Sign in with Twitter

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: #chpKartalıBırakSonucaBak#penguendergikapanmayacakbrexit-backing mps#BrunoBham#PervertTheBeatlesFatih'iz#kouzulondon#ICommunicateBy#derinfutbolvizyonu#karnıyarık#Kuşum15GünSonraLe Pen'den1915Büyük ErmeniYalanı#meinmoscheereportMark Marshall#AliAyİstifa#ErbakanCamii#KutluDoğumMilletindirKHKyla Egemenlik#FurkanVakfınaBüyükZulümFetonünDeğil MilletinHaftası#DoYouWantToWin#SuggestAPolicyForUKIP#trump100days#DavamızLaiklik#KırgınÇiçeklerEylül#VisitIstanbul#NükleerEnerjideAtılımZamanı#BuAkşamBen#nedoğruneyalan#HerŞeyVatanİçin#sözbizim#obirmelek#SenceChpNe#LittleBoyBlue#InternationalSculptureDay#Kendime1Not#Bananarama#insidethetube#JustTattooOfUs#amazinghotels#isimsizler#TGRTHaberdeyiz#BigLittleLies#AngelsinAmerica#GlassboysBrexit MPs#AnkaragücüJosh CullenAdil Öksüz#launchingfilms#Adanaspor#KızlarSevmeyiBilmiyor#pazartesiTEBRİKLER FENERBAHÇEMAykut Erdoğdu#RHOCheshireTolgay ArslanOffsetYasin BörüDunk Contest 2017Ivan KoloffChris SullivanOroville Dam updateHunter McGradyGeorge The Animal SteelePokemon Go Gen 2Robert HarwardLos Angeles WeatherWeather Los AngelesSteve Irwinlisa marie presleyDonald GloverNba All Star Game 2017spacex launchAll Star Weekend 2017Congressional Black Caucussan diego weatherRush LimbaughWin ButlerMore

Most recent 20 results returned for keyword: Draupadi (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/111902085139700650334 R.E D : IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.577 OF 2015 WITH...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.577 OF 2015
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1770 OF 2015

Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar and Others
vs.
Indubai d/o. Kashinath Shivram Chavan and Another

CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
Dated : 10th FEBRUARY, 2016
Citation: 2017(1) ALLMR197

The learned counsel for the respondents waives service.

#498a #bigamy #Contracting of marriage #dowry #dowry law #dp3 #Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar #entitled for maintenance #first marriage #Hindu Marriage Act #ipc 498a #Kashinath Shivram Chavan #Maharashtra Civil Services #MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR #s.498a #S.498A IPC #second marriage #section 498a
Bigamy : Who is entitled for Maintenance | MyNation KnowledgeBase
Fight Against Legal Terrorism,Gender Biased Laws like 498A,Domestic Violence,Custody,Divorce And False Rape/Sexual Harassment Cases
9 hours ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/118353964392964871438 Hemu Saini (Hemu) : 9 Different Names of Draupadi Draupadi and Pandavas by Raja Ravi Varma (Circa. 1910) She is considered...
9 Different Names of Draupadi
Draupadi and Pandavas by Raja Ravi Varma (Circa. 1910) She is considered as the epitome of the womanhood, yet she is the cause of the great Kurukshetra war. She is said to be the binding force behind five Pandava brothers, yet she is the major fault line be...
9 Different Names of Draupadi
Draupadi and Pandavas by Raja Ravi Varma (Circa. 1910)She is considered as the epitome of the womanhood, yet she is the cause of the great Kurukshetra war. She is said to be the binding force behind five Pandava brothers, yet...
1 day ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Philosophy of Osho - Krishna Dancing with Gopikas Some devotee from USA asked me to analyse the philosophy...
Philosophy of Osho - Krishna Dancing with Gopikas

Some devotee from USA asked me to analyse the philosophy of Osho. I think that Osho pleads for freedom in the love of even married human beings. He pleads that the secret contacts are wrong. He says that such illegal contacts should be frankly spoken out. This concept is wrong in two stages. In the first stage the illegal contact itself is wrong. In the second stage, when the other partner knows such contact, the other partner undergoes unimaginable agony. To do sin is one mistake. To hurt the heart of any human being is another mistake. It is a double sin and such a soul, whether male or female will be punished twice in the hell. According to the ethical scripture of Hinduism, a red-hot copper statue of the person with whom the illegal contact was done is placed before the sinner and he or she will be forced to embrace it. The attitude differs from one culture to another.

The villain stole the Helen of Troy. Helen led family life with the villain. When Helen returned back, again she had the normal family life with hero. But when Ravana stole Sita, Sita did not even look at Ravana. Therefore, there is vast difference in the cultures of East and West in the root itself. I do not criticise or praise any culture. But even Jesus did not agree to any such illegal contact of any married human being. He criticised even the prostitution. Thus, the field of Pravrutti is one and the same in view of God, whether it is East or West. Therefore, this again proves that God is one and the same.

Now the point of Lord Krishna comes for analysis. The field of Nivrutti is completely different. As analysed above the background was completely different. The meaning of the act was totally different. The act was done by the request of the soul. The act means the breakage of bond and complete liberation of the soul. The act does not mean any secret dealing to pacify the blind lust. The Lord has no trace of such necessity. The Lord did this act only in Brindavanam and only in the case of Gopikas. After leaving the Brindavanam He never repeated this with any other soul.

But again you quote Lord Krishna who danced with chaste married ladies in Brindavanam. That is completely a special case. Those ladies were sages and Krishna was the Lord. The sages requested the Lord in the previous birth to cut all their family bonds and attract them towards Him. The Lord accepted and gave the boon of salvation to them. Such a background cannot exist in any other case. Moreover, the Lord did not repeat such act with anybody else after leaving Brindavanam.

