Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites

• Twitter + Facebook
• Twitter
• Facebook
• Flickr
• Youtube
• Picasa
• Google+
• Digg
• Blog
• Forums
• Yahoo Answers

Most recent 17 results returned for keyword: The Dictator (Search this on MAP)

Dylan Marck : Watching The Dictator.  This is probably a terrible idea. Watching The Dictator.  This is probably a terrible idea. 12 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - Mendjan Metaj : The Dictator | Albania Webs skip to main | skip to sidebar. Home » Comedy » The Dictator. The Dictator. Posted by Mendjan Metaj Posted on 10:48 PM. Share this article : Labels: Comedy · Next Movie » Home · online marketing. Enter your email address: Delivered by FeedBurner. ===>|Subscribe to Albania Webs by Email|<== ... 18 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - fouad crank : hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh The Dictator 19 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - Marko Anthonio : ""“Someone once said that every form of government has one characteristic peculiar to it and if that ... ""“Someone once said that every form of government has one characteristic peculiar to it and if that characteristic is lost, the government will fall. In a monarchy, it is affection and respect for the royal family. If that is lost the monarch is lost. In a dictatorship, it is fear. If the people stop fearing the dictator he'll lose power. In a representative government such as ours, it is virtue. If virtue goes, the government fails. Are we choosing paths that are politically expedient and morally questionable? Are we in truth losing our virtue? . . . If so, we may be nearer the dustbin of history than we realize.” Ronal Reagan 21 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - Jasper Seren : Award-winning Chinese Filmmaker Undone by His Alliances - The Epoch Times A successful Chinese film director becomes entangled with the propaganda schemes of a brutal dictator. The director enjoys a rich and privileged life, but then loses everything when the dictator’s political opponents charge him with violating the nation’s family-planning laws. 22 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - Self Reliance Workshop : Message to the dictator, Obama-- NON SERVIAM!!! Message to the dictator, Obama-- NON SERVIAM!!! 23 hours ago - Via HootSuite - View - Thomas Colthurst : "This raises the question: How much would participants in a Dictator Game give to the other person if... "This raises the question: How much would participants in a Dictator Game give to the other person if they did not know they were in a Dictator Game study? Simply following me around during the day and recording how much cash I dispense won’t answer this question because in the DG, the money is provided by the experimenter. So, to build a parallel design, the method used must move money to subjects as a windfall so that we can observe how much of this “house money” they choose to give away. "And that is what Winking and Mizer did in a paper now in press and available online (paywall) in Evolution and Human Behavior, using participants, fittingly enough, in Las Vegas. Here’s what they did. Two confederates were needed. The first, destined to become the “recipient,” was occupied on a phone call near a bus stop in Vegas. The second confederate approached lone individuals at the bus stop, indicated that they were late for a ride to the airport, and asked the subject if they wanted the $20 in casino chips still in the confederate’s possession, scamming people into, rather than out of money, in sharp contradiction of the deep traditions of Las Vegas. The question was how many chips the fortunate subject transferred to the nearby confederate. [...] "In a second condition, the confederate with the chips added a comment to the effect that the subject could “split it with that guy however you want,” indicating the first confederate. This condition brings the study a bit closer, but not much closer, to lab conditions, In a third condition, subjects were asked if they wanted to participate in a study, and then did so along the lines of the usual DG, making the treatment considerably closer to traditional lab-based conditions. "The difference between the first two treatments and the third treatments is interesting, but, as I said at the beginning, the DG should be thought of as a measuring tool. Figure 1 shows how many chips people give away in the DG in the three treatments. In conditions 1 and 2, the number of people (out of 60) who gave at least one chip to the second confederate was… zero. To the extent you think that this method answers the question, how much Dictator Game giving is due to people knowing they’re in an experiment, the answer is, “all of it.” Are All Dictator Game Results Artifacts? You walk into a laboratory, and you read a set of instructions that tell you that your task is to decide how much of a $10 pie you want to give to an anonymous other person who signed up for the experimental session. This describes, more or less, the Dictator Game, a staple of behavioral economics with a history dating back more than a quarter of a century. The Dictator Game (DG) might not be the drosophila melanogaster of behavioral economics – ... 