Sign in with Twitter

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: #mimimiJAPrefeitura de Guarulhos#FunPalacesBobby JohnsBloomberg TVMoth Into Flame#nanachan_db理由とうわさHKTの選抜天願さん衝撃の内容#asklaidinamerica#初の最終再臨サーヴァントは誰ですか車9割#VoltaPraAna#İkiYüzlüMoodysGalatasaray - AntalyasporGökhan Yıldırım#nslabconf#FIFA17UKLaunch#labpalestine#hearingprivilege#RTCNYC#MMSNY16#Assess4DLHouston Police#ツイートからにじみ出るあなた情報希望のビデオ#VoteBeDClipeTVZ#BuradanŞimdiSöylüyorum#forgeconf#WHTNC#cssconf#ThereIsMoreThanOne#WCDChatSolo x With My Glock#トミックス40周年思い出の品子孫800匹の絶倫ガメÇokUyguna TTVerilir#三大欲求の割合日ハムM1#DeixaRolarGabilyFeatMika#todasegundaeu#TurkLirasinaDestek#ATLHealthyCities#OReillyAI#İslamdaKadınaBakıs#26EylülDünyaKotCeketGünüRBD BIBLIA LATINA NO SPOTIFY#housingfringe#第二回東北おいでよサミットFrancenildoİsmail Akkol 20Beşiktaş-Dinamo KievSultanbeyli'deFETÖ İstanbul#BoringTruthOrDare保健室PallociJó 7Les Miles firedHouston shootingHow To Register To VoteClash of ChampionsCharles OsgoodSecrets and LiesEzekiel ElliottJose FernandezOdell BeckhamTerrelle Pryorminnesota vikingsarnold palmerbuffalo billsVin ScullyRory McIlroyJetsOnce Upon A TimeBearsgreen bay packersEaglesMore

Most recent 20 results returned for keyword: Supreme Court (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/117293825265705238855 Jerry Ballard : WHY AM I PRO-LIFE AND WHY IS ABORTION NO DIFFERENT THEN HITLER KILLING 6 MILLION JEWS HILLARY SUPPORT...
WHY AM I PRO-LIFE AND WHY IS ABORTION NO DIFFERENT THEN HITLER KILLING 6 MILLION JEWS

HILLARY SUPPORT MASS MURDER OF THE UNBORN CHILD
You just may change your mind when you see this post

TRUMP IS PRO-LIFE AND I STAND WITH TRUMP



Hillary Clinton Applauds Supreme Court Rejecting Pro-Life Law: “Abortion Should be a Right”

NATIONAL STEVEN ERTELT JUN 27, 2016 | 10:47AM WASHINGTON, DC


http://www.lifenews.com/2016/06/27/hillary-clinton-applauds-supreme-court-rejecting-pro-life-law-abortion-should-be-a-right/

Hillary Clinton wasted no time on Monday applauding the Supreme Court decision striking down a Texas pro-life law responsible for saving thousands of babies from abortion. She hailed the decision as a “victory” and saying “abortion should be a right.”
Jerry Ballard originally shared to Fox News Politics (Discussion):

Hillary Clinton Applauds Supreme Court Rejecting Pro-Life Law: “Abortion Should be a Right”

NATIONAL STEVEN ERTELT JUN 27, 2016 | 10:47AM WASHINGTON, DC


http://www.lifenews.com/2016/06/27/hillary-clinton-applauds-supreme-court-rejecting-pro-life-law-abortion-should-be-a-right/

Hillary Clinton wasted no time on Monday applauding the Supreme Court decision striking down a Texas pro-life law responsible for saving thousands of babies from abortion. She hailed the decision as a “victory” and saying “abortion should be a right.”

Here are the tweets Clinton posted immediately upon the high court’s ruling The -H after the tweets is supposed to denote that Clinton write the tweet herself as opposed to having a staffer post it.

Hillary Clinton ✔@HillaryClinton
SCOTUS's decision is a victory for women in Texas and across America. Safe abortion should be a right—not just on paper, but in reality. -H

Hillary Clinton ✔@HillaryClinton
SCOTUS's decision is a victory for women in Texas and across America. Safe abortion should be a right—not just on paper, but in reality. -H

Hillary Clinton ✔@HillaryClinton
This fight isn't over: The next president has to protect women's health. Women won't be "punished" for exercising their basic rights. -H
7:14 AM - 27 Jun 2016


Earlier this month, Clinton told the abortion activists at Planned Parenthood that she would “always have your back.”

