Sign in with Twitter

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: 建物倒壊の恐れ金融機関側熊本市動植物園タッチ我慢スターターDr. Coşkun金正恩氏殺害VFX Games検察主張Media Markt İsveçカロリーナ・ステチェンスカさん声優の水樹奈々さんBeşiktaş 3#MeuSuperPoderEhTirem o ManoelJOY CAN PREMIUM姫屋ソフト水樹奈々さん殺害予告容疑LINEグルメ予約デジチケ忍者姿人間パズドラ三井住友銀・りそなキマリスヴィダール#UygunFiyatdanTTVeriilir森友学園の国有地取得の収支カズンズ#エムマスイントロクイズ#サンワと福助のしあわセット#ForçaCamachoTürk'ün Suriyeliye#beyazfutbolprogramıBATES MOTEL TOMORROW#KutsalaHakaretYasaklansın#InesBrasilMeRepresenta#OyumuzaSahipÇıkalım#EVETbinKereEVET#NusaybindeKatliamYaşanıyor#GerçekSevgi#VocêPartiuMeuCoraçãoEXPLOSÃO BELIEBERSZAYN NO RIRDIRECTIONERS POWERFUL#NoCarnavalEuQuero#ForaEmillyバザラガSabriye#BigLittleLiesALLAH KesinVar#TWD7NaFOXBakan Özhasekiイコさん生駒隊雨の匂いŞükran OvalıŞike Kumpası#RenkliSayfalar#Cemre葦原先生#AnthonyDavis#RUNSKGDunk Contest 2017Ivan KoloffChris SullivanOroville Dam updateHunter McGradyGeorge The Animal SteelePokemon Go Gen 2Robert HarwardScott PruittLos Angeles WeatherMilo YiannopoulosWeather Los AngelesSteve Irwinlisa marie presleyLoganMark CubanDonald GloverNba All Star Game 2017spacex launchTrevor NoahMore

Most recent 19 results returned for keyword: The Dictator (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/116690120318923831488 Nicholas Sweedo : Mission: Impossible -- Episode 12: The Fortune To Watch:  Click Here Synopsis in 3 sentences or less...
Mission: Impossible -- Episode 12: The Fortune
To Watch:  Click Here Synopsis in 3 sentences or less: Casey is captured and killed while in the Florida Keys investigating an exiled dictator and his power-hungry wife who are living comfortably in a heavily guarded mansion.  The dictator had stolen millio...
Mission: Impossible -- Episode 12: The Fortune
To Watch: Click Here Synopsis in 3 sentences or less: Casey is captured and killed while in the Florida Keys investigating an exiled dictator and his power-hungry wife who are living comfortably in a heavily guarded mans...
3 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/109860980101987900709 Formula.Con.Za : the dictator
the dictator
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-oKpKSsFqDzk/WKB4fXwNDhI/AAAAAAAD5cA/BnxW69c8aK01sDJjyPuva2K3LWo3PQt7ACJoC/w506-h750/DICTATOR.gif
3 hours ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/112042293953693383668 Craig Newton : The wealthiest Venezuelans in the country, according to public records, also continue to be public supporters...
The wealthiest Venezuelans in the country, according to public records, also continue to be public supporters of Chavismo, the socialist ideology centered around idolatry of late dictator Hugo Chávez. As of August 2015, Maria Gabriela Chávez — the dictator’s favorite daughter — is believed to be the richest individual in Venezuela, believed to be worth $4.2 billion, almost double the net worth of businessman Lorenzo Mendoza. don't think only Hispanic gov'ts are bribed. How did Obama leave with $250 Million. And both the GOP and DNC are obstructing "draining the swamp"
Venezuela's Elite: 'Should We Stop Enjoying Ourselves Because the Country Is Burning?' - Breitbart
In an in-depth look at the lifestyles of Caracas' socialism-friendly diplomats, the Daily Mail exposes Venezuela's exclusive country clubs.
6 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/100205988202051026828 Skitty “FWD” the Dictator : My country right now:
My country right now:
Watch the video: DORA GETS DEPORTED
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/kCeeiUQquxjAT8q_jTwn_dYB-95gS8rIhx0QhR3t5pqrYO-OuqE-mXC2Hjkkiiu5n00G7u06e3J6DI12WRYk8w=w506-h379
DdIP DIP DIP DIP DEPORTED
10 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/108216647527111939468 Kristi S. : Defense Secretary Disagrees With Trump's Statement That Press Is The Enemy How long before the Dictator...
Defense Secretary Disagrees With Trump's Statement That Press Is The Enemy
How long before the Dictator Trump forces Mattis out the door?
Defense Secretary Disagrees With Trump's Statement That Press Is The Enemy
Mattis said he doesn't have any issues with reporters.
13 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/101670248192604004074 Francesca Van der Geld : The Strange Politics of Gertrude Stein. Why were so many prominent modernist writers and philosophers...

The Strange Politics of Gertrude Stein.

Why were so many prominent modernist writers and philosophers attracted to fascist or authoritarian regimes in the first half of the twentieth century? A list of those who were not—Samuel Beckett, James Joyce, Thomas Mann, and Robert Musil—pales in comparison to a list of those who were—Ezra Pound, William Butler Yeats, T. S. Eliot, Wyndham Lewis, Knut Hamsun, Paul de Man, Louis-Ferdinand Céline, Filippo Marinetti, Martin Heidegger, Robert Brasillach, and a host of others. Add to the latter the name of Gertrude Stein, one of the most avant-garde of modernist writers in the English language, who was also—it turns out—a committed supporter of Philippe Pétain, head of state of the pro-Nazi collaborationist Vichy regime in France during the Second World War.

Gertrude Stein, a Vichy supporter? For most people, including those filling the rooms of several recent major museum exhibits on Stein, this news might come as a surprise. A Jewish-American experimental writer, friend of Picasso and muse to Hemingway, Gertrude Stein seems to embody high modernism in its most creative and progressive form. Her patronage of modernism’s giants—Cézanne, Picasso, and Matisse—made her a radical in her day. Her playful and innovative writing seems to anticipate much of postmodern thought. Her open, unapologetic, same-sex partnership with Alice B. Toklas belongs more to the liberal world of 2012 than to 1912. And yet throughout her life Stein hewed to the political right, even signing up to be a propagandist for an authoritarian, Nazi-dominated political regime.

Stein’s Vichy past has long been known to scholars of her work, if not to the public at large. In 1970, Stein’s biographer Richard Bridgman revealed not only that Stein was a fan of Pétain but had even spent a good part of the war translating his speeches into English in the hopes of having them published in America (they never were). Janet Hobhouse, another early biographer, noted the ironic dissonance between Stein’s fierce critique of the Japanese attack on America at Pearl Harbor and her “sanguine” acceptance of the Nazi occupation of France. And Linda Wagner-Martin, though insisting on Stein’s ties to the Resistance (claimed by Stein herself after the war), also referred to Stein as an apparent propagandist for Vichy.

Yet surprisingly, most of Stein’s critics have given her a relatively free pass on her Vichy sympathies. Others have tried to ignore or justify equally inexplicable events: for example, Stein’s endorsement of Adolf Hitler for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1934, or her performance of the Hitler salute at his bunker in Berchtesgaden after the Allied victory in 1945. Until recently, in fact, the troublesome question of Stein’s politics didn’t really figure in debates over her legacy—as opposed, for example, to the vehement debates surrounding Mussolini supporter and modernist poet Ezra Pound.

Stein’s obvious vulnerability as a Jew in Vichy France—a regime that sent more than 75,000 Jews to concentration camps, of whom only 3 percent survived—explains some of this critical response. Even if we acknowledge that Stein was a Vichy propagandist, what right have we to condemn her for doing what she could to save herself in a terrifying situation? Hiding in plain sight might have been the best way to deflect attention away from herself. Given that many of Stein’s neighbors in the small southern town where she lived during the war were Pétainists makes this argument even more convincing. And the fact that Stein apparently joined her neighbors in supporting the French Resistance after 1943 further underscores these formative ties to her community.

On the other hand, we have no evidence to suggest that Gertrude Stein was anything but an enthusiastic supporter of the Vichy regime. In her correspondence during this period, Stein explicitly refers to herself as a “propagandist” for the “new France.” She was apparently excited by the possibility that Pétain himself had approved of her project to translate his speeches. And in one of the only pieces of Vichy propaganda Stein actually brought to press, a 1941 article on the French language in the Vichy journal La Patrie, Stein envisions a productive continuity between the political and cultural project of Pétain’s National Revolution and her own experimental writing. Even after the war, Stein continued to praise Pétain, stating that his 1940 armistice with Hitler had “achieved a miracle” (this, after Pétain had been sentenced to death by a French court for treason).

Stein’s Pétainism thus presents us with a difficult critical dilemma, but an important one. As admirers of Stein’s playful, radical, pre-postmodern writing, we may want to rescue her from her disquieting political views. But to do so greatly simplifies both her complex character and the historical moment in which she and her fellow modernists lived. Close attention to that moment requires suspending some of our most cherished beliefs about the greatest writers and artists of the early twentieth century: their belief in innovation, in revolution, in the profound necessity of going forward. In fact, for modernists like Stein, the path forward into the future often lay in a return to something lost in the wake of modernity. And it is here where the promises of fascism (and of its variants, like Pétainism) proved particularly attractive to certain modernist writers.

