Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: オーブ5個ナレーション山田トイレの花子RED始まったKötöpÖdönö Önlöyn#WHUMCI#お前らTwitter働いてない間何してたか語れコノハナサクヤヒメ#FBTimEngineSarıLaciYıllarDiler#50TLyeGündemeÇıkarılır0536x267x9887UygunKaliteliTTYapilir SkypeBuraklc97#VEVORecord#RWCTickets#rugbyworldcuptickets#1SaatÖmrümKalsa#CumartesiAnneleri500haftaEditora Abril#RejectedGangNames#SomosTodosDilmaVandallarŞimdi HesapZamanı#AskNigelFarageSeranova BayiAçılışındaCahilsinKeMAL Çünkü#StealMyGirlVideoTodayStealMyGirlVideoToday#DesesperodaVeja#Aecio45PeloBrasil#100ThingsFordeRugby World Cup#SempreTiveUmaAtraçãoPor#HappyBirthdayKatyPerry塁審Pronatec#bencemutlulukACTSモロッコポンちゃんHOLIファイトクラブLe FondreHalloweenWhy is TwitterEl ClassicoJoe HartWest HamSENAI帝京魂四文字IDホルモン焼きそばマインスイーパー#ツイッターが不調なので何を言っても気付かれないSanaAşkımız BitmeyecekFENERBAHÇEYenidenKenetlenmekİçin SaldırKANARYA#UcuzTTyaplır0537x206x1834#VotoAecioPeloBR45ILわっしょいわっしょいイカメンチ#RWC2015#mozfestTerry KeenanSt Vincent MovieOuija MovieJaylen FrybergMegan MahoneyEbola NycGamergateMichael Zehaf-BibeauUltronHoney Boo Boosf giantsLisa Annbetween two fernsConstantineDiwalisolar eclipsedenver broncosGiantsSteve NashJoe MaddonMore

Most recent 20 results returned for keyword: Keith Judd (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/109823898174098600171 Coyote Lane : Barack Hussien Obama Illigitimate Presidency, Eric Holder, Keith Judd | VIDEOS OF THE DAY: THE LAWLESS...
Barack Hussien Obama Illigitimate Presidency, Eric Holder, Keith Judd | VIDEOS OF THE DAY: THE LAWLESS USURPER HAS HIS CLAWS EVERYWHERE! "Western Journalism Dot Com" !
As we all know by now, the Dictator-in-Chief is as lawless as they
come. In fact, I don’t think our nation has ever seen anything, or
experienced anything like Barack Hussien Obama since her founding! The
destruction he’s caused since he’s taken office…a...
Barack Hussien Obama Illigitimate Presidency, Eric Holder, Keith Judd | VIDEOS OF THE DAY: THE LAWLESS USURPER HAS HIS CLAWS EVERYWHERE! "Western Journalism Dot Com" !

7 months ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/100734404448871806226 Ron Ator : Pretty interesting a quick google search on Keith Judd backs up this video.
Pretty interesting a quick google search on Keith Judd backs up this video.
Watch the video: Will This Prisoner Stop Obama?
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/pz-wQV_k6PLH5AIIpiWaEYcSoX6XHmvd2Ip7U_GP9r9Fc2jBrTBq_ZsyO8TfUWUBY9hqHRhYTPC735kPFqG3Gw=w506-h284-n
Video produced by http://www.westernjournalism.com Produced, written, and edited by Kris Zane. Narrated by Tom Hinchey
8 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/103745251370112684753 Kustom X : Keith Judd, the convict who ran for President, became somewhat of a celebrity after almost beating Obama...
Keith Judd, the convict who ran for President, became somewhat of a celebrity after almost beating Obama in the 2012 West Virginia Democratic Primary. .. What wasn’t reported, however,
was that after Obama won the presidential election,
Judd filed a series of lawsuits detailing how Obama was illegally placed on the 2012 presidential ballot.
One lawsuit, filed on May 9, 2013, is scheduled to be heard before a federal court in the next few months.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/man-will-take-obama-behind-bars/
Will This Prisoner Stop Obama?
Keith Judd—who has strangely been in prison since 1999 for a minor threat made against a local New Mexico college—may never make it out of prison alive.
8 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/109823898174098600171 Coyote Lane : Barack Hussien Obama Illigitimate Presidency, Eric Holder, Keith Judd | VIDEOS OF THE DAY: THE LAWLESS...
Barack Hussien Obama Illigitimate Presidency, Eric Holder, Keith Judd | VIDEOS OF THE DAY: THE LAWLESS USURPER HAS HIS CLAWS EVERYWHERE! "Western Journalism Dot Com" !
As we all know by now, the Dictator-in-Chief is as lawless as they
come. In fact, I don’t think our nation has ever seen anything, or
experienced anything like Barack Hussien Obama since her founding! The
destruction he’s caused since he’s taken office…a...
Barack Hussien Obama Illigitimate Presidency, Eric Holder, Keith Judd | VIDEOS OF THE DAY: THE LAWLESS USURPER HAS HIS CLAWS EVERYWHERE! "Western Journalism Dot Com" !