“I have been proud to stand with Planned parenthood for a long time and, as president, I will always have your back,” Hillary said. “We need to protect Planned Parenthood from partisan attacks.”

SIGN THE PLEDGE! We Oppose Hillary Clinton!

“I will be your partner in the election and for the long haul,” Hillary promised the abortion activists cheering her on.

Clinton praised Roe v. Wade for supposedly helping women avoid dangerous illegal abortions but ignored how the Planned Parenthood abortion corporation was responsible for killing a black woman in a botched legal abortion.

Hillary complained that 10 abortion clinics in Texas that kill unborn babies in abortions is not enough and complained that the Supreme Court might uphold a pro-life law in Texas that makes abortion clinics follow the kind of health and safety laws legitimate clinics do.

Voters need to be reminded that Clinton received a question from host Bret Baier about abortion and whether or not unborn children should have any rights before birth. Her answer was shocking.

Clinton’s pro-abortion views are longstanding. In March 2009, Hillary Clinton received Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger award at an event in Houston. During the event, Clinton said that emphasizing and promoting abortion is a key issue in President Barack Obama’s foreign policy. She also defended taxpayer funded abortions for poor women.

During this election, Hillary has slammed a new law in Indiana banning abortions on babies with Down syndrome.

During an interview on The View recently Hillary Clinton said an unborn child just hours before delivery should have no Constitutional rights. Her comments came just days after Clinton said unborn children simply do not have any Constitutional rights, which would include the right to life.

In February, Clinton defended partial-birth abortions: “My husband vetoed a very restrictive legislation on late-term abortions, and he vetoed it at an event in the White House where we invited a lot of women who had faced this very difficult decision, that ought to be made based on their own conscience, their family, their faith, in consultation with doctors. Those stories left a searing impression on me,” she continued.

Clinton has said more taxpayer money needs to go to the Planned Parenthood abortion business and Clinton demonstrated her unyielding commitment to abortion and the Planned Parenthood abortion business, accepting their endorsement during a pro-abortion rally — saying she would be the abortion business’ president.

“I will always defend Planned Parenthood and I will say consistently and proudly, Planned Parenthood should be funded, supported and protected, not undermined, misrepresented and demonized,” Clinton said. “As your president, I will always have your back.”

At a speech to the Women in the World Conference in April 2015, Hillary Clinton argued, “Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care (aka. abortion) and safe childbirth, and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced,” In order to expand worldwide access to abortion, she suggested that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

In May 2015, the U.S. House passed the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to protect unborn babies 20 weeks and older from excruciating late abortions. In addition to a statement slamming House lawmakers for advancing the bill, Clinton tweeted, “When it comes to women’s health, there are two kinds of experts: women and their doctors. True 40+ years ago, true today.”

At a presidential forum at Drake University, Clinton called ending the life of another human being a “fundamental human right.”

