Sign in with Twitter

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites

Trending Topics: #リア充になれるのか#40MilNoMineirao#FreeMediaUnderAttack#SLSalCas#TheEspinosa1Week#askbusangtan#ŞevaLeyletülQedréBîmbarekBe政府調査委#WaahNaRadioTang#RedeMafiaSdvHUNGER GAMES IS ETERNAL#worldmeetsgirl#FoundingFathersin2016#hocayokmuşsonisyan#YargıSıfırlandı#GüldüyGüldüyShowÇocukAlparslanKuytul Hocaefendi#AyasofyadaKuranSesleriRhys Ifans#AX2016#AStrangeThingHappened#HagiaSophiaMosqueSince1453sora tob sakana#JulhoEFériasClubeSDV#LittleMixForVMAs#YüceAdanaBey#セイクリッドナイト石田三成重臣#StreamBodySayNOW#ILove5HCause#ÇinkomaniLollapalooza ColômbiaGerçek Kötüler#JoeyAndTheBrooks#TideVIP#1DMyFamily#ŞimdiHayatFelsefem#GetWellSoonYoungjae#jiangirlsarebeautiful#growingupbrazilian#MoveQuicklyOrFenerbahçe'den Van Persie#2milhoesLuisMariz#strikewitches#BumbumGranada100Milhões#VoltaLove#ZlatanTimeタミヨウ#7DaysUntilGreatEscapeCHICKENS WORKING#SonraBenŞunuDedim#2YearsOfDoingItRight#KadirGecesinde櫻井露伴アーラシュ#BayramZiyaretlerinde#GOSICK5周年祭#三宅健生誕祭滝沢乃南#BuGeceKurtuluşumuzOlsunPurge Election YearBobby TarantinoMondelez Makes Takeover Bid for HersheyRachel PlattenThe Legend of TarzanNBA free agencyBobby BonillaAdnan SyedAndrews Air Force BaseCanada DayEuro 2016TeslaBangladeshTimofey MozgovThe BFGSerena WilliamsBoris JohnsonOJ MayoJeremy LinBlink 182More

Most recent 20 results returned for keyword: TIME Magazine (Search this on MAP) Donna Van Wie : Estée Lauder (/ˈɛsteɪ ˈlɔːdər/; July 1, 1906 – April 24, 2004) was an American businesswoman. She was...
Estée Lauder (/ˈɛsteɪ ˈlɔːdər/; July 1, 1906 – April 24, 2004) was an American businesswoman. She was the co-founder, along with her husband, Joseph Lauder, of Estée Lauder Companies, her eponymous cosmetics company. Lauder was the only woman on TIME magazine's 1998 list of the 20 most influential business geniuses of the 20th century. She was the recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Sh... Read more at Wikipedia

Date of Birth: 01-Jul-1906

Place of Birth: Corona, New York, United States of America

Date of Death: 24-Apr-2004

Profession: Entrepreneur, Businessperson

Nationality: United States of America
Estée Lauder, Date of Birth, Place of Birth, Date of Death
Date of Birth, Place of Birth, Date of Death, Nationality of Estée Lauder (Entrepreneur, Businessperson)
7 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - aina seun maxwell : Neymar has signed a new five-year deal with Barcelona Neymar is the only Brazilian soccer player to ...
Neymar has signed a new five-year deal with Barcelona
Neymar is the only Brazilian soccer player to have graced
the cover of TIME magazine. In fact, the only other Brazilians to find
their way on the cover have been political leaders. Neymar was just beginning to showcase his skill in 2010 when an English
Neymar has signed a new five-year deal with Barcelona
Neymar is the only Brazilian soccer player to have graced the cover of TIME magazine. In fact, the only other Brazilians to find their way on the cover have been political leaders. Neymar was just beginning to showcase his s...
8 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - One Truth : How American Christians are Taking the Mark of the Beast –Without Even Recognizing it! IS THAT TRUE?...
How American Christians are Taking the Mark of the Beast –Without Even Recognizing it! IS THAT TRUE?
by Lorraine Day, M.D.


“Governments don’t want a population capable of critical thinking.

“They want obedient workers, people just smart enough to run the machines and just dumb enough to passively accept their situation.” – George Carlin


What is the Mark of the Beast?

“And he (the beast) causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

“And that no man might buy or sell except he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

“Here is wisdom.  Let him that has understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of man: and his number is 666.”  Revelation 13:16-18

The English word “mark” is the translation of the Greek word charagma, #5480 in Strong’s Concordance, which is essentially the same as the Greek word #5481 in Strong’s Concordance which is:  charakter.  Both words mean an etching, an engraving (such as an exact copy - or the “express image of”), or character.

Jesus was the “express image of God.”  Those who take (or have) the “Mark” of the Beast will be “the express image of” the Beast power.  They will have the same attitudes, morals, disposition and character as the Beast power!

The one who has the “Mark” of the Beast, therefore, is one who exhibits the “character” of the Beast, one who holds the same values, believes what the Beast power tells him, and behaves in the same ways as the Beast.

They “become like the beast” – they think and believe as the Beast power wants them to think and believe - because they have been totally deceived by the Beast Power, the power that owns and controls the media, Hollywood, the money supply of every country on the earth, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, the power that controls every President irrespective of the party to which that President belongs.

A New World Order/One World Government
Geroge Herbert Walker Bush, former President of the U.S., Director of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateralist, CIA Director, member of the occult, elitist Skull & Bones Society, spoke before Congress on September 11,1990 – just eleven years to the day (this was no coincidence) before the destruction of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001.  He was addressing the subject of the Gulf War, and made his first public utterance of his, and his rich cronies’ plans for a world imperialism in stating that the war against Iraq was

“…a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation.  Out of these troubled times…a new world order can emerge.”

Remember the slogan of Communism:

“Order out of Chaos.”

The Communists first create the Chaos.  Then, they bring “order” – their own brand of “order” – out of the Chaos, an “order” of tyranny that crushes all opposition to its rule!

Carroll Quigley, Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), one of the U.S. organizations dedicated to bringing in a World Government, state in his book “Tragedy and Hope”

“The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society that originated in England.. (and) … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established.”

Peter Hoagland, Nebraska State Senator and Humanist, speaking on radio in 1983 with the great American Pastor and Patriot Everett Sileven said:

“Fundamental, Bible believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in.”

David Rockefeller, Internationalist billionaire, Humanist, CFR king pin, founder of the Trilateral Commission, World Order Godfather, and crypto-Jew (a Jew who pretends to be a Gentile), voiced his praise of the controlled U.S. media for keeping their oath not to divulge the Glabalist plans to the public.  Speaking to his fellow conspirators at a meeting, June, 1991 in Baden Baden, Germany, of another infamous World Order groups, the Bilderbergers, Mr. Rockefeller said:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.

“It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the bright lights of publicity during those years.  But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.  The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

James Paul Warburg (Jew), Foreign Agent of the Rothschild Dynasty (also Jews), major player in the Federal Reserve Act scam:  On February 17, 1950, while speaking before the United States Senate, this pompous Internationalist boasted confidently,

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it.  The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”

Control of the Money Supply of the U.S. and the World

The Federal Reserve Bank

The Federal Reserve Bank is a private institution (with NO reserves) in which ALL of the members of the Board of Directors are Jews.  It illegally controls the complete money supply of the United States.

Thomas Jefferson, U.S. President, said:

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.  Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the Government at defiance.  The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.”

James A Garfield, U.S. President, said: 

“Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce.”

Henry Ford, Founder of Ford Motor Company, commented on the privately owned “Federal” Reserve System scam:

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”

Louis McFadden, U.S. Congressman, said this about those same international financial conspirators, during the very time they were taking over the monetary control of America:

“We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known.  I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the FED.  They are not government institutions.  They are private monopolies which pray upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers…”

American Mercury Magazine, December 1957, pg. 92:

“The invisible Money Power is working to control and enslave mankind.  It financed Communism, Fascism, Marxism, Zionism and Socialism.  All of these are directed to making the United States a member of a World Government…”

Mayer Amschel Bauer (alias Rothschild) the Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel of Europe (and now the United States and nearly every country on the face of the earth), stated:

            “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.”

“The Banker’s Manifesto”

“Capital must protect itself in every way…Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible.  When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the STRONG ARM OF THE LAW applied by the central power of leading financiers.  People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders.  This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world.  By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as TEACHERS OF THE COMMON HERD.” (Taken from the Civil Servants’ Year Book “The Organizer” Jan. 1934)

Media Blacks Out the Facts

Richard M. Cohan (Jew), Senior Producer of CBS political news said: 

“We are going to impose OUR AGENDA on the coverage by dealing with issues and subjects that WE choose to deal with.”

Richard Salant (Jew), former President CBS News stated:

“Our job is to give people not what they want, but what WE decide they ought to have.”

Fox News Channel

The Fox News Channel was created by Australian-American media mogul Rupert Murdoch (Jew), who hired former NBC executive Roger Ailes as its founding CEO. It launched on October 7, 1996 to 17 million cable subscribers. It grew during the late 1990s and 2000s to become the dominant cable news network in the United States. In 2010, its programs took the top ten spots for most-watched cable news programs in the 25–54 age demographic, and the top twelve spots among total cable news program viewers.

As of April 2009, the channel was available to 102 million households in the United States and to viewers internationally, broadcasting primarily from its New York studios.

Fox News at times appears to be conservative, but actually toes the “Jewish” party line.  It is the “Trojan Horse” of television news.


World Government Under the U.N.


No. 11:  Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind.  If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.”  Current Communist Goals,  1963 Congressional Record.

Dr. Kurk E. Koch, Professor, Lectured at 100 Universities in 65 countries on 5 continents.  Subjects of expertise: New World Order, Occultism, Extreme Movements, Parapsychology.  His assessment of the coming NWO under the United Nations is that it will reduce everything to one common denominator”

“The system will be made up of a single currency, single centrally financed government, single tax system, single language, single political system, single world court of justice, single head (one individual leader), single state religion.”

He further states; “Each person will have a registered number, without which he will not be allowed to buy or sell; and there will be one universal world church.  Anyone who refuses to take part in this universal system will have no right to exist.”

John E. Rankin, U.S. Congressman:

“The United Nations is the greatest fraud in all history.  Its purpose is to destroy the United States.”

George Bush (Senior), New York 1991,

“My vision of a New World Order forsees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”

And one more traitorous quote from the former President:

“It is the SACRED principles enshrined in the U.N. Charter to which we will henceforth pledge our allegiance.”  U.N. Building, Feb 1, 1992

United Nations’ World Constitution:           

            “…The age of nations must end…The governments of the nations have decided to order their separate sovereignties into one government to which they surrender their arms.”

Zbigniew Brezhinsky, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter and advisor to four presidents, Executive Director of the Trilateral Commission, Marxist and proud of it!  Here he speaks about what a New World Order will be like:

“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society.  Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values.”

He continues:

“Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen.  These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”  From Brezhinsky’s book, “Between Two Ages.”

Walt Rustow, Council on Foreign Relations member and U.N. Spokesman:

            “It is in the American interest to put an end to Nationhood.”

Humanist Manifesto, Article 12:

“We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds.  We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and to move towards the building of a world community.  We look toward the development of a system of world law, world order, based upon transnational government.”

Humanists propose that the United Nations care for and control ALL peoples of the earth.

The Religion of the New World Order

No. 27:  Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social religion.  Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity that does not need a “religious crutch.” 

No. 28.  “Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of ‘separation of church and state.”  Current Communist Goals, 1963 Congressional Record.


David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative (a United Nations world government group):

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer.  No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.”

French Travel Poster: 1992 French “New World Order” Color Poster:  Depicts people as robots, constructing a new Tower of Babel inside the old tower that god had destroyed.  These robotic people are trying to reach their god who is depicted with the sign of Lucifer (the Goat of Mendez five-pointed star) above the newly built tower.  The caption reads:

“Europe: Many Tongues, One Voice.”

In the 13th Chapter of Revelation, TWO separate beasts are described.

This First Beast (Revelation 13:1-10) is the Antichrist Beast, the Beast who comes against (and in place of), Christ, and demands to be worshipped as Christ. 

            New Age Professors Teach Our Children’s Teachers

Below is an excerpt from the Congressional Record, January 10, 1963.  No 40 and 41 of “45 Current Communist Goals” from “The Naked Communist” by Cleon Skousen, former FBI agent who infiltrated Communist party and found their “45 goals to take over America.”

No. 40:  Discredit the family as an institution.  Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

No. 41.  “Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents.  Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.”

Dr. Chester Pierce, Harvard University Professor, Humanist, New World Order Guru.  This professor instructs teachers and those students who aspire to become teachers of our children as follows:

“Every child in America who enters school at the age of five is mentally ill, because he comes to school with an allegiance to our institutions, toward the preservation of this form of government that we have.  Patriotism, nationalism, and sovereignty, all that proves that children are sick because a truly well individual is one who has rejected all of those things, and is truly the international child of the future.”