The Lord did not return back to Brindavanam atleast once to do the same act once again, because the sages already achieved the salvation. Therefore, you cannot bring any case to compare with this special divine case. If it were some other case, the fellow would repeat the same act else where also or atleast return back to repeat the same act. Therefore, the case of Lord Krishna and Gopikas cannot be generalised and the philosophy of Osho cannot be accepted. He generalised a special case to everybody.

Whenever we think of Lord Krishna and Gopikas, we think the only sexual relationship between them. We have a wrong notion that the sexual relationship is only the highest form of love. If that is so why Buddha left His wife and why Meera left her husband for the sake of the Lord? It is only one of several forms of the love. Among the Gopikas who got the highest abode (Goloka) some loved Lord Krishna as their son, some loved Him as brother and some loved Him as their husband. The Lord does not consider the form of the love but estimates the intensity or quantity of love.

There may be parrots or swans or even donkeys made of sugar. Whatever may be the form, the price depends on the weight of the sugar. A lady devotee, Kubja developed lust on Lord Krishna. Krishna satisfied her, sleeping with her one night in the Madhura town. Kubja was not given Goloka. She had lust but not love on the Lord. Lust is related to simply the physical form. Love is related to the total personality. One day the finger of Lord Krishna was cut when He was eating sugarcane. All the wives ran here and there in search of a piece of cloth for bandage. But Draupadi, who loved Lord Krishna as her brother tore her sari and banded the finger. The love of the sister excelled the love of the wives. Therefore, it is not the form of bond but it is the weight of the bond that matters for the Lord.

All the Gopikas who were having different types of bonds with Lord Krishna became mad after the departure of Lord Krishna from Brindavanam. Not only Radha who had the sexual relationship, but also Yasoda who nourished Lord Krishna as mother became mad after His departure. Both Yasoda and Radha reached Goloka because their intensity of love was equal. Therefore, one should love God by cutting all the worldly bonds and must be prepared even to sacrifice the life for the sake of the Lord like Prahlada. Jesus told that he who does not leave wife, children, wealth and even life for His sake is not His beloved disciple. This refers to any human being whether male or female.

The extent of sacrifice of these worldly bonds indirectly gives a measure of the intensity of the bond with God. More you are attached to God, more you will be detached from the world. Therefore, such form of bond with Lord Krishna is not important but the intensity of love to Lord Krishna, which is measured by the sacrifice of the world, is important. Such form of bond is not the invariable path to the Lord. The other bonds are also the alternative ways to reach the same goal. All the paths are parallel to each other and it is a running race of different candidates. The speed in running is important and not the path assigned to him. I am neither encouraging nor discouraging the path because it is purely of personal taste. But the success depends on the intensity and vigour in the love to the Lord.


1 day ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : How to come out of continuous suffering? A devotee asked Swami, ‘How to help the foolish people who...
How to come out of continuous suffering?

A devotee asked Swami, ‘How to help the foolish people who are caught by such continuous troubles in their life from birth to death?’


Swami replied: If such people happen to do some good deeds, the good fruits of such good actions will be immediately introduced to give a break in the continuous suffering. God is always positive and tries to help His children even if there is a trace of possibility. But, remember one thing, that God will not do anything by your simple continuous praise in prayers. Unless some good deed exists, His hands are tightened. When Draupadi cried praying Lord Krishna for help, the Lord immediately verified her account book to see whether there is any credit of her good deed. The Lord found such credit which was infinitely multiplied by Him into infinite number of saris. The infinite multiplication can be done by God provided there is some basic credit from your side. Hence, you should always believe in practical philosophy than continuous begging and weeping before God through prayers.

The practical philosophy can be according to your level and you need not worry about its magnitude since God can multiply it to the required extent. But, the extent of practical philosophy should not be below your capability imagining that God will multiply to any extent. The realization of all these concepts is called as Jnana Yoga or knowledge. The praise of God through prayers without any aspiration in return is called as Bhakti Yoga or Devotion. The implementation of the practical sacrifice is called as Karma Yoga or action, which alone is the fundamental basis for God to bless you.
In any case, the practical sacrifice should be without any aspiration in return. Draupadi sacrificed a piece of her valuable sari to bind the wound of the finger of the Lord without any aspiration in return. Even when she cried for help, she never thought about it since she did it without any expectation in return. Practical service to the society without the name of God gives you temporary heaven. The same service in the name of God brings the grace of God so that when you are ripened, God comes down in the human form to receive your service directly.

If you are serving the humanity in the name of God, you will render the service to God in human form even if you don’t recognize Him. Serving the humanity removes the inherent repulsion to a co-human being due to ego and jealousy. Service to all the living beings is the basis since it is the starting stepping stone by which the service to inert statues and photos is stopped. Such service to inert objects is waste since the service is not received by the receiver. However, even such service is inevitable in the case of beginners, who are unable to eradicate their ego and jealousy towards living beings and especially to the human form of life.

1 day ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/116170515651700209618 S Subramanian : A noble brother of Duryodhanan---VikarNa A noble brother of Duryodhanan--VikarNa - the dice game episode...
A noble brother of Duryodhanan---VikarNa
A noble brother of Duryodhanan--VikarNa - the
dice game episode in Mahabharatham Background: After Yudhistra lost everything in the dice game to Shakuni
playing for Duryodhanan, Duryodhanan sends his charioteer to bring Draupadi to
the assembly. Mahakavi ...
A noble brother of Duryodhanan---VikarNa
A noble brother of Duryodhanan---VikarNa -- the dice game episode in Mahabharatham Background: After Yudhistra lost eve...
2 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/109539892613297187876 shrimattie lakeram : 16 fascinating facts about Draupadi I bet you did…: http://youtu.be/1qhsEAWydh0
16 fascinating facts about Draupadi I bet you did…: http://youtu.be/1qhsEAWydh0
Watch the video: 16 fascinating facts about Draupadi I bet you didn't know
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/wjE2W4Js6nT35Il9n1pVVezJU80akw_0CRsUxCbrapsW_fd4F99eGXq9ADUHAhc70FPM7JmpxUIzZrFgiHhXyQ=w506-h284-n
Unknown facts about Draupadi from Mahabharata
2 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/112668502265880260845 DhanushDhari Misra : About Indian epics. Itihasas and Puranas To know what is written, but not to write in any exam Indian...
About Indian epics. Itihasas and Puranas

To know what is written, but not to write in any exam

Indian scriptures (Itihasas and Puranas) generally describe events purported to have taken place during the period before Kali yug, i.e. prehistoric times. However a small but significant part is devoted to Kali yuga, i.e. the historic period. In fact the dates of ancient history given in the modern text books have been derived from Indian mythology by the pioneers of Indology like Sir William Jones and Prof. Max Muller.