The first order of business for Clinton and her friends at the abortion company is to force Americans to pay for abortions with their tax dollars by attempting to overturn the Hyde Amendment, which has protected Americans from funding most all abortions since the late 1970s. Upheld by the Supreme Court, the Hyde Amendment is now a target of abortion advocates who have moved from pro-choice to pro-abortion — forcing Americans not only to accept unlimited abortions before birth but to pay for them.
9 minutes ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/111429276509442296910 Breaking Duluth News : On Nov. 8, Minnesota voters will consider a question they probably haven’t given much thought to: Should...
On Nov. 8, Minnesota voters will consider a question they probably haven’t given much thought to: Should state legislators set their own salaries, or should a totally independent group decide how much lawmakers are paid? Lawmakers passed the legislation to put the constitutional amendment on the ballot back in 2013, but in the years since then, no one has talked about it all that much. Not the majority of state representative and senators who voted in favor of putting the amendment on the ballot this year. And not the proposal’s critics, who have yet even to form an official campaign against the initiative.   And yet, voters will have to decide if they support or oppose an independent council on legislative pay when they cast their ballots in six weeks. In Minnesota, a constitutional amendment can only pass if the majority of voters who cast ballots in the election vote “yes”; leaving the question blank is essentially the same thing as voting “no.”   Here’s a breakdown of the issue: why some people don’t like it, and what’s happened in other states that set up similar commissions to decide legislator pay.  How are Minnesota legislators paid now — and how much? Under a clause in the state’s constitution, legislators are required to set pay for a wide range of public officials — including themselves. Minnesota legislators make a $31,140 yearly salary for a job that is classified as part-time, covering the four or five months a year legislators are in session in St. Paul. Those serving in leadership positions get a $12,456 annual bonus, and everyone is eligible for daily per diem payments: $96 a day for senators and $77 for House members during the session. That doesn’t include lodging expenses, a necessity for outstate legislators, and for which lawmakers can get reimbursed up to $1,200 a month. If the amendment passes, what would change? The idea behind the amendment is to take the power to set legislative pay out of the hands of lawmakers and transfer it to an independent citizen group. The exact language of the ballot question reads: “Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to remove legislators’ ability to set their own salaries, and instead establish an independent, citizens-only council to prescribe salaries for legislators?”  If the amendment passes, a 16-member salary council would be formed to decide legislator pay every two years. The governor and the Minnesota Supreme Court chief justice would pick the members. No legislators — past or present — or their spouses would be allowed to serve on the council, and lobbyists, judges and state employees would also be barred. Appointees would be split evenly between the two major political parties. Minnesota already has a little-known council that recommends salaries for lawmakers, but they don’t have authority to enact pay raises or decreases, and legislators have ignored their recommendations for years. If the amendment passes, the new council would have the authority to actually change pay for legislators. Why can’t legislators just deal with it themselves? Lawmakers voting to raise their own paycheck is politically dicey, so it doesn’t happen very often. In 2006, 17 incumbent lawmakers in Pennsylvania were ousted after voting to increase their pay by 16 percent. Minnesota’s very first senators and representatives were paid $5 a day in the 1870s. It took until 1945 to hit $1,000 annually, but pay climbed up steadily after that. Legislators last voted to increase their pay back in 1999, when it was raised from $29,657 a year to its current level. But it’s been stuck there ever since, even as other state employees’ salaries increased. Legislative aides now have a higher salary than their bosses, starting at $32,368 a year, though their job is considered full-time. Sen. Kent Eken, DFL-Twin Valley, said the idea behind the amendment is to simply remove the conflict of interest in letting legislators vote on their own pay. But others say it’s time for legislator salaries to increase: While the job is technically only part time, it’s hard for some legislators to find jobs that let them work only half the year. And with irregular hours during session, constituent services and the rigors of the campaign trail, many argue the job requires at least a full-time commitment. The constraints can restrict who is able to serve in the Legislature, leading to more independently wealthy legislators or retirees who have flexible schedules. Who opposes the amendment? Not everyone agrees that legislators deserve a raise, and many think the $31,000 a year salary is already high for a part-time job. What’s more, critics say the new independent legislative commission is simply a way to raise legislator salaries without them having to vote on it. Still, so far, no organized opposition to the amendment has emerged.   Do other states have independent councils, and do they give legislators a raise? In about 20 other states, voters or lawmakers have decided to appoint an independent group of citizens to review and make recommendations on what elected officials should be paid. The makeup of the commission — and their ultimate authority — varies from state to state. In states like California and Washington, the commission has the unilateral authority to raise or lower legislator paychecks.   In states like New York, the legislature can veto the recommendations, but they would have to call a special session to do so before they automatically go into effect. In Missouri and Connecticut, legislators must take a vote on the recommendations before they can become final. In Arizona and Nebraska, legislative pay commission can make recommendations, but voters get the last say as to whether they are implemented. In those states, wages have remained stagnant, with Nebraska legislators making $12,000 a year.A detail from the 2016 Minnesota sample ballot showing the amendment question. In states where the commission has stronger authority, pay for legislators is more likely to go up. In 2009, an all-new compensation commission in Alaska recommended a $26,000 pay increase, which raised legislator salaries for the first time in 15 years. Currently, Alaska legislators make $50,400 a year for the part-time job. In Arkansas last year, a newly established pay commission — added to the constitution by amendment — recommended legislator pay increase from $15,869 to $39,400. Do the legislative pay commissions ever lower legislators' salaries? Yes, though it happens less often. Between 2009 and 2012, a compensation commission in California cut legislative salaries by 23 percent after deciding lawmakers should share the pain of deep budget cuts. With the economy on the rebound, the commission has restored most of those cuts. This year California’s commission voted to boosts legislators' salaries from $100,000 to $104,000, which automatically goes into effect on Dec. 7. In Michigan in 2011, a legislative pay commission recommended legislators take a 10 percent reduction in pay, lowering their  $79,650 salary to $71,685. Both Michigan and California legislatures serve full-time.  Do independent commissions ever leave pay flat? Yes. In Utah, legislators are paid $273 a week, but its independent commission didn’t recommend any changes to compensation in 2016. In New Jersey, Gov. Chris Christie got around the state’s seven-member compensation commission by withholding his appointments to the group. Without his appointments, the group cannot reach a quorum and takes votes on legislator pay. Has there been any research done on how much legislators should be paid? Researchers at Boise State University tried to tackle that question in 2014, specifically focusing on whether or not better-funded Legislatures are better at governing. To do so, political scientists created a scale of professionalism that included three components: salary, the number of days in a legislative session, and the size of the legislature’s staff. The research found that legislatures with higher pay, more time in session and more resources for legislators passed a greater percentage of bills overall. Those legislatures were also more efficient, connected to their constituents and independent from their leadership or political party.  If the amendment passes, how much could legislator pay go up in Minnesota? No one knows for sure what the commission might do, but Minnesota legislator salaries are in middle of the pack compared to other states. In 2013, Minnesota’s current compensation council recommended the annual salary of state legislators should equal 33 percent of the governor’s $120,000 salary starting in 2015. That would bring legislator pay closer to $40,000 per year.  | @MinnPost
There's an amendment to the state constitution on the ballot this year. Here's what you need to know about it.
As issue: Should Minnesota legislators set their own salaries, or should an independent group decide how much lawmakers get paid?
14 minutes ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/108917200439941668395 The Law Offices of Frederick W. Nessler and Associates, Ltd. :