8 months ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/110522999215932277973 soul plane : BOMBSHELL: Government Documents EXPOSE FEMA Detainment List Criteria , plus 21 more BOMBSHELL: Government...
BOMBSHELL: Government Documents EXPOSE FEMA Detainment List Criteria , plus 21 more

BOMBSHELL: Government Documents EXPOSE FEMA Detainment List Criteria Will This Prisoner Stop Obama? Obama Gearing Up For Complete Gun Confiscation US Soldier’s Message To America ‘We Have Failed You’ Homeland Security to Activate ‘National License Plate Recognition Database’ If America Continues To Go Down The Same Path As Europe, This Is What Life Will Be Like… Cop Who Killed Kelly Thomas Seen in Restaurant, Americans Make Him Leave IRS Demands Businesses Show “Bonafide Reasons” for Layoffs Oregon Police Give Nightclubs ID Scanners to Datamine Customers 18 Members of Congress Formally Ask Obama to Reschedule Marijuana DHS to purchase 75.1 million rounds of ammunition this year How Obamacare Will Inevitably Raise Food Prices Illinois Electricity Customers Forced to Get ‘Smart Meters’ or Pay Fine 20 Signs That The Global Economic Crisis Is Starting To Catch Fire The Five Criminals: In America the Gestapo Has Replaced The Rule Of Law Anti-Zionist voice of Donald Duck sacked Video: What This Woman Does to a Knock- Out Game Thug Will Surprise You Exclusive: EU executive sees personal savings used to plug long-term financing gap FAA Shuts Down Flower Drone-Delivery Service Doctors Find 44-Year-Old Fetus in Woman, 84 No Hands! Mind-Controlled Helicopter Flies On Brainwaves DARPA developing ultimate web search engine to police the internet

BOMBSHELL: Government Documents EXPOSE FEMA Detainment List Criteria

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:48 AM PST Sean Brown New documents reveal the criteria used to create the “Main Core” list that our government has been compiling on Americans. To give you a quick background, “Main Core” is a list designed to identify Americans who could be deemed a ‘terrorist’ threat both to the nation and to the government. It started with ...

Will This Prisoner Stop Obama?

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:47 AM PST Keith Judd, the convict who ran for President, became somewhat of a celebrity after almost beating Obama in the 2012 West Virginia Democratic Primary. What wasn’t reported, however, was that after Obama won the presidential election, Judd filed a series of lawsuits detailing how Obama was illegally placed on the 2012 presidential ballot. One lawsuit, filed on May 9, 2013, is scheduled to be heard before a federal court in the next few months.

Obama Gearing Up For Complete Gun Confiscation

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:46 AM PST Robert Rich The news has been circulating quite a bit lately that there is an all out effort to disarm the American people—and as more time goes on, it’s proving to be true. Although he would have loved to use the deaths of the Sandy Hook children to pass through his personal agenda, Obama is ...

US Soldier’s Message To America ‘We Have Failed You’

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:45 AM PST The video below speaks for itself as Gabor Zolna reads a message from a military man which tries to explain the answer to; why hasn’t our military come to help the American people from the criminal actions of the US government?

Homeland Security to Activate ‘National License Plate Recognition Database’

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:44 AM PST UK version of spy system was used to target political activists The Department of Homeland Security is set to activate a national license plate tracking system that will be shared with law enforcement, allowing DHS officers to take photos of any license plate using their smartphone and upload it to a database which will include a “hot list” of “target vehicles”.

If America Continues To Go Down The Same Path As Europe, This Is What Life Will Be Like…

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:43 AM PST Becoming more like Europe is not a good thing. But that is the path that we are currently on. For the most part, Europeans live in a socialist “Big Brother” system in which the government completely dominates your life from the cradle to the grave. Of course there are differences from country to country, but generally speaking the lives of most Europeans are very tightly regulated. You see, the truth is that high levels of individual liberty and freedom are considered to be “dangerous” by the European elite. They believe that if we are all allowed to just do whatever we want that it would result in utter chaos. They are convinced that life is better when those that are smarter (them) control the lives of everyone else. In essence, Europe is like a giant religious cult in many ways (minus the religion). With each passing year, the number of rules and regulations governing the daily lives of Europeans steadily grows, as does the level of control. If you try to live outside of that control, you could very well find yourself in a direct confrontation with the authorities very rapidly.

Cop Who Killed Kelly Thomas Seen in Restaurant, Americans Make Him Leave

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:42 AM PST Manuel Ramos, the cop seen on video beating Kelly Thomas to death, had to leave a place of business last weekend. Nationwide outrage was sparked when Ramos and his partner Jay Cicinelli were found “not guilty” of murder, despite beating the mentally ill homeless man to death as he begged for his life.