In 2007, journalist and author Janet Malcolm published a short book, Two Lives, in which she mused about Gertrude Stein’s connections to a man who may have led her into the orbit of the Vichy regime, a Frenchman named Bernard Faÿ (pronounced fah-ee). Malcolm asked why the modernist Stein would have been drawn to Faÿ, a royalist historian with pronounced far-right political tendencies. Malcolm’s book opened the door to discussing Faÿ’s centrality to the difficult and complex choices Stein made during the Second World War. It also began raising crucial questions about the intersection between artistic modernism and political fascism. My own recent work on Stein and Faÿ has mined the archives to find an exact historical context for this unlikely intersection.

Stein and Faÿ met in 1926, and became so close that Alice Toklas ultimately referred to Faÿ as Stein’s “dearest friend during her life.” For Stein, who not only acquired friends with ease but just as quickly dropped them, the twenty-year friendship with Bernard Faÿ was indeed an anomaly. A French writer and historian of American culture, Faÿ held a prestigious position in Paris as the youngest person ever given a Chair at the elite Collège de France. As Stein’s chief French translator, Faÿ was also the mastermind behind Stein’s highly successful tour of America in 1934–35 following her best-seller The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas. Stein even dedicated her famous book Lectures in America to Faÿ, since it was by listening to Faÿ lecture at the Collège that Stein said she learned how to speak in public.

But Stein and Faÿ’s friendship was based on more than mutual career support. While Faÿ was helping Stein with legal and literary matters, he was also conversing with Stein about the problems of their day—and about possible solutions. In their individual writings and correspondence, we see a remarkable convergence of right-wing ideas and convictions. Both Stein and Faÿ agree that modernity, understood as the nineteenth-century development of industrial and organizational societies in France and America, has become the source of twentieth-century cultural decline. Both trace the roots of this decline to social changes that took place in the wake of the French and American revolutions, changes that had culminated in the disastrous governments of Franklin D. Roosevelt in America and Léon Blum in France. Both agreed that the eighteenth century, in both America and France, was the absolute zenith of human achievement and possibility. And both embrace their own and each other’s role in guiding their respective societies back to that essential, eighteenth-century mode of life.

These convictions would have remained sub rosa for both Stein and Faÿ had the two friends not been confronted with the moment of Vichy. For it was the emergence of the Vichy regime that would allow both to imagine, at least for a while, that their political convictions might actually be realized in practice. For Bernard Faÿ, who had known Philippe Pétain as the “Victor of Verdun” during the First World War, the Vichy regime with its dictatorial authoritarian creed was a salutary development after a century and a half of “democratic nonsense.” Elitist to the core, a royalist and a devout Catholic, Faÿ felt strongly that only a return to the political system and “spiritual values” of the ancien régime could restore France to its premodern, pre-Revolutionary glory.

Pétain’s Vichy regime seemed to Faÿ to promise just that. With his recovery plan for the nation based on a reactionary platform of “family, work, and fatherland,” Pétain sought to use the defeat of the French at the hands of the Nazis as the stimulus for a complete overhaul of French society. Faÿ eagerly signed on to the program. When Pétain authorized an armistice with Hitler in June 1940, Faÿ found himself transformed from a college professor into one of the central figures in the new regime. He was named director of France’s Bibliothèque Nationale, an enormously prestigious position in Paris. Secretly, he was also made chief henchman in charge of the repression of French Freemasons. The latter—mostly secular, left-wing, and often Jewish—were perceived as particularly loathsome by the Vichy regime. Faÿ’s mission was to identify and expose these groups; and while he was not directly in charge of their arrest and deportation, the information he compiled had insidious results. By the end of the war, six thousand French Freemasons had been directly questioned or surveilled, with many losing their jobs; almost a thousand had been deported to concentration camps and almost six hundred killed.

Faÿ’s central role in the Vichy regime undoubtedly had an effect upon Gertrude Stein’s fate during the Second World War. According to Faÿ himself, he prevailed upon Pétain to protect Stein and Toklas and to give them special dispensation to be left undisturbed during the war. Faÿ apparently secured perks like bread tickets and driving privileges for Stein, and possibly intervened when Stein’s name appeared on the third and final installment of the Nazi’s list of banned books in May 1943. Faÿ also stepped in—at the request of Picasso, who somehow knew exactly whom to contact—when the Nazis showed up at Stein’s apartment in Paris to seize her art collection (it was left undisturbed). In crucial ways, therefore, Faÿ was an indispensable friend to Stein during a period in which she was in considerable danger.

Why did Stein choose to stay in France during these dangerous times, when she was urged to leave both by American officials and by friends and members of her own family? As she explained it in “The Winner Loses,” an essay she wrote about the armistice and published in the Atlantic Monthly in November 1940, Stein was tempted to flee France for America but decided not to because of the assurances of local neighbors. Furthermore, she writes, “it would be awfully uncomfortable and I am fussy about my food.” In the same essay, Stein notes that she relied on prophecies and astrological signs to reassure her about the course of the war, most of which promised a swift German defeat. We can assume that Stein also understood something she never mentions in “The Winner Loses”—that her friendship with Faÿ would offer her a great deal of official protection during the regime.

But to say all this is not to deny the authentic enthusiasm and hope Gertrude Stein had for Philippe Pétain, not only in the beginning of the war (when many French people supported him) but well after Pétain had lost the backing of the majority. Her Pétainism appears to have been a bit more complex than that of Bernard Faÿ. For Faÿ, Pétain clearly represented one side of the so-called “two Frances”: Catholic and royalist rather than secular and republican, opposed, above all, to the French Revolution and its liberal democratic legacy. While Faÿ saw in Pétain a set of traits familiar to the French right, Stein seems to have wanted to make Pétain relevant to a wide American audience. For Stein, Pétain’s National Revolution offered a blueprint for a new kind of revolution in the United States, one that would negate the decadence of the modern era and bring America back to its eighteenth-century values.

In both “The Winner Loses” and the introduction she wrote to accompany her project to translate Pétain’s speeches into English, Stein emphasizes how much the French people welcomed and respected Pétain’s armistice with Hitler. But she also explicitly compares Pétain to mythic American figures: George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. Written in 1941, Stein’s introduction to Pétain’s speeches urges Americans to see the dictator as the very embodiment of an American Founding Father. The composite figure of Washington-Franklin-Pétain allows Stein to create a line of connection between present-day France and a lost eighteenth-century America. Regardless of his skills in leading contemporary France, Pétain’s real strength lies in the fact that he is a throwback. Stein’s introduction to Pétain’s speeches not only works as Vichy propaganda, but more importantly—and bizarrely—presents Americans with a model of leadership to emulate.

The modernist writer Ezra Pound took a similar tack in his propaganda on behalf of Mussolini. In his book Jefferson and/or Mussolini, Pound credited Italian fascism with bringing back “Jeffersonian” economic and agrarian values to the modern world. In looking back nostalgically to the rugged individualism of the American eighteenth century, Pound like Stein and a host of other American writers of the interwar period (John Dewey, Ayn Rand, John Dos Passos) contrasted this lost epoch with a decadent modern landscape. Their idealized American eighteenth century was less a real historical era than an ideological foil against which to contrast all the evils of the modern world: industrialization, mass production, bureaucratic capitalism. And for Pound and Stein at least, the surging movements of European fascism promised a renascence of that old, idealized America.

Pound and Stein were just two of the modernist writers who signed on to a fascist or authoritarian program in the hope that it would lead their societies away from the perceived problems of modern life. But this then raises the question: So what? What do the political views of these and other great modernist thinkers have to do with their art or writing? Not much, we could say, in the case of someone like Stein, whose most experimental writing seems highly abstract, patently disconnected from views and opinions, or even from politics. Or maybe her political views, in fact, have a lot to do with her experimental writing. Tracing the lines of convergence between abstract modernist art and the real social world is hard work—but it is beginning to be done. Speaking of the fascist modernist Wyndham Lewis, Fredric Jameson has criticized the systematic “‘innocence’ of intellectuals” that gives a free pass to those whose work we admire, regardless of the context in which it was written or its ultimate aim. It is high time for us to strip away that innocence, and to produce a more inclusive, complex, and realistic portrait of our modernist predecessors and their work.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-6rFQ_d345MI/WKnLv-F3-9I/AAAAAAACPWY/GBiubFU4y0wgVqEuRumMvjHRRhyyldkMQCJoC/w506-h750/gert.jpg
16 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/100205988202051026828 Skitty “FWD” the Dictator : Current mood: Poland in a nutshell
Current mood: Poland in a nutshell
Watch the video: POLAND STRONG RUSSIA WE WAR YOU
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/3OwWoMzlTvAbZs-hj-C5Je9aI0kyDRfHrQh_N8aAD_6q6AZdtC67pFh5AgQxLBwOHAqN76GShLzu40e8A_XSoQ=w506-h284-n
FUK YOU RUSSIA POLAND STRONG
16 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/102702308182949821158 Dana Corbin : Please take this ridiculous survey created by the dictator. Use fake name and email.
Please take this ridiculous survey created by the dictator. Use fake name and email.
Mainstream Media Accountability Survey