To know what is written in the scriptures,
but not to write in any examination

Please read the following paragraphs and answer the questions on the basis of the paragraphs.

It is stated in Mahabharata that Abhimanyu, the son of the third Pandav Arjun, was killed in the battle of Kurukshetra. At that time Uttara, the wife of Abhimanyu, was pregnant and she later gave birth to a son, who was named Parikshith. 36 years after the battle, King Yudhishthira crowned Parikshith as the King and left for the Himalayas along with his four brothers and their wife Draupadi.

The era that started with the coronation of King Parikshith is known as Kaliyuga. The calendar based on Kaliyuga is followed in all the almanacs - commonly known as Ponchang, Ponjka or Panji - of India. The financial year 2006 - 2007 AD was equivalent to Kaliyugabda 5108.

It is stated in the twelfth canto (Dwadash Skanda) of Shrimad Bhagavat Purana, and other Puranas like Kali Yuga Raja Vrittant, that Mahapadmanand was crowned as the King of Magadha with his capital at Giribraj after 1504 years from the birth of Parikshith. He and his eight sons ruled Magadha for a total period of 100 years. After the Nandas, Chandragupta Mourya became the King of Magadha. The last Mourya king Brihadrath was killed by Pushyamitra who established the Sunga dynasty In Kaliyugabda 1797. The Sunga dynasty was followed by the Satabahan dynasty who shifted the capital from Giribraj to Pataliputra.

The last Satabahan king Chandrabij was treacherously killed by Chandragupta I in Kaliyugabda 2775. However Chandragupta I (who had assumed the title Vijayadithyas) ruled for only 7 years and was succeeded by his son Samudragupta (who had assumed the title Ashokadithya). Samudragupta ruled for 51 years and was succeeded by his son Chandragupta II (who had assumed the title Vikramaditya). Because of his assumed title, Chandragupta II is mistakenly identified as King Vikramaditya of Ujjain who was born much later in Kaliyugabda 3000, became the king at the age of 17 and had started the Vikram Sambat which is still in use in the Indian almanacs.

Adi Shankaracharya was born in Kaliyugabda 2593 and had come to Ujjain when he was 9 years old. After that he traveled widely and established four monasteries in the four different corners of India.

Alexander had invaded India in 327 BC. Megasthenes has written in his book Indica that 15 years after the invasion of Alexander, Helen, the daughter of the Greek ruler Selucus was married to Sandrocyptus, whose capital was at Palibothra. He has further stated that Sandrocyptus was the son of Sandrocottus who was the King at Palibothra soon after the invasion of Alexander. Sandrocottus had treacherously killed the previous ruler Xandramese who was the last ruler of his dynasty.

Example question:

For how many years did Mauryas rule?
Answer: 229

Working:
Nanda dynasty (Mahapadmanand and his 8 sons) ruled for 100 years beginning from 1504 years after the birth of Parikshith. Thus Mourya dynasty started 1604 years after the birth of Parikshith who became king (and Kaliyugabda started) at the age of 36. Thus Mourya dynasty started in Kaliyugabda 1568 (1604 - 36). It ended in Kaliyugabda 1797 (with the death of Brihadrath). Thus Mourya dynasty ruled from Kaliyugabda 1568 to 1797, i.e. 229 years.

Please note that quite a few Professors of History have objected to this post including the referred web pages and asked for their removal. So these posts may be taken off the internet sites at any time.

1. Till 2017 AD, how many years have elapsed from the battle of Kurukshetra?
2. Who was the paternal grandfather of Parikshith?
3. In which year, BC or AD, did Samudragupta become the king?
4. Where was the capital of the Maurya kings?
5. In which year, BC or AD, did Adi Shankaracharya come to Ujjain?
6. Which Indian king does Megasthenes refer to as Xandramese?
7. Which Indian king does Megasthenes refer to as Sandrocottus?
8. Which Indian king does Megasthenes refer to as Sandrocyptus?
9. Which Indian city does Megasthenes refer to as Palibothra?
10. What is the name of the book that Megasthenes wrote on India?
11. How many monasteries did Adi Shankaracharya establish?
12. Who was the grandfather of Chandragupta II?
13. How many years after the birth of Parikshith was Vikramaditya of Ujjain born?
14. In which year, BC or AD, was Adi Shankaracharya born?
15. In which year, BC or AD, was Vikramaditya of Ujjain born?
16. In which year, BC or AD, did Vikramaditya of Ujjain become the king?
17. In which year, BC or AD, did Chandragupta I become the king?
18. In which year, BC or AD, did Chandragupta II become the king?
19. Who was the mother of Parikshith?
20. Who was the wife of the Pandavas?
21. Which king of Magadha is mistakenly identified as Vikramaditya of Ujjain?
22. Where was the capital of Magadha, before Pataliputra became the capital?
23. Which dynasty ruled Magadha before Sunga dynasty?
24. Which dynasty ruled Magadha before the Gupta dynasty?
25. Who was the last king of Satavahana dynasty?

Why the dates given in our history books are different from the dates you get here? To know the answer please visit

http://www.puranic.site88.net/EndOfIndomania.pdf

From the picture of the page of a Purana, at the end of this post,

can you find out who was the ruler of India who met Jesus Christ?

Can you identify the Purana and the chapter?