Dr. Paul Brandwein, Leading, U. S. child psychologist.  This man also instructs teachers on how to recognize mental disability in our school children.  He states:

“Every child who believes in God is mentally ill.”  (All public schools have a psychologist.)

Dr. Sidney Simon, Lecturer, Educator who some say specializes in encouraging immoral and criminal activity in youths.   He instructs teachers as follows: 

“We do not need any more preaching about right and wrong.  The old ‘thou shalt nots’ simply are not relevant.”  Further he says, “Values clarification is a method for teachers to change the values of children without getting caught.” 

Humanist Curriculum: Along with the Secular Humanists training our nation’s teachers to be “change agents” for their New World Order, there is the matter of the literature that they have for teachers to use to instruct American children.  One such book entitled “Weep for Our Children” might explain to Police Officers a great deal about why crime rates in school age children are skyrocketing.  Consider this one passage touting the humanistic “Values Clarifications/Situation Ethics” program:           

“It’s OK to lie.  It’s OK to steal.  It’s OK to have premarital sex.  It’s OK to cheat or to kill if these things are part of your value system, and you clarified these values for yourself.  The important thing is not what values you choose, but that you have chosen them yourself freely and without coercion of parents, spouse, priest, friends, ministers or social pressure of any kind.”


Psychiatrists Used by New World Order for Mass Psychology and Incarceration of Dissidents in Mental Asylums 

No. 39:  “Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.”  Congressional Record, January 10, 1963.  No 39 of “45 Current Communist Goals” – an excerpt from “The Naked Communist” by Cleon Skousen, former FBI agent who infiltrated Communist party and found their “45 goals to take over America.”

“For decades, it has been the job of those within the field of psychology to introduce to the American public the idea that those who believe in God are sick and must be “enlightened” or eliminated, and that “immorality” is the only path to the NEW AGE.  And indeed it is.  The several quotes below will drive home this well planned scenario. 

Bertrand Russell, philosopher, educator and atheist:  

“I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is Mass Psychology…It’s importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda…Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class (Elite).  The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated.” 

Dr. G. Brock Chisholm, First head of the World Federation of Mental Health (A New World Order group.)  

“What basic psychological distortion can be found in every civilization of which we know anything?  The only psychological force capable of producing these perversions is morality – the concept of right and wrong.  The re-interpretation and eventual eradication of the concept of right and wrong are the belated objectives of nearly all psychotherapy.” 

“The pretense is made that to do away with right and wrong would produce uncivilized people, immorality, lawlessness, and social chaos.  The fact is that most psychiatrists and psychologists and other respected people have escaped from moral chains and are able to think freely.” 

Those are words right out of the mouth of Satan.  And the immense deterioration in our society and the increase in lawlessness and violent crime proves Dr. Chisholm to be not only WRONG – but a FOOL! 

In case anyone reading this thinks that this change in the morals of our nation is accidental, he or she must read the book, “THE SOVIET ART OF BRAINWASHING: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook of Psychopolitics,” written by Kenneth Goff.  In this book, Goff, a one-time dues-paying member of the Communist Party, writes: “During my training I was trained in Psychopolitics.  This was the art of capturing the minds of a nation through brainwashing and fake mental health.” 

Kenneth Goff paid a high price for his efforts to alert the American people.  After attempting to inform America of Marxist-trained Psychologists being placed inside the U.S. to change the morals and beliefs of our nation, he mysteriously died from poisoning in 1964.  His farewell in his book says:  “This manual of the Communist Party should be in the hands of every loyal American, that they may be alerted to the fact that it is not always by armies and guns that a nation is conquered.”  In this book is found an address by Beria, the Head of the Lenin University School of Psychopolitics.  His 1933 address to a group of American/Marxist Psychology students is most revealing. 

Speaking to this group who would be returning to ply their treachery in the U.S. he said: 

“A psycho-politician must work hard to produce the maximum chaos in the fields of ‘mental healing.’  You must work until every teacher of psychology unknowingly or knowingly teaches only Communist doctrine under the guise of ‘psychology.’  You must labor until every doctor and psychiatrist is either a psycho-politican or an unwitting assistant to our aims.  You must labor until we have dominion over the minds and bodies of every important person in your nation (America).  

“You must work until suicide arising from mental imbalance is common and calls forth no general investigation or remark…You must dominate as respected men the fields of psychiatry and psychology.  You must dominate the hospitals and universities…You can come and take your instruction as worshippers of Freud…Psychopolitics is a solemn charge.  With it you can erase our enemies as insects.  You (psychologists) can change their (leaders) loyalties by psychopolitics.  Given a short time with a psychopolitician you can alter forever the loyalty of a soldier in our hands or a statesman or a leader in his own country, or you can destroy his mind. 

“Use the courts, use the judges, use the Constitution of the country, use its medical societies and its laws to further our ends…By psychopolitics create chaos.  Leave a nation leaderless.  Kill our enemies.  And bring to Earth, through Communism, the greatest peace man has ever known.  Thank you.” 

(This is only a short part of Beria’s speech to the visiting American psychology students.) 

NOTE: Everything he asked these students to accomplish when they returned to practice their “art” in our nation has occurred.  And now we can look forward to that “peace” he promised under the U.N. New World Order.




Joseph Stalin stated that after communism succeeds, “…then, there will come a peace across the earth.” 

Karl Marx said, “…the meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to Socialism (read – Communism).” 

God said, “,,,they have seduced my people, saying PEACE; and there is NO PEACE.”  Ezekiel 13:10 

The Apostle Paul said “For when they shall say, ‘PEACE and SAFETY,’ then sudden destruction comes upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”  1 Thess 5:3 

Goals of America’s Enemies 

Karl Marx:  “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” 

Leon (real name: Lev) Davidovich Trotsky:  “Religions are illogical primitive ignoarnace.  There is nothing as ridiculous and tragic as a religious government.” 

American Humanist Movement, Doctrinal statement:  “We are humanists…We are not for God…we are for socialism (Communism).” 

Humanist Magazine, 1983 Jan-Feb issue.  Humanist John J. Dunphy: 

“I am convinced that the battle for humankind’s future must be waged and won in the public school classroom by teachers that correctly perceive their role as proselytizers of a new faith which will replace the rotting corpse of Christianity.”


Have they Reached Their Goals?
(Check it out below.) 

Communist Rules for Revolution
(Captured at Dusseldorf in May 1919 by Allied Forces)


1.    Corrupt the young; get them away from religion.  Get them interested in sex.  Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness. 

2.    By specious argument cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues: honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledge word, ruggedness. 

3.    Encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders. 

4.    Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. (Like Racial differences?) 

5.    Get people’s minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays, and other trivialities. 

6.    Get control of all means of publicity. (Media) 

7.    Destroy the people’s faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and disgrace. 

8.    Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscation and leaving the population helpless. 

This is only a partial list.  It was secured and stamped with the seal of Florida State Attorney, George A. Broutigam.  This material testimony was taken from someone he terms “a known member of the Communist Party.”  According to this Communist’s testimony this strategy is still part of the Communist plan to overthrow free societies such as the United States. 

Rowan Gaither, head of the Ford Foundation, said: 

“The task is to covertly lower the standard of living, the whole social structure, of America so that it can be MERGED with all other nations” for a One World Government. 

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 32nd President of the U.S., also a Communist Jew, said:

           “In politics nothing happens by accident.  If it happened, you can bet it was planned that way.”

The plan of these globalists is that when America, the last “holdout,” is brought to its knees, the American “sheep” will beg their new god (GOVERNMENT) to save them!  The “salvation” they are being tricked into demanding will be the merging together of all nations under the great “bastion of peace and freedom,” the United Nations – a Communist organization run from behind the scenes by the Jews, an organization that OWNS the United States which is no longer a Republic, but a “Corporation.”



Is Communism Dead? 

No Way. 

Communism is “Alive and Well” - 
and Running the U. S. Government


Vladimir Lenin, real name Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, a Jew, said: 

“It would be the greatest mistake, certainly, to think that concessions mean PEACE.  Nothing of the kind.  Concessions are nothing but a new form of war.” 

Dmitri Manualisky, Soviet Diplomat (1947) revealed the Communists’ intention to brainwash the American public:  

“We will offer the Christian world unheard of peace overtures, and these nations, stupid and decadent, will leap at the chance to be our friends: they will willingly cooperate in their own destruction.  Then, when their guard is down, and they have gone to sleep, we will smash them with our clenched fist.” 

Mikhail Gorbachev’s speech at the 70th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution (1987)           

            “…In October 1917, we parted with the old world, rejecting it once and for all.  We are moving toward a new world, a world of Communism.  We shall never turn off that road,” 

And from his speech to the Soviet Politburo, November 1987: 

“Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about Glasnost and Perestroika and democracy in the coming years.  These are primarily for outward consumption.  There will be no significant internal changes in the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes.  Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep.  We want to accomplish three things: 

One, we want the Americans to withdraw conventional forces from Europe,

Two, we want them to withdraw nuclear forces from Europe. 

Three, we want the Americans to stop proceeding with Strategic Defense Initiative.

Remember what the renowned H.L. Mencken, journalist, essayist, and critic of American life, said, 

“To die for an idea, it is unquestionably noble.  But how much nobler it would be if men died for ideas that were TRUE.” 

Vladimir Lenin: 

“…one of the basic conditions for the victory of Communism is the arming of the workers (Communist) and the disarming of the bourgeoisie (the middle class).” 

“If the citizenry disarms, well and good.  If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.” 

Leo Tolstoy, 1893: 

“Governments need armies to protect them against their enslaved and oppressed subjects.”



Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals

by Peter Kasler

Self-Reliance For Self-Defense -- Police Protection Isn't Enough!

All our lives, especially during our younger years, we hear that the police are there to protect us. From the very first kindergarten- class visit of "Officer Friendly" to the very last time we saw a police car - most of which have "To Protect and Serve" emblazoned on their doors - we're encouraged to give ourselves over to police protection. But it hasn't always been that way.

Before the mid-1800s, American and British citizens - even in large cities - were expected to protect themselves and each other. Indeed, they were legally required to pursue and attempt to apprehend criminals. The notion of a police force in those days was abhorrent in England and America, where liberals viewed it as a form of the dreaded "standing army."

England's first police force, in London, was not instituted until 1827. The first such forces in America followed in New York, Boston, and Philadelphia during the period between 1835 and 1845. They were established only to augment citizen self-protection. It was never intended that they act affirmatively, prior to or during criminal activity or violence against individual citizens. Their duty was to protect society as a whole by deterrence; i.e., by systematically patrolling, detecting and apprehending criminals after the occurrence of crimes. There was no thought of police displacing the citizens' right of self-protection. Nor could they, even if it were intended.

Professor Don B. Kates, Jr., eminent civil rights lawyer and criminologist, states:

Even if all 500,000 American police officers were assigned to patrol, they could not protect 240 million citizens from upwards of 10 million criminals who enjoy the luxury of deciding when and where to strike. But we have nothing like 500,000 patrol officers; to determine how many police are actually available for any one shift, we must divide the 500,000 by four (three shifts per day, plus officers who have days off, are on sick leave, etc.). The resulting number must be cut in half to account for officers assigned to investigations, juvenile, records, laboratory, traffic, etc., rather than patrol.



Such facts are underscored by the practical reality of today's society. Police and Sheriff's departments are feeling the financial exigencies of our times, and that translates directly to a reduction of services, e.g., even less protection. For example, one moderate day recently (September 23, 1991) the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) "dropped” [2] 157 calls to its 911 facility, and about 1,000 calls to its general telephone number (415-553-0123). An SFPD dispatcher said that 150 dropped 911 calls, and 1,000 dropped general number calls, are about average on any given day. [3]

It is, therefore, a fact of law and of practical necessity that individuals are responsible for their own personal safety, and that of their loved ones. Police protection must be recognized for what it is: only an auxiliary general deterrent.

Because the police have no general duty to protect individuals, judicial remedies are not available for their failure to protect. In other words, if someone is injured because they expected but did not receive police protection, they cannot recover damages by suing (except in very special cases, explained below). Despite a long history of such failed attempts, however, many, people persist in believing the police are obligated to protect them, attempt to recover when no protection was forthcoming, and are emotionally demoralized when the recovery fails. Legal annals abound with such cases.

Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30 minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the Warren court graphically states in the opinion: "For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their attackers."

The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them, but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [4] There are many similar cases with results to the same effect. [5]

1. Guns, Murders, and the Constitution (Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, 1990).

2. A "dropped" call in police dispatcher parlance is one that isn't handled for a variety of reasons, such as because it goes unanswered. Calls from people who get tired of waiting on hold and hang up are classified as "drops" as well.

3. KGO Radio (Newstalk 810), 6:00 PM report, 09-26-91, and a subsequent personal interview with the reporter, Bernie Ward.

4. Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981).