20 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/103842074385725779714 Bob Saget (Stan) : Why is every Sacha Barren Cohen movie after Borat! always called "funnier than Borat!" like I ain't ...
Why is every Sacha Barren Cohen movie after Borat! always called "funnier than Borat!"
like I ain't kidding
Brüno was called that
I think The Dictator was called that too I think
And The Brothers Grimsby was called that too
I mean when you think about it
Does this mean Borat! wasn't that funny or
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/103765059315395624080 fatkul nur koi rudin : Get lyrics to The Dictator Decides by Pet Shop Boys at eLyrics.net.
Get lyrics to The Dictator Decides by Pet Shop Boys at eLyrics.net.
Pet Shop Boys – The Dictator Decides Lyrics
Get lyrics to The Dictator Decides by Pet Shop Boys at eLyrics.net.
1 day ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/100893996521908769519 Jane Wallace : NEWS DESK DONALD TRUMP AND THE ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE By David Remnick February 18, 2017 President...
NEWS DESK
DONALD TRUMP AND THE ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
By David Remnick February 18, 2017
President Trump seems determined to exploit the public’s mistrust of the media to the hilt, if only to distract his base from the disappointments that are sure to come.
President Trump seems determined to exploit the public’s mistrust of the media to the hilt, if only to distract his base from the disappointments that are sure to come.
PHOTOGRAPH BY PABLO MARTINEZ MONSIVAIS / AP
When the leaders of the Bolshevik movement—Lenin, Stalin, and the rest—used the term vrag naroda, an “enemy of the people,” it was an ominous epithet that encompassed a range of “wreckers” and “socially dangerous elements.” Enemies included clergy, intellectuals, monarchists, Trotskyists, “rootless cosmopolitans,” and well-to-do farmers. To be branded an enemy of the people was to face nearly inevitable doom; such a fate was soon followed by a knock on the door in the middle of the night, a prison cell, the Gulag, an icy ditch—a variety of dismal ends. To be called an “enemy of the people” did not mean you had to hold oppositional thoughts or commit oppositional acts; it only meant that the dictator had included you in his grand scheme to insure the compliance of the population.

Robespierre, one of the architects of the Jacobin Reign of Terror, set out to “horrify” the opposition, and his instruments were the epithet, righteousness, and the blade. “The revolutionary government owes to the good citizen all the protection of the nation,” he said. “It owes nothing to the Enemies of the People but death.”

In 1917, the same year as the Bolshevik seizure of power, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin published an essay in Pravda called “Enemies of the People,” in which he lionized the Jacobin Terror as “instructive.” His party, “the Jacobins of the twentieth century,” he wrote, should follow suit, if not with the guillotine, then with mass arrests of “the financial magnates and bigwigs.” Once in power, Lenin was far more brutal than the revolutionary French. He built the first outposts of the gulag archipelago. Stalin, Lenin’s energetic successor, expanded the system from western Russia to the Sea of Okhotsk, ten time zones to the east.

Now, Donald Trump, the elected President of the oldest democracy on earth, a real-estate brander and reality-T.V. star, has taken not to Pravda but to his own preferred instrument of autocratic pronouncement—the tweet—to declare the media “the enemy of the American people.” Here is the declaration in full:

Follow
Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
The FAKE NEWS media (failing @nytimes, @NBCNews, @ABC, @CBS, @CNN) is not my enemy, it is the enemy of the American People!
8:48 AM - 18 Feb 2017
43,752 43,752 Retweets 136,237 136,237 likes
For months, cool, responsible heads have been counselling hot, impulsive heads to avoid overreacting to Trump. We must give him a chance. We must not in all our alarm compare him to all the tin-pot dictators and bloody authoritarians who have disgraced history. The Oval Office—its realities and traditions—will temper his rages. His aides, his son-in-law, and his daughter will “soften” his impulsivity. Besides, he doesn’t really mean all he says. Even as Trump was signing one chilling executive order after another—all with the cool counsel of Steve Bannon, late of Breitbart—we were assured that everything was fine. He was simply fulfilling the agenda of his campaign. Calm down. Don’t react to every tweet. Don’t take the bait.
Then came his press conference, last week, his first solo press conference in office, and it was epochal. Ostensibly an occasion to announce a replacement appointment to the Department of Labor after the first had to step aside, Trump instead took it upon himself to denounce repeatedly and at length the sinful, dishonest press and the “very fake news” it produces. It was unforgettable. With all his nastiness, his self-admiring interruptions and commands (“Sit down! Sit down!”) Trump resembled an over-sauced guy at a bar who was facing three likely options in the near term: a) take a swing at someone, b) get clocked by someone else, or c) pass out and wake up on a hard, alien cot.

But the venue was not a bar. It was the White House, and this was hardly a joke. What Trump resembled at the lectern was an old-fashioned autocrat wielding a very familiar rhetorical strategy.

Joel Simon, the executive director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, makes the point that autocrats from Chávez to Erdoğan, Sisi to Mugabe, all follow a general pattern. They attack and threaten the press with deliberate and ominous intensity; the press, in turn, adopts a more oppositional tone and role. “And then that paves the way for the autocrat’s next move,” Simon told me. “Popular support for the media dwindles and the leader starts instituting restrictions. It’s an old strategy.” Simon pointed to Trump’s lack of originality, recalling that both Néstor Kirchner, of Argentina, and Tabaré Ramón Vázquez, of Uruguay, referred to the press as the “unelected political opposition.” And, as Simon has written, it was the late Hugo Chávez who first mastered Twitter as a way of bypassing the media and providing his supporters with alternative facts.

Trump, as indulgent parents say of an indolent child, is “not a big reader.” He may not hear every historical echo in his “enemy of the American people” tweet. What he does know, however, is that the American trust in “the media”—that generalized term that stretches from the Times to NewsMax—is miserably low. He is determined to exploit that to the hilt, if only to distract his base from the disappointments that are sure to come. On Saturday evening, he held a rally in Melbourne, Florida, and doubled down on the familiar theme: putting himself in the same league as Lincoln and Jefferson, he told the crowd, “Many of our greatest Presidents fought with the media and called them out.” The agenda is always to divide. “They have their own agenda, and their agenda is not your agenda,” he said.

At the same time, there are distinct signs that Trump is losing ground among members of the conservative media who had initially cut him some slack, not least because they felt the liberal media had been besotted by Barack Obama. The attacks on the legitimacy of the courts, on the intentions of the intelligence agencies, and on the patriotism of the press have become too evident, too repulsive to be discounted as mere sideshow. Joe Scarborough, the former Republican congressman from Florida and the co-host of “Morning Joe,” tweeted a telling call to the right on Friday: “Conservatives, feel free to speak up for the Constitution anytime the mood strikes. It is time.”

It’s true that Trump has not arrested any journalists. He has not shuttered any newspapers or television stations or Web sites. I went to work at The New Yorker on Friday and helped close a new issue that includes a deeply reported and tough-minded Letter from Washington, by Nicholas Schmidle, about the Michael Flynn affair, as well as a Comment by George Packer that notes that Trump, at his press conference, “behaved like the unhinged leader of an unstable and barely democratic republic.” Yes, there was a little trouble with a Xerox machine, but no one at the office counted it a threat to the First Amendment. In the meantime, the New York Times and the Washington Post­­ are engaged in a ferociously competitive battle to cover this new Administration that has bolstered the forces of fact and truth; and no one has shut off their computers or phones, either. At CNN, Jeff Zucker, the network president, has gotten telephone calls of bitter complaint from Jared Kushner about the coverage of his father-in-law, but if the performance of Jake Tapper and others there is any indication, the attempt to intimidate CNN has not deflated any spirits. The journalists at Mother Jones, MSNBC, BuzzFeed, The Atlantic, NPR, The National Review, the Marshall Project, ProPublica, and many other outlets are doing their work with determination and seriousness.

In Vladimir Putin’s Russia, as in every genuinely authoritarian state, there are no “enemies”—or, at least, none with the capacity to challenge power. Calling on all the repressive means available in such a state—compliant courts and legislatures; the elimination of political competition; comprehensive censorship of television—soaring popularity ratings are achieved. President Trump may wish for such means, just as he wishes for such popularity. For all the chaos and resulting gloom these past weeks, it has been heartening to see so many “enemies of the American people”—protesters, judges, journalists, citizens of all kinds, even some members of Congress—do their work despite Presidential denunciation, not necessarily as partisans of one party or another but as adherents to a Constitution.


David Remnick has been editor of The New Yorker since 1998 and a staff writer since 1992. More
MORE: DONALD TRUMP MEDIA FAKE NEWS

WATCH: Strongbox allows you to send tips, information, and files to The New Yorker with a greater degree of anonymity than conventional e-mail.


