Sign in with Twitter Sign in with Facebook

Type the topic in any language to check out real time results of Who's Talking on Social Media Sites


Trending Topics: 商戦Real Madri#IveteNoProgramaDaSabrina#LancamentoClipeVaiVendoLLFenomenler A9TVde#DosMelhoresFasProMelhorCantorLSFall For Fallen In 2015#言うだけならタダだから出したい同人誌呟いてみる#WeAreAllHarry6号アキラくん明くん#MuitosSeguidoresComValentinoザラム#RTした人をあり得ないほどの雑さで紹介するシュバルツClaudinha e IveteSérgio RamosここでOPカブトPlatiniEx Lupe Fans#ozscarecrow#babyitscoldoutsidevideo1 NYC#3Adamefsanelerle#LordOfMisrule#ChangeTwoLettersInATVShowTwo NYPD#YeniYıldanBeklentilerimCaroline and Pasha#StadyumSaatiYeniTürkiyeYeniGüç Hedef2023#ASKBUNNYDiktatöreKarşı ÖzgürBasınYusufTekin MusterihOlamiyoruz#GugukDevleti#affetbeniRodney AndersonRik Mayall#AskClara#strictlyfinal#scdfinalBentekeAyşenurWhitlockChristmas is in 5#potatobowlFour ChristmasesDarren Webster#NoControlメリロTrevardo Williams#GabyArrasaEmAltoAstral#bbcstrictly#UKvsUCLA#genclerucuyorKürtlerVuruyor DaişKaçıyorFrankie and KevinトラクルPK movieBenji MaddenNicki Minaj Nip SlipSerial PodcastBobby ShmurdaAmerican SniperListeriaChris KyleChampsLegend of Korraleah reminijay cutlerStephen ColbertRajon RondoSonykate uptonphiladelphia eaglesMichael BubleAmber RoseCubaMore

Most recent 20 results returned for keyword: Americans Elect (Search this on MAP)

https://plus.google.com/104197774872580832972 Carl Coglianese : The Death of America was a Suicide The Death of America was a Suicide By Jim Turnage (about the author...
The Death of America was a Suicide
The Death of America was a Suicide By Jim Turnage (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages) Related Topic(s): American Capitalism ; Americans Elect ; Americans For Prosperity ; Americans For Prosperity ; Balance ; Class ; Corporations ; Cor...
The Death of America was a Suicide

10 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/107787521949607071848 Salma Attariyyah : A Government Answerable to No One Israel gets away with abusing its privileged position because the...
A Government Answerable to No One

Israel gets away with abusing its privileged position because the very people we Americans elect and pay to protect us mostly believe it is safer to go along with perceived Israeli interests than to oppose them. As they are fixated on the two year election cycle they are not terribly interested in the long term consequences of their actions. If Israel murders an American or two in the course of “defending” itself, congress and the White House will always look the other way and sometimes even praise the killers, as it did with Rachel Corrie and Furkan Dogan. But Israel is only partially to blame for the cynical political maneuvering that led a president to secretly permit an agency dedicated to national security to provide raw information on American citizens to another government with which it is not in any actual alliance and that has a history of behaving irresponsibly. Indeed, the Jonathan Pollard and Ben-Ami Kadish espionage cases, the Lavon Affair, and the attack on the USS Liberty all suggest that Israel will not hesitate to harm the United States and even kill American citizens if it thinks it will gain something by so doing.

OLD NEWS BUT NOT FORGOTTEN

The Edward Snowden March 2009 memo which reveals that the National Security Agency (NSA) is illegally spying on American citizens and then passing the raw information it obtains on to Israel is particularly shocking because it demonstrates with documentary evidence just how Washington’s inside the beltway crowd places its relationship with Israel above its responsibility to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States. But equally interesting is the tale of the dog that did not bark in the night. The crowds of angry Americans concerned about their loss of privacy gathering in front of the White House failed to materialize because the story, unreported in most of the media, quickly disappeared down the memory hole. The Washington Post placed it on a back page while The New York Times did not report it at all, Managing Editor Dean Baquet calling it a story that was neither "significant" nor "surprising" as determined by his "news judgment." The Times own Public Editor Margaret Sullivan disagreed, however, as did most of the readers’ comments on the failure to include it in the paper. Some commenters noted that the Times is frequently inclined to avoid stories that are critical of Israel.

