Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: タルモFaizLobisinin DolarOyunu#DolarOyunuTutmaz#MakeSomeonesDayIn3Words#CrispyIsBackYOU CANT BE HAPPY iF U ARE MADサルカンNatNósTeAmamosJadeNaOperacaoDesenrolaJolirio#OperaçãoDonzelaDeFerro#teknikanalizfbgsReisiCumhur GaziŞehirde#FriendsFightOverDressArthurAguiarTeAmamosBaşınızaAtilla TAŞdüşsün#KorsanKitabaHayırHesaplarınızıEmre PolatÇalıyor#aşığımçünküOlympiaSirki ArtıkVıalandDa#NesseFimDeSemanaEu#みなさん何県民と何県民のハーフですか#BlackOutDay#Sormakİstiyorum#2AnosSemChorao#TheVampsVIP#Crufts2015モダマス#SeriaBomSeLírio#AskLOX#gardenersworld坂道くんMc GuiBoeheimWilkinMenendez蘭子#他の人があまり経験したことないようなことを晒すありがとうJames WardGail Platt楽しみおめでとうSally WebsterRoryReggie WayneBrandon Marshall#HeyUSA#tonaagua#OrtadoğuyaBarışEkerGıdaMüh AlımınıAcıklıyor#WhiteOutDayHoli in IndiaOgretmeneNisanda 40BinAtamaKian & Jc新葉わかばちゃんリリアナChorão#DavisCupUnfinished BusinessAimee OsbourneMomofuku AndoAmerican CrimeAvengers Age Of UltronBen CarsonJodi AriasLaGuardia Airportdaniel von bargenpurimHOLIKatie HopkinsKim KardashianRussell WestbrookHarrison FordBob BarkerVince WilforkDan StevensChris BrownShania TwainMore

Most recent 18 results returned for keyword: joe arpaio (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/112304529634886581095 Dr. Vladymir de Rothschild, MD, PhD : Sheriff Joe Arpaio is the best Sheriff in the World <3 :-) Controversial Arizona sheriff's immigration...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio is the best Sheriff in the World <3 :-) 

Controversial Arizona sheriff's immigration lawsuit against Obama will go to federal appeals court as White House remains defiant on 'amnesty' plan
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/108484142476889903612 Stonewall Jackson : Sheriff Joe Arpaio Lawsuit: http://youtu.be/dcQLtq1XJ0U
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Lawsuit: http://youtu.be/dcQLtq1XJ0U
Watch the video: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Lawsuit
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/XyGPFmtnBAhyiNgz6wvh-7o9b6Ia8nbT3rqF4Vfz6tn3llHUT939MIMZJGyU2ae44LyKQGUQeN7Yc8qV4sIE0Q=w506-h284-n
Via The Huffington Post: "The Justice Department filed suit Thursday against Maricopa County, Ariz. Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his office for unlawfully discrimi...
3 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/108484142476889903612 Stonewall Jackson : Sheriff Joe Arpaio & Judge Joe Miller Discuss Oba…: http://youtu.be/sWuQgCgpBdQ
Sheriff Joe Arpaio & Judge Joe Miller Discuss Oba…: http://youtu.be/sWuQgCgpBdQ
Watch the video: Sheriff Joe Arpaio & Judge Joe Miller Discuss Obama's Forged Identity Documents
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/x2oKigxZbXOJR656f-ioDH0rOLcnTOASXcuKNYyTzjp2Xa0_D7bXQoB_XRDS2LgXgi92CieulZuPXUjCdQAC3g=w506-h379
Sheriff Joe Arpaio And Judge Joe Miller Discuss Obama's Forged Identity Documents - 2/25/2015 - http://www.BirtherReport.com - FULL AUDIO: http://www.birther...
3 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/106882871263251826534 clare sulivan : Sheriff Joe Arpaio: “Our Country is Under Attack & Barack Obama is the Aggressor”..? Known as America’s...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio: “Our Country is Under Attack & Barack Obama is the Aggressor”..?
Known as America’s Sheriff, Joe Arpaio took a shot at Barack Obama at the end of August over his criminal negligence when it comes to the immigration invasion taking place on America’s southern border. In an email, the Arizona sheriff declared, “Our country is under attack. And Barack Obama is the aggressor.”
Arpaio wrote:
Our country is under attack.
And Barack Obama is the aggressor. That’s right. Our own President has overseen the release of thousands of illegal immigrants…hundreds of whom are convicted criminals – even felons, which are flooding into America.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio: "Our Country is Under Attack & Barack Obama is the Aggressor" » Sons of Liberty Media
Sheriff Joe Arpaio: "Our Country is Under Attack & Barack Obama is the Aggressor"
4 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/116734816633333594657 InCONVENIENTtruthsTV : Good grief.  Reporter Troy Hayden and Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  Two guys I don't think Jodi Arias is going...
Good grief.  Reporter Troy Hayden and Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  Two guys I don't think Jodi Arias is going to miss.
~~Fox 13 Reporter Troy Hayden ~ Just a Tenacious Punk Reporter~Or Sheriff Joe's Special Boy~~~~March 1, 2015
So once again Troy Hayden has broken his word to Jodi Arias in his relentless attempt for a scoop. Hayden released an audio recording of Jodi singing from Estrella jail when he reported a story on her and her fellow inmates s...
4 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/102375149150729681506 Brighty - : Sheriff Joe warns amnesty judge on ‘defiant’ Obama http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/sheriff-joe-warns-amnesty...
Sheriff Joe warns amnesty judge on ‘defiant’ Obama
http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/sheriff-joe-warns-amnesty-judge-on-defiant-obama/
SHERIFF JOE WARNS AMNESTY JUDGE ON 'DEFIANT' OBAMA
President's refusal to obey 'another affront to the rule of law'
author-image BOB UNRUH
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/11/obama-glare.png
An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County is asking the judge who ordered federal bureaucrats not to implement President Obama’s amnesty-by-memo plan to order a hearing over the administration’s apparent refusal to abide by the order.
A notice and recommendation was filed Friday in the Texas case, which was brought by 26 states, by attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch on behalf of Arpaio, who has his own lawsuit against Obama over amnesty but joined the Texas case in a friend-of-the-court filing.
“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson,” the filing explains.
The suggestion is accompanied by a motion seeking “further leave” of the court to file the request.
It explains: “If the defendants have in fact halted implementation of the programs in compliance with the court’s temporary injunction, the opportunity to assure the court and other observers of this may be afforded by the court asking for a response on whether the reports of continued implementation are accurate and whether the injunction is being complied with.”
Two weeks ago, U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to stop implementation of the Obama amnesty plan because officials failed to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act.