MOST POPULAR
Donald Trump and the Enemies of the American People
By David Remnick
Michael Flynn, General Chaos
By Nicholas Schmidle
My Last Day as a Surgeon
By Paul Kalanithi
Many in Nation Tired of Explaining Things to Idiots
By Andy Borowitz
A Selection of the 30 Most Disappointing Under 30
By Bess Kalb
Our Thirty Most Popular
Do you have a tip for The New Yorker that requires anonymity and security?
Send it via Strongbox. »

MORE FROM THE NEW YORKER
Letter from Washington

Michael Flynn, General Chaos
Nicholas Schmidle

Ryan Lizza

Why Trump Needs an Enemy
Ryan Lizza

Page-Turner

My Last Day as a Surgeon
Paul Kalanithi

Satire from the Borowitz Report

Many in Nation Tired of Explaining Things to Idiots
Andy Borowitz
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/115251688654530926288 countessarcadius : Michael Levine is a 25-year veteran of the DEA turned best-selling author and journalist. His articles...
Michael Levine is a 25-year veteran of the DEA turned best-selling author and journalist. His articles and interviews on the drug war have been published in numerous national newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and Esquire.

When Nixon first declared war on drugs in 1971, there were fewer than 500,000 hard-core addicts in the nation, most of whom were addicted to heroin. Three decades later, despite the expenditure of $1 trillion in tax dollars, the number of hard-core addicts is shortly expected to exceed five million. Our nation has become the supermarket of the drug world, with a wider variety and bigger supply of drugs at cheaper prices than ever before. The problem now not only affects every town on the map, but it is difficult to find a family anywhere that is not somehow affected. (pp. 158, 159)

The Chang Mai factory the CIA prevented me from destroying was the source of massive amounts of heroin being smuggled into the US in the bodies and body bags of GIs killed in Vietnam. (p. 165)

My unit, the Hard Narcotics Smuggling Squad, was charged with investigating all heroin and cocaine smuggling through the Port of New York. My unit became involved in investigating every major smuggling operation known to law enforcement. We could not avoid witnessing the CIA protecting major drug dealers. Not a single important source in Southeast Asia was ever indicted by US law enforcement. This was no accident. Case after case was killed by CIA and State Department intervention and there wasn't a damned thing we could do about it. CIA-owned airlines like Air America were being used to ferry drugs throughout Southeast Asia, allegedly to support our "allies." CIA banking operations were used to launder drug money. (pp. 165, 166)

In 1972, I was assigned to assist in a major international drug case involving top Panamanian government officials who were using diplomatic passports to smuggle large quantities of heroin and other drugs into the US. The name Manuel Noriega surfaced prominently in the investigation. Surfacing right behind Noriega was the CIA to protect him from US law enforcement. As head of the CIA, Bush authorized a salary for Manuel Noriega as a CIA asset, while the dictator was listed in as many as 40 DEA computer files as a drug dealer. (pp. 166, 167)

The CIA and the Department of State were protecting more and more politically powerful drug traffickers around the world: the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan, the Bolivian cocaine cartels, the top levels of Mexican government, Nicaraguan Contras, Colombian drug dealers and politicians, and others. Media's duties, as I experienced firsthand, were twofold: first, to keep quiet about the gush of drugs that was allowed to flow unimpeded into the US; second, to divert the public's attention by shilling them into believing the drug war was legitimate by falsely presenting the few trickles we were permitted to indict as though they were major "victories," when in fact we were doing nothing more than getting rid of the inefficient competitors of CIA assets. (pp. 166, 167)

On July 17, 1980, drug traffickers actually took control of a nation. Bolivia at the time [was] the source of virtually 100% of the cocaine entering the US. CIA-recruited mercenaries and drug traffickers unseated Bolivia's democratically elected president, a leftist whom the US government didn't want in power. Immediately after the coup, cocaine production increased massively, until it soon outstripped supply. This was the true beginning of the crack "plague." (pp. 167, 168)

The CIA along with the State and Justice Departments had to combine forces to protect their drug-dealing assets by destroying a DEA investigation. How do I know? I was the inside source. I sat down at my desk in the American embassy and wrote the kind of letter that I never myself imagined ever writing. I detailed three pages typewritten on official US embassy stationary—enough evidence of my charges to feed a wolf pack of investigative journalists. I also expressed my willingness to be a quotable source. I addressed it directly to Strasser and Rohter, care of Newsweek. Two sleepless weeks later, I was still sitting in my embassy office staring at the phone. Three weeks later, it rang. It was DEA's internal security. They were calling me to notify me that I was under investigation. I had been falsely accused of everything from black-marketing to having sex with a married female DEA agent. The investigation would wreak havoc with my life for the next four years. (pp. 168-171)

In one glaring case, an associate of mine was sent into Honduras to open a DEA office in Tegucigalpa. Within months he had documented as much as 50 tons of cocaine being smuggled into the US by Honduran military people who were supporting the Contras. This was enough cocaine to fill a third of US demand. What was the DEA response? They closed the office. (p. 175)

Sometime in 1990, US Customs intercepted a ton of cocaine being smuggled through Miami International Airport. A Customs and DEA investigation quickly revealed that the smugglers were the Venezuelan National Guard headed by General Guillen, a CIA "asset" who claimed that he had been operating under CIA orders and protection. The CIA soon admitted that this was true. If the CIA is good at anything, it is the complete control of American mass media. So secure are they in their ability to manipulate the mass media that they even brag about it in their own in-house memos. The New York Times had the story almost immediately in 1990 and did not print it until 1993. It finally became news that was "fit to print" when the Times learned that 60 Minutes also had the story and was actually going to run it. The highlight of the 60 Minutes piece is when the administrator of the DEA, Federal Judge Robert Bonner, tells Mike Wallace, "There is no other way to put it, Mike, [what the CIA did] is drug smuggling. It's illegal [author's emphasis]." (pp. 188, 189)

The fact is – and you can read it yourself in the federal court records – that seven months before the attempt to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993, the FBI had a paid informant, Emad Salem, who had infiltrated the bombers and had told the FBI of their plans to blow up the twin towers. Without notifying the NYPD or anyone else, an FBI supervisor "fired" Salem, who was making $500 a week for his work. After the bomb went off, the FBI hired Salem back and paid him $1.5 million to help them track down the bombers. But that's not all the FBI missed. When they finally did catch the actual bomber, Ramzi Yousef (a man trained with CIA funds during the Russia-Afghanistan war), the FBI found information on his personal computer about plans to use hijacked American jetliners as fuel-laden missiles. The FBI ignored this information, too. (p. 191

1 day ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/115251688654530926288 countessarcadius : Michael Levine is a 25-year veteran of the DEA turned best-selling author and journalist. His articles...
Michael Levine is a 25-year veteran of the DEA turned best-selling author and journalist. His articles and interviews on the drug war have been published in numerous national newspapers and magazines, including the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and Esquire.

When Nixon first declared war on drugs in 1971, there were fewer than 500,000 hard-core addicts in the nation, most of whom were addicted to heroin. Three decades later, despite the expenditure of $1 trillion in tax dollars, the number of hard-core addicts is shortly expected to exceed five million. Our nation has become the supermarket of the drug world, with a wider variety and bigger supply of drugs at cheaper prices than ever before. The problem now not only affects every town on the map, but it is difficult to find a family anywhere that is not somehow affected. (pp. 158, 159)

The Chang Mai factory the CIA prevented me from destroying was the source of massive amounts of heroin being smuggled into the US in the bodies and body bags of GIs killed in Vietnam. (p. 165)

My unit, the Hard Narcotics Smuggling Squad, was charged with investigating all heroin and cocaine smuggling through the Port of New York. My unit became involved in investigating every major smuggling operation known to law enforcement. We could not avoid witnessing the CIA protecting major drug dealers. Not a single important source in Southeast Asia was ever indicted by US law enforcement. This was no accident. Case after case was killed by CIA and State Department intervention and there wasn't a damned thing we could do about it. CIA-owned airlines like Air America were being used to ferry drugs throughout Southeast Asia, allegedly to support our "allies." CIA banking operations were used to launder drug money. (pp. 165, 166)

In 1972, I was assigned to assist in a major international drug case involving top Panamanian government officials who were using diplomatic passports to smuggle large quantities of heroin and other drugs into the US. The name Manuel Noriega surfaced prominently in the investigation. Surfacing right behind Noriega was the CIA to protect him from US law enforcement. As head of the CIA, Bush authorized a salary for Manuel Noriega as a CIA asset, while the dictator was listed in as many as 40 DEA computer files as a drug dealer. (pp. 166, 167)

The CIA and the Department of State were protecting more and more politically powerful drug traffickers around the world: the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan, the Bolivian cocaine cartels, the top levels of Mexican government, Nicaraguan Contras, Colombian drug dealers and politicians, and others. Media's duties, as I experienced firsthand, were twofold: first, to keep quiet about the gush of drugs that was allowed to flow unimpeded into the US; second, to divert the public's attention by shilling them into believing the drug war was legitimate by falsely presenting the few trickles we were permitted to indict as though they were major "victories," when in fact we were doing nothing more than getting rid of the inefficient competitors of CIA assets. (pp. 166, 167)