Perhaps the much better reported role of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in pushing for a war against Syria in spite of the overwhelming objections of the American people had something to do with it, the mainstream media being unwilling to excoriate Israel and its friends twice in one week. But to be fair to the Israelis, they are not the villains in the piece even if they did aggressively seek information on Americans, which one should presume to be the case. It was the newly inaugurated President of the United States and the government he headed that took the steps to share its intelligence on Americans. Israel might have requested or even demanded the information but it was up to the White House to say "no.

Israel gets away with abusing its privileged position because the very people we Americans elect and pay to protect us mostly believe it is safer to go along with perceived Israeli interests than to oppose them. As they are fixated on the two year election cycle they are not terribly interested in the long term consequences of their actions. If Israel murders an American or two in the course of "defending" itself, congress and the White House will always look the other way and sometimes even praise the killers, as it did with Rachel Corrie and Furkan Dogan. But Israel is only partially to blame for the cynical political maneuvering that led a president to secretly permit an agency dedicated to national security to provide raw information on American citizens to another government with which it is not in any actual alliance and that has a history of behaving irresponsibly. Indeed, the Jonathan Pollard and Ben-Ami Kadish espionage cases, the Lavon Affair, and the attack on the USS Liberty all suggest that Israel will not hesitate to harm the United States and even kill American citizens if it thinks it will gain something by so doing.

Some observers attempting to exonerate the White House and NSA point out that the memo of understanding in question is not signed, possibly suggesting that it was not ever acted on. But if that were so, the NSA could have denied that there was any such arrangement. Instead, it commented that "Any U.S. person information that is acquired as a result of NSA’s surveillance activities is handled under procedures that are designed to protect privacy rights," which sounds like a confirmation of what the memo describes. And it is also a bit of a fudge. The memo makes clear that Israel is being given "raw" and "unminimized" intelligence, which means that it is not being examined or scrubbed to remove information about Americans. In the first paragraph the memo states explicitly that the material being provided by NSA to the Israeli SIGINT National Unit (ISNU) is "including but not limited to Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) technology and equipment and raw SIGINT data signals intelligence information that has not been reviewed for foreign intelligence purposes or minimized.

That means nothing being turned over to Israel is being reviewed in advance to protect US citizens. Most of the remaining text of the memo goes on to ask that Israel comply with NSA rules on the use of information relating to American citizens. It also and characteristically insists that any communications to or from officials of the US government be destroyed "upon recognition." The beast knows how to protect itself, apparently, but it imposes no sanctions if Israel does not comply with any of the conditions or guidelines, stating specifically that "this agreement is not intended to create any legally enforceable rights…" making the entire procedure toothless from Tel Aviv’s point of view. And yet another Snowden memo cited by the Guardian notes that there have been "Trust issues which revolve around previous Israel operations," suggesting that NSA has for some time been aware that it is being diddled.

The NSA, by refusing to address the issue at all, is also failing to reveal just how much sensitive information has been given to Israel. Since it is unaware of what exactly is included in the SIGINT it might also have no idea how much intelligence it has been passing. Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard gave Israel enough top secret information to fill a room. One has to suspect that NSA might be going far beyond that in its attempt to satisfy Israeli demands. Another Snowden derived US intelligence community assessment dated September 2007 also reported by the Guardian notes how the NSA-Israel relationship has "become overwhelmingly one sided in favor of Israel…‘tilted heavily in favor of Israeli security concerns…driven almost totally by the needs of the partner.’" An NSA report one year later notes dyspeptically how Israel targets "us to learn our positions on Middle East problems…a National Intelligence Estimate ranked them as the third most aggressive intelligence service against the US

So where is the White House on all of this? Echoing the NSA, President Obama has insisted that there are strict safeguards on information relating to American citizens that is accidentally acquired. But if Obama has indeed authorized the passage of signals intelligence to Israel without any screening and without any effective controls on how it is used, which would include phone calls, emails, and metadata relating to American citizens, why isn’t he being forced to answer questions regarding what exactly he has done and how that fits in with his assertions about respecting privacy? Or broader questions about national security? Where are the Republicans and the so-called progressives concerned about the constitution and civil liberties who should be demanding answers? As soon as the subject turns to Israel they become very shy, apparently, but these are all symptoms of a government that has pari passu become only answerable to itself, particularly when the media is uninterested in a story that it finds embarrassing. It is not what the Founders of the United States envisioned and it hardly benefits the American people, but it is what we have. Unfortunately.