IRS Demands Businesses Show “Bonafide Reasons” for Layoffs

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:40 AM PST The IRS will require employers who terminate employees to show that they did so for “bona fide business reasons” in order to be eligible for delaying the ObamaCare health insurance employer mandate. Under new guidelines announced on February 10, the IRS will delay the mandate until 2016 for medium-sized businesses employing between 50 and 99 people. Businesses with 49 employees or fewer are not required to provide their employees with health insurance coverage under ObamaCare, as the Affordable Care Act is generally called.

Oregon Police Give Nightclubs ID Scanners to Datamine Customers

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 03:07 AM PST Police in Multnomah County quietly suspended a new data mining program this week after a local newspaper began questioning its legality. For the last several weeks, police have issued ID-scanning devices to clubs and bars all throughout Portland’s Old Town neighborhood. The scanners not only captured customers’ personal data, including names and photos, but uploaded all the information to a police database.

18 Members of Congress Formally Ask Obama to Reschedule Marijuana

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:59 AM PST Today, Congressman Earl Blumenauer (OR-03) along with 17 other members of Congress, sent a bipartisan letter to President Obama asking him to direct Attorney General Eric Holder to reschedule marijuana from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, as is permitted by 21 U.S.C. § 811.

DHS to purchase 75.1 million rounds of ammunition this year

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:53 AM PST The Department of Homeland Security plans to purchase 75.1 million rounds of ammunition at a cost of $22.7 million this year, according to a newly released report from the Government Accountability Office. GAO reports that DHS has over 70,000 firearm-carrying personnel and that the ammo purchases go largely to firearm training and qualification requirements.

How Obamacare Will Inevitably Raise Food Prices

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:49 AM PST One of the reasons conservatives try to conserve the status quo is because they recognize that there may be unintended consequences to change. Conservative policy is based on the modest idea that, up to this point, we have been able to survive (if not thrive) with the systems and procedures we have been using heretofore, so we should preserve them since we can’t be sure something else will in fact be better. This restraint holds countries back from the chaos of a perpetual revolution. I’m not saying it’s the best policy; sometimes it just holds countries back. But it reflects the better part of prudence. And the alternative, leftist progressivism, has proven itself utterly incompetent to foresee even the most basic of consequences. Take Obamacare for example.

Illinois Electricity Customers Forced to Get ‘Smart Meters’ or Pay Fine

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:42 AM PST In the early days of the Obama administration, “smart power” was all the rage—and not just on the foreign policy scene. In April 2009, National Public Radio reported how one Allentown, Pennsylvania, mother was saving more than a hundred dollars each month on her electric bill. Tammy Yeakel’s power company, PPL Energy, had helpfully installed a “smart meter” on her home that could monitor her power usage in real time. The meter uploaded that information to PPL’s website, so she could identify peak usage times during the day.

20 Signs That The Global Economic Crisis Is Starting To Catch Fire

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:31 AM PST If you have been waiting for the "global economic crisis" to begin, just open up your eyes and look around. I know that most Americans tend to ignore what happens in the rest of the world because they consider it to be "irrelevant" to their daily lives, but the truth is that the massive economic problems that are currently sweeping across Europe, Asia and South America are going to be affecting all of us here in the U.S. very soon. Sadly, most of the big news organizations in this country seem to be more concerned about the fate of Justin Bieber's wax statue in Times Square than about the horrible financial nightmare that is gripping emerging markets all over the planet. After a brief period of relative calm, we are beginning to see signs of global financial instability that are unlike anything that we have witnessed since the financial crisis of 2008. As you will see below, the problems are not just isolated to a few countries. This is truly a global phenomenon.

The Five Criminals: In America the Gestapo Has Replaced The Rule Of Law

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:22 AM PST All five of these Gestapo wannabes are in violation of their oath of office to protect the Constitution of the United States. They have relentlessly violated the Constitution, which makes these five, who are in charge of US intelligence and black operations, traitors to the United States. Yet, they have not been arrested and put on trial. Congress is content to sit there and listen to their ongoing lies time after time after time, despite the fact that these 5 have committed more and worse crimes against our country than the “terrorists” that serve as an excuse for the crimes committed by the intelligence agencies.

Anti-Zionist voice of Donald Duck sacked

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:14 AM PST The voice of Donald Duck in the Middle East has been fired after saying he had “so much hate inside me” and called for the destruction of Israel. Wael Mansour, an Egyptian radio personality, celebrated his dismissal from the cartoon on Twitter, saying he was “proud” he had been fired.

Video: What This Woman Does to a Knock- Out Game Thug Will Surprise You

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:07 AM PST The “knock out game” has taken root in our country and is becoming a growing epidemic of entertainment for thugs. It’s time to take a stand for self defense and fight back, as this woman bravely does in this video. In an unexpected turn of events, the male assailant had the tables turned on him after choosing the wrong woman to knock out, and an on-looker captured the whole thing on tape.

Exclusive: EU executive sees personal savings used to plug long-term financing gap

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 02:00 AM PST The savings of the European Union's 500 million citizens could be used to fund long-term investments to boost the economy and help plug the gap left by banks since the financial crisis, an EU document says. The EU is looking for ways to wean the 28-country bloc from its heavy reliance on bank financing and find other means of funding small companies, infrastructure projects and other investment.