5. See, for example, Riss v. City of New York, 22 N.Y.2d 579, 293 NYS2d 897, 240 N.E.2d 860 (N.Y. Ct. of Ap. 1958); Keane v. City of Chicago, 98 Ill. App.2d 460, 240 N.E.2d 321 (1968); Morgan v. District of Columbia, 468 A.2d 1306 (D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1983); Calogrides v. City of Mobile, 475 So.2d 560 (S.Ct. A;a. 1985); Morris v. Musser, 478 A.2d 937 (1984); Davidson v. City of Westminster, 32 C.3d 197, 185 Cal.Rptr. 252, 649 P.2d 894 (S.Ct. Cal. 1982); Chapman v. City of Philadelphia, 434 A.2d 753 (Sup.Ct. Penn. 1981); Weutrich v. Delia, 155 N.J. Super 324, 326, 382 A.2d 929, 930 (1978); Sapp v. City of Tallahassee, 348 So.2d 363 (Fla.Ct. of Ap. 1977); Simpson's Food Fair v. Evansville, 272 N.E. 2d 871 (Ind.Ct. of Ap.); Silver v. City of Minneapolis, 170 N.W.2d 206 (S.Ct. Minn. 1969) and Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 61 (7th Cir. 1982).

Duty of the Police is to Protect the Corporation – the U.S. Government – NOT the citizens


The police are a constituted body of persons empowered by the state to enforce the law, protect property, and limit civil disorder.[1] Their powers include the legitimized use of force. The term is most commonly associated with police services of a state that are authorized to exercise the police power of that state within a defined legal or territorial area of responsibility. Police forces are often defined as being separate from military or other organizations involved in the defense of the state against foreign aggressors; however, gendarmerie and military police are military units charged with civil policing.

Law enforcement, however, constitutes only part of policing activity.[2] Policing has included an array of activities in different situations, but the predominant ones are concerned with the preservation of order.[3] In some societies, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, these developed within the context of maintaining the class system and the protection of private property.[4] Some parts of the world may suffer from police corruption. 

Where do we go for protection? 

So, if the police are not required to protect the citizens, and the government takes away all the guns so the citizens cannot protect themselves, where do we go for protection? 

Does it become “painfully” clear that the only place we can turn is - - - - to the Lord!  But, most people will wait until a crisis occurs, and then they won’t even know the Lord – up close and personal – so they won’t know how to rely on Him.  That’s why it’s important to get to know the Lord now – and learn to trust Him now! 

As Joseph said to his brothers about selling him into slavery: 

            “You meant this for evil, but God meant it for good.”  (text) 

The New World Order/Illuminati/Jews mean gun confiscation for EVIL, but God means it for GOOD – to prove there is no place to go for safety – except to the Lord. 

Jesus said,  

“You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32 

“I am the way, the truth, and the life.” John 14:6 

“The devil has been a Liar from the beginning - - He is the father of Lies.”  John 8:44 

Again, remember what William Casey said: 

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”  William Casey, CIA Director (1981) sKnights of Malta 

The vast majority of Christians have no idea what is going on in this country politically, religiously, or medically.  They have no discernment because they have not had their eyes opened by the Lord. 

“The natural man (the one who only understands with his five senses) receiveth not the things of the spirit of God for they are foolishness to him; neither can he know them, because spiritual things are spiritually discerned.”  1 Cor 2:14 

One can only know and understand truth when they know Jesus up close and personal, because Jesus says He IS “the truth.”  John 14:6


In order to know truth, we must know Jesus Christ. 

The vast majority of American Christians are in utter darkness 

Everything below is believed by the vast majority of Americans, including American Christians, but it is ALL wrong.  They are totally deceived.  

The truth is that everything below was done by the Jews who run this country, and by the Israeli Death Squads that are given carte blanche access to America by the U.S. Immigration Department that is controlled by the Jews. 

The following beliefs are ALL lies.  The public is brainwashed and mind controlled to believe them. 

The LIES of False Flag Political Operations 

9/11 was done by Osama bin Laden – a LIE! 

Oklahoma Bombing was done by Timothy McVeigh – a LIE! 

Waco: there was child molestation going on, so the children (and all the others) were burned to death!  That certainly kept them from being molested!!! – a LIE! 

War in Iraq occurred because Iraq had “Weapons of Mass Destruction.” – a LIE! 

War in Afghanistan – to destroy Al Qaeda (which is a U.S./Israeli founded and funded organization) – a LIE! 

Coming War in Syria – because Syria is “using chemical warfare agents against its own people.” – a LIE! 

Coming War in Iran – because Iran has – or will soon have – nuclear weapons – a LIE! 

Pearl Harbor and WW II – the BAD Japanese attacked us for “no reason” – a LIE! 

Holocaust Hoax: 6 million Jews were killed in German concentration camps – a LIE!


Vaccinations prevent disease and rarely harm those to whom they are given – a LIE! 

Drug medications cure disease and are necessary for treatment – a LIE! 

Chemotherapy and radiation are proper treatments for cancer – and actually work! – a LIE! 

Mutilating Surgery – cutting off one’s body parts or cutting out their organs  cures patients. – a LIE! 


Churches are the way to find God – a LIE! See: 

God is going to burn His wayward children in hell forever – or “as long as they deserve” – a LIE!  See: 

God has given humanity Freewill – a LIE!  See Eph 1:11 and: 

When a person dies, he goes to heaven – a LIE!  See: 

Churches should support war by U.S. military – a LIE!  War is nothing less than Corporate Murder of innocent people who just want to be left alone. 

Recreational Distractions 

24-hour per day Sports Networks 

More televising of sporting events 

Extreme Sports 

Violent and occult videogames 


TV news and news magazines. 

TV programming: promoting male homosexuality, lesbianism, adultery, drug use, promiscuous sex, redefining the family unit, secularism, ridicule of Christianity. 

That the president of the U.S. runs the country 

That the House and Senate have something – anything - to do with running the country 

That your vote counts 

What About the recent Sandy Hook “Massacre”? 

And now – as of December 14, 2012 – that a “lone gunman” – Adam Lanza – murdered 20 school children and 6 teachers at Sandy Hook, a school in Newtown Connecticut.  

What’s the Real Truth about the
Sandy Hook “Massacre”?


The original “Official Version.” 

Adam Lanza, a 20-year old “tech geek loner” possibly suffering from some variation of Autism, somehow snapped on Friday, December 14, 2012, shot his mother in the face with a rifle 6 times at home, killing her, then drove her car to the Sandy Hook Elementary School (where his mother supposedly was a teacher), and shot and killed 20 kindergarten children, and 6 teachers with a “long gun” of some sort.  Then he shot himself (with the same “long gun.”) 

This “lone gunman” scenario is similar to the July, 2012 Aurora, Colorado shooting and other school shootings around America. 

If the Sandy Hook “Massacre” really happened that way, there shouldn’t be much room for errors in reporting.  However, the “official” version has changed multiple times, and even the supposedly “final” version does not fit the facts of the case. 

There are still numerous legitimate questions for which there are no answers. 

1.    How did Adam Lanza get into the school?  The doors of the school are secure.  No one can just walk in.  There are security cameras at various places around the school property?          

Who let him in?  Who would allow entrance into a school to a man dressed in a face mask, flak jacket, and camouflage pants, carrying several high velocity weapons?   

Why isn’t he seen on security cameras? 

If Lanza shot his way into the school, why aren’t there pictures of a front door full of bullet holes and lots of broken glass? 

Yet, there are none! 

2.  The press has reported that there are no records on Adam Lanza

anywhere for anything for the last 3 years.  How can that be?  He seems not to have existed for all that time.  Does he even exist?  Did he move to another country 3 years ago?  Possibly Israel – since he IS Jewish! 

3.    It was first reported that Adam Lanza’s mother, Nancy, was a teacher at the Sandy Hook school, and that Adam killed her in the school, not at their home. 

Later it was reported that Nancy was not a regular teacher at the school, that she was a substitute teacher, but that “fact” has also been dropped from the official version. 

4.    What has not been reported by the mainstream Press is that Adam Lanza was a Jew, as was his mother.  Is it possible that Adam Lanza and his other, Nancy, were sayanim (look it up), or even Israeli Mossad agents, as was Chandra Levy (look her up)? 

5.    The interview by the supposed Medical Examiner was either done by an actor who knew nothing about the facts of the case or routine medical jargon, or was done by the real Medical Examiner, Wayne Carver, who clearly knew NOTHING about the case.  

His “performance” was that of a Buffoon!  He even joked around in a totally inappropriate manner for such a heinous crime - probably because he was extremely uncomfortable with his total lack of knowledge about the bodies and bullet wounds.  First he said the victims were shot with a rifle – 3 to 5 times.

That alone is extraordinary, because that would mean that the perpetrator, reported to be Adam Lanza, fired and hit his small – obviously rapidly moving victims (they would be running away)  - 100 times (5 X 20) just to kill the children (not including the teachers).  The whole event took 3-5 minutes.  That is an amazing feat by a young geeky kid who apparently had no military training. 

6.    The Medical Examiner said later that some children had been shot 11 times, making the story even more unbelievable.  How would there be enough time, or ammunition, to do that?  And why would any single victim be shot 11 times.  It would be hard to hit a small (6-year old), moving target 11 times, and if the small victim was disabled on the floor with the first shot or two, why waste 8 or 9 additional bullets when just ONE would finish off the dying victim? 

When this is all put together, Lanza would have had to shoot at least once per SECOND – even more, if any victims actually were shot 11 times! 

Of course, adding these outrageous elements makes the event seem more violent and horrific – just what is needed to confiscate all the guns – which is the primary goal of this HOAX! 

7.    The Medical Examiner (ME) first said that the children were all shot with a “long gun” – presumably a rifle,.  However, no rifle was reported to have been found near Lanza’s dead body or any other place in or near the school EXCEPT the long gun that was found locked in the trunk of what was claimed to be Adam Lanza’s car. 

That would mean that Adam Lanza would have had to shoot all the children with the rifle, then lock it back in his trunk BEFORE he killed himself – or maybe “after” he killed himself!! ONE MAJOR PROBLEM.  

The Medical Examiner (ME) stated that Lanza shot and killed himself with the rifle, something that is not easy to do.  Then, immediately, the ME changed his story and said he didn’t know what caliber of gun Lanza used to shoot himself.

If Adam Lanza shot himself with his rifle, then he would have had to get up – AFTER he was dead – and lock the rifle in his trunk!! 

8.    Amazingly, only ONE victim was reported to have been injured, but not killed.  All the rest were Dead!  Again, that is extraordinary precision shooting on the part of Adam Lanza who had no military training whatsoever. 

9.    And, of course, the “Lone Gunman” ended up shooting himself, so he cannot be interrogated at any level – whether by the police or by the courts in a trial.  It’s all “tied up with a neat little bow” so the “official version” will stand with no possibility for anyone to determine anything different. 

This is always the Modus operandi with mind control “Manchurian candidates” so they can never be questioned. 

10. How did Adam Lanza happen to have his brother, Ryan’s, I.D. on him when the brothers hadn’t seen each other for a year or two and Ryan apparently hadn’t reported his I.D. missing.  Also, why would Adam have a false I.D. if he was planning to kill himself anyway? 

Even more, why did Adam Lanza wear a mask to hide his identity, if he was going to kill himself which would allow EVERYONE to know who he was? 

And why would he wear a flak jacket, ostensibly to keep him from being killed, when he knew he would be shooting at unarmed 6-year old victims? And if the police were called, which they were, why would he care if they shot him when he was planning to kill himself anyway? 

And since he was planning to kill himself, why would he totally destroy the hard drive to his computer before he left home, something that the police and press reported he did, because after he would be dead, there would be nothing for him to hide. 

11. Why was Ryan Lanza, who the police admit was not involved in the shooting, and who was working in Manhattan – 75 miles away, kept in custody for several days after the shooting? 

12. Why was it reported BEFORE the Sandy Hook slaying that the police were investigating a murder in Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of - - - Ryan Lanza! 

An older “confirmed” version of events had RYAN, not Adam, traveling that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut to kill the children.  Other variations of the story had Ryan AND Adam going to both their divorced parent’s homes and killing them both before going to the school to shoot the children. 

Were the real perpetrators of this False Flag Operation initially trying to frame both Ryan and Adam Lanza? 

13.  According to Connecticut State Police Commander, Lt. Vance, the police were on the scene “instantaneously” and the shooting had already ended.  Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old Dawn Hochsprung. 

But here is a BIG PROBLEM:  The Newtown Bee, the local newspaper, said that Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots – more than she could count – shots that went “on and on.”

That would mean that Ms. Hochsprung was giving an interview to the Newtown Bee AFTER she had been killed: 

On the following page is a copy of that newspaper story, with the information reportedly given by Ms. Hochsprung – after she was dead?

14.  And here is another BIG PROBLEM:  It was reported by the officials initially on the scene on Friday, that the bodies of the victims would not be removed from the school until Sunday – three days AFTER the shootings. 

That is absolutely absurd – and would never happen!  The 26 bodies would start to decay – and stink – and it would be much harder to autopsy them.  In addition, it would be outrageous and terribly disrespectful to both the victims and their families to purposely let the bodies begin to rot in the school. 