1 day ago - Via Reshared Post - View - Vine of CHRIST Ministries : Readings for such a time as this(2): United With Christ PROBABLY the most important doctrinal fact u... Readings for such a time as this(2): United With Christ   PROBABLY the most important doctrinal fact underpinning the spiritual life is the believer's union with Christ. It is foundational to the truth of cocrucifixion of the Christian with Christ, which in turn is the basis for freedom from the power of sin. Unfortunately, this concept is little understood, unbalanced in its presentation, and unused in its application. The Concept The concept of being united with Christ is developed chiefly by Paul in his use and explanation of the phrase "in Christ." Our Lord announced the idea in the Upper Room before His crucifixion when He declared, "In that day you shall know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I in you" (John 14:20). But the apostle Paul gave us the far-reaching revelation of the meaning of this concept. He uses the idea in relation to our heavenly calling (Phil. 3:14), election in Christ (Eph. 1:4), forgiveness (Eph. 1:7; 4:32; Col. 1:14), redemption (Rom. 3:24), freedom from condemnation (Rom. 8:1), freedom from the law (Gal. 2:4), justification (Gal. 2:17), and life (Rom. 6:11, 23; 8:2). In other words, our justification, or salvation, is vitally related to being "in Christ." Too, our future bodily resurrection is guaranteed by being "in Christ" (1 Cor. 15:22). But our principal interest in the concept is its relation to our present sanctification or to the Christian life. Paul taught that in Christ believers are sanctified (1 Cor. 1:2), rooted and built up (Col. 2:7), taught (Eph. 4:21), guarded (Phil. 4:7), led in triumph (2 Cor. 2:14), and have boldness and access to God (Eph. 3:12). It is easy to see that many of the vital activities of Christian living are based on our position in Christ. What does this concept mean? My own definition is simply this: To be in Christ is the redeemed man's new environment in the sphere of resurrection life. The key word is environment, for being in Christ is not a barren state or an almost unreal positional truth (as it is often presented), but a vital, pulsating, functioning involvement. The chief characteristic of this environment is resurrection life, the life of Christ Himself. Another writer speaking of this same position of the believer describes it this way: "He has been transplanted into a new soil and a new climate, and both soil and climate are Christ."  In trying to define or describe a difficult concept like this one, it often helps to look at the opposite. What is the opposite of being in Christ? It is being in Adam and encompassed by the environment of death (1 Cor. 15:22). This is a position which all men have by birth, for all sinned in Adam (Rom. 5:12). Notice the contrast in each area—justification, sanctification, glorification—between being in Adam and being in Christ. AREAIN ADAMIN CHRIST JustificationNone (condemnation)Complete (eternal life) SanctificationSlaves to sinServants of righteousness GlorificationThe second deathResurrection unto life Thus in relation to sanctification or the Christian life, which is our chief interest in this book, being in Christ frees us from the bondage of sin and enables us to live righteously before God. However, before seeing how this works out, it is necessary to consider one other question: How did we achieve this position? How is it that we are placed in Christ? The Means   The answer to this question: We are placed in Christ not by anything we can do, but by the sovereign baptizing work of the Holy Spirit. "For by one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all made to drink of one Spirit" (1 Cor. 12:13). In other words, this position which is the basis for all victorious living is effected by something God does for us through the baptizing work of the Holy Spirit. There is probably no work of the Holy Spirit which is more confused than this one. Many who have had some climactic spiritual experience subsequent to salvation have chosen to label it "the baptism of the Spirit." And they have become so wrapped up in a precious experience that they find it difficult to comprehend the biblical doctrine. This has tragic ramifications, for a lack of understanding of the doctrine of the baptizing work of the Holy Spirit will obscure the important truth of union with Christ which is the basis for genuine spirituality. There are at least four characteristics of the baptizing work of the Spirit: 1. All believers have been baptized by the Spirit. This ministry is not reserved for a select few. If that were so, the body of Christ would be composed only of those selected or spiritually qualified to be baptized. In the key passage (1 Cor. 12:13) notice that Paul did not say that only the spiritual people at Corinth had been baptized. He said all. Notice too that he did not exhort them to be baptized as some groups do today in order to become spiritual. Certainly this would have been an easy solution to the problems generated by the carnality in the church at Corinth, if it were a valid solution. But baptism, in and of itself, does not give power; it sets up a relationship which in turn can unleash power. Further evidence that all believers have been baptized is apparent in the lack of exhortations or commands to be baptized by the Spirit anywhere in the New Testament. If some Christians have been baptized and some have not, surely there would be somewhere an exhortation to those who had not been. But nowhere is there such, which simply confirms the fact that all believers have experienced this work of the Spirit. 