Illinois Supreme Court appoints Christopher Bonjean as Director of Communications | Illinois Lawyer Now
The Illinois Supreme Court has appointed Christopher Bonjean as Director of the Office of Communications and Public Information, effective October 3, 2016. He will head a newly reorganized communications operation, which has been charged with developing strategies to inform and educate a diverse ...
16 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/101367549022879705079 Don Lester : Hilary the liar crook murder cheater no morals
Hilary the liar crook murder cheater no morals 
A Liberal-Dominated Supreme Court is a Threat to Our Basic Freedoms | TheCatholicAssociation.org
If Hillary Clinton is elected, she will pack the Supreme Court with liberals to impose her radical agenda without the consent of the people or our elected representatives. This must not be allowed to happen.
27 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/109576406011506117051 AbaloneKid : PROPHESY UNFOLDING [GET THE GOSPEL OUT, BELOVED'S] There are many recent developments in the godless...
PROPHESY UNFOLDING [GET THE GOSPEL OUT, BELOVED'S]

There are many recent developments in the godless West. To name a few:

The Supreme Court of Italy last week ruled that public masturbation is legal (except in front of minors).

-The New York City Council voted in May that public urination is not a criminal act.

The San Francisco City Council decided, by one vote, to continue the city's ban on public nudity - not, of course, on the grounds of "decency" but on the grounds of public health.

Since that can easily be resolved by use of a towel on public benches and chairs, it is only a matter of time, probably a couple of years, before people will be permitted to walk around naked in San Francisco.

A few weeks ago, teachers in Charlotte, North Carolina, were instructed not to refer to their elementary school students as "boys and girls" but as "students" and "scholars." The reasoning is presumably for inclusivity - there may be a student who has no gender identity - and that adults should not impose a gender identity on young people.

-In a New York Times op-ed column, a professor of philosophy noted his shock at learning that most young Americans do not believe that moral truths exist. They are incapable of asserting that anything, including killing for fun, is wrong beyond personal opinion.

These are all inevitable consequences of the death of belief in God and Judeo-Christian values, and of the Bible as society's primary moral reference work.

The West has been in moral decline since World War I, the calamity that led to World War II and the death of national identity and Christianity in most of Europe.

There has always been one exception: the United States. But now that is ending. The seeds of America's decline have been sown since the beginning of the 20th century, and they came to fruition with the post-World War II generation, the baby boomers.