On July 17, 1980, drug traffickers actually took control of a nation. Bolivia at the time [was] the source of virtually 100% of the cocaine entering the US. CIA-recruited mercenaries and drug traffickers unseated Bolivia's democratically elected president, a leftist whom the US government didn't want in power. Immediately after the coup, cocaine production increased massively, until it soon outstripped supply. This was the true beginning of the crack "plague." (pp. 167, 168)

The CIA along with the State and Justice Departments had to combine forces to protect their drug-dealing assets by destroying a DEA investigation. How do I know? I was the inside source. I sat down at my desk in the American embassy and wrote the kind of letter that I never myself imagined ever writing. I detailed three pages typewritten on official US embassy stationary—enough evidence of my charges to feed a wolf pack of investigative journalists. I also expressed my willingness to be a quotable source. I addressed it directly to Strasser and Rohter, care of Newsweek. Two sleepless weeks later, I was still sitting in my embassy office staring at the phone. Three weeks later, it rang. It was DEA's internal security. They were calling me to notify me that I was under investigation. I had been falsely accused of everything from black-marketing to having sex with a married female DEA agent. The investigation would wreak havoc with my life for the next four years. (pp. 168-171)

In one glaring case, an associate of mine was sent into Honduras to open a DEA office in Tegucigalpa. Within months he had documented as much as 50 tons of cocaine being smuggled into the US by Honduran military people who were supporting the Contras. This was enough cocaine to fill a third of US demand. What was the DEA response? They closed the office. (p. 175)

Sometime in 1990, US Customs intercepted a ton of cocaine being smuggled through Miami International Airport. A Customs and DEA investigation quickly revealed that the smugglers were the Venezuelan National Guard headed by General Guillen, a CIA "asset" who claimed that he had been operating under CIA orders and protection. The CIA soon admitted that this was true. If the CIA is good at anything, it is the complete control of American mass media. So secure are they in their ability to manipulate the mass media that they even brag about it in their own in-house memos. The New York Times had the story almost immediately in 1990 and did not print it until 1993. It finally became news that was "fit to print" when the Times learned that 60 Minutes also had the story and was actually going to run it. The highlight of the 60 Minutes piece is when the administrator of the DEA, Federal Judge Robert Bonner, tells Mike Wallace, "There is no other way to put it, Mike, [what the CIA did] is drug smuggling. It's illegal [author's emphasis]." (pp. 188, 189)

The fact is – and you can read it yourself in the federal court records – that seven months before the attempt to blow up the World Trade Center in 1993, the FBI had a paid informant, Emad Salem, who had infiltrated the bombers and had told the FBI of their plans to blow up the twin towers. Without notifying the NYPD or anyone else, an FBI supervisor "fired" Salem, who was making $500 a week for his work. After the bomb went off, the FBI hired Salem back and paid him $1.5 million to help them track down the bombers. But that's not all the FBI missed. When they finally did catch the actual bomber, Ramzi Yousef (a man trained with CIA funds during the Russia-Afghanistan war), the FBI found information on his personal computer about plans to use hijacked American jetliners as fuel-laden missiles. The FBI ignored this information, too. (p. 191

1 day ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114574083245220430729 Sun-Young Jung (ANNE) : Why accusing- After slandering a lot, Choi Geum Sook and the basement brothel call themselves as if...
Why accusing-

After slandering a lot, Choi Geum Sook and the basement brothel call themselves as if warm mom

Those former university guys were that clever in search for some rich women for convenient lives. In that context, Gerhardt and his wife and the restaurant maid and the diplomat evaded some hard work and pretend as if they did something invisible. Hahm Chaibong also wrote in a magazine the he was happy that he could evade the difficult work of study for Korean entrance exam. Although they are bluffing as if something more in studying area, they say, "studying is nothing", after evading some genuine difficult work of study. Especially those slandering university guys and Gerhardt tend to evade some hard effort and search for some lucrativeness. Didn't Gerhardt say that he would not get together with women without money. He is romantic, somehow. Choi Geum Sook is his maid.





↳The excited nuns sent by Choi Geum Sook, the spy in Songpa district. This invincible slandering daughter of Choi Taemin always sent some nuns at the last phase of her fraud and accusation if her slandering fraud didn't work out. Then, she says that she is a mom with hurt hear because she gave birth to a disabled baby. Due to her slandering deceptive behavior, it is imaginable how much she might have used her female organ at random. She laughed and laughed when I tried to talk with her because she made fraud on a driver. She laughed and laughed ridiculing me. Even to a new military man who was unknown to her, she was talking about me, laughing and laughing, while I was on the line. She was not any mom with heart.


*Fr. Jan. 13. 2016
(Personally)
eMail to America:
Tonight, the lecherous daughter of the restaurant maid seems to mobilize more young Youths, in spreading fraud. She and Choi Geum Sook always mobilize some membership of the PC Room where I get to. These guys are extremely excited with Choi Geum Sook’s lecherous rhetoric.

She must have got succeeded to Choi Taemin’s slandering and deception. She is invincibly vindictive and slandering. What is more, she laughed and laughed. Seemingly, these ignorant volatile youths are yelling due to some unknown excited stimulation from Chi Geum Sook. I do not like such an undisciplined extreme volatile Youth’s pathos.



Because Choi Geum Sook and Park Keun Hye and Robinson must have spread the photos of my abdomen, please ask the Korean officials to transmit the photos of Park Keun Hye’s vestiges of abortion and giving birth to. The lecherous Park Keun Hye and Robinson must have sent another new man to upstairs. Please help me so that those unknown Youths could not humiliate me, in collaboration with Choi Geum Sook and Robinsons and Wollek and the former 119 man. They might be sending harmful rays to my mother now, in order to inflict harm to her. The restaurant maid perpetually made phone calls to my eldest brother, behind me, with distorted words.

The restaurant maid is a sibling of the former prostitute who gave me a key directly twenty five years ago, at Kim Sam Ji's apartment. It is scary and surprising that she even moved to the house where I'm living now. If having such a big energy, those senders of her had better learn English, instead of asserting as if I went on a trip with Charlie Brovo, in collaboration with the daughter of the restaurant maid who is not any disciplined woman but says that she is more of all because she gave birth to. Sending rays to the other women's abdomen is not any doing more of the others, neither warm mom as she asserts of herself. Please help my mother so that the guys upstairs could not send any rays to her.



This graduate of highschool says, "Should we get away just because we did not study?" After following me and making fraud for many years, she says so, if it didn't work out, in collaboration with Choi Jung Lak and the former head of Severance Hospital, the old Choi, who sent her to the house.



This greedy daughter of the restaurant maid even made a direct phone call to some social workers and uttered, "Good Morning, How are you, Zai Zehen..," in addition to some more conversation. Then, she asserted as if tri-lingual while strongly asserting as if I went on a trip with Charliie Bravo to learn English. She also asserted that Yonsei University is easy to enter and that she did not enter university because she had without money. Not all university students are rich when entering university. She is not any disciplined woman. After all those rhetoric didn't work out, she says these days that she is a mom and more of all. Ha Ha. Whether or not this deceptive woman would think so, she has been annoying me since she and her family followed me into the current house, as a sibling of the very prostitute who gave me the key directly twenty five years ago. It is a scary stalking. But Yun Seong Jin and Choi Jung Lak say that they are good karma to me. Ha Ha. These stalking widowers make the others say that I should not car the personal lives of the restaurant maid upstairs. Although they sent her to the house since ten years. Ha Ha. These widowers and she perpetually sent some clinic guys and seniorium persons at night. If it didn't work out, these scary greedy oldmen and the slaking restaurant maid said that they did not know my name.



Even after following to my house with combing all, they say so. How much suffering I might have getting through, if they sent such a sibling of the woman who gave me the key twenty five years ago? They are scary vindictive stalkers. They had better mind their own business, instead of coming my personal lives. Into the basement of my house, these stalking old widowers sent another former prostitute who made the job in Japan. These scary lecherous men brazenly say that they will help me after finding which men I got together.


* Sat. Jan. 14. 2016
(Personally)eMail to America:
Yesterday, I told you about Kim Jae Shin and Choi Jae Cheol who might be the sibling of Kim Jai Kyu and Chi Jae Wook, respectively. Hahm Chaibong and Park Keun Hye and Robinsons erased the content of that content from my file, in treason motivation. Chi Jae Cheol must be a son or brother of Choi Jae Wook who cleverly evaded the Aungsan bombing, knowingly. He must have been informed of the bombing previously and evaded it. Choi Jung Lak must have informed him of it because he and Yun Sang Hyun must have plotted it.
It is most viciou sof Choi Jung Lak and Hahm Chaibong that they erased the content of the email sent to you.
If Choi Jae Wook knew it, he shouldn't have saved his own life only. It is most mean of him.
Chou Geum Sook and Choi Jung Lak plant only their siblings into the Korean government. So, these siblings of the traitors are caring for Chung Yoora in Europe also.
Since I stayed in Germany, these siblings of Choi Taemin ridiculed me that I made a research on the Korean 'dictator'. After having robbed hi safe long years ago and bought a lot of real estate in a few years, with Park Chunghee's cash, they seem to have had prick of conscience. kim Jong Pil might have been most greedy because Jun Du Hwan occupied the presidency although he was sure as if he could grab the position. They plotted the Aungsan bombing also, after murdering Park Chunghee, in greed for the safe and the position of presidency. They must have deceived Kim Ja Kyu also, with the fake painting, after depriving cost from him.

