s death. 


2 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114515187854133905081 Ali Ahmed : Jihadist groups around the world Despite Osama Bin Laden's death in 2011, the organisation that he founded...
Jihadist groups around the world
Despite Osama Bin Laden's death in 2011, the organisation that he founded is still wreaking havoc Nearly 13 years on from the devastating 9/11 attacks by al-Qaeda, the group, its affiliates and other jihadist groups are still in business. So who are they? A...
Jihadist groups around the world
Despite Osama Bin Laden's death in 2011, the organisation that he founded is still wreaking havoc Nearly 13 years on from the devastating 9/11 attacks by al-Qaeda, the group, its affiliates and other jihadist groups are stil...
2 months ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/114571031457393382385 Abd Alhaï : New York Times Reported Osama Bin Laden Death in 2002
New York Times Reported Osama Bin Laden Death in 2002
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Xaf0HUqDP2c/UyZ5s8Jq05I/AAAAAAACOQA/Y81JNXY2qW4/w506-h750/safe_image.png
2 months ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/104031629768206023099 William Smith : New York Times Reported Osama Bin Laden Death in 2002
New York Times Reported Osama Bin Laden Death in 2002
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Xaf0HUqDP2c/UyZ5s8Jq05I/AAAAAAACOQA/Y81JNXY2qW4/w506-h750/safe_image.png
2 months ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/114529371273443966439 H George Tavakoli : New York Times Reported Osama Bin Laden Death in 2002
New York Times Reported Osama Bin Laden Death in 2002
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-Xaf0HUqDP2c/UyZ5s8Jq05I/AAAAAAACOQA/Y81JNXY2qW4/w506-h750/safe_image.png
2 months ago - Via Reshared Post - View -