Radical and aggressive secularism and atheism have replaced religion in virtually every school and throughout American public life.

We have gone from President Abraham Lincoln reading the Bible every day to Alaska Airlines feeling forced to stop passing out prayer cards with meals. In a hundred years, we've gone from near-total biblical literacy to near-total biblical illiteracy.

One wonders whether half of America's college seniors could correctly identify Cain and Abel, or whether more than 1 in 10 Americans could cite the Ten Commandments.

We have gone from President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaiming the need to save "Christian civilization" in World War II speeches to a virtual ban on American presidents mentioning the word "Christianity." And, as is widely noted, Americans are no longer supposed to wish strangers "merry Christmas," and they must refer to a Christmas party as a "holiday party."

Similarly, the European Union constitution never mentions Christianity, despite the fact that it was Christianity that formed Europe.

The prices that we Americans and Europeans are paying for creating the first godless societies in recorded history amount to civilizational suicide. Boys and girls are not to be referred to as boys and girls; Western elites dismiss national identity as protofascism; the belief that moral truth exists has been destroyed and replaced by feelings and opinions; fewer people are marrying; and more people live alone than at any time in American history.

Western European countries have become empty, soulless places. They are pretty and appear materially secure (for now), but they stand for almost nothing (except "multiculturalism" and "tolerance"). They have replaced a Jewish population that overwhelmingly wanted to assimilate with a Muslim population that does not want to.

And nearly all European countries are headed to Greece-like insolvency as fewer and fewer workers pay enough in taxes to support those who collect welfare, and as tensions with their Muslim inhabitants increase.

But the good news is that now, beginning with Italy and New York, citizens can watch each other masturbate or urinate in public.

When societies stop believing in God: They commit suicide.

Source:
http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/article.cfm?recent_news_id=678#qgIIIpJHeCVdfYLQ.99
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-skQRDJriSmY/V-k5A62aIXI/AAAAAAAA0OM/XZ8HmLRdJi4PoS8cq1CDN64dQIOnqznCwCJoC/w506-h750/tenseptember262016bvnv.jpg
27 minutes ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/110843007558500349504 Wendell D. O'Neal : Notice of Appeal on schedule for delivery at U.S. District Court of Phoenix on 09/25/2016. O'Neal v ...
Notice of Appeal on schedule for delivery at U.S. District Court of Phoenix on 09/25/2016. O'Neal v University of Phoenix Inc et al, 2:14-cv-02207-GMS, (D Ariz).

Appellant attaches Notice of Appeal opposing District Court order denying case Reopening for Remand Modification against Apollo and University of Phoenix Inc together with Supreme Court and Civil Court of Appeals Orders Denying Superior Court subpoena enforcement against Apollo and University of Phoenix Inc. Id.

District Court of Phoenix will process Notice of Appeal by attachment of Order Denying Case Reopening and Motion with Exhibits including Maricopa Deputy Sheriff Return for submission to Ninth Circuit Court. Id. Fed. R. App. Proc. Rules 3 et seq.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/--dohpIwaA3Y/V-kzUMrhybI/AAAAAAAAkYs/DS2kzQbbqeclIsCFUOvqzEHFabMgZKi0wCJoC/w506-h750/16%2B-%2B1
29 minutes ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/102056078440860985699 Nooww : "This proves that all the way to the highest court, these were our rights from the beginning." The board...
"This proves that all the way to the highest court, these were our rights from the beginning." The board chairman of South Carolina Equality after the Supreme Court allowed gay marriage to proceed in South Carolina in November 2014