Answers

1. Till 2017 AD, how many years elapsed from the battle of Kurukshetra? 5154

2. Who was the paternal grandfather of Parikshith? Arjun

3. In which year, BC or AD, did Samudragupta become the king? 320 BC

4. Where was the capital of the Mourya kings? Giribraj

5. In which year, BC or AD, did Adi Shankaracharya come to Ujjain? 500 BC

6. Which Indian king does Megasthenes refer to as Xandramese? Chandrabij

7. Which Indian king Megasthenes refers to as Sandrocottus? Chandragupta I

8. Which Indian king Megasthenes refers to as Sandrocyptus? Samudragupta

9. Which Indian city does Megasthenes refer to as Palibothra? Pataliputra

10. What is the name of the book that Megasthenes wrote on India? Indica

11. How many monasteries did Adi Shankaracharya establish? 4

12. Who was the grandfather of Chandragupta II? Chandragupta I

13. How many years after the birth of Parikshith was Vikramaditya of Ujjain
born? 3036

14. In which year, BC or AD, was Adi Shankaracharya born? 509 BC

15. In which year, BC or AD, was Vikramaditya of Ujjain born? 102 BC

16. In which year, BC/AD, Vikramaditya of Ujjain became the king? 85 BC

17. In which year, BC or AD, did Chandragupta I become the king? 327 BC

18. In which year, BC or AD, did Chandragupta II become the king? 269 BC

19. Who was the mother of Parikshith? Uttara

20. Who was the wife of the Pandavas? Draupadi

21. Who is mistakenly identified as Vikramaditya of Ujjain? Chandragupta II

22. Where was the capital of Magadha, before Pataliputra? Giribraj

23. Which dynasty ruled Magadha before the Sunga dynasty? Mourya

24. Which dynasty ruled Magadha before the Gupta dynasty? Satabahan

25. Who was the last king of Satabahan dynasty? Chandrabij

For more information please visit the post
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/our-history-books-correct-dhanushdhari-misra?trk=mp-reader-card


https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-2SwXGKAv0rE/WPtPfXP22yI/AAAAAAAACJg/gHt_TyZhklMEIIehOUGS9Lc0Q1D7raMggCJoC/w506-h750/predicition-01.jpg
2 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Violence-Jesus-Krishna-Moahamad-Human Incarnation Q’ran says that a Muslim should protect even the ...
Violence-Jesus-Krishna-Moahamad-Human Incarnation

Q’ran says that a Muslim should protect even the enemy belonging to other religion. It says that a Muslim can speak about the preaching of Allah to the enemy and then leave the enemy in protected place. It never says that the religion should be spread by violence. It speaks about the war for justice, which is not the war for propagation of religion. For that matter, Gita arose only from the state of war, which was fought for establishing justice. Even Bible says that the rigid fools who do not realize should be thrown to the liquid fire, which is violence. Therefore, violence is not wrong. But the cause of violence should be perfectly justified. When Mohammad came, there were three hundred religions, which were quarelling among themselves with lot of violence. He tried His best by preaching the concept of one God. There was no alternative way to subside the violence between them.

Actually after Jesus, the concept of human incarnation was fully realized but this concept was exploited by cheaters. Every fellow became a prophet and declared himself as the human incarnation. The followers started preaching that particular form is only the one God. You can imagine easily the situation at the time. When violence is justified, it is called as punishment given by God. If the violence is not justified, it becomes Chaos due to egoism of a demon, which can be subsided only by divine punishment. Actually at the end, Hinduism speaks about the incarnation of Kalki and Christianity speaks about the final punishment given by God. Both these situations are of terrible violence only.

The last sort of God is only punishment, which can alone bring peace at least temporally for some time when the world is filled with brutal conservative fools, who are the wild beasts in the human form. The Lord says in Bible “Revenge is mine” which means the Lord punishes the unjust people. The Lord said in Gita that He will destroy the evil person (Vinasaya cha….). God is double-edged knife. Not only He protects the justice but also He punishes the injustice. A rich weak human being may protect the justice but may not be able to punish the injustice. A poor strong fellow may punish the injustice but not protect the justice by giving compensation. Thus, the human beings have limitations but the Lord is strong as well as rich and therefore is capable in both sides.

This is the meaning when Jesus mentioned about the divine kingdom on the earth. He means that one may escape the king on this earth but can never escape God. When you are affected by injustice, pray for compensation only (“Ask that shall be given”-Bible) and not for the punishment of enemy. You will be compensated. When you do not pray for the punishment of enemy, you will see the punishment of your enemy soon from God. You may react to your enemy with equal or double force. But God will react with million times of force. Draupadi was pestering Krishna for the destruction of her enemies. The Lord fulfilled her wish but all her sons were killed by enemies and Lord did not protect them. Some times God punishes your enemy through your self. Arjuna killed the enemies, forced by the Lord. But Arjuna was not having the intention to kill the enemies and was against the war. Since he was forced by the Lord, he fought the war for justice.

When Muslims followed Mohammad in His war for unifying the religions, it was justified because there was clear divine instruction. Since Mohammad was the last divine preacher, now the war for justice need not be carried on because in the absence of divine preacher there is every possibility of misunderstanding of every situation as requirement for war of justice. Therefore, the instruction of Mohammad was limited to that time because He was capable of deciding the correct requirement for war for justice. Mohammad removed the concept of human incarnation because the effects of exploitation were severe in that time. Muslims should realize that human incarnation means that God entered in the human body and not that God modified as human body. Mohammad objected only modification of God in to human body. This is not condemning the concept of human incarnation. God only enters the human body and Mohammad himself was the human incarnation because God entered in to Mohammad and gave Q’ran. Gita clearly says that God entered the human body (Manusheem Tanu Asritam..) and that God is not modified in to human body(Avyaktam Vyakti Mapannam…). Bible also says that God is in flesh and does not say that God has become flesh. Thus, there is no difference between three religions.

2 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : You should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the constant courage of Hanuman. You should...
You should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the constant courage of Hanuman.