FAA Shuts Down Flower Drone-Delivery Service

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 01:54 AM PST A floral company preparing a new drone delivery service in Michigan was shut down by the Federal Aviation Authority this week after the agency discovered the shop’s test flight on YouTube.

Doctors Find 44-Year-Old Fetus in Woman, 84

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 12:28 AM PST In a story as bizarre as it is deja vu-ish, a 44-year-old fetus has been found in an 84-year-old Brazilian woman. The Daily Mail reports by way of G1 that the discovery came last Friday, when the woman's intense stomach pains landed her in a hospital in Tocantins state in central Brazil.

No Hands! Mind-Controlled Helicopter Flies On Brainwaves

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 12:20 AM PST It may seem like science fiction, but researchers are experimenting with a mind-controlled device that enables users to fly a model helicopter with only their thoughts. Researchers at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis created a brain-computer interface — a system that allows the brain to communicate directly with an external device — that lets participants control the path of a flying object, known as a quadcopter, simply by thinking about specific movements. The futuristic technology could one day help people with disabilities lead more independent lives, the scientists said.

DARPA developing ultimate web search engine to police the internet

Posted: 14 Feb 2014 12:13 AM PST The Pentagon’s research arm that fosters futuristic technology for the military will soon begin working to surpass current abilities of commercial web search engines. Yet, once it masters the “deep Web,” the agency doesn’t say much about what comes next.

You are subscribed to email updates from Pakalert Press To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.

Email delivery powered by Google

Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
8 months ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/103322526151123413935 Cam Loon : Is the Obama regime going to stage a “suicide” to make Keith Judd’s lawsuit go away, with Eric Holder...
Is the Obama regime going to stage a “suicide” to make Keith Judd’s lawsuit go away, with Eric Holder again taking the job as “point man” to cover it up?
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/man-will-take-obama-behind-bars/#0YX6eyDmjYZMIgip.99
Will This Prisoner Stop Obama?
Keith Judd—who has strangely been in prison since 1999 for a minor threat made against a local New Mexico college—may never make it out of prison alive.
8 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/112111196451586545452 ReadWrite : Underwater archaeologist Franck Goddio has discovered a 1,600-year-old city that sunk to the bottom ...
Underwater archaeologist Franck Goddio has discovered a 1,600-year-old city that sunk to the bottom of the sea off the coast of Egypt. 

More info/pictures here: http://bit.ly/188b1FW
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-HH0esGPLWx0/UbN_PPDvPVI/AAAAAAAADAc/PniyFFV9Cd8/w506-h750/hepi.jpg
1 year ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/113241015827372362141 Keith Judd :

Watch the video: How To Tie Your Shoes
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/FzB53cVtBidFLKpWCXeDtjYlmIJb7QQgde37k_tFbmHIhGYQzswM9QAmtPJFcelsD8mdZ-aiUfxpUdF_duiLTw=w506-h379-n
Japanese project.
1 year ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/113244828975493133027 Chris Dyer : Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court
never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings,
they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. 
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress 
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM
THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING
REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO SUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE
JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE, EVIDENCE
OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON
IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by
a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual
justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin.
She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but
the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it
back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and
Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to
stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate
committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and
when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination 
due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as
he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
 Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased
mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of
1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and
signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for
removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s
passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty
of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged
application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC
§ 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was
either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a
treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s
use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United
States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the
private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his
use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING
TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY:
IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS
AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN
THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304,
where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively
obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the
Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express
receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for
by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden
from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees
of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by
the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows
where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen
A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the
Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give
an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy.
Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State
Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was
reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the
case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book
signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice
Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even
though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of
justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case.
One can believe that a judge
would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing
with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a
month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen
was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on
the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case
at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH
TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or
death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people
are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice
Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz
demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to
deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to
Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a
case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S.
Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his
name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social
Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this
usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The
nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of
the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn
affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand
signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the
application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees
with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of
the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices
and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs,
U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to
know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason,
who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which
is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1


Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=391915
http://inquisitionnews.blogspot.com/2013/02/orly-taitz-press...
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for inve...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one
1 year ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/110219327643577705724 Jo Sparkles : Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. 
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress 
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO SUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE, EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin. She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
 Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased
mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC § 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual, shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY: IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304, where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the Supreme Court.    
Taitz provided the court with Federal Express receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the
Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give
an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy.
Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State
Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was
reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the
case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book
signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice
Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even
though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of
justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case.
One can believe that a judge would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to Eric Fossum, the same employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The
nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of
the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn
affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand
signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the
application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs, U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason, who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=391915
http://inquisitionnews.blogspot.com/2013/02/orly-taitz-press...
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for inve...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one
1 year ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/108275737719750703876 Joe Jain : Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court
never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings,
they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. 
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress 
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM
THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING
REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO SUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE
JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE, EVIDENCE
OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON
IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by
a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual
justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin.
She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but
the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it
back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and
Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to
stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate
committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and
when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination 
due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as
he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
 Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased
mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of
1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and
signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for
removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s
passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty
of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged
application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC
§ 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was
either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a
treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s
use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United
States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the
private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his
use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING
TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY:
IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS
AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN
THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304,
where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively
obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the
Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express
receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for
by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden
from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees
of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by
the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows
where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen
A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the
Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give
an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy.
Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State
Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was
reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the
case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book
signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice
Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even
though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of
justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case.
One can believe that a judge
would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing
with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a
month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen
was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on
the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case
at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH
TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or
death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people
are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice
Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz
demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to
deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to
Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a
case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S.
Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his
name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social
Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this
usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The
nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of
the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn
affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand
signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the
application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees
with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of
the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices
and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs,
U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to
know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason,
who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which
is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1


Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=391915
http://inquisitionnews.blogspot.com/2013/02/orly-taitz-press...
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for inve...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one
1 year ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/107503635617395328870 Tonia Addison-Hall : Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court
never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings,
they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. 
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress 
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM
THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING
REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO SUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE
JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE, EVIDENCE
OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON
IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by
a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual
justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin.
She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but
the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it
back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and
Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to
stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate
committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and
when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination 
due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as
he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
 Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased
mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of
1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and
signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for
removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s
passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty
of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged
application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC
§ 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was
either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a
treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s
use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United
States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the
private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his
use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING
TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY:
IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS
AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN
THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304,
where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively
obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the
Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express
receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for
by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden
from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees
of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by
the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows
where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen
A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the
Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give
an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy.
Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State
Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was
reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the
case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book
signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice
Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even
though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of
justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case.
One can believe that a judge
would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing
with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a
month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen
was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on
the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case
at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH
TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or
death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people
are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice
Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz
demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to
deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to
Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a
case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S.
Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his
name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social
Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this
usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The
nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of
the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn
affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand
signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the
application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees
with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of
the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices
and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs,
U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to
know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason,
who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which
is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1


Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=391915
http://inquisitionnews.blogspot.com/2013/02/orly-taitz-press...
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for inve...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one
1 year ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/113244828975493133027 Chris Dyer : Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court
never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings,
they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. 
Demand for investigation forwarded to Congressman Goodlatte, Chair of
the Judiciary Committee of Congress 
Law offices of orly taitz
29839 santa margarita ste 100
Rancho santa margarita ca 92688
ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
orly.taitz@gmail.com
orlytaitzesq.com
02.16.2013
Via Federal Express
Attn. Congressman Bob Goodlatte
Chairman of the Committee on Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives
WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE
2309 Rayburn HOB
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone: (202) 225-5431
Fax: (202) 225-9681
PETITION FOR AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION IN THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
EVIDENCE OF EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
THE UNITED STATES HIDING FROM JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT PLEADINGS
AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFFS AND ATTORNEYS, REMOVING CASES FROM
THE ELECTRONIC DOCKET, EVIDENCE OF BOGUS CONFERENCES OF JUSTICES BEING
REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN NO SUCH CONFERENCES TOOK PLACES AND THE
JUSTICES BEING CLUELESS ABOUT THE VERY EXISTENCES OF THE CASE, EVIDENCE
OF CRIMINAL COMPLICITY OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND TREASON
IN THE MOST SERIOUS CASES DEALING WITH NATIONAL SECURITY.
02.16.2013.
Dear Mr. Goodlatte,
On 12.11. 2013   Attorney Dr. Orly Taitz, ES filed an application for
stay on behalf of plaintiffs in Noonan et al v Bowen et al 12 A 606.
On 12.26.2012 Attorney for Plaintiffs resubmitted her application to
the Chief Justice John Roberts, who referred the case to the conference
of all 9 Justices to be conducted on February 15, 2013. Taitz followed
Rule 22 of the Supreme Court that stated “Renewed application is made by
a letter to the clerk, designating the Justice to whom the application
is to be directed, and accompanied by copies of the original
application…” these copies were supposed to be forwarded to 9 individual
justices, library of Congress and National Archives.
Clerk for Stays Redmond Barnes sent back to Taitz 5 copies, whereby 5
justices never got the application, so clearly they could not discuss
the case during the conference, as they never saw a word of the
pleadings or evidence. Taitz submits herein the Exhibit 1, photograph of
the original box in which 5 copies were sent back,  as well as the
photograph of the stamp. Taitz preserved the box and the documents as
evidence.
Moreover, on 02.12.2013 Taitz traveled to Washington DC and submitted
to the clerks’ office a supplemental brief with information crucial to
the U.S. National Security to be reviewed by the justices prior to the
February 15 conference. Taitz talked to clerks Sevgi Tekeli and James
Baldin.
She was told to give the pleadings to the guard at the
entrance, as the Supreme Court has mandatory screening for anthrax, but
the pleadings will be docketed the same day and forwarded to Justices.
The clerks’ office never docketed the Suplemental Brief (Exhibit 2
Supplemental Brief with the date stamp of the Supreme Court) and sent it
back, so none of the Justices read the Supplemental Brief as well.
Taitz provides the Judiciary Committee with the application (Exhibit 3) and the Supplementary Brief (Exhibit 2).
Case at hand was scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013 in a
conference of all the justices of the Supreme Court of the United
States.
This case came from the Supreme Court of California and was brought
by Presidential Candidates: Edward Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran and
Keith Judd  against the Secretary of the State of California, seeking to
stay the certification of the votes for the candidate for the U.S.
President Barack Obama due to the fact that the aforementioned candidate
committed fraud when he provided his declaration of the candidate and
when the Democratic party submitted the certificate of the nomination 
due to the fact that Barack Obama is not eligible for the position, as
he is not a Natural born U.S. citizen, as required by the U.S.
Constitution Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5. The declaration of the
candidate and the certification of the nomination were based on fraud,
on Obama’s use of forged IDs, , stolen Connecticut social Security
number xxx-xx-4425, use of a name that was not legally his use of
Indonesian citizenship and based on aiding and abetting by corrupt
governmental officials. Most notable example of criminal aiding and
abetting was signing by the chair of the Democratic Party of Hawaii
Brian Schatz a falsified OCON (Official Certificate Of Nomination of a
candidate) where the usual wording “eligible according to the provisions
of the U.S. Constitution” were removed in order to accommodate
ineligible Obama.
Plaintiffs provided the Supreme Court of California and the Supreme
Court of the United States with over 100 pages of official records,
sworn affidavits of senior law enforcement officials and  experts
showing that Barack Obama is:
A citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203
from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As  a citizen of
Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S.
Presidency.
 Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this
court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham,  deceased
mother   of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name
Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of
1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and
signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia. As the requirement for
removal as listed in the passport,  is obtaining a foreign allegiance,
it is believed that Barack Obama Soebarkah was removed from his mother’s
passport  when he obtained his Indonesian passport. Barack Obama cannot serve as a U.S. President as the legal entity Barack Obama does not exist. The only legal entity based on the only verifiable record is Barack Obama Soebarkah.
Obama does not have a valid U.S. birth certificate. Plaintiff
provided affidavits  from Sheriff of Maricopa County Arizona Joseph
Arpaio, Investigator Zullo, experts Felicito Papa, Douglas Vogt, Paul
Irey, showing that the image posted by Obama on Whitehouse.gov is a
computer generated forgery. When there is a question of authenticity of a
document, the only way to authenticate, is to conduct expert evaluation
of the original document.  Registrar of the State of Hawaii and
Director of Health and Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii in charge of
the Health Department were obstructing justice and absolutely refused to
comply with any subpoenas and produce the original 1961 birth
certificate and as such there was never any authentication of the
alleged birth certificate. After 4 years of obstruction of Justice, it
is clear that the Hawaiian officials have nothing to show and genuine
1961 birth certificate for Barack Obama simply does not exist.
Obama does not have a valid Selective Service certificate. Based on
the affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio and investigator Zullo, alleged copy of
Obama’s Selective Service Certificate, is  COMPUTER GENERATED FORGERY.
In this   supplemental brief Plaintiffs are providing additional
evidence, a sworn affidavit from the Chief investigator of the Special
Investigations Unit of the US Coast Guard (ret) and  former special
agent of the DHS Jeffrey Stephan Coffman who attested under the penalty
of perjury that Obama’s alleged Selective Service registration is a
forgery.
Plaintiffs submitted with their TRO and complaint the Affidavits of
Sheriff Arpaio and Investigator Zullo and as a supplement an affidavit
of the Chief Investigator of the Special investigations of the US Coast