- nooww.com #dope #facts #interesting #quiz #trivia #news
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-oUffVZpstzM/V-k4pdXI6VI/AAAAAAAAAkU/GH92IPI_7j4Fh4av-9QhlROz0jEUCoPNgCJoC/w506-h750/5b36c71c-5abf-418c-9ffb-7c96df0c121c
31 minutes ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/102375689999017648252 taxmanagementindia : #excise Refund claim - unjust enrichment - whether the refund sanctioned by Assistant Commissioner is...
#excise Refund claim - unjust enrichment - whether the refund sanctioned by Assistant Commissioner is wrong, since the appellants have not proved that they have not passed on the duty burden - duty paid under protest - refund pertains to refund of pre-deposit amount - only - Held that - it is found that the respondents have not produced any specific documentary evidence to prove that the duty has not been passed to other person/ buyer to nullify the doctrine of unjust-enrichment. I do not find that they were forced by any authority and that they followed correctly the provisions of law applicable to under protest payments. It is also found that the respondents have submitted that they were forced to debit the duty, that they made the payment under protest at the time of preventive checks of the goods sold during the period 01.04.1997 to 27.09.1997 but I do not find any evidence proving forced recovery debit and also there is no endorsement on the TR-6 challans for payment under protest as prescribed under Rule 233B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Mafatlal Industries Limited vs. UOI 1996 (12) TMI 50 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA and in the case of Sahkari Khand Udyog Mandal Limited vs. Commissioner 2005 (3) TMI 116 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA held that no refund can be made unless it is established that burden of duty is not passed on to others. Therefore, in view of the same, we find no infirmity in the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) ... ... ... #CaseLaws
33 minutes ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/117991744753278185470 Robert Sherman : jail for benistar founder Edit post Published on September 13, 2016 LikedUnlikejail for benistar fou...
jail for benistar founder
Edit post
Published on September 13, 2016
LikedUnlikejail for benistar founder2Comment2ShareShare jail for benistar founder0
Stacey Arenas
Stacey Arenas
Assistant Managing Director, Marketing Manager at Vebaplan LLC
+1 516-938-5007





Home
Did Benistar Harm You?
Benistar Leader in Jail!
IRS Medics
Expert Witness
About Lance
Our Services
Contact Us


Should you trust Benistar?

Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc. Single-handedly Shapes 419 Plan Jurisprudence by Cosgrove Law Group, LLC Since its creation in December 1997, the Benistar 419 Plan, has brought much scrutiny to the tax interpretation of 419 plans. Created by Daniel Carpenter, the purpose of the Benistar 419 Plan was to provide life insurance to employees through a company’s contributions to a…

Read more...



BENISTAR 419 PLAN HELD BY TAX COURT TO BE A “LISTED TRANSACTION”

The United States Tax Court has held that the Benistar 419 Plan & Trust, crafted by Daniel Carpenter, was a plan that offered the same type of tax benefits as those listed in IRS Notice 95-34 (i.e., the deduction of contributions made to the trust arrangement). In fact, the benefits of the Benistar Plan were touted as “virtually unlimited.” Promotional materials…

Read more...



No. 54: Daniel Carpenter and a Host of Criminal Allegations

Daniel E. Carpenter (Simsbury, CT), attorney and businessman, was scheduled to report to a federal prison on Friday, June 20. His saga involves cases over more than a decade in federal district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court. Among the federal agencies involved in the cases are the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, the Department…

Read more...



Abusive Tax Shelters – 419 Plans – Section 79 Plans

The IRS is cracking down on abusive tax shelters. Many of them are being marketed to small business owners by insurance professionals financial planners, accountants, and attorneys. These plans come in various versions, and most of them have gotten the participant audited and the salesman sued.They purportedly allow the business owner to make a large tax-deductible contribution, and some or all…
Lance Wallach | LinkedIn
View Lance Wallach’s professional profile on LinkedIn. LinkedIn is the world's largest business network, helping professionals like Lance Wallach discover inside connections to recommended job candidates, industry experts, and business partners.
44 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/117991744753278185470 Robert Sherman : jail for benistar founder Edit post Published on September 13, 2016 LikedUnlikejail for benistar fou...
jail for benistar founder
Edit post
Published on September 13, 2016
LikedUnlikejail for benistar founder2Comment2ShareShare jail for benistar founder0
Stacey Arenas
Stacey Arenas
Assistant Managing Director, Marketing Manager at Vebaplan LLC
+1 516-938-5007





Home
Did Benistar Harm You?
Benistar Leader in Jail!
IRS Medics
Expert Witness
About Lance
Our Services
Contact Us


Should you trust Benistar?

Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc. Single-handedly Shapes 419 Plan Jurisprudence by Cosgrove Law Group, LLC Since its creation in December 1997, the Benistar 419 Plan, has brought much scrutiny to the tax interpretation of 419 plans. Created by Daniel Carpenter, the purpose of the Benistar 419 Plan was to provide life insurance to employees through a company’s contributions to a…

Read more...