2. Each believer is baptized by the Spirit only once; baptism is not repeated. Each believer is baptized at the time of his conversion, and there is no scriptural reference which would indicate that the same person is baptized a second time. Indeed, the Greek tense of the word baptize in 1 Corinthians 12:13 indicates an unrepeated experience. Think for a moment of the implications of repeated baptisms. Since Spirit baptism places a person in the body of Christ, a second baptism would mean that that person had been removed from the body since his first baptism and was on the occasion of the second being reinstated into the body. Such an idea is completely foreign to Scripture. 3. All believers have been baptized whether they know it or not. This which God does for us occurs whether or not we are conscious of it. I do not mean to imply that no experience results from this new position, but the baptism itself, the actual placing of the believer in the body of Christ, is something that happens whether or not we have any experience or consciousness or understanding of it. Formerly in Adam, we are now in Christ, transferred by a miracle of God's grace.4. The fact that all believers are baptized into the body does not in itself guarantee that power will be experienced or displayed in the life. The Corinthians, all of whom had been baptized, fell far short of displaying the power of God in their lives. They were baptized and carnal. The Galatians too had been baptized but were far from spiritual Christians (Gal. 3:27; cf. 1:6; 4:9). The demonstration of power compatible with our new position involves other factors, but the position itself can be attained in no other way than by the baptizing work of the Spirit. Thus union with Christ means the introduction of the believer into that new environment of Christ's resurrection life by means of the baptizing work of the Holy Spirit. Formerly in Adam, we are now in Christ, transferred by a miracle of God's grace. When I was a student the transplanting of the cornea of the eye was a new and startling operation. One particular case gained a great deal of publicity, for it involved transplantation of the cornea of a condemned criminal awaiting execution into the eye of a blind citizen of that state. The prospective recipient visited the donor before his execution, and this of course received even more publicity in the papers. In due time the execution was carried out, the operation was performed and the sightless man was able to see. That cornea illustrates very well what is true of every believer in Christ. Formerly he was, as the eye in that criminal, in Adam—condemned justly to death. There was no hope of escape apart from a miraculous intervention. And that is exactly what happened when he believed in Christ. A miracle did occur and he was removed from the condemnation of death in Adam and placed through the baptizing work of the Spirit into Christ. And then that one who was condemned was justified and placed in that new sphere of resurrection life with all of its privileges and responsibilities. This is the true story of every believer in Christ. The Consequences If union with Christ involves (as it does) partaking of all that He is, then the most important consequence of this union as far as the victorious life is concerned is that it is the means of actualizing our cocrucifixion with Him (Col. 2:12; note especially Rom. 6:1-10). Being associated with Christ by baptism into His death, burial and resurrection is the basis for the crucifixion of the believer's sin nature and his victory over sin; and this is all based on our union with Him which has been accomplished for us by the baptizing work of the Spirit. Some become so concerned with the question of whether or not water baptism is in Romans 6 that they miss the principal point of the passage. One extreme wants to be certain that water baptism is taught there in order to justify immersion as the mode of baptism; the other extreme seeks to eliminate water entirely from the passage in order to avoid the conclusion that immersion is the proper form of the ordinance. Certain facts seem to be obvious. (1) Water baptism by whatever mode or all of them together could never accomplish what is said to have been accomplished in the passage. Water cannot crucify the old man and provide the basis for not serving sin (v. 6). (2) On the other hand, it is