Sun-Young Jung

* Thu. Jan. 5. 2016
(Personally)
(Personally)
eMail to America:
Although I saved the content of email sent to you, Park Keun Hye and Hahm Chaibong and Robinsons erased the description on the banging by the restaurant maid. The other day, I sent the photo of the cute buttressing stuff of turtle with explaining the banging of the doors. But Park Keun Hye and Robinsons and Hahm Chaibong erased it. It is scary because these treasonous traitors got trivial and made more augmented fraud to some social workers. Sometimes, they made adroit fraud and input much antipathy, sending some seniorium persons or policemen all of sudden. It was scary.
Would you please transmit the attached files to some officials to whom they might have reached for a new? Please tell them that they erased many contents from my files. Please tell the Denmark Justices and the German ministers that the wife of Gerhardt and Choi Geum Sook sent the restaurant maid since ten years, after searching for the woman who gave me the key directly twenty five years ago. I have been suffering from unspeakably painful fraud of this follower sent by Gerhardt's wife and Choi Geum Sook. They have been doing the fraud everyday since ten years. If I got to the small academy, Choi Myung Sook and Lim Kyung Seok mae a lot of fraud, as you proved it by reaching for the academy directly, after I wrote their address and names. Please tell them also that you proved that Wollek took huge cash from Himmelmann even after she made huge accusation behind Gerhardt. After deceiving the officials as if he did not, Wollek says another rhetoric again and again. My female friend in Germany called him as Psychopath, watching how he annoyed me while I stayed in Germany.

Please tell them that you reached for the very Korean male student of dormitory of whom I told you. Please tell them also that you made it sure with the Korean outright officials that the woman in the basement did make prostitution and abortion in Japan for many years. Hahm Chaibong and Park Keun Hye and Lee Kyung Sook and the Gerhardts and Robinsons have been slandering to new officials as if she were only a simple mom, asking them to send e to hospital. It has been painful years to me. Please tell them also that the brothel in the basement sent prostitute Kwak to the prosecutor, Kim Hyung Joon and he other judge, in order to shatter them. It has been steered by Choi Jung Lak and Lee Kyung Sook and her husband, Mr. Michelle Robinson.
I would appreciate you if you help me.

Sincerely,

Sun-Young Jung


banging of the restaurant maid-
(Although Idid saved this part of description of baning, Park Keun Hye and Hahm Chaibong and Robinson always erased it repeatedly and said some distorted words to new officials.)
* Sat. Dec 23. 2016
(Personally)
eMail to America: banging of the restaurant maid
The restaurant maid has been banging their door these days deliberately many times, everyday. They sometimes took many policemen and recorded their own sound and made accusations more.
Until a few years ago, I opened my window and the doors.
(These days, I closed all pf my doors firmly).
There are winds if opening door. So, some doors closed itself with banging loudly. That's why I bought this prop of support to keep baning sound although expensive. While being cute, it was useful. These days, I did not open any windows neither any door.
In view of the restaurant maid's banging repeatedly, they seem to accuse it, although it is they that have been banging with their doors. They frequently took some huge families and romped around all day ling, many times for many years.
But they still say as if I did something wrong.
They pretend as if fond of small daily lives while only exerting themselves on fraud on me ever since moving the house. Please help me so that this greedy restaurant maid could not slander to the German officials. It is this restaurant maid that followed me since ten years as the wife of Gerhardt steered.
I would appreciate you if you help me.
Sun-Young Jung







↳The excited nuns sent by Choi Geum Sook, the spy of Korea in Songpa district
If Choi Geum Sook could not make any more fraud through officials, she always resort to some nuns and church, asking them to send me to hospital. So excited volatile nuns even get near to me directly. I asked the state officials to see through their belly if they made abortion. Some of them did make so. They had better mind their own business, getting more right conscience. Within their category of going through, they believe Choi Geum Sook's fraudulent rhetoric.
Although I wrote down this content, Hahm Chaibomg erased it. from my files. It is brazen of him to dare to infiltrate into the other's area and property. He has been working with the Chois in an institute, believing all their lies. But he said as if wholehearted to me as a 'horse'.


*Sat. Nov. 5. 2016
(Personally)
The former 119 man and Yun Seong Jin have been sure that they are more of me and could have me, because I made part time job in Germany. So, these widowers always attach such a cleaning woman wherever I went. Sometimes, they happened to do their work. But most of them were sent by the former old 119 oldman and Choi Myung Sook. If I got to the department store, theses stalking widowers will make learning to me that I should not spend on luxury things. They even got much concerned if only I spend for electricity with bill of fifty dollars in summer. So, these widowers were willing to send me to hospital if made much bill of telephone cost although it is they that have made me explain through phone call. It has been much hindrance of my daily lives.

They usually link some social workers through those workers of building also, spreading severe fraud, making them ridicule me and call me 'ajumma'. If it doesn't work out, they will play as if they were more rife and more of all.

They usually starts with the rhetoric about the diplomat Kwon as if wholehearted and about 'Paris Texas'. It was distributed only in the year of 1984 when he desired Lee Hui Hyng type of woman. It is an annoyance from behind the scene because I had to think about non favorite persons.

Yun Seong Jin and the former 119 man always reached for Choi Sun Sil when I hot in touch with Jeong Ho Seong, in order to say the same

fraudulent words. Jeong Ho Seong listened to Choi Sun Sil. The former 119 oldman and Yun Seong Jin and Choi Myung Sook told the same repeated fraud which they did to the other officials.

I'd like to say that the real culprit is lurking behind the scene, shifting the charges all only to the executives. The very culprit is Yun Seong Jin and the former old 119 man. They usually conceal themselves behind the scene.

Please ask the UN directors and Security Forum Swiss and French Supreme Justices to make Lim Seok Chang and the stalking judge from Daejon move to other region. They are Robinson's radical lines. They usually shatter the outright stream of Korea. Please ask the French Justices to write letters to investigate the stalking judge from Daejon if there is sponsor and bribed. He will make learned women as

professors as of duty. In his limited way of thinking, he is hardened on professorship of Gerhardt as if benevolent. Please help me so that he could not only pursue shinier things of position of those stalkers while disregarding the genuine efforts of me.



Sun-Young Jung





*Wed. Oct. 15. 2016

(Personally)

eMail to America:

I described the following content and saved in my file, but Hahm Chaibong and the womanizer Byung Kook erased all as Mr. Michelle Robinson and Gerhardt wished. As a servant of Lee Kyung Sook, Hahm Chaibong believes the lie of the woman in the basement who is the sibling of Lee Kyung Sook. He wrote something negative about me, which I noticed. So, I tried to explain by sending emails. I shouldn't have do that. I should have made him mistake as if I went to Germany to marry after buying clothes. During the explaining, my learned aspects were revealed to some righteous officials. So, he got jealous. This man has been willing to be privileged owing to his former father's position. He did write in social magazine that he was happy because he could evade the difficult entrance exam of Korean university.



On my google + site, Hahm Chaibong erased the content although he cannot know the facts, brazenly.

As a virtual doctor, I taught school children with pleasure at a small academy for school children. It was pleasant for me if I got together with the female lecturers at snack food house or at Karaoke. We cleaned the class room because school children had better not clean the classroom due to dirts. It got late, after we got together at snack food house, getting a drink together. I could only drink only two small straight of rice wine. Whenever I got back home, I happened to be faced with the daughter of the restaurant maid with her ex boy friend who was walking her, embracing eagerly. If I got a drink with the female lecturers at midnight, Yun Sang Hyun and Yun Sanghee always sent their brother-in-law into the basement of this house at that time. Through the former tenant, the Yuns asked some psychiatrists to send me to hospital, saying that I was drunk. Ha Ha.