BENISTAR 419 PLAN HELD BY TAX COURT TO BE A “LISTED TRANSACTION”

The United States Tax Court has held that the Benistar 419 Plan & Trust, crafted by Daniel Carpenter, was a plan that offered the same type of tax benefits as those listed in IRS Notice 95-34 (i.e., the deduction of contributions made to the trust arrangement). In fact, the benefits of the Benistar Plan were touted as “virtually unlimited.” Promotional materials…

Read more...



No. 54: Daniel Carpenter and a Host of Criminal Allegations

Daniel E. Carpenter (Simsbury, CT), attorney and businessman, was scheduled to report to a federal prison on Friday, June 20. His saga involves cases over more than a decade in federal district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court. Among the federal agencies involved in the cases are the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, the Department…

Read more...



Abusive Tax Shelters – 419 Plans – Section 79 Plans

The IRS is cracking down on abusive tax shelters. Many of them are being marketed to small business owners by insurance professionals financial planners, accountants, and attorneys. These plans come in various versions, and most of them have gotten the participant audited and the salesman sued.They purportedly allow the business owner to make a large tax-deductible contribution, and some or all…
https://www.google.com/search?q=www.419plan&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS702US702&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=638&ei=ZTXpV5iRAcG5-AH6lLuwCQ&start=60&sa=N

44 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/117991744753278185470 Robert Sherman : jail for benistar founder Edit post Published on September 13, 2016 LikedUnlikejail for benistar fou...
jail for benistar founder
Edit post
Published on September 13, 2016
LikedUnlikejail for benistar founder2Comment2ShareShare jail for benistar founder0
Stacey Arenas
Stacey Arenas
Assistant Managing Director, Marketing Manager at Vebaplan LLC
+1 516-938-5007





Home
Did Benistar Harm You?
Benistar Leader in Jail!
IRS Medics
Expert Witness
About Lance
Our Services
Contact Us


Should you trust Benistar?

Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc. Single-handedly Shapes 419 Plan Jurisprudence by Cosgrove Law Group, LLC Since its creation in December 1997, the Benistar 419 Plan, has brought much scrutiny to the tax interpretation of 419 plans. Created by Daniel Carpenter, the purpose of the Benistar 419 Plan was to provide life insurance to employees through a company’s contributions to a…

Read more...



BENISTAR 419 PLAN HELD BY TAX COURT TO BE A “LISTED TRANSACTION”

The United States Tax Court has held that the Benistar 419 Plan & Trust, crafted by Daniel Carpenter, was a plan that offered the same type of tax benefits as those listed in IRS Notice 95-34 (i.e., the deduction of contributions made to the trust arrangement). In fact, the benefits of the Benistar Plan were touted as “virtually unlimited.” Promotional materials…

Read more...



No. 54: Daniel Carpenter and a Host of Criminal Allegations

Daniel E. Carpenter (Simsbury, CT), attorney and businessman, was scheduled to report to a federal prison on Friday, June 20. His saga involves cases over more than a decade in federal district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court. Among the federal agencies involved in the cases are the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, the Department…

Read more...



Abusive Tax Shelters – 419 Plans – Section 79 Plans

The IRS is cracking down on abusive tax shelters. Many of them are being marketed to small business owners by insurance professionals financial planners, accountants, and attorneys. These plans come in various versions, and most of them have gotten the participant audited and the salesman sued.They purportedly allow the business owner to make a large tax-deductible contribution, and some or all…
Our Services