He did not reach a determination of the constitutionality of Obama’s executive actions, a decision Klayman is hopeful will be delivered by a federal appeals court in Washington, where his case on behalf of Arpaio now is pending.
Since the issuance of Hanen’s temporary injunction, the White House has asked that it be overturned.
Klayman’s filing noted Obama’s statement at a town hall meeting in Miami on Feb. 25 that he won’t be deterred by “one federal judge” on immigration.
Obama, according to the Washington Times, “told a Miami crowd that he will move ahead with his executive action on immigration and vowed that his administration will become even more aggressive in the weeks and months to come.”
Klayman’s filing also noted Obama said: “This is just one federal judge. We have appealed it very aggressively. We’re going to be as aggressive as we can.”
Wrote Klayman: “The Obama administration is continuing to signal not only its disagreement with the court’s order, which is its right, but beyond that its non-compliance with the court’s order.”
The attorney also noted a report from Judicial Watch, a public interest organization, that said “a source within the U.S. government contracting industry” said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security “is continuing at full speed to implement the ‘deferred action’ programs created on November 20, 2014.”
“In short,” Klayman told the court, “President Obama’s defiant pledge in Miami, Florida, on February 25, 2015, to move forward aggressively with implementation of his deferred action amnesty by executive over-reach …  more than suggests that the Obama administration is continuing to implement the executive action amnesty in defiance of the court’s temporary injunction.
“Given the strong reports that DHS is continuing to implement the programs that the court enjoined, the court should issue an order to show cause and call for clarification and assurance from the defendants that they are and will comply with the court’s temporary injunction, and if not take immediate remedial actions to [ensure] that the order is being complied with.”
The Obama administration’s action “to expend taxpayers money in violation of this court’s temporary injunction order would be another affront to the rule of law,” he wrote.
WND reported earlier this week that Obama’s amnesty plan took another step forward.
It came when the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced the extension of a program allowing spouses of certain visa holders to obtain work permits.
According to the Washington Times, the move will, in 90 days, allow some 180,000 immigrants to be eligible for the benefit “in the first year.”
“Allowing the spouses of these visa holders to legally work in the United States makes perfect sense,” the newspaper quoted agency chief Leon Rodriguez saying. “It helps U.S. businesses keep their highly skilled workers by increasing the chances these workers will choose to stay in this country during the transition from temporary workers to permanent residents.”
The Texas lawsuit was filed when the states suddenly faced massive new demands for public services such as schooling and health care from foreigners who previously had been subject to deportation.
Hanen granted a preliminary injunction that prevents the government from enforcing the Obama administration’s immigration orders. The ruling also confirmed WND’s exclusive report that, contrary to popular perception, the order to delay deportation was not an executive order by the president. Instead, it was a memorandum issued by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson at Obama’s direction.
Klayman even noted that according to a Weekly Standard report, Obama was threatening “consequences” for federal employees who followed the judge’s order, instead of the amnesty memos from Johnson.
That report quoted Obama saying: “Until we pass a law through Congress, the executive actions we’ve taken are not going to be permanent; they are temporary. There are going to be some jurisdictions and there may be individual ICE official or Border Control agent not paying attention to our new directives. But they’re going to be answerable to the head of Homeland Security because he’s been very clear about what our priorities will be.”
He continued, “If somebody’s working for ICE … and they don’t follow the policy, there’s going to be consequences to it.”
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., described the administration’s action as “another program that has not been authorized by law.”
“There’s been no sense at all by President Obama, the Department of Home Security [Secretary] Jeh Johnson, the Democratic members of this Congress, no concern about the employment prospects of lawful immigrants, green card holders and native-born Americans,” Sessions told the Times. “The first thing we should do is be focusing on getting jobs for Americans that are unemployed. Are we going to keep Americans on welfare and benefits while we bring in more and more foreigners to take jobs when we’ve got Americans ready and willing to take those jobs?”
Sen Ted Cruz, R-Texas, also raised the issue of compliance with the court order.
“Violating an unambiguous federal court order by defying its instructions to cease and desist a particular activity would represent a significant breach of your authority, and would be an escalation in abuse of our separation of powers,” Cruz wrote to administration officials. “For a president and his cabinet to telegraph intent to violate a federal court order requires additional scrutiny from Congress.”
But administration officials were unabashed in their intent.
The Washington Times said Cecilia Munoz, White House domestic policy director, addressed the issue: “It’s important to put [Hanen's order] in context, because the broader executive actions are moving forward. The administration continues to implement the portions of the actions that the president and the Department of Homeland Security took, which were not affected by the court’s ruling.”
But Hanen’s order said: “The United States of America, its departments, agencies, officers, agents and employees and Jeh Johnson, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; R. Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of United States customs and Border Protection; Ronald D. Vitiello, deputy chief of United States Border Patrol, United States Customs and Border Protection; Thomas S. Winkowski, acting director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and Leon Rodriguez, director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services are hereby enjoined from implementing any and all aspects or phases of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents.”
And even Obama himself said he couldn’t do it alone.
House Speaker John Boehner has listed online 22 times when Obama has made such statements.
For example, in October 2010, Obama said: “I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself. … I’ve got to have some partners to do it. … If Congress has laws on the books that says that people who are here who are not documented have to be deported, then I can exercise some flexibility in terms of where we deploy our resources, to focus on people who are really causing problems as opposed to families who are just trying to work and support themselves. But there’s a limit to the discretion that I can show because I am obliged to execute the law. … I can’t just make the laws up by myself.”
Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano has said unless an appeals court intervenes in the case, Obama’s amnesty program likely will fail.
He commented on the government’s request for that intervention.
“They basically said the government will be irreparably harmed if you don’t lift this injunction because we need to provide a service to the illegal aliens we promised we would help.”
Napolitano said the government “wants to break the law so it can help other lawbreakers stay here.”
WND also reported when yet another a federal judge in Pennsylvania declared the amnesty unconstitutional.
“President Obama’s unilateral legislative action violates the separation of powers provided for in the United States Constitution as well as the Take Care Clause and, therefore, is unconstitutional,” said U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab.
The judge noted Obama “contended that although legislation is the most appropriate course of action to solve the immigration debate, his executive action was necessary because of Congress’ failure to pass legislation, acceptable to him, in this regard.”
“This proposition is arbitrary and does not negate the requirement that the November 20, 2014, executive action be lawfully within the president’s executive authority,” the judge wrote. “It is not.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/sheriff-joe-warns-amnesty-judge-on-defiant-obama/#43HSCVcghZTlSqw0.99
Sheriff Joe warns amnesty judge on ‘defiant’ Obama