Guard Jeffrey Stephan Coffman. Based on those affidavits Obama’s alleged
application for the selective service is a forgery. According to  5 USC
§ 3328.every man born after 1959 has to register with the Selective
Service and cannot work in the executive branch if he did not register
with the selective service.
(a)An individual—
(1)who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to
register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 App. U.S.C. 453); and
(2)who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so
register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the
individual,
shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency.
As Obama claims to be born in 1961 (without a valid birth certificate
we don’t even know when he was born) he had a duty to register with the
Selective Service. A forgery does not represent a registration, as such
Obama is not eligible to be working in the executive branch of the U.S.
government. He is not eligible to be a President in the White House or a
janitor in the White House and it is a duty of this court to exercise
its’ jurisdiction to rule Obama not constitutionally eligible.
4.     Obama’s 2009 tax returns posted by Obama
himself on line showed him using a CT Social Security number
xxx-xx-4425, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS. Affidavit of
investigator Albert Hendershot provided herein as an exhibit showed it
being issued to Harrison (Harry ) J. Bounel, born in 1890 in Russia,
immigrant to the United States, presumed to be deceased, whose death was
either not reported to the SSA or deleted from the computer system by a
treasonous and criminally complicit employee of the SSA. Due to Obama’s
use of a stolen SSN he is not eligible to work anywhere in the United
States, not in the Federal Branch, not in any other branch, not in the
private sector, not even to pick tomatoes or clean toilets. Based on his
use of a stolen SSN the only thing Obama is eligible to is at least 18
month prison term and deportation. For that reason alone the Supreme
Court of California erred in denying the application. This court has to
either grant the application or remand it back to the Supreme Court of
California for reconsideration.
 315 MILLION U.S. CITIZENS DEMAND TO KNOW, WHO IS COMMITTING
TREASON AND AIDING AND ABETTING THE USURPATION OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY:
IS IT DONE BY 9 JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OR BY THE STAFF ATTORNEYS
AND CLERKS OF THE COURT WHO HAVE HIDDEN THE PLEADINGS AND EVIDENCE IN
THIS CASE FROM THE JUSTICES
Justices Antonin Scalia in his book “Making your case” p77 described a
process of triage in the Supreme Court, he wrote: “Another factor
distinctive to petitions for certiorari is that judges don’t like to
spend a lot of time deciding what to decide. Indeed in most courts they
won’t even read the brief in support of your petition, but will rely on
summaries (or on the selection of particular briefs) by law clerks. And
law clerks don’t like to spend much time on this job either.”
Unfortunately, the clerks do more than summaries. Taitz, counsel for
the plaintiffs submits as Exhibit 3 a recent correspondence with the
Supreme Court in regards to case Taitz v Astrue USCA District of Columbia Circuit no 11-5304,
where Taitz caught the employees of the Supreme Court actively
obstructing justice and tampering with the documents submitted to the
Supreme Court.     Taitz provided the court with Federal Express
receipts showing packages received by the Supreme Court and signed for
by the employees of the Supreme Court, but never docketed and hidden
from the Justices of the Supreme Court by the employees. These employees
of the court were not appointed by the President, were not confirmed by
the Senate, they never took an Oath of Allegiance and nobody knows
where their allegiance lies.
This is only one of a number of suspicious activities in the Supreme Court of the
United States. Previously a case Lightfoot v Bowen
A-084524 by the same attorney Taitz  was deleted from the docket of the
Supreme Court on inauguration day January 21, 2008, ostensibly to give
an impression that there are no more challenges to Obama’s legitimacy.
Only after the enormous pressure from the public,  media, State
Representatives and sworn affidavits from attorneys the case was
reentered in the public docket. Clerk in charge for STAYs Danny Bickle
repeatedly made incorrect statements claiming that all files were
deleted due to some type of computer malfunction, which was not the
case. Later, in March of 2009 during a meeting with attorneys and book
signing in Los Angeles Taitz was able to discuss the case with Justice
Scalia, who was absolutely clueless that the case even existed, even
though according to the docket he was a part of the conference of
justices who denied that case dealing with the legitimacy of the U.S.
President and he voted to deny that case.
One can believe that a judge
would forget a case about some trivial dispute, but not a case dealing
with the U.S. Presidency he supposedly discussed in conference only a
month and a half earlier. It is clear that the case Lightfoot v Bowen
was decided by the clerks, the names of the justices were printed on
the order when the justices had no clue the case even existed. In a case
at hand dealing with the usurpation of the U.S. Presidency this is HIGH
TREASON, for which guilty parties should be getting a life in prison or
death penalty and the nation is entitled to know who these people
are.    
In a different case Rhodes v MacDonald 10A56 (entered by the Supreme Court as
Taitz v MacDonald) a docket entry showing Justice Clarence Thomas denying an
application for STAY was made retroactively on a weekend when Justice
Thomas was thousands of miles away giving a seminar in Utah. When Taitz
demanded to see an actual signature by Justice Thomas on the order to
deny stay or on the cover page of the application, she was referred to
Eric Fossum, the same
employee, who signed the denial letter in the Taitz v Astrue case, who admitted to her on the phone that there is no signature of Justice Thomas either on the order or on the cover page of the petition.
As such, there is no proof justice Thomas ever saw the petition or ever
read a word written in the petition. When citizens went to the Supreme
Court and requested copies of the pleadings in aforementioned cases,
they were told that there are no such documents available.
Noonan v Bowen is a
case which provides an undeniable evidence of usurpation of the U.S.
Presidency by a criminal, a citizen of Indonesia who claims that his
name is Barack Obama, who is using all forged IDs and a stolen Social
Security number and a last name not legally his. Allowing this
usurpation to go on is an act of HIGH TREASON. The
nation has a right to know who is committing high treason: 9 justices of
the Supreme Court of clerks, who hide the pleadings and sworn
affidavits from justices. For that reason plaintiffs respectfully demand
signatures of the justices on the order or on the front page of the
application. If there are no actual signatures of the justices the
plaintiffs and the nation as a whole will know that the justices never
saw a word of pleadings an the case was “ruled upon” by court employees
with unknown allegiance.   Plaintiffs also demand to know the names of
the court employees who summarized the case, provided it to the justices
and compiled the list of approved or denied applications. Plaintiffs,
U.S. Congress, law enforcement and World Community at large deserve to
know who committed HIGH TREASON, who should be tried for high treason,
who should be getting a penalty which is customary in such cases, which
is a life in prison or death penalty.
Conclusion:
Plaintiffs and their attorney are demanding an immediate
investigation of both the actions of the employees of the Supreme Court
of the United States in hiding pleadings and exhibits from the Justices
and Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security
042-68-4425.
Not addressing this case represents high treason against the United States of America and people of the United States of America
Respectfully submitted
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
Exhibit 1