not easy to remove the imagery of immersion from these verses. Baptism in relation to death, burial and resurrection is an obvious picture of immersion. The proper resolution of the matter is to admit that although it is the baptism of the Spirit which does the work, it is water baptism which pictures what is done. Water baptism is the object in this object lesson, but the work of the Spirit is what makes the lesson true. Our union with Christ means a separation from the domination of the sin nature because of its crucifixion.What is it that has happened? A death has occurred for believers because of the union with Christ in His death. What is death? Some views of the victorious life are forced to define death as extinction since they teach that the sin nature, being dead, is eradicated. Others, more moderate, would have to consider death as cessation since they teach that, although the sin nature is still present in the believer, he can cease from sinning in this life. Thus death means a cessation of the activities (but not of the presence) of the sin nature. This is probably the impression created by most speakers on this passage. But death does not mean either extinction or cessation; it always means separation. Physical death is the separation of the immaterial part of man from the material body. It does not mean that the person has become extinct or that he has ceased to be or to function. The unbeliever who dies, for instance, is still conscious and active though apart from his physical, earthly body (Luke 16:19-31). Spiritual death is certainly not extinction or inactivity. Every unsaved person walking the face of the earth today is spiritually dead but is at the same time existing and active. However, he is separated from God, and this is what makes him spiritually dead. The second death is the eternal state of separation which unbelievers will experience in the lake of fire. There could be no such experience if death means extinction or cessation. Death always means separation, and it does in Romans 6 as well. When, then, is the crucifixion of Romans 6 a separation from? To answer this we need only remind ourselves of the subject of the chapter, "Are we to continue in sin that grace might increase?" (v. 1). In other words, the death to sin of Romans 6 is a separation from the power of the sin nature to cause the believer to continue in sin. It is separation from the domination of sin over a Christian's life. This is accomplished by the crucifixion of the sin nature in order to "destroy" the body of sin so that we need not serve sin (v. 6). That word destroy does not mean to annihilate, which would infer that the sin nature is eradicated in the Christian. Notice its use in 2 Thessalonians 2:8: "And then the lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming." The man of sin is "destroyed" at the second coming of Christ, and yet he continues to exist in the lake of fire into which the devil is cast a thousand years later (Rev. 20:10; in the Greek the plural verb "shall be tormented" indicates that all three beings are alive in the lake of fire forever and ever). Another interesting use of the word is in Luke 13:7: "And he said to the vineyard-keeper, 'Behold, for three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree without finding any. Cut it down! Why does it even use up the ground?'" Here the word is translated "use up." Obviously the fig tree did not destroy the ground in the sense of annihilating it, but it did make the ground useless or idle as far as serving a good purpose was concerned. In the same sense the sin nature has been "destroyed"; that is, it has been made ineffective, useless, so that we do not have to continue in sin. The Scripture speaks both of the crucifixion of the old nature (Rom. 6:6) and the crucifixion of the person (Gal. 2:20). This is no contradiction; rather, it is simply another illustration of the unity of man's being. Thus what is said of or attributed to one aspect or facet of man's being may be predicated of him. Although Christ lives in me, it is a life which I live (Gal. 2:20). Even though apart from Him we can do nothing (John 15:5), we labor to be accepted of Him (2 Cor. 5:9). With the heart man believes unto righteousness, and I believe. Out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, and I think evil. The flesh produces hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife (Gal. 5:20), and yet I am the one who bites and devours others (Gal. 5:15). Thus it is not strange or out of line for the Scriptures to speak of the crucifixion of the old nature and of the person. To capitulate: Our union with Christ means a separation from the domination of the sin nature because of its crucifixion. But it also means a resurrection to newness of living (Rom. 6:4). Throughout this section of Scripture not only is death taught but also our resurrection. The truth includes not only the fact of separation from the old but also the all-important association with the new, the risen life of Christ. It is mentioned in every verse in Romans 6:4-10. Union with Christ, therefore, not only