And there would be absolutely NO REASON for the bodies to be left there. 

But then suddenly, the “officials” changed their plans and said they had removed the bodies during the night on Saturday night, thus eliminating ANY pictures of the bodies being removed from the school, AND eliminating any pictures of the bodies arriving at the morgue, since there were no journalists around. 

Why would the “officials” remove the “bodies” in the middle of the night, 2 days AFTER the shooting.  It makes no sense at all, unless there were NO bodies, unless the victims had not been shot but had been abducted immediately after the shooters (yes, plural) entered the school and took them hostage, putting them in a van and taking them away BEFORE the 9/11 calls were even made, and before any police or journalists arrived on the scene.  Remember this thought, we will discuss it later on.

15. According to Ryan Lanza, he removed his Facebook page shortly after the shooting, but another Facebook page in his name was posted, a Facebook page that Ryan says is not his. Who posted the False Facebook page of Ryan Lanza? 

16. Why did the New York Post publish a detailed “interview” with Ryan Lanza when Ryan says he NEVER gave an interview to the New York Post? 

17. Why has a deputy been assigned to EVERY family whose relative was killed at Sandy Hook?  Why have none of the real relatives been allowed to speak to the press? 

18. The “Parents” who DID talk to the press were obvious actors – who completely faked it, as the YouTube video of “Robbie Parker,” a supposed parent, proves.  Before talking to the press, he is laughing and smiling, not the actions of a father who has just had a young child brutally murdered.  Then you see him approach the microphone, change his demeanor, and “get into character” to speak like a grieving father. 

Total Fakery! 

Also, the other “families of victims” are also actors who, no matter how hard they try, never shed a real tear.

There is a website called where one can hire actors to stage crisis situations such as fake terrorists drills.  Check it out.  Obviously these actors were from that organization or one similar. 

19. Another BIG PROBLEM:  Why were none of the parents allowed to see their dead children, and only shown pictures of them instead – pictures that could easily have been Photo-shopped. 

The explanation given by the authorities was that the children were too badly injured, so the officials were “protecting” the parents from the gruesome scene of seeing their children. 

Obviously, that is Hogwash.  Every parent has a right to make that decision.  This proves that something very “fishy” is going on! 

20. Why did the police, when finding Lanza’s long gun in the trunk of what was identified as his car (belonging supposedly to his mother), handle the entire gun WITHOUT gloves, destroying forensic evidence (fingerprints)? 

21. Why was the car purported to belong to Adam Lanza’s mother, the car Adam “drove to the school to do the shooting” actually registered to a Christopher Rodia, a criminal with a significant police record. 

Who is Christopher Rodia?  And what was he doing at the scene of the shooting? 

22. How did the Newtown, CT area just happen to have an “empty” school nearby that can accommodate the 600 students from Sandy Hook who can go to another school immediately after the Christmas break? 

23. Obviously they will destroy the Sandy Hook school where the shooting took place so no forensic examination can take place.  The debris will undoubtedly be shipped abroad, just like the debris from the destroyed Murrah building in Oklahoma City, and the debris from 9/11, so no one can examine it. 

By the way, that school is apparently 53 years old and was scheduled for demolition anyway. 

24. And just watch: they will undoubtedly then build on the ground where the school has been demolished, a “memorial” to those “killed” in the shooting – so everyone will “NEVER FORGET.”  (Just like the slogan for the Holocaust Hoax!) 

25. What about the 2 other shooters who were apprehended at the scene, including one we watched on TV from a helicopter view.  The suspect is being chased by police through the woods, and apprehended, “proned” and handcuffed, and put in the Police car – reportedly in the FRONT seat?  (Criminals are ALWAYS put in the back seat.  Was this person actually working with the police – and therefore known to the police?) 

And why was he subsequently RELEASED by the police with no explanation whatsoever? 

26. Why are those who still LEGALLY support gun ownership having their Facebook pages removed against their will? 

27. Why did Newtown Police Chief Vance say publicly that those on social network sites who question the “Official Version” of the incident (HIS WORDS) will be prosecuted?  Whatever happened to Free Speech? 

28. Isn’t it a “coincidence” that the Sandy Hook “shooting” took place in the state of Connecticut, where Joseph  Lieberman, a Jew, is the Senator, and also the CHAIRMAN of the committee on Homeland Security – the group that wants to confiscate all the guns? 

29. Isn’t it a “coincidence” that both the words “Aurora” and “Sandy Hook” are prominently displayed in the 2012 batman movie “The Dark Knight Rises”?  In that movie, the name “Aurora” is displayed in bright red neon letters about 20 feet high on the top of a building.  And the name Sandy Hook – in very large letters, about 7 inches high, is seen on a map that an actor in the movie is displaying.  His hand and pointed finger move over the map, and then come to rest right at the words “Sandy Hook.” 

The Aurora, Colorado “lone gunman” shooting took place in July, 2012, and the Sandy Hook “lone gunman” shooting occurred in December, 2012. 

This is referred to in occult illuminati “jargon” as “The revelation of the method.”  Or, in simpler terms:  “We of the illuminati Jews believe that you goyim (meaning: lower than beasts) are so stupid, that we’re going to tell you beforehand what we are going to do to you.” 

30. Emilie Parker, supposedly a first grader at Sandy Hook, whose “father” was smiling and laughing before his interview (just 1 day after her brutal “murder”) is seen on President Barack Obama’s lap in a picture taken TWO DAYS AFTER the Sandy Hook shooting, at the Memorial service for the Sandy Hook victims.  She is alive and well and wearing the SAME clothes as she was wearing in the picture with her parents supposedly taken BEFORE she was “murdered.” 

Also, Emilie Parker does not appear in any of the school pictures from Sandy Hook school.  Obviously, she was not a student there.  She, like all the other “families” interviewed, is an actor – a total fake. 

31. Why are virtually ALL the people in the “Robbie Parker family picture making occult, Satanic signs?  The mother and father are only showing 3 fingers on the hands that are seen in the picture.  Both babies are giving Satanic baphomet signs with their hands.  And the young girl identified as “Emilie” appears to be photo-shopped into the picture because neither parent has their arms around her as they do the other two children.

32. The Sandy Hook Elementary School where the supposed “shootings” took place is an UNOCCUPIED school.  Satellite photos taken between March 2011 and October 2011 show the school to be UNOCCUPIED – with NO cars in the parking lot? 

Could it be that the satellite photos were taken during the summer while school was not in session? 

Nope!  The trees have no leaves, showing that it is NOT in the summer.

Could it be that the photos were taken in the evening when everyone was gone?

Nope!  The photos were obviously taken during the sunniest part of the day.

Could it be that the satellite photos were taken on the weekend when school was not in session?

Nope!  In the same satellite photo as the one showing Sandy Hook Elementary school, there is another school nearby that is clearly in session with the parking lot filled with cars, while there are NO cars, nor people, nor any activity at the Sandy Hook school.

Clearly the Sandy Hook school was an unused, unoccupied school building at the time of the Sandy Hook HOAX “shootings.” 

33. What a coincidence that the SAME Lt. Paul Vance who was the spokesperson for Sandy Hook is also seen as the Spokesperson for a terrorist drill at Oxford school in CT, just a short distance from Sandy Hook.

34. What a coincidence that in order for a school district to obtain federal money, they must participate in a “terrorist drill” with fake blood and fake “injured children” and police in combat gear chasing the fake “perpetrators.”  How convenient to have numerous videos and still pictures available from these “drills” to show on TV when faking a supposedly “real” shooting.

35. Why is Adam Lanza’s DEATH recorded in the Social Security Department as taking place on December 13, 2012 – the day BEFORE the Sandy Hook shootings?

36. Why were there NO EMTs running to the scene of the shootings to administer emergency care and rush the injured to the hospital?  Why were the ambulances hemmed in by numerous cars, unable to move, with NO police managing traffic?  Why were the police the ones to decide if a victim was truly dead and could not be helped by EMTs or doctors?  It’s  the doctor’s job to declare a person dead – not the job of the police!

37. What was the goal of the Sandy Hook “Massacre”?  GUN CONTROL!  - the same goal for which the Aurora, Colorado shooting took place, the same goal for which the Columbine Massacre took place, and every other “lone gunman” shooting that has taken place in the last few years: to confiscate the guns of the people. 

The Jewish Illuminati who are purposely destroying America financially, politically, and spiritually, are terrified that the people will remain armed as the economy falls farther and farther into the worst depression that this country will ever see.  They are afraid that the people will wake up and understand WHO has done this to them. 

The Real Truth About Sandy Hook!

Now that we have exposed many of the major lies of the “official version” (there are even more) of the Sandy Hook shooting, what is the REAL TRUTH about this event?

Here is what the evidence tells us: 

NONE of those who were reported as killed in the Sandy Hook incident were shot.  NONE of them were killed at the scene.  There is no evidence that any of them are dead.  They may well have been immediately abducted from the school BEFORE either the police or journalists arrived.  That is why the false story about leaving the bodies in the building for three days was announced, so all the journalists would go away.  Then they could “report” that the bodies had been removed in the middle of the night (when no one was there). 

The shootings – if there were indeed ANY shootings - were not done by Adam Lanza.  He was only a “patsy.”  In fact, it is not known if the supposed body of Adam Lanza was actually found.  Or even if anyone named “Adam Lanza” actually exists.  And if he does exist, why are there no records about him anywhere for the last three years.  Neither the press, nor anyone else, it seems, was allowed to see his body.  And the “clown” Medical Examiner knew nothing about what was going on.  It is impossible to believe ANYTHING he has said.  Again, he’s either an actor, or a totally incompetent Medical Examiner who was forced to give an interview about bodies that he NEVER saw.  

The Medical Examiner didn’t know how many of the children who were shot were boys or girls.  After all, there were only 20 bodies of children that would have been processed into the morgue, tagged and recorded.  That’s his job to know! 

He didn’t know what they were wearing.  His answer to that question was, “They were wearing “Kid Stuff.”  

He said he was saving Adam Lanza’s body for the last autopsy – when that should have been the FIRST one. 

He first said Adam Lanza shot himself with a rifle, then he laughingly changed his story and said he didn’t know what kind of gun Adam used. 

It is painfully clear that the Medical Examiner was lying about everything, and that he never saw even ONE of the bodies of the supposed “victims.”  

Not one of the Parents was allowed to see his or her dead children 

In addition, NONE Of the families were allowed to see their dead child.  As a parent, you know you would NOT stand for that.  That is one of the reasons a deputy was assigned to each family, not only to “keep them in line” but to prevent them from talking to the press, and to prevent them from watching television where they would see all the fake interviews by actors – NOT legitimate members of the families of the victims. 

It would not be hard to keep grieving parents from watching television.  They would have no inclination to do that because it would just remind them of the terrible incident that had caused them the loss of their child. 

It is likely that the government “graciously” paid for the funerals of the “dead” children, and maybe even gave to each family a cash payment for this terrible tragedy along with a request (demand) that they sign a paper stating that they would not speak of this event - EVER -  to the press, because of - - - - - - “National Security”!!! 

This is what happened to the families of the victims of 9/11. 

(The cash payments to the families would come, of course, from the taxpayers’ pockets.) 

What happened to the children and teachers that were supposedly “killed” at Sandy Hook? 

Possibly the same thing that happened to those who were purported to be on the planes in 9/11.  We know that NO plane crashed in Pennsylvania.  United Flight 93 landed in Cleveland, where all the people were taken off the plane.  That was reported in several mainstream news articles and television news programs, which suddenly were dropped from the news. 

And the crater in Pennsylvania that supposedly was caused by the crash of the Jumbo Jet measured a mere 10 X 15 feet in diameter.  And there was no evidence of body parts, luggage, nor was there any debris from a crashed airplane. 

And no commercial plane hit the Pentagon.  The Forensic evidence proves that the damage done to the Pentagon was done by a missile or a very small military plane carrying a missile or explosives.  There was NO debris from a commercial plane, no human body parts, no luggage, and cadaver dogs found no evidence of the remains of human beings. 

There is also ample evidence that the other two planes reported to have hit the Twin Towers either were non-existent and were Photo-shopped into the news pictures, or if they did hit the buildings, they had no passengers in them.  They were being run by remote control, technology that was readily available at that time from the company owned and run by Dov Zakheim, a Neo-con, Jewish rabbi, and former Comptroller of the Pentagon.  It was during Zakheim’s tenure at the pentagon that $6 BILLION “went missing” – most likely it was sent directly to Israel! 

One video clip that was shown on television ONLY ONCE – shows one of the planes coming clear through the tower with its nose INTACT!  Obviously that video was photoshopped! 

So where are all those passengers as well as the Sandy Hook “victims”? 

There is a huge – and lucrative - pedophile ring in America and around the world- at the highest levels of government and in the circles of the super wealthy.   This is where most of the kidnapped children pictured on milk cartons end up. 

There is also an enormous – and lucrative – sex slavery business in America and around the world. 