5 days ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/114174307775392021804 Cecelia McCarty : Given the strong reports that DHS is continuing to implement the programs that the court enjoined, the...
Given the strong reports that DHS is continuing to implement the programs that the court enjoined, the court should issue an order to show cause and call for clarification and assurance from the defendants that they are and will comply with the court’s temporary injunction, and if not take immediate remedial actions to [ensure] that the order is being complied with.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-now-warning-federal-judge-obama/#2r21uhFBwWQro0dB.99
Sheriff Joe Just Took A Big Stand For America, Hauls Defiant Obama Before Judge
Sheriff Joe Arpaio has a dire warning for judge standing in Obama's way.
5 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/103355654726888136925 Walt Armour : Sheriff Joe warns amnesty judge on ‘defiant’ Obama http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/sheriff-joe-warns-amnesty...
Sheriff Joe warns amnesty judge on ‘defiant’ Obama
http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/sheriff-joe-warns-amnesty-judge-on-defiant-obama/
SHERIFF JOE WARNS AMNESTY JUDGE ON 'DEFIANT' OBAMA
President's refusal to obey 'another affront to the rule of law'
author-image BOB UNRUH
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/11/obama-glare.png
An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County is asking the judge who ordered federal bureaucrats not to implement President Obama’s amnesty-by-memo plan to order a hearing over the administration’s apparent refusal to abide by the order.
A notice and recommendation was filed Friday in the Texas case, which was brought by 26 states, by attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch on behalf of Arpaio, who has his own lawsuit against Obama over amnesty but joined the Texas case in a friend-of-the-court filing.
“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson,” the filing explains.
The suggestion is accompanied by a motion seeking “further leave” of the court to file the request.
It explains: “If the defendants have in fact halted implementation of the programs in compliance with the court’s temporary injunction, the opportunity to assure the court and other observers of this may be afforded by the court asking for a response on whether the reports of continued implementation are accurate and whether the injunction is being complied with.”
Two weeks ago, U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to stop implementation of the Obama amnesty plan because officials failed to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act.