Whenever I taught school children at small academy, with pleasure, the retired Gerhardt always pretended as if willing to upgrade me, if I overcame the severe fraud by those stalkers, hindered my work, six times in all. Because it was painful due to the intrigue through the other lecturers, I once took a lecturer's cell phone to bathroom and surfed the telephone numbers from which she took (Jasmin's cell phone at 'Spelling Bee' in Mog Dong). There were many phone calls from Lim Kyung Seok and Choi Myung Sook and Park Kyung Hwa who were all unknown to me. Park Kyung Hwa's phone number was most conspicuous because it came from Jeong-up City. I dialed the number and simply asked if it was a company for school children's book or sheets of learning material. In full of hypocrite voice, she denied and hang up instantly in brusque manner. In a few weeks, I made a phone call again and made the same question without saying anything, in calmness. Then, she said that she would call police if I asked the same question again. Ha Ha. She was very suspicious. So, I made a phone call in two month again. Her son said that his father is a professor after I asked if his father is a owner of construction company. I got it and surfed the internet if there was any good university in Jeong-eup City. There was only third-graded college. Lim Choeng Kyu was her husband who is only a master, not any doctor, at department of internet. (He seems to major in hacking, as a spay lecturer.) Because I could not know who they were, I just told the gate guard of that college that I picked up fifty dollars in his small memo book. At hearing of fifty dollars, he told all his cell phone number and his name and his department. Ha Ha. The sibling of Park Kyung Hwa likes money only. Whenever I told that I picked up fifty dollars, her siblings always told who they were. Ha Ha



Many years later, they slandered to my eldest sister-in-law as if the head of a university in Sucheon were friend of her. His name was Lim Sang Kyu, in the same family rhyme of Lim ◯Kyu like Lim Cheong Kyu. Although righteous officials proved that they are same family members, these siblings made someone lie to my elder sister and my eldest brother as if I tend to take all the persons of same family name belonged to the same siblings. They ridiculed me, saying, "You are nothing." Although I saved Park Tae Hwan, I could not say it to my family, because Park Kyung Hwa's siblings already said a lot of lie as if megalo maniac. She even pretended as if her sibling saved him by capturing the picture at tv and giving it to an umpire. Ha Ha. If in such a subtlety, how could a picture of tv prove that he did not move his shoulder, which should be scrutinized in delicacy?



If I called a surrogate driver, Choi Geum Sook reached for him and slandered with various fraud. This slandering woman's name was registered at his cell phone with the description of 'defence ministry'. When I told it to the officials, this slandering woman told that she happened to meet him at Catholic church although he always told that he was a Presbyterian Christian, recommending me also to go to church. Ha Ha. The old Choi who was the head of Severance Hospital and his sibling have been slandering in such a vindictive way since long. He was the plotter of assassination of Park Chunghee. He and the traitors robbed his safe. Choi Sun Sil is his niece. These siblings of Choi are the traitors to our country as well as to the North. Their sibling's gain and lucrative position matter only, which side of two Korean would be shattered.

Many years ago, some righteous Korean officials did tell me that they are all the cousins between themselves.



(Fr. Nov. 11. 2016) The Yuns and Choi Myung Sook have been intriguing like when they made a lot of fraudulent phone calls to 'Spelling Bee' academy. It is trauma to me that those invisible vindictive women and men unknown to me told a lot of lie behind the scene. They are now stirring up our country lso, with Choi Sun Sil.



Although the description as above is true, Hahm Chaibong is brazenly erasing my writing at google + at random.



Would you please reach for the lecturer named Jasmin if she is still there if my saying is true? The owner of the small academy was educated in England. Since long, there seems to have been intriguers from England. from Jasmin's cell phone I could watch the phone number of Park Kyung Hwa. Jasmin was an inborn Seoulite and she said clearly that there was no friend, neither any guys known to her in Cheonbuk region. So, I got strong suspicion on Park Kyung Hwa.

On Jamin's cell phone, there were many phone calls from Choi Myung Sook and Park Kyung Hwa and Lim Kyung Seok and social welfare center. I still have the memo which I scribbled in haste, with my heart beating in haste at the bath room there. Ha Ha. The phone number from Park Kyung Hwa was registered at her cell phone. It was an odd intrigue everyday. There names were registered as if friend with names only. I scarcely wrote the number with my heart beating. Ha Ha. If taking the others' cell phone to bathroom, it made my heart beating. I still keep the scribbled number on my memo. But for many years, I could not know at all who they are. Gradually only, I could vaguely noticed what they are because they continued to make fraud on me. I got to there thrice a week.

Please reach for the academy and Jasmin and transmit the description on Gerhardt and Robinson and the diplomat. Please transmit the evaluation on them by he American outright psychiatrist.



When I surfed the cell phone of the surrogate driver, there was the name Choi Geum Sook with the cell phone number at the expected time as I fathom. I scribbled the number on my memo sheet, which still exists.

After I told it to the officials, she instantly changed the number, saying a lie as if I were deluded. It happened about nine yeard ago.

I would like to tell you also about Choi Geum Sook and how I got to know that she was working at Defense ministry. The surrogate driver registered her name with the title 'defense ministry'. Because he told a lot of odd suspicious comment to me, I asked him to borrow his cell phone and surfed the numbers and wrote down on memo sheet, at that time. I still have those scribbled writings. She made a lot of phone calls. If I tried to make a talk with her, her husband or some man answered and transmitted my call to her. Then, she ridiculed me, laughing and laughing, while calling me 'ajumma'. She seemed to be an inborn ignorant slanderer. I hate such a vulgar undisciplined volatile woman. She must be still slandering to the passers-by on street. She likes it. Toward unknown military men, she told about me in distorted way, a lot while talking on a telephone with me.

(Fr. Nov. 11. 2016) The Yuns and Choi Myung Sook have been intriguing like when they made a lpt of fraudulent phone calls to 'Spelling Bee' academy. It is trauma to me that those invisible vindictive women and men unknown to me told a lot of lie behind the scene. They are now stirring up our country also, with Choi Sun Sil.



Although the description as above is true, Hahm Chaibong is brazenly erasing my writing at google + at random.



Sun-Young Jung



p.s.

Choi Myung Sook and the old Choi have been slandering since long. Their sibling, Choi Sun Sil has been steering Park Keun Hye with various flattering, in order to press lucrative gain, using her position. In collaboration with the former old 119, these Choi's siblings have been slandering since long. They substituted Park Keun Hye for Yuk Yeong Soo's daughter. In treason motivation, they have been steering this daughter of Lee Hyun Lan, while pressing much lucrative gain. In order to commit such a slandering and treason, thse siblings of the old Choi must have substituted her for Yuk Yeong Soo's daughter. If these siblings treason didn't work out, Choi Myung Sook and Choi Sun Sil and Robinson usually plt such a disaster like Sewol or the bus crash, in order to evoke revolt. During the chaos, these siblings nd Robinson will only rob the safe or account, like this faction did against Park Chunghee. Choi Sun Sil has been the Korea president. She and her old unlce, the former head of Severance Hospital seem to have been making American president also. It is a scary greed of these siblings. With the robbed cash from the safe of Park Chunghee, these siblings have been swirling up the Korean as well as American Senates and politics. Please make a set up so that these siblings of Choi Taemin could not usurp any more money through slandering, using the Blue House power. The already robbed cash from Park Chunghee should be returned to Park Keun Ryeong who is the truly daughter of Yuk Yeong Soo. Choi Myung Sook and Choi Geum Sook are robbers. In such a treason, these women started to poison my Kimchi since a few years, whenever my mother sent Kimchi, in collaboration with Wollek and the Gerhardts. They still put something into my running water. These women of Choi and Robinson are treason motivated.





* Thu. Nov. 10. 2016

(Personally)

eMail to America:

They are even erasing my description on the Spelling Bee's lecturer Jasmin and Choi Myung Sook' phone calls. They have been erasing my files of this description two times more. Choi Myung Sook and Choi Geum Sook and Lim Kyung Seok are all siblings of Choi Taemin and Choi Sun Sil. They made a lot of phone call to the places where taught school children. Through Hahm and the diplomat Kwon, these traitors erased my description again and again through hacking.

Choi Myung Sook is a sibling of Choi Sun Sil. Because they robbed the safe of Park Chunghee, they have been making long such fraud and accusation. Lim Kyung Seok's sister was a fifth wife of Choi Taemin. They made a lot of phone calls to Spelling Bee Academy where I taught school children.

How much prick of conscience these siblings of Choi Taemin might have had, after realizing that I made a research on the 'dictator' whose main safe they robbed long years ago? They have been ridiculing me that I made a research on the 'dictator' since I stayed in Germany.

Although you made the right investigation and proved my appeal, Park Keun Hye and Robinson's husband and Gerhardt erased all the descriptions through the diplomat Kwon.

Would you please tell the head of the international Amnesty and the French Supreme Justices and the Security Forum Swiss and German Justices abd American Court that you made the right investigation and proved that Choi Myung Sook and Lim Myung Seok called a lot to the Spelling Bee? Park Keun Hye is deceiving them as of it never happened as if I were deluded. Please help me.



The husband of Robinson and Gerhardt and Park Keun Hye will deceive new officials and Justices as if I were deluded with following of those traitors.

*Sat. Dec. 28. 2016
(Personally)
eMail to America: an inborn slandering woman, Choi Geum Sook

Today, I bought a few cucumber at the mart near my house.
The daughter of the restaurant maid changed even the cucumbers into other poisoned ones holding much more water. If normal, the wet humidity never flows. If changed, there is much water and almost flows. It is really painful. She will not get back to her husband still stays there, in order to inflict harm to my mother, by sending rays to her, through the CCTV measure installed by Hahm Chaibong and Cho Sam Yoeng who is a sibling of the pimp Cho Yun Seon. She will match mate to me also by attaching the lecherous widower in Seo-daemun district, in collaboration with Robinson's husband.