The evil minds of the perpetrators of these heinous events would think it foolish to “waste” 20 children and 6 mostly young women teachers by killing them  Why not abduct them to be used to service pedophiles, force the teachers into sex slavery, or use both children and adults as mind-controlled slaves, or eventually kill them to be used as organ donors, or even more horrible – for human sacrifices, which are known to occur in the Illuminati elitists echelons of power both in this country and abroad.

So, who is responsible for this crime? 

Certainly not “lone gunman” Adam Lanza who did not have the capability of doing any of this. 

We know there were at least 3 people involved, including the two men who were chased into the woods and apprehended by police.  At least one, or maybe both, of those apprehended were summarily released, with no mention of them ever again. 

Adam Lanza was either killed by those who perpetrated the event – to be used as a “patsy,” or maybe he’s not even dead.  Has anyone actually seen his body? Or maybe he doesn’t even exist? 

This event has all the “fingerprints” of a U.S. CIA/Israeli Mossad Black Psy-Op False Flag Operation.  Such an operation had to be meticulously planned long before the event took place, just like the Oklahoma Bombing (April 19, 1995) and the destruction of the Twin Towers by controlled demolition on 9/11. 

A False Flag Operation – followed by Slave-inducing Legislation – Again and Again 

Oklahoma City Bombing 

Only EIGHT DAYS after the Oklahoma Bombing, On April 27, 1995, a 107 page bill was introduced into Congress.  It was called the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, which was nothing more than a major step towards outright Communism, taking away more and more of our rights as citizens of the United States.  The Bill is 107 pages long, single-spaced, and in legalese!  It could not possibly have been written AFTER the Oklahoma Bombing, therefore, it had to have been written BEFORE the Oklahoma Bombing. 

Once again we see the pattern of the Jewish Illuminati Globalists:  Create the False Flag Operation to cause the population to accept legislation that will take away their rights – “for their own safety.” 

This bill was signed into law in April of 1996, on the First anniversary of the Oklahoma Bombing. 

Destruction of the Twin Towers, etc., on September 11, 2001. 

Just 2 1/2 months later, on October 26, 2001, the Patriot Act was signed into law by the President, taking away more of our rights.  The law is literally many hundreds of pages long, and as Ron Paul has written, “The Patriot Act was written many, many years before 9/11.”  

They then had to create the False Flag “terrorist” operation in order to emotionally manipulate the population into accepting the onerous law – “for their own safety.”.

Senators and Congressman were not even allowed to read – or even see – the bill before it was passed. 

The Sandy Hook “Massacre” 

Once again we see a False Flag Operation created by the same perpetrators, the Jewish Illuminati, which most certainly will soon be followed by gun confiscation legislation.  Just watch and you will see! 

The shooter(s) at Sandy Hook wore masks so they couldn’t be identified, and thus the real perpetrators could blame it on anyone they wished. 

The shooter(s) either shot through the door of the school, or more likely, disabled the security system, then came in surreptitiously and, at gun point, rounded up the young children in the classes previously determined, and also rounded up any teachers who heard the ruckus and came out into the hallway and witnessed the event.  They immediately loaded them into vans or trucks without windows and took them away. 

This was a major operation that took long-term planning of many individuals. 

It’s sad to say, but it would have been more merciful for the “victims” to have been shot dead in the supposed “massacre” than to go through what is facing them now! 

No one was killed at the scene.  That’s why the school must be guarded now as a “crime scene” and must be demolished as soon as possible, so no one can examine the building for trajectories of bullets fired or for DNA evidence of the blood of the “victims,” or for any other evidence that would prove or disprove whether anyone had been shot. 

Who Benefits? 

Questions such as, “Who are the people behind this Heinous Event?” always must be answered by the additional question, “Who Benefits?” 

Because the goal of this false flag operation is Gun Confiscation (if you are skeptical, just watch how rapidly gun control legislation will appear in Congress). Obviously, the ones who benefit are the ones seeking to disarm every citizen in America.  And who are they? 

Answer: The ones who purposely are destroying America, the international Illuminati/Jewish Bankers who stole the money supply of America exactly 100 years ago through the illegal and unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and who have as their goal the control of the whole world and the eventual elimination of all non-Jews on the face of the earth. 

The Illuminati/Jewish Bankers are the ones responsible for the present depression through their successful plans of sending all manufacturing jobs off shore, and by inflating our money supply until our money becomes worthless, and by extensive weather control turning middle America’s farm land into a drought-stricken wasteland causing food to become scare and soon exorbitantly expensive. 

They know that the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees American citizens the right to keep and bear arms.  Isn’t it curious that just two weeks after the Sandy Hook incident, a New York Times Editorial called for eliminating the U.S. Constitution because it is “out-moded”?  It’s important to understand that the New York Times is also owned and run by the Jews, as is ALL of the media! 

The Jewish Globalists also know that as America sinks deeper into a depression which cannot be turned around because there are no jobs in America anymore, that the people will begin becoming angry as they will have no jobs, no money, no home, and no food.  They will be desperate and will begin to fight back! 

At that time, the Illuminati Jews who are responsible for the mess we’re in will be in danger for their life, because the U.S. population is heavily armed.  That’s why it is paramount for them to take the guns away from the citizenry as soon as possible.  They planned to have this taken care of completely by the year 2000, but obviously they are behind schedule. 

What better way for the citizens of the United States to be brainwashed and mind controlled into willingly giving up their guns than for the Illuminati to perpetrate a Satanic attack against young children, manipulating the population into an emotional state where they are no longer able to think clearly, and thus will be willing – even anxious – to have Congress pass legislation taking away ALL the guns. 

However, banning guns does NOT decrease violent gun crime.  In 1996, after a similar false flag shooting in a city in the UK, guns were banned.  By 2003, gun crime had more than doubled in the UK because now only the criminals are armed and they know that the citizenry is unarmed.  It is “Open Season” for the criminals. 

When the city of Chicago banned private gun ownership, the gun crime skyrocketed – again, because now only the criminals have guns. 

When guns are banned, gun crime always increases.  

It makes as much sense to ban guns to fight gun violence as it does to ban spoons in order to fight obesity.  

Furthermore, it is the Jews who own all the movie studios who produce pictures filled with gun violence, and it is the Jews who own all the television networks who produce television shows that are filled with gun violence,

and it is the Jews who own the video game companies who produce video games filled with gun violence,

and it is the Jews who own virtually all the pharmaceutical companies who produce drug medications, such as Zoloft, Prozac, and other similar SSRI drugs – prescribed by (mostly) Jewish psychiatrists - that increase the user’s homicidal

and suicidal tendencies.  Both Andrea Yates and Susan Smith, who murdered their own children, were on this type of drug, as were the Columbine killers.

and it is the Jews who run the mafia and the drug trafficking that increases drug use and gun violence, 

and it is the Jews who own and control all the media: newspapers, news magazines, television news, and almost all radio networks.  The only news outlets that they don’t totally own – yet – are the Internet and a few independently owned radio stations. 

and it is the Jews whose goal is to eliminate Christ and Christianity from the American culture causing an exponential increase in lawlessness. 

And it is the Jews like California Senator Diane Feinstein, a total hypocrite who promotes gun confiscation, but admittedly carries a concealed weapon for her own protection, who wants to eliminate everyone else’s right to protection. 

Why don’t we start Gun Control by eliminating all the guns of the Secret Service agents who guard President Obama!! 

Conclusion on Sandy Hook: 

The “Massacre” at Sandy Hook was yet another False Flag Operation by the Israeli Mossad/CIA cabal (the CIA is also totally controlled by the same Jews that control the U.S. government) specifically designed to further their efforts to confiscate ALL guns from every citizen in America, to force us into slavery to serve the Jewish Globalists’ One World Government. 

Adam Lanza, also a Jew, was either a “patsy” who was turned on by those he served, possibly as a Sayanim, or even an agent of the Mossad (the Jews have no problem sacrificing one of their own when necessary), or maybe he isn’t even dead, but may have been hustled out of the country to safety in Israel. 

Wake Up America!  Don’t be once again emotionally manipulated by those who want YOU dead! 

Open your eyes and start studying, researching and analyzing for yourself, rather than letting the controlled media fill your mind with lies! 

Conclusion on the Mark of the Beast: 

So, what does it mean to “take the Mark of the Beast”?  It means to become like the Beast power, to be controlled by the Beast Power, to believe the lies of the Beast Power, to support the wars perpetrated by the Beast Power, and eventually to worship the Beast Power, which many Evangelical churches are doing already by believing the Jews are “God’s chosen people,” even though Israel is genociding the Palestinians, and they are responsible for virtually ALL the terrorism in the world.  

As Jesus said to the Pharisees, the “spiritual” (but not physical) ancestors of the present-day Jews: 

“That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth since Abel…”  Matt 23:35 

World-wide Christianity has been “taking” the Mark of the Beast for decades, including today, without even realizing it!




















Chaplain Jerry
(559) 303-0142  or e-mail me

11 hours ago - Via Reshared Post - View - Christian Answers for the New Age : THE NEW GOD OF CONSCIOUSNESS: A GOD-LESS SPIRITUALITY New Age writer/teacher Deepak Chopra's book, "...
New Age writer/teacher Deepak Chopra's book, "The Future of God," is about Chopra's god, a god which is arising in the field of science through misapplication of quantum theories applied spiritually. Endorsements of Chopra’s book include scientists leaning toward New Age thinking and New Agers (such as Larry Dossey). Although Chopra is refuting Dawkins and atheism, he's using the New Age filter of "Consciousness" to do so.

This is part of a march toward a Christless and God-less Spirituality in our culture. The names of some of the organizations that the endorsers represent reveal their New Age nature.

The subtitle of the book is significant: The Future of God: A Practical Approach to Spirituality for Our Times. The word “practical” appeals to the pragmatic nature of the American culture.

Quantum physics has been spurring this view for awhile, leading many to embrace an Eastern and New Age concept of reality that all is energy and alive, and forms (such as people) arising from this energy field are mere manifestations of it. Notice what Huston Smith writes;

Quote==“Deepak Chopra has successfully blended ancient Vedanta Philosophy with his unique perspective on modern science to provide a vast audience with solutions that meet many needs for our modern age.”==(From Amazon page for Chopra’s book)

It is no accident that Deepak Chopra made a pitch for this book at Marble Collegiate Church in New York City (see photo), the church of none other than Norman Vincent Peale. Peale was probably the most influential person in injecting New Thought into the culture and church via his book, "The Power of Positive Thinking." (Since then, it has been "The Secret").

Some of the endorsements of scientists and others for The Future of God are quite startling and revealing:

“Being a nuclear physicist dealing with basic quantum field theory I find my worldview agreeing with Deepak Chopra. The all-embracing holistic quantum field is a step forward from our classical reductionistic interpretation of a determined "reality". It suggests a dynamic, alive cosmos or "Wirklichkeit". Dr Chopra's work will be talked about for a long time to come.” -- Hans Peter Duerr, Scientific Member and Director Emeritus Max Planck Institute for Physics and Astrophysics

“As Deepak explains, Dawkins’ materialism is the delusion, not God. Eastern spiritualists, Western constructivists and quantum physicists agree – the mind shapes, if not creates, the world. Materialism is a mirage of deeper level quantum reality, one which surfaces in living systems, guiding consciousness and evolution. The ‘Watchmaker’ isn’t blind. Dawkins is.” -- Stuart Hameroff, M.D., Professor, Anesthesiology and Psychology Director, Center for Consciousness Studies The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona,

"The Future of God is a brilliant exposition for the need of consciousness-based reality. It is consistent with the worldview of quantum physics which showed the importance of the mind and is a fitting answer to the claims of militant atheists whose science is based on outdated views now known to not be true and which became obsolete almost a century ago." -- Menas C. Kafatos, Fletcher Jones Professor of Computational Physics at Chapman University, and co-author of The Non-local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind

“Deepak Chopra has successfully blended ancient Vedanta Philosophy with his unique perspective on modern science to provide a vast audience with solutions that meet many needs for our modern age. He is among the influential scholars, authors, and thinkers who have found truth in the Perennial Philosophy and developed ways to help people apply that truth to their daily lives.” -- Huston Smith, author of Why Religion Matters: The Faith of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief

“At a time when the revolutions of the physical sciences are changing our understanding the human consciousness, The Future of God is a book that needed to be written and no one could have written it better than Deepak Chopra. In this brilliant analysis, Chopra shows how God is evolving with our consciousness, and how both, the religious and atheistic fundamentalists are focused on an outdated God. This book is a treasure of deep insights which will not only touch your heart but will also lead you to understand how a God without illusions is a necessary condition for your physical well being.” -- Lothar Schäfer, distinguished professor of physical chemistry (emeritus) at the University of Arkansas and author of Infinite Potential

“In The Future of God, Deepak Chopra crisply dissects the militant atheist's assertion that there is no meaning or purpose to life, and no need for faith in an accidental universe. He lays bare the belief vs. disbelief controversy and provides sound reasons why it is both possible and necessary to mature beyond the simplistic dogmas that have sustained a timeworn and increasingly futile debate.” -- Dean Radin, Ph.D., author of The Conscious Universe and Supernormal

“The Future of God is a much-needed book. Chopra convincingly exposes the limitations, arrogance and intellectual blindness of the 'new atheists'. He recognizes that unbelief has a role to play, but he also shows how to go beyond the atheists' narrow dogmatism to a far richer experience and understanding of reality.” -- Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, author of Science Set Free.