breaks the power of the old capacity, but it also associates us with Him who gives the power to live according to the new capacity. We do not choose to make or break union with Christ; but we may choose whether or not to enjoy its benefits.When did or does all this happen? Historically, it occurred when Christ died and rose again. His death and resurrection are the basis for all these consequences which follow. But as far as our personal history is concerned this union with Christ does not happen until we receive the Savior and at that moment are baptized into His body by the Holy Spirit. The historical actions of Christ's death and resurrection become part of our personal history when we believe and are baptized into His body. But practically, these truths may be present or absent from our daily experience. The fact that we have been crucified with Christ—that the power of the sin nature has been broken and made inoperative, that we need not serve sin—this is unalterable and does not depend on anything I do. But putting this into practice does depend on meeting certain conditions, one of which is reckoning these things to be true (v. 11). This means counting up the weight and truth of the facts that have been revealed in verses 1-10 and calculating them to be true for me. It has the idea of considering, evaluating, and putting on my own account all that the crucifixion of Christ means to me in regard to breaking the power of sin in my life. Failure to make this basic calculation is often the reason why the practice of these truths may be absent from the believer's daily experience. What our Lord has done makes it possible to live the Christian life; putting the possibility into practice involves a number of other factors, many of which include the exercise of the human will. We do not choose to make or break union with Christ; but we may choose whether or not to enjoy its benefits. We cannot create the new nature nor break the power of the old; but we can choose to listen to the old and obey it even after its power has been broken. When one is living under a dictator of a country he has no choice but to obey the laws of that dictatorship. If the dictator is overthrown by a democratic regime and sent into exile in another country, the citizens are free to live a new kind of life. But it is quite conceivable that there would be some within the country who would prefer the deposed dictator and seek to serve him even though his power had been broken. And serve him they could, receiving their instructions over his clandestine radio and carrying them out while rejecting the freedom into which they had been brought. The sin nature is like a deposed dictator who was overthrown by the death of Christ. Christians are citizens of heaven with a new freedom to live lives pleasing to God. But the sin nature has not been eradicated nor has the individual's will been nullified; therefore it is possible to choose to listen to and follow the promptings of sin, but it will never be possible for sin to regain the domination and control it had before conversion. - from "Balancing the Christian Life" - via WORDsearch10 1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Stephen Randall : "I know this is hard for you Americans to imagine, but please try" An oldie, but always makes my smile... "I know this is hard for you Americans to imagine, but please try" An oldie, but always makes my smile/cry. Works for any western culture. Watch the video: The Dictator - Democracy vs Dictatorship Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, t... 1 day ago - Via Mobile - View - Julie Birkeskov : 1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Sami Sa : Watch the video: THE DICTATOR ... 1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Tempesdomn Gaine : Watch the video: Watch The Dictator 2012 Free Online Streaming linkul2.cristi Online Free Full Movie. Streaming Novamov HD trailer Watch The Dictator Online Free Full Movie Streaming Novamovatch The Dictator Online Free Full Movie Streaming Novamov HD trailer Watch The Dictator Online FMovie Streaming Novamov HD, Watch The Dictator 2012 Movie Online Free VideThe Dictator 2012 Movie Online Free, Download The Dictator 2012 Movie Online Freep 2 days ago - Via YouTube - View - EthicalBradri : Basic Security Firewalls Keeping Your Linux System Secure An Insecure World Basic Security Fortunately... Basic Security Firewalls Keeping Your Linux System Secure An Insecure World Basic Security Fortunately, Linux has a lot of built in security that it inherits from its Unix forebears. User accounts are clearly separate from each other. It's easy to configure a Linux system so that normal users have zero rights outside their own user space. The administrator or 'root' account is virtually untouchable if one doesn't have physical access to the machine and proper password and login policies are in place. User Account Security Root is the number one user on the system. Fortunately, root's privileges can only be shared explicitly through the use of programs like 'sudo'. Other than that, there's no way a normal user under