You should not intensify the worship in the time of problem

Generally, people try to worship God in the times of difficulties. The omniscient God knows that your intensity of the worship is generated by the ambition for the solution of your problem and that it is not generated by the true love to God. You should not intensify the worship in the time of problems. You can fool the people but not the omniscient God. You should maintain the same intensity of worship in all the times without linking it to benefits and solutions of problems. Such true devotion will be credited to the account. When Draupadi tore her sari and sacrificed for the Lord, then she was in happy situation. Therefore, your sacrifice is valid if it is done in the happy moment when there is no need for the help of God. At any cost, you should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the constant courage of Hanuman.


The true path path to please God


Identify True Path irrespective of Personal Liking

The devotees who cannot do any pratical sacrifice is the lowest

One should search for the real path to please God and try to follow it

Truth is always truth whether all the people in this universe accept or not

Another important worst aspect of a devotee is to decide the possible way for him as the only real way to God. His way may be lowest in quality but in his argument, such way becomes highest since he can travel in that way only. All other ways, which may be of far higher quality, are not at all the ways as per his argument since he cannot follow such ways.

I will give an example. Let us take the case of a greedy person. He cannot sacrifice even a single paisa or penny for the sake of God and therefore, he criticizes that money cannot purchase God. He will argue that the devotees, who sacrifice their bonds with money for the sake of God as the foolish people trying to purchase God by money. Even though such devotees are far higher than him in sacrificing the most valuable money for the sake of God, he will not tolerate them because he cannot sacrifice money for the sake of God. The possible way for him is to recite prayers and to do different worships involving rigid religious customs. He will say that such religious customs only please God.

In fact, such a devotee is the lowest since he cannot do any practical sacrifice and he is only theoretical. God appreciates only the practical sacrifice. God gave thousands of saris to Draupadi as a reward for her practical sacrifice especially to God. God did not reward her for her different forms of worship and different prayers recited. The human psychology is to raise the status of the path that is possible to him and to degrade all other paths, which are impossible for him. This is stupidity plated with ego and jealousy.

One should search for the real path to please God and try to follow it slowly if not today, after sometime later on. The constant effort will lead to the success one day or other. Instead of doing effort for such practical way, people try to give importance to theoretical ways, which are nothing but expressions of devotion through words, mind and intelligence only.

Since, they are experts and talented in such stupid theoretical and religious ways, they try to give highest status to such ways since they can follow such ways only. By such behavior, they may get false satisfaction in following the true path to please God, but they utterly fail in reality. A false thing does not become true by arguments and propaganda. Truth is always truth whether all the people in this universe accept or not. This is also another type of behavior of devotees to be rectified.


2 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : The rate of interest of the bank of God is infinite If you have practically sacrificied to God in human...
The rate of interest of the bank of God is infinite

If you have practically sacrificied to God in human form you need not weep or cry



When Draupadi cried begging the Lord for clothes, the Lord was not moved by her cry and begging. The Lord immediately checked her account book to see whether there is any credit in it that can be drawn along with its interest. The Lord observed one practical sacrifice of Draupadi for the sake of the Lord done previously as the credit in her account. Once the finger of Krishna was cut by the blade of a sugarcane. All the wives ran to the different sides of the house for a piece of cloth to be used as the bandage for the wound. But, Draupadi immediately tore the edge of her costly sari and the resultant piece of cloth was used as the bandage. Generally, women are fond of jewels and saris. Due to this reason, the wives of Krishna could not do that act. That piece of cloth sacrificed for the Lord was multiplied as thousands of saris because the rate of interest of the bank of God is infinite since the wealth in it is infinite.

If this service was done to a human being, hardly two or three saris could have been supplied. Hence, the Lord could have supplied those saris even if Draupadi did not weep. Even if she was silent leaving everything to God, this miracle should have been done. The reason for the miracle is not her weeping and begging. The reason is her practical sacrifice to God especially the human incarnation.

You should not intensify the worship in the time of problem

Do not beg and weep before God be always brave and dignified before God like Hanuman

Devotees developed different talents in the art of weeping and begging to God!!!

Some devotees should be awarded Padma Vibhushan for developing new trends in weeping and begging before God!


You may have faith in God but it is very difficult to recognize the human incarnation and maintain continuous faith in It. It has been the worst practice in all the religions since devotees everywhere developed different talents and techniques in the art of weeping and begging. Some devotees should be awarded Padma Vibhushan for developing new trends in weeping and begging before God! God hates you if you weep and beg anything from Him because you are aware of your false devotion to Him. Your real devotion is towards yourself, your wife, your children, your parents, your relatives and your friends only.

You know the truth of your false devotion and now you are trying to cheat God by your art of weeping and different discovered sentences, poems and songs of begging. It is a double crime. Hence, do not beg and weep before God. Be always brave and dignified before God like Hanuman. When you know that you do not deserve due to your false devotion, then also you maintain the dignified way before God. In such case, it is only one crime, which can be also rectified in course of time by developing true devotion. You need not ask God for anything even in your mind. If there is some credit of your true devotion in your account proved by practical sacrifice, the reward will come from God spontaneously in the required situation.

Generally, people try to worship God in the times of difficulties. The omniscient God knows that your intensity of the worship is generated by the ambition for the solution of your problem and that it is not generated by the true love to God. You should not intensify the worship in the time of problems. You can fool the people but not the omniscient God. You should maintain the same intensity of worship in all the times without linking it to benefits and solutions of problems. Such true devotion will be credited to the account. When Draupadi tore her sari and sacrificed for the Lord, then she was in happy situation. Therefore, your sacrifice is valid if it is done in the happy moment when there is no need for the help of God. At any cost, you should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the constant courage of Hanuman.