He did not reach a determination of the constitutionality of Obama’s executive actions, a decision Klayman is hopeful will be delivered by a federal appeals court in Washington, where his case on behalf of Arpaio now is pending.
Since the issuance of Hanen’s temporary injunction, the White House has asked that it be overturned.
Klayman’s filing noted Obama’s statement at a town hall meeting in Miami on Feb. 25 that he won’t be deterred by “one federal judge” on immigration.
Obama, according to the Washington Times, “told a Miami crowd that he will move ahead with his executive action on immigration and vowed that his administration will become even more aggressive in the weeks and months to come.”
Klayman’s filing also noted Obama said: “This is just one federal judge. We have appealed it very aggressively. We’re going to be as aggressive as we can.”
Wrote Klayman: “The Obama administration is continuing to signal not only its disagreement with the court’s order, which is its right, but beyond that its non-compliance with the court’s order.”
The attorney also noted a report from Judicial Watch, a public interest organization, that said “a source within the U.S. government contracting industry” said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security “is continuing at full speed to implement the ‘deferred action’ programs created on November 20, 2014.”
“In short,” Klayman told the court, “President Obama’s defiant pledge in Miami, Florida, on February 25, 2015, to move forward aggressively with implementation of his deferred action amnesty by executive over-reach …  more than suggests that the Obama administration is continuing to implement the executive action amnesty in defiance of the court’s temporary injunction.
“Given the strong reports that DHS is continuing to implement the programs that the court enjoined, the court should issue an order to show cause and call for clarification and assurance from the defendants that they are and will comply with the court’s temporary injunction, and if not take immediate remedial actions to [ensure] that the order is being complied with.”
The Obama administration’s action “to expend taxpayers money in violation of this court’s temporary injunction order would be another affront to the rule of law,” he wrote.
WND reported earlier this week that Obama’s amnesty plan took another step forward.
It came when the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced the extension of a program allowing spouses of certain visa holders to obtain work permits.
According to the Washington Times, the move will, in 90 days, allow some 180,000 immigrants to be eligible for the benefit “in the first year.”
“Allowing the spouses of these visa holders to legally work in the United States makes perfect sense,” the newspaper quoted agency chief Leon Rodriguez saying. “It helps U.S. businesses keep their highly skilled workers by increasing the chances these workers will choose to stay in this country during the transition from temporary workers to permanent residents.”
The Texas lawsuit was filed when the states suddenly faced massive new demands for public services such as schooling and health care from foreigners who previously had been subject to deportation.
Hanen granted a preliminary injunction that prevents the government from enforcing the Obama administration’s immigration orders. The ruling also confirmed WND’s exclusive report that, contrary to popular perception, the order to delay deportation was not an executive order by the president. Instead, it was a memorandum issued by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson at Obama’s direction.
Klayman even noted that according to a Weekly Standard report, Obama was threatening “consequences” for federal employees who followed the judge’s order, instead of the amnesty memos from Johnson.
That report quoted Obama saying: “Until we pass a law through Congress, the executive actions we’ve taken are not going to be permanent; they are temporary. There are going to be some jurisdictions and there may be individual ICE official or Border Control agent not paying attention to our new directives. But they’re going to be answerable to the head of Homeland Security because he’s been very clear about what our priorities will be.”
He continued, “If somebody’s working for ICE … and they don’t follow the policy, there’s going to be consequences to it.”
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., described the administration’s action as “another program that has not been authorized by law.”