normal circumstances can do what root can. But user accounts can also be a source of compromise and they need to be made secure. We can start by making sure that user directories are accessible only to the owner of the account. To do this, directories should be created with read, write and execute permissions only for the user: drwx------ 101 bsmith bsmith 8192 Nov 9 17:53 bsmith In the event that somebody was able to get a password for a user account, this would make it extremely difficult to browse other users' files for possible information like passwords. It will also keep legitimate users from poking around in other people's directories. Of course, one user account may be all that's needed in order to gain root privileges. This can be done by exploiting known bugs. Remember, we're trying to make it more difficult, but 100% secure is never possible. If It Isn't Permitted, It's Prohibited Running a Linux system should never be compared with a democracy. The root user is the dictator. What he or she permits, is allowed. What isn't allowed doesn't come up for debate. It's prohibited. If you're the root user and you've just set up a system, the first thing you should do is go over to /etc and open up the hosts.deny file. Place the following line in it, if it isn't in there already. This should probably be the only line in the file, apart from comments: ALL : ALL This establishes from the outset that nobody can do anything. That is, we're denying ALL to ALL. Now we can start to give access to certain hosts and users via hosts.allow Giving access to services in hosts.allow can be service based, host/ip based or both. For example, if you wanted to permit logins to pickup mail via IMAP, you could add this to your hosts.allow: imapd: ALL Since you may have roaming users, it would be impossible to know where they might be at any given moment. They may be getting their connection from a hotel or an public wireless point at an airport, for example. This would let anybody from anywhere login (or at least try to login) to the IMAP daemon. Since mail passwords are often sent in the clear, this is potentially a security breach if your users had the same password for mail pickup as they do for their accounts. Their password could be sniffed and an attacker could gain a foothold in the system via a user account. This, of course, doesn't have to happen. We could, for example, set up a mail system that uses virtual accounts instead of real ones, keeping the user accounts and the mail accounts separate. Virtual mail accounts would also keep you from having to give user accounts on the system altogether. A mail system with virtual accounts can be very useful and is something we'll deal with in a separate section of this advanced course. There are also measures that we can take in the hosts.allow file itself that would slow at attacker down. We could limit access by hostname or IP to other services by adding the following lines to your hosts.allow. # acmeisp.com = Bob's ISP # 333.444.555.666 = Janet's home IP # 987.654.321.001 = Dave the outside consultant ALL : 192.168., .acmeisp.com, 333.444.555.666, 987.654.321.001 I always find it a good idea to add little comments about who belongs to these IPs and hosts. If you ended up up, say, ending your contract with Dave, the outside consultant, you don't really want him having access to the machine anymore. With these comments you can more easily keep track of what people should be accessing and who should be removed. Sure, it's a little bit more work, but security is only as good as the work you put into it. Believe me, attackers have more time on their hands than you, so any extra work is worth the trouble. We've secured our machine as best we can with the default tools and files available, but it still isn't good enough. What we can do now, other than un-plugging our machine when we're not using it, is to set up a top-notch firewall.   2 days ago - Via Google+ - View - Tracy Kurtz : How did I get  back on gmail when I WAS ON FACE BOOK ,When I DIDN'T CHOOSE TO GO TO GMAIL  AT TIME IT... How did I get  back on gmail when I WAS ON FACE BOOK ,When I DIDN'T CHOOSE TO GO TO GMAIL  AT TIME IT THROW ME BACK TO GMAIL,! who is the dictator here? this a bunch of bull crap! 2 days ago - Via Google+ - View - Gopi Chandra Kharel : North Korea Sends Special Envoy To China: Will Kim Jong-un Regain Beijing’s Support? North Korea has sent a top military official to Beijing as a special envoy on behalf of the dictator Kim Jong-un, the country's news agency said. 2 days ago - Via Google+ - View - athalia Azana : Was Hugo Chavez a President or a Dictator Hugo Chavez, President or Dictator? Terrorism #He often stayed in contact with some very powerful terrorists. Some of his most notable connections were to members the Colombian guerilla army. He was also fond of Saddam Hussein. Many speculate that the two became friends. Was Hugo Chavez a good president or the dictator they say he was? CHECK THIS UP 2 days ago - Via Google+ - View - Maria Dinh : The Dictator😂😂😂 its so funny The Dictator😂😂😂 its so funny 2 days ago - Via Google+ - View -