2 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : GOD HATES WEEPING AND BEGGING Do not Intensify Worship in Troubled Times O Learned and Devoted Servants...
GOD HATES WEEPING AND BEGGING

Do not Intensify Worship in Troubled Times

O Learned and Devoted Servants of God,

If you are a true devotee, you need not weep or beg before God

Do not resort to weeping and begging for God’s grace




The devotee interested in the spiritual line should study more about the successful devotees. The study of God is not so important as the study of the personality of a true devotee. You should concentrate more on Prahlada, who could succeed in pleasing the Lord and your concentration on Lord Narasimha is not so important. You should always examine the personality of Hanuman in the spiritual line because God is extensively pleased with Him, which can be seen in the awarded fruit. Hanuman is made the future creator of this universe and this is the highest fruit, which means that God is extensively pleased with Him. Hanuman is famous for His courage and dignity. He never wept and begged before God.

If you are a true devotee, you need not weep or beg before God. If you have money in your pocket, you will go to the market of vegetables and purchase the vegetables with courage, confidence and dignity since you are going to pay the proper price. When you do not have money in your pocket, you will weep and beg before the seller of vegetables for donation of one or two vegetables at least. Therefore, if you weep and beg God for His grace, it means that you do not have the real devotion in your heart to pay the exact price of the grace of God. You know that your devotion is not true. Therefore, you are resorting to weeping and begging for God’s grace.




When Draupadi cried begging the Lord for clothes, the Lord was not moved by her cry and begging. The Lord immediately checked her account book to see whether there is any credit in it that can be drawn along with its interest. The Lord observed one practical sacrifice of Draupadi for the sake of the Lord done previously as the credit in her account. Once the finger of Krishna was cut by the blade of a sugarcane. All the wives ran to the different sides of the house for a piece of cloth to be used as the bandage for the wound. But, Draupadi immediately tore the edge of her costly sari and the resultant piece of cloth was used as the bandage. Generally, women are fond of jewels and saris. Due to this reason, the wives of Krishna could not do that act. That piece of cloth sacrificed for the Lord was multiplied as thousands of saris because the rate of interest of the bank of God is infinite since the wealth in it is infinite.

If this service was done to a human being, hardly two or three saris could have been supplied. Hence, the Lord could have supplied those saris even if Draupadi did not weep. Even if she was silent leaving everything to God, this miracle should have been done. The reason for the miracle is not her weeping and begging. The reason is her practical sacrifice to God especially the human incarnation.



You may have faith in God but it is very difficult to recognize the human incarnation and maintain continuous faith in It. It has been the worst practice in all the religions since devotees everywhere developed different talents and techniques in the art of weeping and begging. Some devotees should be awarded Padma Vibhushan for developing new trends in weeping and begging before God! God hates you if you weep and beg anything from Him because you are aware of your false devotion to Him. Your real devotion is towards yourself, your wife, your children, your parents, your relatives and your friends only.

You know the truth of your false devotion and now you are trying to cheat God by your art of weeping and different discovered sentences, poems and songs of begging. It is a double crime. Hence, do not beg and weep before God. Be always brave and dignified before God like Hanuman. When you know that you do not deserve due to your false devotion, then also you maintain the dignified way before God. In such case, it is only one crime, which can be also rectified in course of time by developing true devotion. You need not ask God for anything even in your mind. If there is some credit of your true devotion in your account proved by practical sacrifice, the reward will come from God spontaneously in the required situation.

Generally, people try to worship God in the times of difficulties. The omniscient God knows that your intensity of the worship is generated by the ambition for the solution of your problem and that it is not generated by the true love to God. You should not intensify the worship in the time of problems. You can fool the people but not the omniscient God. You should maintain the same intensity of worship in all the times without linking it to benefits and solutions of problems. Such true devotion will be credited to the account. When Draupadi tore her sari and sacrificed for the Lord, then she was in happy situation. Therefore, your sacrifice is valid if it is done in the happy moment when there is no need for the help of God. At any cost, you should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the constant courage of Hanuman.


Generally, people try to worship God in the times of difficulties. The omniscient God knows that your intensity of the worship is generated by the ambition for the solution of your problem and that it is not generated by the true love to God. You should not intensify the worship in the time of problems. You can fool the people but not the omniscient God. You should maintain the same intensity of worship in all the times without linking it to benefits and solutions of problems. Such true devotion will be credited to the account. When Draupadi tore her sari and sacrificed for the Lord, then she was in happy situation. Therefore, your sacrifice is valid if it is done in the happy moment when there is no need for the help of God. At any cost, you should stop weeping and begging before God and learn the constant courage of Hanuman.

2 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/105845319309536221148 Napson Fernandes : Pooja Sharma and shaheer sheikh, instagram, mahabharat, age, draupadi, photos, husband, aham sharma,...
Pooja Sharma and shaheer sheikh, instagram, mahabharat, age, draupadi, photos, husband, aham sharma, facebook, hot, latest news, suresh sharma, twitter, Nepali actress, biodata, biography, wiki, height
Pooja Sharma and shaheer sheikh, instagram, mahabharat, age, draupadi, photos, husband, aham sharma, images, facebook, hot, latest news, suresh sharma, twitter, Nepali actress, biodata, biography, wiki, height get whole information about htis tv actress her...
Pooja Sharma and shaheer sheikh, instagram, mahabharat, age, draupadi, photos, husband, aham sharma, facebook, hot, latest news, suresh sharma, twitter, Nepali actress, biodata, biography, wiki, height
Pooja Sharma and shaheer sheikh, instagram, mahabharat, age, draupadi, photos, husband, aham sharma, images, facebook, hot, latest news, suresh sharma, twitter, Nepali actress, biodata, biography, wiki, height get whole infor...
2 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/114846681457381212644 Sadanand Patwardhan : Role of Theatre in DISSENT. An interesting article about the British rule, repressive of Freedom of ...
Role of Theatre in DISSENT.
An interesting article about the British rule, repressive of Freedom of Expression, was intelligently subverted through subtle dramatic expression. It also tells the story of how regime reacted by regressively bringing in legislation, SEDITION clause in IPC in 1870/ Ordinance prohibiting dramatic performances which were SCANDALOUS, DEFAMATORY, SEDITIOUS, OBSCENE OR OTHERWISE ‘PREJUDICIAL TO PUBLIC INTEREST/ Dramatic Performance Bill in 1876, later enacted into a law or Vernacular Press Act in 1878, to muzzle dissent.