“There’s been no sense at all by President Obama, the Department of Home Security [Secretary] Jeh Johnson, the Democratic members of this Congress, no concern about the employment prospects of lawful immigrants, green card holders and native-born Americans,” Sessions told the Times. “The first thing we should do is be focusing on getting jobs for Americans that are unemployed. Are we going to keep Americans on welfare and benefits while we bring in more and more foreigners to take jobs when we’ve got Americans ready and willing to take those jobs?”
Sen Ted Cruz, R-Texas, also raised the issue of compliance with the court order.
“Violating an unambiguous federal court order by defying its instructions to cease and desist a particular activity would represent a significant breach of your authority, and would be an escalation in abuse of our separation of powers,” Cruz wrote to administration officials. “For a president and his cabinet to telegraph intent to violate a federal court order requires additional scrutiny from Congress.”
But administration officials were unabashed in their intent.
The Washington Times said Cecilia Munoz, White House domestic policy director, addressed the issue: “It’s important to put [Hanen's order] in context, because the broader executive actions are moving forward. The administration continues to implement the portions of the actions that the president and the Department of Homeland Security took, which were not affected by the court’s ruling.”
But Hanen’s order said: “The United States of America, its departments, agencies, officers, agents and employees and Jeh Johnson, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; R. Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of United States customs and Border Protection; Ronald D. Vitiello, deputy chief of United States Border Patrol, United States Customs and Border Protection; Thomas S. Winkowski, acting director of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and Leon Rodriguez, director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services are hereby enjoined from implementing any and all aspects or phases of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents.”
And even Obama himself said he couldn’t do it alone.
House Speaker John Boehner has listed online 22 times when Obama has made such statements.
For example, in October 2010, Obama said: “I am president, I am not king. I can’t do these things just by myself. … I’ve got to have some partners to do it. … If Congress has laws on the books that says that people who are here who are not documented have to be deported, then I can exercise some flexibility in terms of where we deploy our resources, to focus on people who are really causing problems as opposed to families who are just trying to work and support themselves. But there’s a limit to the discretion that I can show because I am obliged to execute the law. … I can’t just make the laws up by myself.”
Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Andrew Napolitano has said unless an appeals court intervenes in the case, Obama’s amnesty program likely will fail.
He commented on the government’s request for that intervention.
“They basically said the government will be irreparably harmed if you don’t lift this injunction because we need to provide a service to the illegal aliens we promised we would help.”
Napolitano said the government “wants to break the law so it can help other lawbreakers stay here.”
WND also reported when yet another a federal judge in Pennsylvania declared the amnesty unconstitutional.
“President Obama’s unilateral legislative action violates the separation of powers provided for in the United States Constitution as well as the Take Care Clause and, therefore, is unconstitutional,” said U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab.
The judge noted Obama “contended that although legislation is the most appropriate course of action to solve the immigration debate, his executive action was necessary because of Congress’ failure to pass legislation, acceptable to him, in this regard.”
“This proposition is arbitrary and does not negate the requirement that the November 20, 2014, executive action be lawfully within the president’s executive authority,” the judge wrote. “It is not.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/02/sheriff-joe-warns-amnesty-judge-on-defiant-obama/#43HSCVcghZTlSqw0.99
Sheriff Joe warns amnesty judge on ‘defiant’ Obama