“The Future of God is the freshest riposte yet in response to the chest-beating, triumphal, militant atheism that can’t stop congratulating itself for imaginary victories over traditional religion. Dr. Chopra shows how this tiresome movement is based in bad philosophy, bad science and bad psychology, and how it is mired in abysmal confusion about what authentic spirituality is all about. He shows how militant atheism, through sleight-of-hand, merely substitutes one blind faith for another, managing to fool itself in the process. In The Future of God, Dr. Chopra describes an approach to God that is congruent with a modern worldview, while simultaneously honoring the innate human connection with the Divine.” -- Larry Dossey, M.D., author of One Mind: How Our Individual Mind Is Part of a Greater Consciousness, and Why It Matters
--- From Amazon at
In actuality, God is a personal being and is not part of creation. Since God is Creator, He is not part of his creation. Creation shows that there must be a Creator, but to create, one must be distinct from and prior to that creation. Moreover, God cannot be an actual part of a corrupt, decaying, and disaster-prone creation.

If there were a god that is part of creation, that god would merely be a diffused force subject to the physical laws of the universe. Such a god cannot have a mind or will, so could not be personal and able to express love, to communicate, or have any power over creation. In effect, this could not be a god.

In equating “Consciousness” with a godlike being, Chopra and his awed scientist followers are downgrading a God worthy to know and worship. It is a god with no majesty or power, which results in making man king of his own world. This is exactly the philosophy of New Thought and alleged Christian minister Norman Vincent Peale.

Here is an article about a televised event at Marble Collegiate Church, the church of Norman Vincent Peale, where Chopra spoke on his book:

Quote==Deepak is the author of eighty books translated into over forty-three languages, including numerous New York Times bestsellers in both the fiction and nonfiction categories. Time magazine heralds Chopra as one of the top 100 heroes and icons of the century and credits him as “the poet-prophet of alternative medicine.”……Basically one of his major missions is teaching us all how to connect back to God. Great! But why do we need to be taught this at all? Because we’ve put up blocks that make it next to impossible to experience God. Chopra was about to unleash the formula to find the source again==From article at
I posted the info above so those who don’t know can see how big Chopra is in the world of publishing. Please be aware that he is one of them most influential spiritual writers and teachers today. Chopra wrote this to explain how we get back to God:

Quote== Deepak lays out the road to connect back with God, and it’s through first uncovering the inner you. He lays out the framework for connecting back to God in four easy ways:
1. Expanding awareness
2. Meditation
3. Prayer
4. Self-awareness

The brilliant thing about Deepak is how he blends science with spirituality. He’s able to prove the existence of God through not only spiritual terms but also scientific terms…..Science has proven that we are made up of the same cosmic dust as stars, we’re interstellar dust. In other words, we all come from the same source, everything is one and everything is connected.

…..So, that source that you’re made up of, i.e. star dust, atoms, etc. is inside you!

 Source (Universe/God) = Your Inner being……The source of the universe is also your source. So God is a part of you, inside of you, because you’re connected to that source, you have to be because you come from it.
“You are not just a drop in the ocean, you are a mighty ocean in the drop.”
-Rumi.==End quote from same article as quote above

Chopra’s “god” is a god that goes back to pantheism. In the past, Chopra has called God “Divine Intelligence.” But as I pointed out, such a god cannot be intelligent because how can a force be intelligent?

We all “come from the same source” in the sense we were all created by God, but we do not literally come from one source in the sense that we were made from God. Such a god cannot exist as god. If God is not distinct from creation, then there is no real god who can create, love, have a will, know everything, and forgive.

But we do have a God who loves, and a God who forgives when one has trusted in Christ:
== “For God loved the world in this way: He gave His One and Only Son, so that everyone who believes in Him will not perish but have eternal life.”== John 3:16

== “Love consists in this: not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”==1 John 4:10
== “We love because He first loved us.”== 1 John 4:19

== "But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us."== Romans 5:8

== “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.”== Acts 10:43

== “In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace.”== Ephesians 1:7

== “and He said to them, “Thus it is written, that the Christ would suffer and rise again from the dead the third day, and that repentance for forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed in His name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem.”== Luke 24: 46, 47
CANA article on New Thought
Excellent evaluation of Norman Vincent Peale’s teachings from Watchman Fellowship
CANA article on Deepak Chopra’s book The Third Jesus
CANA article on Emmet Fox and Agnes Sanford: Two Dangerous
CANA articles on “The Secret”
FB post June 10, 2016
To ask questions or comment please visit CANA FB page:
13 hours ago - Via Google+ - View - Monique Aimee Dyer : E.T. Then 34-year-old director Steven Spielberg reportedly drew on his own experiences as an unusually...

Then 34-year-old director Steven Spielberg reportedly drew on his own experiences as an unusually imaginative, often-lonely child of divorce for his science-fiction classic E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial, which is released on 11 June 1982.

For Spielberg, E.T. marked a return to territory he had first visited with the classic Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977), in which Richard Dreyfuss plays a man who comes face to face with a fearsome alien force that eventually proves to be human-friendly.

With E.T., Spielberg would create an even more appealing vision of alien life, in the form of a diminutive creature with wrinkled skin and a glowing belly. Spielberg worked closely with the screenwriter, Melissa Mathison (future wife of Harrison Ford, the star of Spielberg’s Indiana Jones films) to capture on film the story of the wise, kind and cuddly alien botanist who is stranded on Earth and needs the help of a sensitive little boy, Elliott (Henry Thomas) to get back home.

Elliott and his siblings, played by Robert MacNaughton and a seven-year-old Drew Barrymore, hide E.T. (as the alien dubs himself) in a closet to keep him out of sight from prying adults, including their mother, who is distracted by her painful separation from her husband. Before long, a special link develops between E.T. and Elliott, who will eventually risk his own safety to return E.T. to his planet.

From the time that E.T. had its first showing, on closing night at the 1982 Cannes Film Festival, the film’s buzz was overwhelmingly positive. Richard Corliss raved in TIME magazine: “[E.T.] is a perfectly poised mixture of sweet comedy and ten-speed melodrama, of death and resurrection, of a friendship so pure and powerful it seems like an idealized love.”

TIME also included the fictional alien in its list of candidates for Man of the Year–the first film character to receive that honor. Nominated in nine categories at the 1983 Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director, the film won four Oscars, for Best Sound Effects Editing, Best Visual Effects, Best Original Score and Best Sound.

E.T. had stupendous success at the box office, eventually raking in some $435 million (it was re-released in 1985 and a special 20th-anniversary edition was issued in 2002). As of 2008, it stood at No. 5 on the list of the highest-earning films of all time.

#ET   #stevenspielberg   #scifi   #extraterrestrial   #movies   #films   #OldHollywood   #blockbusters   #aliens  

17 hours ago - Via Reshared Post - View - Monique Schneider-Kayser (Kayser Monique) : Why Your DNA Isn't Your Destiny Time magazine had an interesting cover story about an interesting new...
Why Your DNA Isn't Your Destiny
Time magazine had an interesting cover story about an interesting new area of science called Epigenetics.

When people talk about 'pit bulls', there is often a lot of talk about genetics and whether certain types of dogs are genetically predisposed to certain traits that may make them more dangerous to the public. This inevitably leads to a nature vs nurture discussion. But the entire conversation may not even be that easy (and that one isn't easy).

Simply put, Epigenetics is based on scientific evidence that shows that nature may be a more powerful factor than we could have ever predicted. Not only can we be shaped by the environment that surrounds us, but historical evidence suggests that powerful environmental conditions can somehow leave an "imprint" on our genetic material that can then be transferred to future generations. Environmental factors like diet, stress and prenatal nutrition can not only affect how our genes are expressed, but can affect future generations as well.

In his upcoming book, "The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You've been Told Abut Genetics, Talent and IQ Is Wrong", science writer David Shenk calls epigentics a "new paradigm" that "reveals how bankrupt the phrase 'nature vs nurture' really is."

At this point, it seems unlikely that epigenetics would change how we emotionally react to certain events, it may affect how we physically react (sweaty palms, higher heart rate, etc).

The science itself is pretty new -- and most of its applications have been focuses seemingly on cancer research -- so it would be mere speculation on what impact epigenetics really has on canines in one way or the other. However, one thing would seem pretty evident -- and that's the tremendous diversity that would exist within a particular breed of dog. Not only would dogs be a product of their genetics, and of their environment - - but also products of the specific environment of previous generations. It also seems to point at an increased need for officials to focus on animal abuse and cruelty for long-term public safety concerns.

It will be interesting to see how this new area of science evolves over time, but it seems all the more reason that we need to be treating dogs as individuals -- uniquely shaped by their own genes, environment, and the environment of their parents -- with their own specific attitudes and behaviors. It's not just an's science.

You can read the Time Magazine article here --
Why Your DNA Isn't Your Destiny,8599,1951968-1,00.html
23 hours ago - Via Reshared Post - View - DENIO VALE : TIME MAGAZINE - Jul 11, 2016 Vol 188 No 2 & 3 The Bright Side in America Today In the Latest Issue: ...
TIME MAGAZINE - Jul 11, 2016 Vol 188 No 2 & 3
The Bright Side in America Today
In the Latest Issue:

1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Urban Time Magazine : Rihanna "Sledgehammer" Music Video Earlier on today a new music video has dropped by the princess herself...
Rihanna "Sledgehammer" Music Video
Earlier on today a new music video has dropped by the princess herself Rihanna called "Sledgehammer" for the the motion picture Star Trek Beyond. The song was drawn for her love for Star Trek as a child being introduced to the series by her father. The song...
Rihanna "Sledgehammer" Music Video

1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Dr. Noelle Nelson : The recent “Longevity Issue” of Time Magazine held great promise—an entire issue devoted to the joy ...
The recent “Longevity Issue” of Time Magazine held great promise—an entire issue devoted to the joy of longevity, how great! Then I read the very first article title on the cover: “The Alzheimer’s Pill: A radical new drug that could change old age.” My heart sank. My excitement vanished. Once again, getting older was automatically associated with decline and dementia.
Live a Simply Fabulous Life—Whatever Your Decade!
The recent “Longevity Issue” of Time Magazine held great promise—an entire issue devoted to the joy of longevity, how great! Then I read the very first article title on the cover: “The Alzheimer’s Pill: A radical new drug tha...
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Gabriel S : Does Acupuncture Work? Good Article by Time Magazine
Does Acupuncture Work? Good Article by Time Magazine
You Asked: Does Acupuncture Work?
For certain conditions—particularly pain—there’s evidence it works. Exactly how it works is an open question.
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Adrian Kaiser : Published on Jun 13, 2016 According to multiple accounts, the Black Knight Satellite has been transmitting...
Published on Jun 13, 2016
According to multiple accounts, the Black Knight Satellite has been transmitting radio signals for as long as we've been able to recognize the fact.

The US and Soviet Union have shown particular interest in this “unidentified space object” Rumors are that it was Nikola Tesla the first man to “intercept” a signal from the black knight satellite in 1899 after building a high-voltage radio device in Colorado Springs.

Since the 1930′s Astronomers worldwide have been reporting strange radio signals which allegedly come from the “Black Knight”.

In 1957, Dr. Luis Corralos of the Communications Ministry in Venezuela photographed it while taking pictures of Sputnik II as it passed over Caracas.

The story of the Black Knight made its media debut in the 1940′s when the St. Louis Dispatch and The San Francisco Examiner wrote about the “Satellite” on May 14th 1954.

The Time Magazine wrote about the Black Knight Satellite on the seventh of March, 1960.

In 1957, an unknown “object” was seen “shadowing” the Sputnik 1 Spacecraft. According to reports, the “unidentified object” was in Polar orbit.

There has been much discussion, de-bunking, and disinformation regarding this topic. What is true and what is false...that's probably the main question here.
Standard YouTube License
Watch the video: The Ultimate Black Knight Satellite Documentary
According to multiple accounts, the Black Knight Satellite has been transmitting radio signals for as long as we've been able to recognize the fact. The US a...
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Photoworks Direct : Five Recommended Cameras for Beginners The question that most budding photographers ask first is “which...
Five Recommended Cameras for Beginners

The question that most budding photographers ask first is “which is the best #camera for beginners?”. Actually, there is no such thing as a “camera for beginners” anymore. Most modern cameras are capable of delivering excellent snaps provided you know the basics of #photography. If you do not have the skills, no matter what camera you use, the pictures you take will be awful. And if you are good at it, you can take decent photos with even the most modest cameras out there. With that being said, let us look at some of the most preferred, professional “beginner” cameras available today.