Exhibit 2
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=391915
http://inquisitionnews.blogspot.com/2013/02/orly-taitz-press...
Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one single page of pleadings, they also did not forward to any of the Justices the Supplemental Brief. Demand for inve...
Noonan supplemental brief with the SCOTUS stamp 02.12.2013 Press release: clerks of the Supreme Court never forwarded to 5 out of 9 Justices one
1 year ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/102361617869002252985 Keith Judd :

1 year ago - Via Google Check-ins - View -
https://plus.google.com/105397886084648437268 Phil Tubb : Something to remember I think this is a good time to recall that over 40% of democrats in West Virginia...
Something to remember

I think this is a good time to recall that over 40% of democrats in West Virginia voted in the primary for Keith Judd, a convicted felon currently (and then) being held in a federal prison.  With a tad over 9% more votes, he would have beaten better-known, and better-funded, Barack Obama.  Just something to think about.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/09/meet-keith-judd-the-felon-challenging-obama.html
http://apps.sos.wv.gov/elections/results/results.aspx?year=2012&eid=8&county=Statewide
Meet Keith Judd, the Felon Challenging Obama
The president lost a whopping 40 percent of the vote in Tuesday's West Virginia Democratic primary to Judd, an inmate in a Texas federal prison. But is the jailbird even eligible to run?
2 years ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/102361617869002252985 Keith Judd :

2 years ago - Via Google Check-ins - View -
https://plus.google.com/118107718720313034250 Allen Varney : "Those results come two weeks to the day after Keith Judd, a convicted felon incarcerated in Texas, ...
"Those results come two weeks to the day after Keith Judd, a convicted felon incarcerated in Texas, won 41 percent of the vote against Obama in the West Virginia primary." (Pravda):

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-challenged-in-arkansas-primary/2012/05/22/gIQAJzmLjU_story.html
Obama challenged in Arkansas primary
His margins of victory Tuesday remain an indicator of pockets of unrest within the Democratic Party. While no one doubts that race may be a factor in parts of the South, exit polling suggests it isn’t...
2 years ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/107350674110482449715 Antonio Guadagno : Inmate 11593-051 Your next democratic candidate? Well, no, but he did receive a higher percentage against...
Inmate 11593-051 Your next democratic candidate?

Well, no, but he did receive a higher percentage against +Barack Obama than any previous competition.

I just have to laugh at this... :D And the pic is priceless... :D

(Other links to it: http://blogs.ajc.com/jamie-dupree-washington-insider/2012/05/09/obama-vs-federal-inmate-11593-051/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/may/9/inmate-tops-40-percent-wva-primary-against-obama/
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/federal-inmate-keith-judd-receiving-sizable-percent-of-vote-in-west-virginia-democratic-primary/ )
Religio-Political Talk (RPT) Democrats Bucking Trends? Inmate 11593-051 Gets 42% of Votes Against Obama!
About us. About Us About Papa Giorgio @ RPT: Biased: I have my own interests and personal beliefs in mind when talking to others, spiritually or politically (Prov 21:2; Matt 15:19), because... I am Fa...
2 years ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/108353445005506425650 Kenton Tilford : [new post] Keith Judd reason for Obama camp to worry? nope
[new post] Keith Judd reason for Obama camp to worry? nope
Keith Judd's 41% Showing in West Virginia is Nothing for Obama to Worry About
Obama has faced a fairly typical amount of competition in his own party's primary. His popular vote percentage is within two percentage points of both Nixon's in 1972 and Clinton's in 1996...
2 years ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/112446178954204346449 Mustafa Hirji : This is embarrassing. """"" Keith Judd, who is serving a 17 1/2-year prison sentence for extortion...
This is embarrassing.

"""""

Keith Judd, who is serving a 17 1/2-year prison sentence for extortion at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas, took 41 percent of the vote in West Virginia’s Democratic primary Tuesday night — 72,000 votes to Obama’s 106,000. He would qualify for convention delegates, if anyone had signed up to be a Judd delegate. (No one did.)
"""""
Why felon Keith Judd did so well against Obama in West Virginia
THE FIX | Keith Judd, who is serving a 171/2-year sentence for extortion, took 41 percent of the vote in Tuesday’s Democratic primary.
2 years ago - Via Google+ - View -