https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-plQCuqZkxCE/VIMImwlQRUI/AAAAAAAAQkY/t0U606757YE/w506-h750/2014%2B-%2B1
14 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/115314553618401350272 Article Bellis : Majority of Americans Want Money Out of Politics In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the ...
Majority of Americans Want Money Out of Politics

In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows unlimited campaign funds. 

Will Americans elect candidates who receive large amounts of funding from corporations and individuals?

Published: November 23, 2014 | Authors: Karin Kamp | Moyers & Company | Op-Ed

A survey conducted in July found that a majority of Americans from across the political spectrum oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision that opened the floodgates to endless campaign spending. 

And that was before the 2014 elections became the most expensive midterm elections ever, with at least $3.7 billion spent on Congressional races (that doesn’t count state, local and judicial elections).

The research, commissioned by Public Citizen, surveyed likely 2014 voters from the two main political parties, as well as independents.

As the chart below shows, 61 percent of those polled oppose Citizens United (with 51 percent strongly opposed), the Supreme Court decision that allows corporations and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns. 

Democrats, Republicans and independents show very similar opposition rates at 61, 58 and 62 percent, respectively. 

Also, special interest lobbying and election spending was viewed especially negatively, with 76 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of Republicans and 74 percent of independents having an unfavorable opinion of its impact on our politics.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

When asked how important the issue of reducing the influence of money in politics and elections is, 78 percent of Americans said that it’s an important issue. The chart below shows the mean, or average, rating on a 0-10 scale, with 10 being the most important.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

In terms of financing elections, 60 percent of voters (65 percent of Democrats, 53 percent of Republicans and 61 percent of independents) think America needs either major changes or a complete overhaul of our campaign finance laws. Below, you can see that only seven percent don’t think any changes are needed.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

Over half of voters are in favor of a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and related campaign finance decisions. Sixty-two percent of Democrats, 54 percent of Republicans and half of independents said they favor the amendment; only 25 percent of voters believe that the proposed amendment is an assault on the right to free speech. Some 62 percent of voters believe that the current election system allows the voices of a few to drown out the many using million-dollar microphones.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

And perhaps a bit of good news for campaign reformers like Lawrence Lessig: The survey found that voters are ready to reward elected officials that support overturning Citizens United.

The poll was commissioned by Public Citizen and conducted by Lake Research Partners, a Democratic polling firm, and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, a Republican polling firm, using a live telephone survey of 800 likely voters between July 26 and July 29. The numbers of Democrats, Republicans and independents polled reflected the proportions of projected likely national 2014 voters from each of those parties. 

The poll’s margin of error was +/- 3.5 percent.

http://www.nationofchange.org/2014/11/23/majority-americans-want-money-politics/
27 days ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/110734946218641679352 Rex Dexter : Majority of Americans Want Money Out of Politics In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the ...
Majority of Americans Want Money Out of Politics

In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows unlimited campaign funds. 

Will Americans elect candidates who receive large amounts of funding from corporations and individuals?

Published: November 23, 2014 | Authors: Karin Kamp | Moyers & Company | Op-Ed

A survey conducted in July found that a majority of Americans from across the political spectrum oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision that opened the floodgates to endless campaign spending. 

And that was before the 2014 elections became the most expensive midterm elections ever, with at least $3.7 billion spent on Congressional races (that doesn’t count state, local and judicial elections).

The research, commissioned by Public Citizen, surveyed likely 2014 voters from the two main political parties, as well as independents.

As the chart below shows, 61 percent of those polled oppose Citizens United (with 51 percent strongly opposed), the Supreme Court decision that allows corporations and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns. 

Democrats, Republicans and independents show very similar opposition rates at 61, 58 and 62 percent, respectively. 