Nikon D3200
Nikon is the unanimous leader in optics in general and cameras in particular. The D3200 is a reasonable priced, entry level DSLR camera (Digital Single-lens Reflex Camera) with a capacity of 24.2 mega pixels. In the UK, the Nikon D3200 currently sells at about £ 360. It is compact, lightweight and comes with the recently developed Nikon DX-format CMOS sensor. The D3200 has a sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 6400. It can shoot pictures at a speed of 4 fps (frames per second) in continuous shooting mode, letting you capture the very best of decisive photographic moments.

Sony RX100
This is an advanced compact camera with a maximum resolution of 20.2 mega pixels. The RX100 is part of the famous cyber-shot product line from #Sony Corporation. Time magazine had named it one of the best inventions of 2012. The exceptional 7.5 cm TFT LCD display of this camera is worth mentioning for its ability to clearly display images even in harsh sunlight. It has a range of ISO 125 to ISO 6400, allowing quality pictures to be taken in any lighting conditions. At present, the RX100 is available at a price of £ 250 in the UK.

Fujifilm X100S
This one is a large sensor, fixed lens camera available in the UK for about £ 1300. The comparatively higher price tag is justifiable for its outstanding image quality. The maximum effective resolution is 16.3 mega pixels and the camera has a native ISO sensitivity range of ISO 200 to ISO 6400. The X100S can shoot at a speed of 6 fps and comes with a 2.8 inch 460 K TFT LCD display.

Canon EOS 600D
This 18.0 mega pixel, DSLR camera released in 2011 is a real steal at £ 800. It can even record full HD, 1080p resolution video at 24 frames per second. The rear display of the camera is 3.0 inches and it has a sensitivity range of ISO 100 to ISO 6400. The EOS 600D comes with USB 2.0 and HDMI interfaces for connectivity.

Panasonic Lumix G5
Panasonic introduced the Lumix G5 in 2012 and is still one of the most recommended entry level cameras for aspiring photographers. At present, the Lumix G5 is available for £ 800 in the United Kingdom. The live MOS sensor of this mirrorless interchangeable lens camera has an effective capacity of 18.3 mega pixels. The Lumix G5 is based on a special standard called Micro Four Thirds System (MFT), created by #Panasonic in association with Olympus Corporation.

#photography #photoshoot #Nikon #Canon
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Javier Robles : 💗💗👌👌👌👌👌👌👌💗💗 #PriyankaChopra is tipped to pick up the #BestSupportingActress gong at this ...
#PriyankaChopra is tipped to pick up the #BestSupportingActress gong at this weekend's #International-Indian-Film-Academy (IIFA)Awards, but she currently hasn't signed any more Hindi films.

Instead, Chopra has spent most of this year in the US, shooting for her debut #Hollywood movie - the #Baywatch reboot - opposite #Dwayne #TheRock' #Johnson and #ZacEfron.

She has starred in more than 50 Indian films since being crowned Miss World in 2000.

After a short stint as a Universal Music Group recording artist, Chopra found wide fame in America when she signed a talent holding deal with ABC Studios, leading to her television debut in #Quantico.

The crime thriller has been renewed for a second season and bagged Chopra the Favourite Actress in a New TV Series gong at this year's #People'sChoiceAwards.

But despite her success, Chopra says she wouldn't describe herself as "a Hollywood star" just yet.

"I'm still very new, I'm not even a year old in America," she told the BBC.

"I may be on the cover of Time [Magazine] because of 100 most influential, People's Choice Awards, #TeenChoiceAwards but I think there is such a long way to go."

'Indian actors are not a joke'

Chopra now hopes that she can use her wider profile to make Indian Cinema more accessible in the west.

"To convince another part of the world that Bollywood is not just jokers who break in to song and dance was very difficult. I'm literally ploughing the ground and making people understand that Indian actors are not a joke."

Her time in America has also made her appreciate the campaigning of performers such as #AmitabhBachchan and #ShabanaAzmi who want to denounce the use of the term #Bollywood.

#bollywood #style #beauty #love #passion
#fashion #photography #Actress #dance
#Shakira #music #pop
1 day ago - Via Reshared Post - View - Frank A Hilario : Defying Media Defining Duterte MANILA: On 12 May 2016, TIME Magazine put Rodrigo Duterte on its cover...
Defying Media Defining Duterte
MANILA: On 12 May 2016, TIME Magazine put Rodrigo Duterte on its cover and portrayed him as "The Punisher" – I'm afraid the latest being punished is Philippine media. Interestingly, Ian Bremmer calls Duterte "a wildcard in the pack of world leaders" (13 May...
Defying Media Defining Duterte

1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - Frank A Hilario : Defying Media Defining Duterte MANILA: On 12 May 2016, TIME Magazine put Rodrigo Duterte on its cover...
Defying Media Defining Duterte
MANILA: On 12 May 2016, TIME Magazine put Rodrigo Duterte on
its cover and portrayed him as "The Punisher" – I'm afraid the latest
being punished is Philippine media. Interestingly, Ian Bremmer calls Duterte "a wildcard in
the pack of world leaders" (13 May...
Defying Media Defining Duterte

1 day ago - Via Google+ - View - DYLN Inspired : Understanding calories is complicated according to this Nutrition Professor, but she has some simple...
Understanding calories is complicated according to this Nutrition Professor, but she has some simple advice to enable you to figure them out...
My Time Magazine op-ed: We are still confused about calories
While I was in Israel last week, Time Magazine published an op-ed it had invited me to write. Here it is. Even in ‘healthy’ foods, calories can tick up fast Nutrition professor that I …
2 days ago - Via - View - Gus Mktg&Mgmt-Services : WOMEN GENDER TESTING FOR OLYMPIC GAMES <> ...
<<The Humiliating Practice of Sex-Testing Female Athletes>>

//For years, international sports organizations have been
policing women for “masculine” qualities — and turning
their Olympic dreams into nightmares. But when Dutee
Chand appealed her ban, she may have changed the rules.//

One day in June 2014, Dutee Chand was cooling down after a set of 200-meter sprints when she received a call from the director of the Athletics Federation of India, asking her to meet him in Delhi. Chand, then 18 and one of India’s fastest runners, was preparing for the coming Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, her first big international event as an adult. Earlier that month, Chand won gold in both the 200-meter sprint and the 4-by-400-meter relay at the Asian Junior Athletics Championships in Taipei, Taiwan, so her hopes for Scotland were high.

Chand was raised in Gopalpur, a rural village in eastern India with only intermittent electricity. The family home was a small mud hut, with no running water or toilet. Her parents, weavers who earned less than $8 a week laboring on a government-issued loom, were illiterate. They had not imagined a different life for their seven children, but Chand had other ideas. Now, as she took the five-hour bus ride to Delhi from a training center in Punjab, she thought about her impending move to Bangalore for a new training program. She wondered if she would make friends, and how she’d manage there without her beloved coach, who had long been by her side, strategizing about how best to run each race and joking to help her relax whenever she was nervous. She thought little of the meeting in Delhi, because she assumed it was for a doping test.

But when Chand arrived in Delhi, she says, she was sent to a clinic to meet a doctor from the Athletics Federation of India — the Indian affiliate of the International Association of Athletics Federations (I.A.A.F.), which governs track and field. He told her he would forgo the usual urine and blood tests because no nurse was available, and would order an ultrasound instead. That confused Chand, but when she asked him about it, she recalls, he said it was routine.

Chand had no idea that her extraordinary showing in Taipei and at a national championship earlier that month had prompted competitors and coaches to tell the federation that her physique seemed suspiciously masculine: Her muscles were too pronounced, her stride was too impressive for someone who was only five feet tall. The doctor would later deny that the ultrasound was a response to those reports, saying he ordered the scan only because Chand had previously complained of chronic abdominal pain. She contends she never had any such pain.

Three days after the ultrasound, the federation sent a letter titled “Subject: Gender Verification Issue” to the Indian government’s sports author­ity. “It has been brought to the notice of the undersigned that there are definite doubts regarding the gender of an Athlete Ms. Dutee Chand,” the letter read. It also noted that in the past, such cases “have brought embarrassment to the fair name of sports in India.” The letter requested the author­ities perform a “gender verification test” on Chand.

Shortly after, Chand says, she was sent to a private hospital in Bangalore, where a curt woman drew her blood to measure her level of natural testosterone, though Chand had no idea that was what was being measured. Chand also underwent a chromosome analysis, an M.R.I. and a gynecological exam that she found mortifying. To evaluate the effects of high testosterone, the international athletic association’s protocol involves measuring and palpating the clitoris, vagina and labia, as well as evaluating breast size and pubic hair scored on an illustrated five-grade scale.

The tests were meant to identify competitors whose chromosomes, hormones, genitalia, reproductive organs or secondary sex characteristics don’t develop or align in the typical way. The word “hermaphrodite” is considered stigmatizing, so physicians and advocates instead use the term “intersex” or refer to the condition as D.S.D., which stands for either a disorder or a difference of sex development. Estimates of the number of intersex people vary widely, ranging from one in 5,000 to one in 60, because experts dispute which of the myriad conditions to include and how to tally them accurately. Some intersex women, for instance, have XX chromosomes and ovaries, but because of a genetic quirk are born with ambiguous genitalia, neither male nor female. Others have XY chromosomes and undescended testes, but a mutation affecting a key enzyme makes them appear female at birth; they’re raised as girls, though at puberty, rising testosterone levels spur a deeper voice, an elongated clitoris and increased muscle mass. Still other intersex women have XY chromosomes and internal testes but appear female their whole lives, developing rounded hips and breasts, because their cells are insensitive to testosterone. They, like others, may never know their sex development was unusual, unless they’re tested for infertility — or to compete in world-class sports.

When Chand’s results came in a few days later, the doctor said her “male hormone” levels were too high, meaning she produced more androgens, mostly testosterone, than most women did. The typical female range is roughly 1.0 to 3.3 nanomoles of testosterone per liter of blood, about one-tenth that of typical males. Chand’s level is not publicly known, but it was above the 10-nanomoles-per-liter threshold that the I.A.A.F. set for female competitors because that level is within the “male range.” As a result, officials said, she could no longer race.

In the two years since, Chand has been at the center of a legal case that contests not only her disqualification but also the international policy her lawyers say discriminates against athletes with atypical sex development. For Chand, who had never heard the words “testosterone” or “intersex,” it has been a slow and painful education. When she was first told she was being barred because of her testosterone level, she didn’t understand anything the officials were saying. “I said, ‘What have I done that is wrong?’ ” she told me by phone in May through a Hindi translator. “Then the media got my phone number and started calling me and asking about an androgen test, and I had no idea what an androgen test was. The media asked, ‘Did you have a gender test?’ And I said, ‘What is a gender test?’ ”

No governing body has so tenaciously tried to determine who counts as a woman for the purpose of sports as the I.A.A.F. and the International Olympic Committee (I.O.C.). Those two influential organizations have spent a half-century vigorously policing gender boundaries. Their rationale for decades was to catch male athletes masquerading as women, though they never once discovered an impostor. Instead, the athletes snagged in those efforts have been intersex women — scores of them.

The treatment of female athletes, and intersex women in particular, has a long and sordid his­tory. For centuries, sport was the exclusive province of males, the competitive arena where masculinity was cultivated and proven. Sport endowed men with the physical and psychological strength that “manhood” required. As women in the late 19th century encroached on explicitly male domains — sport, education, paid labor — many in society became increasingly anxious; if a woman’s place wasn’t immutable, maybe a man’s role, and the power it entailed, were not secure either.

Well into the 20th century, women were discouraged from participating in sports. Some medical experts claimed that vigorous exercise would damage women’s reproductive capacity and their fragile emotional state and would make them muscular, “mannish” and unattractive to men. Critics fretted that athletics would unbind women from femininity’s modesty and self-restraint.

As women athletes’ strength and confidence grew, some observers began to wonder if fast, powerful athletes could even be women. In the 1936 Berlin Olympics, the runners Stella Walsh of Poland and Helen Stephens of the United States were rumored to be male impostors because of their remarkable athleticism, “male-like” muscles and angular faces. After Stephens narrowly beat Walsh in the 100-meter dash and posted a world record, Stephens was publicly accused of being a man, by Walsh or Polish journalists — accounts vary. German Olympics officials had examined Stephens’s genitals before the event and declared her female. Four decades later, in an unexpected twist, an autopsy of Walsh revealed she had ambiguous genitalia.