5 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114726920925926117304 lindawillets : Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://www.westernjournalism.com...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way

http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-now-warning-federal-judge-obama/?


U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to cease implementing Obama's amnesty plan.
F. PETER BROWN — FEBRUARY 27, 2015
 Chris Curtis / Shutterstock.com  Chris Curtis / Shutterstock.com
An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President Obama’s executive amnesty, asking that a hearing be held on Obama’s refusal to comply with the court’s order.

The attorney, Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, stated to the judge in the filing:

“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson.”

Advertisement-content continues below

U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to cease implementing Obama’s amnesty plan; but, since then, Obama has warned that “one federal judge” will not stand in his way toward implementing amnesty.

Obama, according to the Washington Times, “told a Miami crowd that he will move ahead with his executive action on immigration and vowed that his administration will become even more aggressive in the weeks and months to come.”

Klayman noted in the filing: “The Obama administration is continuing to signal not only its disagreement with the court’s order, which is its right, but beyond that its non-compliance with the court’s order.”

Advertisement-content continues below

He went on to write:

“In short,” Klayman told the court, “President Obama’s defiant pledge in Miami, Florida, on February 25, 2015, to move forward aggressively with implementation of his deferred action amnesty by executive over-reach …  more than suggests that the Obama administration is continuing to implement the executive action amnesty in defiance of the court’s temporary injunction.

“Given the strong reports that DHS is continuing to implement the programs that the court enjoined, the court should issue an order to show cause and call for clarification and assurance from the defendants that they are and will comply with the court’s temporary injunction, and if not take immediate remedial actions to [ensure] that the order is being complied with.”
Klayman also noted that Obama is threatening “consequences” to federal employees who obey the federal judge’s ruling to cease implementation of his amnesty.

Share this article
Sheriff Joe Just Took A Big Stand For America, Hauls Defiant Obama Before Judge
Sheriff Joe Arpaio has a dire warning for judge standing in Obama's way.
5 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/116813494492581956991 Richard Irbinskas : Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way. U.S. District Judge Andrew ...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way. U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to cease implementing Obama’s amnesty plan. image:…
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama's Way
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama's Way. U.S. District Judge Andrew S. Hanen ordered federal agencies to cease implementing Obama's amnesty plan. image: F. Peter Bro...
6 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/118164717113540580488 Haji al Kidya : An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President...
An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President Obama’s executive amnesty, asking that a hearing be held on Obama’s refusal to comply with the court’s order.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-now-warning-federal-judge-obama/#WpAMBmZtkzg02Pi7.99
Sheriff Joe Just Took A Big Stand For America, Hauls Defiant Obama Before Judge
Sheriff Joe Arpaio has a dire warning for judge standing in Obama's way.
6 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/106035820985092305771 Ted Welles : Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI An attorney...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI

An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President Obama’s executive amnesty, asking that a hearing be held on Obama’s refusal to comply with the court’s order.

The attorney, Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, stated to the judge in the filing:

“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson.”

More http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-SAH9dCk-7sU/VPGOhtX7AII/AAAAAAABSe4/YlubDaUw-YY/w506-h750/640a631c-1e8b-470e-bfb4-70e313b4942e
6 days ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/112591121877685563269 Tomorrow's News Today : Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI An attorney...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI

An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President Obama’s executive amnesty, asking that a hearing be held on Obama’s refusal to comply with the court’s order.

The attorney, Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, stated to the judge in the filing:

“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson.”

More http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-SAH9dCk-7sU/VPGOhtX7AII/AAAAAAABSe4/YlubDaUw-YY/w506-h750/640a631c-1e8b-470e-bfb4-70e313b4942e
6 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/105030879479059605082 Conspiracy Theories Today! : Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI An attorney...
Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has A Dire Warning For Judge Standing In Obama’s Way http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI

An attorney for Sheriff Joe Arpaio made a filing with the federal judge who ordered the halting of President Obama’s executive amnesty, asking that a hearing be held on Obama’s refusal to comply with the court’s order.

The attorney, Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch, stated to the judge in the filing:

“Several reports indicate that the executive branch under the Obama administration has not complied with this court’s temporary injunction, but continues full-speed to implement a grant of amnesty and related benefits to approximately 5 million citizens of foreign countries who are illegally in the United States under the defendants’ November 20, 2014, executive action programs implemented by several memoranda issued by Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson.”

More http://bit.ly/1C6DGtI
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Px0gS8oS8IQ/VPGOf7w453I/AAAAAAAAHbk/A-qUJSTHIn4/w506-h750/3d00a19a-6b24-4be1-8ce0-baff75df6850
6 days ago - Via - View -