Also, special interest lobbying and election spending was viewed especially negatively, with 76 percent of Democrats, 79 percent of Republicans and 74 percent of independents having an unfavorable opinion of its impact on our politics.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

When asked how important the issue of reducing the influence of money in politics and elections is, 78 percent of Americans said that it’s an important issue. The chart below shows the mean, or average, rating on a 0-10 scale, with 10 being the most important.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

In terms of financing elections, 60 percent of voters (65 percent of Democrats, 53 percent of Republicans and 61 percent of independents) think America needs either major changes or a complete overhaul of our campaign finance laws. Below, you can see that only seven percent don’t think any changes are needed.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

Over half of voters are in favor of a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and related campaign finance decisions. Sixty-two percent of Democrats, 54 percent of Republicans and half of independents said they favor the amendment; only 25 percent of voters believe that the proposed amendment is an assault on the right to free speech. Some 62 percent of voters believe that the current election system allows the voices of a few to drown out the many using million-dollar microphones.

(Chart: Public Citizen, 2014)

And perhaps a bit of good news for campaign reformers like Lawrence Lessig: The survey found that voters are ready to reward elected officials that support overturning Citizens United.

The poll was commissioned by Public Citizen and conducted by Lake Research Partners, a Democratic polling firm, and Chesapeake Beach Consulting, a Republican polling firm, using a live telephone survey of 800 likely voters between July 26 and July 29. The numbers of Democrats, Republicans and independents polled reflected the proportions of projected likely national 2014 voters from each of those parties. 

The poll’s margin of error was +/- 3.5 percent.

http://www.nationofchange.org/2014/11/23/majority-americans-want-money-politics/
27 days ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/108015835983532524536 NationofChange : In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows...
In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows unlimited campaign funds. Will Americans elect candidates who receive large amounts of funding from corporations and individuals?
Majority of Americans Want Money Out of Politics - NationofChange
In a survey, the majority of Americans oppose the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allows unlimited campaign funds. Will Americans elect candidates who receive large amounts of funding from corporations and individuals?
27 days ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/106648708306407050690 Ta Nia Mila : Did Americans get what they want? Americans elect Democrats who try to accomplish complex policy goals...
Did Americans get what they want?

Americans elect Democrats who try to accomplish complex policy goals, then turn around and elect Republicans when things don't work perfectly. They say they hate gridlock, then elect people who will give them more of it.

As political scientists have known for decades, Americans are "symbolic conservatives" but "operational liberals" -- they like things like small government in the abstract, but they also like all the things government does.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/06/opinion/waldman-what-do-voters-want/index.html
Did Americans get what they want?
They abhor gridlock but have just elected GOP politicians committed to that very thing, Paul Waldman says. They want to have their cake and eat it, too.
1 month ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/106373698664666717969 Akemi Mokoto : Between Democrat and Republican, Democrat is the lesser of the two evils. If Americans elect enough ...
Between Democrat and Republican, Democrat is the lesser of the two evils. If Americans elect enough Republicans to keep the Senate and take the House, that'll prove to me and the world one of two things:

1) Most American voters are just as stupid as everybody thinks.

2) American voters are masochist.

Assuming Republicans take control of congress, America will deserve whatever happens to it between now and 2016. If things improve(HA!), so be it. If shit doesn't improve or they get worse(expected), then remember who asked for it. Me? Since Independent isn't an important thing here, I'm going to go with the lesser of the shit heads and vote Democrat.

Oh, and if you're able to vote but choose not to, you have no right to complain about the outcome end aftermath. Only those that played a role in the elect has any room to bitch.