In 1938, the gender of an athlete was again in dispute. The German high-jumper Dora Ratjen, a former fourth-place Olympian who won a gold medal at the European Athletics Championship, was suddenly identified as male, prompting Germany to quietly return the medal. When Ratjen’s case became public years later — he claimed that the Nazis pressured him to pose as a woman for three years — it vali­dated the growing anxiety about gender fraud in athletics. But in 2009, the magazine Der Spiegel investigated medical and police records and found Ratjen had been born with ambiguous genitals but, at the midwife’s suggestion, was raised as a girl, dressed in girls’ clothes and sent to girls’ schools. Dora lived as a female until two years after the 1936 Olympics, when police were alerted to a train traveler in women’s clothes who looked suspiciously masculine. With relief so apparent that the police noted it in their report, Ratjen told them that despite his parents’ claims, he had long suspected he was male. A police physician examined him and agreed, but reported that Ratjen’s genitals were atypical. Ratjen changed his first name from Dora to Heinrich. But those details were unknown until recently, so for decades, Ratjen was considered a gender cheat.

By the mid-1940s, international sports administrators began requiring female competitors to bring medical “femininity certificates” to verify their sex. In the 1950s, many Olympics officials were so uneasy about women’s participation that Prince Franz Josef of Liechtenstein, a member of the International Olympic Committee, spoke for many when he said he wanted to “be spared the unesthetic spectacle of women trying to look and act like men,” writes Susan K. Cahn, a his­tory professor at the University at Buffalo, in her book “Coming On Strong: Gender and Sexuality in 20th-Century Women’s Sports.” Others were particularly bothered by women in track and field because of the strained expressions on their faces during competition. Such female exertion violated the white middle-class ideal of femininity, as did the athletes’ “masculinized” physiques, prompting Olympic leaders to consider eliminating those events for women.

In 1952, the Soviet Union joined the Olympics, stunning the world with the success and brawn of its female athletes. That year, women accounted for 23 of the Soviet Union’s 71 medals, compared with eight of America’s 76 medals. As the Olympics became another front in the Cold War, rumors spread in the 1960s that Eastern-bloc female athletes were men who bound their genitals to rake in more wins.

Though those claims were never substantiated, in 1966 international sports officials decided they couldn’t trust individual nations to certify femininity, and instead implemented a mandatory genital check of every woman competing at international games. In some cases, this involved what came to be called the “nude parade,” as each woman appeared, underpants down, before a panel of doctors; in others, it involved women’s lying on their backs and pulling their knees to their chest for closer inspection. Several Soviet women who had dominated international athletics abruptly dropped out, cementing popular conviction that the Soviets had been tricking authorities. (More recently, some researchers have speculated that those athletes may have been intersex.)

Amid complaints about the genital checks, the I.A.A.F. and the I.O.C. introduced a new “gender verification” strategy in the late ’60s: a chromosome test. Officials considered that a more dignified, objective way to root out not only impostors but also intersex athletes, who, Olympic officials said, needed to be barred to ensure fair play. Ewa Klobukowska, a Polish sprinter, was among the first to be ousted because of that test; she was reportedly found to have both XX and XXY chromosomes. An editorial in the I.O.C. magazine in 1968 insisted the chromosome test “indicates quite definitely the sex of a person,” but many geneticists and endocrinologists disagreed, pointing out that sex was determined by a confluence of genetic, hormonal and physiological factors, not any one alone. Relying on science to arbitrate the male-female divide in sports is fruitless, they said, because science could not draw a line that nature itself refused to draw. They also argued that the tests discriminated against those whose anomalies provided little or no competitive edge and traumatized women who had spent their whole lives certain they were female, only to be told they were not female enough to participate.

One of those competitors was Maria José Martínez Patiño, a 24-year-old Spanish hurdler who was to run at the 1985 World University Games in Japan. The night before the race, a team official told her that her chromosome test results were abnormal. A more detailed investigation showed that although the outside of her body was fully female, Patiño had XY chromosomes and internal testes. But because of a genetic mutation, her cells completely resisted the testosterone she produced, so her body actually had access to less testosterone than a typical woman. Just before the Spanish national championships began, Spanish athletic officials told her she should feign an injury and withdraw from athletics permanently and without fuss. She refused. Instead, she ran the 60-meter hurdles and won, at which point someone leaked her test results to the press. Patiño was thrown off the national team, expelled from the athletes’ resi­dence and denied her scholarship. Her boyfriend and many friends and fellow athletes abandoned her. Her medals and records were revoked.

Patiño became the first athlete to formally protest the chromosome test and to argue that disqualification was unjustified. After nearly three years, the I.A.A.F. agreed that without being able to use testosterone, her body had no advantage, and it reinstated Patiño. But by then, her hopes for making the Olympics were dashed.

Dutee Chand was only 4 when she started running, tagging along with her sister, Saraswati, a competitive runner who liked to practice sprints along the local Brahmani River. Saraswati found training boring, so she recruited Dutee, 10 years her junior, to keep her company. For years, Dutee ran in bare feet — even on the village’s mud-and-pebble streets — because she had to protect the only shoes she owned: flimsy rubber flip-flops that she knew her parents could not afford to replace.

When Dutee was about 7, her parents pressed her to stop running and learn to weave instead. But Saraswati argued that with Dutee’s speed, she could earn more as a sprinter. Saraswati, who has since become a police officer, reminded her parents of the benefits her own running had brought to the family. Once the district government realized Saraswati’s athletic potential, she, like other athletes, was given meat and chicken and eggs, food her family had not been able to afford. And she reminded them of the prize money she brought home whenever she did well in marathons. They agreed to let Dutee run.

Not long after, Saraswati used a string to measure Dutee’s foot and took a bus to the nearest city, about 60 miles away, to find an affordable pair of sturdy sneakers for her sister. The ride took three hours, frequently picking up passengers carrying goats or chickens and large bundles. When Saraswati gave Dutee the sneakers the next morning, Saraswati told me over the phone through a translator, Dutee yelped. “She asked me what can happen if she runs wholeheartedly. She asked if she would go abroad like me, and said she had never sat in a bus or a train, and asked where the money will come from for her to go abroad. I said that ‘if, with these shoes, you run well, you will be sent abroad from the money that will come to you, and not just that, but you’ll also get a tracksuit. So run!’ ”

In 2006, 10-year-old Dutee was accepted into a state-sponsored sports program more than two hours from the family’s home. Food, lodging and training were covered. She missed home but appreciated the dorm’s electricity, running water and indoor toilets. And she was happy she could send prize money to her parents.

That same year, though Dutee didn’t know it, a catastrophe was unfolding for another Indian sprinter. Santhi Soundarajan, a 25-year-old from southern India, finished second in the 800 meters at the 2006 Asian Games in Doha, Qatar, all the more impressive given her roots as a member of India’s impoverished “untouchable” caste. The previous decade, the I.O.C. and I.A.A.F. yielded to pressure by the medical and scientific community and stopped sex-testing every female athlete. But the groups retained the right to test an athlete’s chromosomes when questions about her sex arose and to follow that with a hormone test, a gynecological exam and a psychological evaluation.

In Soundarajan’s case, the media noted that she wasn’t just fast; she also had a deep voice and a flat chest. The day after Soundarajan’s race, the Athletics Federation of India drew her blood and examined her body. Some of her results were leaked to the media. Shortly after, Soundarajan was watching TV when she saw a news report that she had “failed” a sex test. Rejected by the local sports federations, stripped of her silver medal, tormented by ongoing scrutiny and unbearably embarrassed, she attempted suicide, reportedly by swallowing poison.

As Chand began competing in national athletics, another runner from a poor rural village, this time in South Africa, burst onto the interna­tional athletic stage. When Caster Semenya blew by her opponents in the 800-meter race at the 2009 African Junior Championships, her performance raised suspicions. Shortly after, sports officials tested her as she prepared for the World Athletics Championship. Unconcerned — she assumed the investigation was for doping — Semenya won gold again. Almost immediately, the fact that Semenya had been sex-tested was leaked to the press. Instead of attending what is normally the celebratory news conference, Semenya went into hiding. The I.A.A.F. spokesman Nick Davies announced that if Semenya was an impostor, she could be stripped of her medal. He added: “However, if it’s a natural thing, and the athlete has always thought she’s a woman or been a woman, it’s not exactly cheating.”

Fellow athletes, the press and commenters on social media scrutinized Semenya’s body and made much of her supposed gender transgressions: her muscular physique, her deep voice, her flexed-biceps pose, her unshaved armpits, the long shorts she ran in instead of bikini shorts, in addition to her extraordinary speed. A story on Time magazine’s website was headlined “Could This Women’s World Champ Be a Man?” One of Semenya’s competitors, Elisa Cusma of Italy, who came in sixth, said: “These kind of people should not run with us. For me, she is not a woman. She is a man.” The Russian star runner Mariya Savinova reportedly sneered, “Just look at her.” (The World Anti-Doping Agency would later accuse Savinova of using performance-enhancing drugs and recommend a lifetime ban.) The I.A.A.F. general secretary, Pierre Weiss, said of Semenya, “She is a woman, but maybe not 100 percent.” Unlike India, South Africa filed a human rights complaint with the United Nations arguing that the I.A.A.F.’s testing of Semenya was “both sexist and racist.” Semenya herself would later write in a statement, “I have been subjected to unwarranted and invasive scrutiny of the most intimate and private details of my being.”

After nearly a year of negotiations (the details of which are not public) the I.A.A.F. cleared Semenya to run in 2010, and she went on to win the silver medal in the 2012 Olympics. She will be running in Rio. But the federation still faced condemnation over leaks, public smears and the very idea of a sex test. The I.A.A.F. maintained it was obliged to protect female athletes from having “to compete against athletes with hormone-related performance advantages commonly associated with men.” In 2011, the association announced that it would abandon all references to “gender verification” or “gender policy.” Instead, it would institute a test for “hyperandrogenism” (high testosterone) when there are “reasonable grounds for believing” that a woman may have the condition. Women whose testosterone level was “within the male range” would be barred. There were two exceptions: If a woman like Maria Patiño was resistant to testosterone’s effects — or if a woman reduced her testosterone. This entails having her undescended testes surgically removed or taking hormone-suppressing drugs.

Not long after the policy went into effect, sports officials referred four female athletes from “rural or mountainous regions of developing countries” to a French hospital to reduce their high testosterone, according to a 2013 article in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. The authors, many of whom were physicians who treated the women, describe telling them that leaving in their internal testes “carries no health risk,” but that removing them would allow the athletes to resume competition, though possibly hurt their performance. The women, who were between 18 and 21, agreed to the procedure. The physicians treating them also recommended surgically reducing their large clitorises to make them look more typical. The article doesn’t mention whether they told their patients that altering their clitorises might impair sexual sensation, but it does say the women agreed to that surgery too.

Chand was unaware of any controversy surrounding Semenya or other intersex athletes. Her gender concerns were much more immediate: She saw other 15-year-old girls becoming curvier and heard them talk about getting their periods. She asked her mother why her body wasn’t doing the same thing, and trusted her answer: Chand’s body would change when it was good and ready.

In 2012, Chand advanced to a national-level athletic training program, which in addition to food and lodging provided a stipend. At 16, she also became a national champion in the under-18 category, winning the 100 meters in 11.8 seconds. The next year, she won gold in the 100 meters and the 200 meters. In June 2014, she won gold yet again at the Asian championships in Taipei.

Not long after that, she received the call to go to Delhi and was tested. After her results came in, officials told her she could return to the national team only if she reduced her testosterone level — and that she wouldn’t be allowed to compete for a year. The particulars of her results were not made public, but the media learned, and announced, that Chand had “failed” a “gender test” and wasn’t a “normal” woman. For days, Chand cried inconsolably and refused to eat or drink. “Some in the news were saying I was a boy, and some said that maybe I was a transsexual,” Chand told me. “I felt naked. I am a human being, but I felt I was an animal. I wondered how I would live with so much humiliation.”

As news spread that Chand had been dropped from the national team, advocates encouraged her to fight back. Payoshni Mitra, an Indian researcher with a doctorate in gender issues in sport who had advocated on behalf of other intersex athletes, suggested Chand send a letter to the Athletics Federation of India, requesting her disqualification be reversed. “I have not doped or cheated,” Chand said in Hindi, and Mitra, who would become Chand’s government-appointed adviser, translated to English. “I am unable to understand why I am asked to fix my body in a certain way simply for participation as a woman. I was born a woman, reared up as a woman, I identify as a woman and I believe I should be allowed to compete with other women, many of whom are either taller than me or come from more privileged backgrounds, things that most certainly give them an edge over me.”

Mitra and others also urged Chand to take her case to the international Court of Arbitration for Sport — the Supreme Court for sports disputes — arguing that the I.A.A.F.’s testosterone policy was discriminatory and should be rescinded. She agreed. Over four days in March 2015, a three-judge panel heard Chand’s appeal, as a total of 16 witnesses, including scientists, sports officials and athletes, testified.

Female athletes, intersex and not, wondered just how this case would affect their lives. At the hearing, Paula Radcliffe, the British runner who holds the women’s world record for the marathon, testified for the I.A.A.F., saying elevated testosterone levels “make the competition unequal in a way greater than simple natural talent and dedication.” She added, “The concern remains that their bodies respond in different, stronger ways to training and racing than women with normal testosterone levels, and that this renders the competition fundamentally unfair.”

2 days ago - Via Google+ - View -