@@For example, K.P. Khadilkar’s play Keechak Vadha is a landmark in the theatre of protest. It was the allegory of an incident in the Mahabharata in which Keechak, the lustful brother-in-law of King Virat, in whose court the five Pandavas had sought refuge incognito, is slain by Bheema, using a stratagem. Though no names were mentioned, everyone knew that Keechak was Lord Curzon, Draupadi was India, Yudhishtira was the moderate and Bheema the extremist section in the Congress. The message was that a weak government in London (King Virat) has allowed Curzon to insult and humiliate India. While her moderate champion advocates gentle (constitutional) measures, which prove ineffective, the extremist adopts violent measures and the oppressor is disposed off without difficulty.@@
https://thewire.in/124882/dissent-theatre-intolerance-colonialsim/
What India's Anti-Colonial Theatre Tells Us About Dissent in Times of Intolerance
Plays written during the freedom movement highlight how the theatre community evolved creative stratagems to overcome political intolerance.
3 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Difficulties come to you by My grace since those purify you by driving you to Me Happiness comes to...

Difficulties come to you by My grace since those purify you by driving you to Me

Happiness comes to you by My anger only.

Difficulty and desire bring you to Me like two constables arresting a thief bring to court!

Try to develop true love on Me without aspiration for any fruit in return as you love your children

Difficulties come to you by My grace since those purify you by driving you to Me. Difficulties make your brain very alert and yourself very active. Intensive devotion and concentration on Me is developed even though the devotion and difficulties are not true love on Me since your aim is only to get rid of the difficulties with My help. At least you are introduced to the process of intensive devotion, which in course of time may transform into real devotion also. Difficulty and desire bring you to Me like two constables arresting a thief bring to court! I will react in a positive manner hoping that you will develop real devotion to Me in future. But, My hope always remains as hope only even though millions of births pass on! Happiness makes you inactive and inert developing ego and drags you away from Me. Hence, happiness comes to you by My anger only.

When Krishna asked Kunti to ask for a boon, Kunti asked the Lord to continue the difficulties so that she will be always praying the Lord! Actually, happiness is the fruit of your good deed and difficulty is fruit of bad deed. I pick up both fruits and arrange your life cycle with both fruits in alternative fashion. Whenever you press Me through your devotion I drag the good fruits from the future cycles with some reduction like premature deposits and postpone the present bad fruits to future cycles with interest like re-casted pro-notes. A time will come in future in which you are having the life cycles filled with only bad fruits. You will blame and scold Me in the future on such occasion “O cruel God! Even though I am strong devotee, from my birth, I am suffering continuously throughout my life!” What can I do? I can’t create fruits without deeds, which is against the very basic norm of divine administration. At least, if a tiny fruit exists, I can multiply it.

Draupadi tore her sari for a piece of cloth for bandage when My finger was cut. I multiplied that piece of cloth in to hundreds of saris when she was going to be made naked. If you worship Me without any desire in return, I can create any number of fruits whenever you are in need. Draupadi always worshiped Me for her protection in her life and hence a tiny fruit was needed for multiplication. Kuchela always worshiped Me without any desire and didn’t express even a trace of desire when he came to Me in spite of his severe poverty. Hence, I gave him fruits created in infinite quantity. Hence, try to develop true love on Me without aspiration for any fruit in return as you love your children. In such case, I shall give you any fruit needed by you to any extent without your asking for it. If you develop this special line of love without any account between us, such line is said to be Nivrutti. Love on Me for the sake of fruits is the line of Pravrutti. Pravrutti is better than atheism, but, Nivrutti is far far better than Pravrutti. The devotion of Gopikas, Hanuman, Prahalada, Kannappa etc., is the climax of Nivrutti.

Universal Spirituality for World Peace

4 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Any total surrender is lesser than the value of God Total sacrifice and total surrender – of any body...
Any total surrender is lesser than the value of God

Total sacrifice and total surrender – of any body in Nivrutti is never
Over payment, because any - total surrender is lesser than the value of God.
Hence, God is never over ambitious – in collecting extra price for Nivrutti.
Total sacrifice of entire wealth is done – to the children in Pravrutti,
Not impossible, Dharma Raja did it – even in playing chess with Duryodhana.
The same total sacrifice of wealth – was not done in charity of Aswamedha,
Which was done in the name of God, - only excess wealth was sacrificed

In Aswamedha, hence total sacrifice – is done by people in Pravrutti but
They feel it as impossible in Nivrutti, - Dharma Raja sacrificed even self
In the chess game by becoming slave, - but to surrender self and to become
Slave of God becomes impossible – in Nivrutti, hence total surrender is possible.
When Krishna asked to tell a lie, - he should have told it as a slave of God.
When Draupadi was put in bet, - he did not remember justice, but remembered
Justice when Lord asked to tell lie, - hence Pravrutti is greater than Nivrutti
For any soul, only blessed souls – like Gopikas proved real value of Nivrutti.

Pravrutti contains justice and injustice, - playing chess game is injustice.
He has no right to bet shares of brothers, - property came from father Pandu.
Even his share is for his son, no right, - entire game was injustice voted
Against justice even by Dharma Raja, - a person famous for justice, what to
Speak of common men? he was for – injustice in his total surrender, after war
He didn’t surrender kingdom to Krishna – like this, Nivrutti fails even before
Injustice of Pravrutti, one may vote to God – against justice of Pravrutti
But not against injustice of Pravrutti, - one may donate money from savings

Meant for children or even by fast, - but not the money spent in luxuries!