From what it sounds like, it'll be the Democratic and Independent voters that's more likely to not vote. That's damn sad but it's pretty much a self-inflicted injury so you'll only have yourself to blame of the Republican's take over completely. Again, as for you able body, voters that won't vote, you just keep your lazy ass mouth shut and continue to be a useless sack of shit.
1 month ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/104034253208854400406 Theodore Rahm : If we help Republicans win on November 4, the win will help Americans elect a Republican President in...
If we help Republicans win on November 4, the win will help Americans elect a Republican President in 2016. With Republicans back in our White House we will get rid of the muslim influence that's weakened our Armed forces, forced common core perversion on our children, and told Obama to use executive orders taking away our rights. With Republicans leading we can rebuild American values, and definitely put Americans back to work reversing our rising deficit!
Does A Midterm Victory Carry Over To The Next Presidential Election? Dick Morris TV: History Video! - DickMorris.com
In this History video commentary, I discuss whether a midterm victory will carry over to the next Presidential election. Tune in! Click Here to give me your thoughts and continue the discussion. Click Here to listen to Dick’s radio show broadcasting LIVE every M-F From 3-6 PM ET. Call-in at 855-839-1210 and say hi! ClickContinue reading…
1 month ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/115702818896664090940 Center Mass Inc. : The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses...
The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses the midterm elections — the leaders that Americans elect this year will determine whether Barack Obama achieves his lifelong dream to “transform America” by eliminating your right to keep and bear arms the same way it’s been abolished in much of the world. Read the full issue here: http://bit.ly/1pxlH4V
November 14 AFF

1 month ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/118385083764837671461 Dennis Gorski : The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses...
The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses the midterm elections — the leaders that Americans elect this year will determine whether Barack Obama achieves his lifelong dream to “transform America” by eliminating your right to keep and bear arms the same way it’s been abolished in much of the world. Read the full issue here: http://bit.ly/1pxlH4V
November 14 AFF

1 month ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/116279432555439538485 JW C : The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses...
The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses the midterm elections — the leaders that Americans elect this year will determine whether Barack Obama achieves his lifelong dream to “transform America” by eliminating your right to keep and bear arms the same way it’s been abolished in much of the world. Read the full issue here: http://bit.ly/1pxlH4V
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tOKYmp4MIq8/VEbb5YQrWII/AAAAAAAAMUU/KpvOUyrr9Cg/w506-h750/10360833_10152461232862898_6348302991194279652_n.jpg
1 month ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/103322526151123413935 Cam Loon : The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses...
The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses the midterm elections — the leaders that Americans elect this year will determine whether Barack Obama achieves his lifelong dream to “transform America” by eliminating your right to keep and bear arms the same way it’s been abolished in much of the world. Read the full issue here: http://bit.ly/1pxlH4V
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tOKYmp4MIq8/VEbb5YQrWII/AAAAAAAAMUU/KpvOUyrr9Cg/w506-h750/10360833_10152461232862898_6348302991194279652_n.jpg
1 month ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/102370361389076306125 J Samson : The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses...
The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses the midterm elections — the leaders that Americans elect this year will determine whether Barack Obama achieves his lifelong dream to “transform America” by eliminating your right to keep and bear arms the same way it’s been abolished in much of the world. Read the full issue here: http://bit.ly/1pxlH4V
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tOKYmp4MIq8/VEbb5YQrWII/AAAAAAAAMUU/KpvOUyrr9Cg/w506-h750/10360833_10152461232862898_6348302991194279652_n.jpg
1 month ago - Via Reshared Post - View -
https://plus.google.com/105123070224984461528 NRA News : The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses...
The November issue of NRA America's 1st Freedom is now available. This month's cover story discusses the midterm elections — the leaders that Americans elect this year will determine whether Barack Obama achieves his lifelong dream to “transform America” by eliminating your right to keep and bear arms the same way it’s been abolished in much of the world. Read the full issue here: http://bit.ly/1pxlH4V
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tOKYmp4MIq8/VEbb5YQrWII/AAAAAAAAMUU/KpvOUyrr9Cg/w506-h750/10360833_10152461232862898_6348302991194279652_n.jpg
1 month ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/113672304772993300897 The Citizen : In close US mid-terms, GOP targets a tarnished Obama - One month before Americans elect their representatives...
In close US mid-terms, GOP targets a tarnished Obama - One month before Americans elect their representatives in Congress and state offices, Republicans have a clear if narrow edge as they pick away at President Barack Obama's tarnished record. http://ow.ly/2OAVXZ
In close US mid-terms, GOP targets a tarnished Obama

2 months ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/117316629445714018433 Doyel Times : Zee NewsWashington: One month before Americans elect their representatives in Congress and state offices...
Zee NewsWashington: One month before Americans elect their representatives in Congress and state offices, Republicans have a clear if narrow edge as they pick away at President Barack Obama`s tarnished record. The commander-in-chief`s critics have painted…
doyeltimes.com/in-close-us-mid-terms-gop-targets-a-tarnished-obama-zee-news/