46 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/110653950210909287079 Carl Clark : ...If the democrat wins there will be a liberal leaning supreme court that would and could overturn ...
...If the democrat wins there will be a liberal leaning supreme court that would and could overturn rulings like Citizen's United and the striking down of portions of the civil rights act. The effect of a democrat winning this coming election is monumental in the fight for justice and equality in America.
I cannot stress how much different life will be with a democratic president and a liberal majority supreme court. The majority of Americans will see their lives and opportunities improve. The majority of Americans will find that their rights as citizens in our nation are not only preserved but enhanced. Our nation will focus more on internal building within our borders to not only help with livable wages and bring new technologies into play but we will also be attacking the causes of global warming while advancing policies that address and improve immigration status and reform. The list of things a liberal leaning supreme court can accomplish for the elderly, women, workers and students is long but very doable.-CC.
The necessity of electing a Democrat as President (#2796)
The very first thought about having a democrat as president is the US Supreme Court vacancy. Currently we have 4 justices that side almost exclusively on the conservative republican agenda. We also have 4 justices that side e...
46 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/108445507482625702925 Tom Lehner : By the time the next president takes the oath of office on Jan. 20, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will...
By the time the next president takes the oath of office on Jan. 20, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be 83 years old, Justice Anthony Kennedy will be 80 years old, and Justice Stephen Breyer will be 78 years old.
A Conservative Take on Trump’s Supreme Court Nominee List
The next president will have the opportunity to leave a massive imprint on the federal courts for a generation or more.
47 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114446864233855723930 Ace Ventura : Murder trial delayed for Surrey Six killer Jamie Bacon The murder trial for accused gangster Jamie Bacon...
Murder trial delayed for Surrey Six killer Jamie Bacon
The murder trial for accused gangster Jamie Bacon has been pushed back to March of 2018.

As part of reasons given from the bench, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Ker said the defence is crafting an application for a stay of proceedings because of the ...
Murder trial delayed for Surrey Six killer Jamie Bacon
The murder trial for accused gangster Jamie Bacon has been pushed back to March of 2018. As part of reasons given from the bench, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Ker said the defence is crafting an application for a stay ...
48 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/107243770325412271525 CloudNine™ : ““Ultimately, we conclude that if used properly, observing the limitations and cautions set forth herein...
““Ultimately, we conclude that if used properly, observing the limitations and cautions set forth herein, a circuit court’s consideration of a COMPAS risk assessment at sentencing does not violate a defendant’s right to due process,” wrote Justice Ann Walsh Bradley of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.” http://buff.ly/2a7wGqd
Court Rules that Judges Can Consider Predictive Algorithms in Sentencing: eDiscovery Trends - eDiscoveryDaily
Score one for big data analytics. According to The Wall Street Journal Law Blog, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled last week that sentencing judges may take into account algorithms that score offenders based on their risk of committing future crimes.
49 minutes ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/116780544121860688713 Vincent Artale jr : Jesus travels to Jerusalem for the annual Passover celebration and while he is there, he receives a ...
Jesus travels to Jerusalem for the annual Passover celebration and while he is there, he receives a visitor during the night. The visitor is a Pharisee named Nicodemus. Nicodemus is also a member of the Jewish Supreme Court, the Sanhedrin. Andreas…
Commentary on John 3 (Nicodemus Meets Jesus) — Tough Questions Answered
Jesus travels to Jerusalem for the annual Passover celebration and while he is there, he receives a visitor during the night. The visitor is a Pharisee named Nicodemus. Nicodemus is also a member o…
55 minutes ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/115756477970014823383 Breaking El Paso News :

Texas Asks Supreme Court to Reinstate Voter ID Law - Rewire
Republican legislators in state legislatures that have passed rigid voter ID laws have claimed that such laws are necessary to prevent in-person voter fraud. GOP-led investigations have not turned up evidence of voter fraud.
55 minutes ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/101844282580493255208 Donald Scarinci :

New Jersey Supreme Court to Consider Gap-Period Obligation - scarincilawyer.com
The New Jersey Supreme Court will consider whether municipal affordable housing obligations include a "separate and discrete" gap-period obligation.
58 minutes ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/118020124418655713628 Dandy Dada : KENYA JUDICIAL COMMISSION BEGIN SEARCH FOR DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE The Judicial Service Commission (JSC...
KENYA JUDICIAL COMMISSION BEGIN SEARCH FOR DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) on Monday began interviewing applicants for the position of Deputy Chief Justice to succeed Justice Kalpana Rawal, who retired in June under controversial circumstances.

High Court Judge Abida Ali-Aroni was the first applicant to face the panel.

There are 16 applicants for the Deputy Chief Justice (DCJ) position. Besides the office holder's judicial functions as a member of the Supreme Court bench, the DCJ is also the deputy head of the Judiciary and vice-president of the apex court.

READ MORE

http://newsnetworkafrica.blogspot.com/2016/09/kenya-judicial-commission-begin-search.html
KENYA JUDICIAL COMMISSION BEGIN SEARCH FOR DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) on Monday began interviewing applicants for the position of Deputy Chief Justice to succeed Justi...
1 hour ago - Via Google+ - View -