Control luxuries and eat for good health – so that you can serve God and
Save to give to your child, this is voting – for justice against injustice in
Pravrutti, if you fail even in this, - how can you vote for Nivrutti against
Pravrutti? If you can’t resist chess – to save wealth for your issue, how can
You sacrifice wealth to God resisting – your issue? You couldn’t realize value
Of even justice in Pravrutti, how can – you realize highest value of Nivrutti?
Hence, Krishna kept silent when – Dharma Raja suffered in the forest.
You become blind to sacrifice for – injustice, but not blind to sacrifice to God!

Even justice is not given value, - rejecting the injustice in Pravrutti by you,
How can you give value to God even – rejecting justice of Pravrutti here?
Gita says that fools fail in Pravrutti – as well as in Nivrutti due to ignorance.
Your blind attraction for chess game – could throw away justice of Pravrutti,
But attraction for God fails to do so, - your attraction is not real at all!

First kill your attraction for chess game – to save for your child, this is the
First step of voting justice against – injustice in Pravrutti, then only the
Second step to throw away attraction – to child for the sake of God.
Today God need not compete with – justice of Pravrutti, which was
Already thrown away by injustice, - hence, God competes with injustice.
Modern Arjuna will kill grandfather – for the sake of wealth, God need not
Order Arjuna to kill grandfather – for His mission, God asks wealth only.
Modern Gopika has already voted – for her darling against her husband,
God need not compete with her – husband but competes with her darling!
In old Bharata and old Bhagavata – God competed with justice of Pravrutti,
In modern Bharata and Bhagavata – God competes with injustice of Pravrutti!
In old Gita God said to leave justice – for His sake, but now God has to say
In Modern Gita to leave injustice – for His sake to prove Himself highest!

If innocent old Krishna asks modern Arjuna – to kill his grandfather for
God’s sake, modern Arjuna will act externally,- terrible pain to kill grandfather,
So that finally he will kill Bhishma,- as if he is killing Bhishma for Krishna only!
Now modern Arjuna gets grace of God, - and also wealth together, it is just
One shot two birds, but God is – too much modern as Lord Dattatreya,
He will not ask to kill Bhishma, - He will ask only for the kingdom,
He is innocent Bhole Shankara for – straight and innocent devotees only.

5 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Nivrutti is more valuable than – Pravrutti The value of Nivrutti is infinite – none can pay its actual...
Nivrutti is more valuable than – Pravrutti
The value of Nivrutti is infinite – none can pay its actual value.

Arjuna could not kill Bhishma – for the sake of wealth, it is Pravrutti,
He was justified in Pravrutti – to withdraw from the war, but when
Krishna showed the real angle, – the war was not simple Pravrutti,
It is Nivrutti to serve mission of Lord, - in destroying evil on earth.
Nivrutti is more valuable than – Pravrutti and Arjuna fought for
Nivrutti as a servant of the Lord, - justice of Pravrutti is defeated
Before the Lord, Dharma Raja – played chess and lost every thing.
He sacrificed all bonds of family – and wealth in Pravrutti, he even
Sacrificed justice by betting Draupadi – after self-defeat in emotion.
All this sacrifice should have been – done to Krishna as Nivrutti.
He did not sacrifice justice – when Krishna asked to tell a lie.

5 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Differentiate Nivrutti from Pravrutti You must always differentiate the context of God (Nivrutti) from...
Differentiate Nivrutti from Pravrutti

You must always differentiate the context of God (Nivrutti) from the context of human beings (Pravrutti). Krishna punished Kauravas for trying to uncloth Draupadi. But, the same Krishna did not return the saris of Gopikas. This appears as a contradiction. The first scene is between two human beings. One human being is trying to see the naked body of the wife of the other human being. In the second scene, God is trying to see the naked body of the human being. In the second scene, the message of God is that He is already aware of every atom of the creation and is testing Gopikas whether they realize this in practice. Theory is different from practice. Only a few Gopikas, who had the realization, lifted their folded hands.

5 days ago - Via Community - View -
https://plus.google.com/115394334019020797727 Abhijth Anil : Service Without Aspiration The highest stage is not to aspire for anything from the Lord. The Lord ...
Service Without Aspiration

The highest stage is not to aspire for anything from the Lord. The Lord does everything according to His judgement and your deeds. When you desire something, it cannot bring any reaction in the Lord. Some devotees cry with a very loud voice and do several actions for help from the Lord. The crying too will not bring any trace of reaction in the Lord. Draupadi cried for help from the Lord. The Lord did not respond because of her cries. Draupadi had torn her sari to apply a bandage to the finger of the Lord when it was cut. It was this deed that made the Lord to help her in her time of need. The Lord would have helped her even without her cries.

The Lord was watching the situation and was ready for the correct moment to act. The point of merit in the cry of Draupadi was that she believed Lord Krishna to be omnipresent and did not confine the Lord to His limited body. Therefore, she cried in the court itself, even though the Lord was in a far away place. Devotion without any aspiration is the best. The next middle level devotion is to believe that the Lord is omnipresent and pray at any place. The lower level of devotion is to try to inform the human incarnation personally. This is an insult to the Lord because you do not believe the Lord in human form is atleast omnipresent. If you think that the Lord is not omnipresent how can He help you as omnipotent?

The devotees who have firm faith in Me (His Holiness Shri Dattaswami) as the human incarnation often phone Me and submit their requests for protection. I advise them not to do so. By telephoning, they limit Me to this human body only and thus I cannot become omnipresent. If I am not omnipresent, I cannot be omnipotent to help them. Above all this, the main point is whether the devotee requests for anything or not, the protection from the Lord comes only based on the selfless service offered by him to the Lord without aspiring for any fruit in return. When such service is absent, the Lord cannot do any help merely based on their requests or prayers and crying. Therefore, there is no need of prayer or request or crying to the Lord if selfless service is absent. There is also no need of prayer, request or crying to the Lord if selfless service is present. Therefore, a devotee should always concentrate on the selfless service to the Lord without aspiring for any fruit in return and the prayer should be only in the praise of the Lord and not for asking any boon or protection because even if you ask, there is not even a trace of use.


5 days ago - Via Community - View -