2 months ago - Via - View -
https://plus.google.com/115088882861679339904 Eight, Arizona PBS : Join #AZHorizon as Republican Doug Ducey, Democrat Fred DuVal, Libertarian Barry Hess and Americans ...
Join #AZHorizon as Republican Doug Ducey, Democrat Fred DuVal, Libertarian Barry Hess and Americans Elect representative John Mealer running for #AZGov debate the latest issues LIVE @ 5pm #Vote2014
2 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/117294360274142439374 Constitution Party : BALLOT ACCESS: Battleground ARIZONA. The Constitution Party of Arizona begins ballot access petitioning...
BALLOT ACCESS: Battleground ARIZONA. The Constitution Party of Arizona begins ballot access petitioning on August 26, contact them now to help.
Independents Up in Arizona, Democrats and Republicans Down

Independents: 1,152,444, up 0.6 percent since March.

Republicans: 1,122,723, down. 0.17 percent since March.

Democrats: 944,665, down 0.45 percent since March.

Libertarians: 26,915, up 0.01 percent since March.

Americans Elect: 399, no percentage change

source, the Arizona Republic. 

The Constitution Party of Arizona starts petitioning for ballot access on August 26. Please help us take back Arizona and send a contribution to:

The Constitution Party of Arizona,
PO Box 10383, Tempe, AZ 85284.
or use our Give Now app on this page.
4 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/105909436467296371451 Alfredo Bremont : that's what they said to Hamas the NATO Nazi murder regime, The terrorist victim as the aggressor israel...
that's what they said to Hamas the NATO Nazi murder regime, The terrorist victim as the aggressor israel is considered the victim. from Afghanistan to Tripoli all NATO does is kill children's destroy house's and residents kill the elderly and put in place corrupt governments, they call this barbaric democracy or obey us or you are with them. this Nazi organization is the right arm of the UN and the left arm is washington, this criminals all they do is kill the innocent and their own people as the UN has now admitted work for us and risk your lives. not for the good and the spiritual but rather the construction companies, the world bank and the IMF-FMI, the organisation that has as task destroy Africa and south america turn europeans into slaves and have the chocolate boy from Ukraine build a slave and crematoriums shop for the idiotic Ukrainians,as he calls them this lot do not deserve to love so we shall kill them as we did to JESUS.
people hate america because Americans elect hitler style presidents that spread wars worldwide, Clinton, g w bush Obama, etc..! so you the people are the ones that put criminals in office so they can destroy the world is normal that the world hate Americans . what do you expect..! do as Germans did on ww 1 and 2 love the one that enslaves you which is what Americans do. they love the one that enslaves you, Iraq,  Israel, 911, Vietnam, you name it, just crimes and wars for petrol and land like Gaza another gas war. and the Americans applaud is Hamas the terrorist which in fact is israel the criminal.  moreover Americans are slaughter for no reason just  by you the people electing warmongers and criminals. navy seals die for nothing because you the people elect criminals and warmongers. yes support the troops commit crimes and be kill for wall street. that is the american mentality and them complain. 
Greenwald: US Intelligence Enables Israeli Attacks
Glenn Greenwald tells Paul Jay that new Snowden documents show that American hands are in every war launched by Israel against Palestinians
4 months ago - Via Google+ - View -
https://plus.google.com/113034556058163587674 Nicholas Temple : Why Do We Seem to Always Elect Millionaires to the Presidency? (redux) S everal months ago I returned...
Why Do We Seem to Always Elect Millionaires to the Presidency? (redux)
S everal months ago I returned to a question that has bothered me since I first studied American history: “We do we Americans elect primarily wealthy men to be our president?” I have been some research for several months and eventually found a website that...
Nick's Bytes: Why Do We Seem to Always Elect Millionaires to the Presidency? (redux)
Several months ago I returned to a question that has bothered me since I first studied American history: “We do we Americans elect primarily wealthy men to be our president?” I have been some research for several months and eventually found a website that gave me some surprising answers.
6 months ago - Via - View -