When I got back home, the restaurant maid's husband was stand by, keeping timing of being face with me. Many times, he waited for me, while smiling. His wife smiled at me, even after this couple murdered my father in collaboration with Hahm Chaibong and Cho Yun Seon. I smiled at them also. It is a bitter world. After calling German policmen to my room at the dormitory amny times, the department store cashier smiled at me also.

Today, this laborer timely got on his truck. Even when I greeted him, he instantly turned on the engine of the truck and ran in a rush to somewhere else, in order to further rhetoric.

Choi Geum Sook and her husband always bother me in such a way.
Right before I got to the entrance of allay to my house, a woman whom I never saw before was waiting for me with his son. I was upset because she was waiting for me. I hate such a deceptive woman who waits for me but pretends as if by chance, even using his own kid. Although pretending as if calling a surrogate taxi, I knew she was after me, in obsession in peeping at me, at the ally. She would not stop his kind' crying, yelling more at him. In view of the abusing her own son in obsession in more excited things toward the other woman, in collaboration with some positioned man, she must have made prostitution in Japan. It should be investigated.

As soon as I sit at living room, another gentle man got upstairs, and the daughter of the restaurant maid is whispering lie to him now. There would be no such a deceptive family like the restaurant maid's upstairs. They followed me since ten years and have been annoying me everyday. They banged their doors also. After murdering my father, they will further inflict harm to my mother and my elder brother-in-law, by sending rays to them every night. They seldom sleepfor doing such a scary excited mission ordered by Jeong Keun Hye and Robinson and Gerhardt.

It is most absurd and brutal of the male official in Seo-daemun district and Robinson's husband that they are not interested in the poisoning of my running water but in the diplomat who pretends as if wholehearted. In the same slandering wholeheartedness, the widower at Seo-daemun district and Robinson's husband are annoying me.
After the brothel in the basement spread fraud to some invisible persons, she and Robinson abruptly sent some hospital guys to me. They are scary and tiring.
Choi Geum Sook has been slandering behind me since long. Although she and her sister Choi Myung Sook wee never known to me, they and Lim Kyung Seok made a lot of fraudulent phone calls to persons around me. If I got to small academies, they made fraudulent phone calls. It was proved that they did it. They are the siblings of Choi Taemin. Lim Seon-ee is said to be the fifth wife of Choi Taemin. Lim Kyung Seok must be her brother. hey robed the safe of Park Chunghee long years ago. They ridiculed me that I made a research on the Korean 'dictator' since I stayed in Germany. Before Choi Geum Sook's Choi Taemin met Park Keun Hye, he is said to have lived at a shabby one room at a slum area of Bulkwang Dong, the norther egion of Seoul. His siblings are said to have bought huge amount of real estate and buildings in Kangnam area in the nineteen eighties. How much prick of fretting conscience, these siblings of Choi Taemin might have had when they ridiculed me that I made a research on the Korean 'dictator'? While defending myself to their severe fraud, I got to know what they are. But Choi Geum Sook has been saying as if she never reached for the others bu as if I were deluded.

It was proved recently that Choi Myung Sook and Choi Geum Sook and Lim Kyung Seok and Park Kyung Hwa made a lot of fraudulent phone calls to the small academies, by the righteous Americans.
Because they bothered me ubiquitously, I once calla surrogate driver. At that time, I knew that someone might have made a phone call to him again. I asked him to borrow his cell phone and watched Choi Geum Sook and her phone number under the register of 'defense ministry'. Although he persuaded me to get to presbytarian church, saying that he was also presbytarian Christian, he said that he got to know her at Catholic church. It made me sure that Choi Geum Sook always reached for the nuns and Catholic covenant to send me to hospital. At last phase of her sever accusation and fraud, she always reached for some nuns, if her stealthy accusation throgh the officials didn't work out. Due to her further slandering and lie through that line, behind the officials, I had to explain the same content again right after the official accusation was finished. Then, she lied back to the former officials who just finished the stealthy accusation, as if she never did but as if I were still obsessed with the same thing. There would be no such a dirty slandering woman on earth. Choi Geum Sook is a maid of Wollek. Through her husband's branch of health care, she has been annoying me since many years.
After I watched her phone numbers at the cell phone of the driver, I tried to talk with her on the cell phone number. Her husband transmitted my call to her. But she slandered a lot, laughing and laughing at me. Even during the talk with me, she made a phone call to the other young military man, talking about me through another phone apparat, ridiculing me to him. Although he was unknown to her, she talked about me a lot for long minutes. She liked men, in typical slandering woman's gesture. She laughed and laughed. She called me 'ajumma' although she was married and gave birth to, which means that she is 'ajumma'. It was about ten years ago. In retrospect, her father, Choi Taemin, must have made such an invincible slandering to the Koreans. After laughing and ridiculing me, she changed her cell phone number next day and told other officials, "How did she know my phone number? How did she know it? How did she know my phone number?" She made even more severe fraud and accusation on me, saying more lie to new officials. She was an inborn slandering woman like her father, Choi Taemin. She was invincibly slandering deceptive woman.
Today's stalking woman must have been sent by this invincibly slandering woman, Choi Geum Sook, She is a maid of Wollek and Gerhardt. Since long, she has been doing spay role of Wollek and the lecherous Gerhardt. They share the typical vicious personality.

After it was proved recently that these siblings of Choi Taemin made a lot of phone calls to the small academy, this slandering woman kep the house wives and their kid from getting to the seats of food corner at the department store, leaving many seats free. Otherwise, she always sent many house wives and their kid, making them after me. Choi Geum Sook likes the trick of food. When pulling trick of domino effect toward North Korea, she and her colleagues liked to reach for the North Korean restaurants. On the very bloody night, her sibling Chung Seung Hwa was eating at the building next door to the party place of the 'dictator'. When these siblings of Choi Taemin made huge accusation with the faculties and the wife of Gerhardt in huge scale, in Germany, they yelled of 'buying rice', These siblings of Choi Taemin have the only obsession of eating and restaurant and rice. Maybe because their Choi Taemin was living at a shabby room in slum area in Seoul. After slandering Jeng Geun Hye, hey bought huge real estate and buildings. Lim Kyung Seok's sister, Lim Seon-ee, is said to have asserted as if she earned so much money by selling potatoes at the mart. But during those years, potatoes were the cheapest vegetables in Korea. No one in Korea could earn so much cash by selling potatoes.
Choi Geum Sook's husband seems to work at a branch of Social Health Care Insurance. His voice expresses that he might be a smaller man with his small thing. That's why Choi Geum Soo like so many new men, like the daughter of the restaurant maid upstairs have been taking new gentlemen almost every night. She was fluent speaking to an unknown man, breaking the talk while ai was still on the line. She was really deceptive slandering woman. Such a woman must have done worse behavior than the brothel in the basement of this house who was proved o have made a lot of abortion and prostitution on Japan for many years. That's why Choi Geum Sook gave birth to a disabled baby. I made it sure with my logical assumption. After listening her slandering voice and volatile deception and fondness of new unknown men, I made the logical assumption and made it sure, by asking the other officials. I was right. At that time, I asked the other officials if she had a disabled kid. During my education years, I learned in my teens that women have to keep their womb. If rolling holes like this brothel and Choi Geum Sook did, disabled babies would be given birth to. If not genetic disposition, most of disability is due to the mom's unethical tolling of their holes before marriage. Choi Geum Sook and this brothel in the basement are the very evidence themselves. These women are brazenly saying that their heart is hurt because she gave birth to disabled babies. When having many gentlemen irresponsibly, giving in her own lecherous lust, Choi Geum Sook and this brothel in the basement must have never hurt. Only abortion and their flesh must have been hurt. While making fraud and accusation, they say that they are moms and hurt due to the disability of the kids. These two whores are responsible for the disability themselves. But they will conceal their picking at random, because the hole is unseen and even use the disability of their kid, to draw some pity from the other outright officials, pretending as if warm hearted moms. These two whores are not that ordinary as moms. While picking ar random, they gave birth to disabled babies. To make more effective fraud, they use even the kids' disability, in shaming show of hurt of heart. I never ever heard of such a slandering invincible vicious woman like Choi Geum Sook. She is an inborn whore slanderer. Recently I could fathom why She must be a daughter of the very slanderer Choi Taemin who was the very cause of the bloody assassination of the Korean national leader. These sibling have some shared some feature of an invincible slandering in their own smiling composure and smile, which is eventually vicious impact on the outright humans.
In the like manner, Lee Hyun Lan's daughter has been slandering to Korean people as if she never gave birth to any baby. But Chung Yoora is her daughter who she gave birth to with Choi Taemin. The rightepus officials captured the photos of her abdomen and hole through gynecologists, proving that she made many abortions and giving birth to. But she said a lie to the Korean people as if she has been leading a solitary life. She is much more deceptive that Choi Geum Sook. In Korea. such a slandering does not belong to a personal life of a politician but a deception. If having so concealed personal life, she had better lead personal life further, instead of deceiving Korean people in many ways, rather than having greed for the official transparent presidency. While saying of mom, she deceives the Korean innocent people.

Sun-Young Jung





1 day ago - Via Google+ - View -